Comparison Between Three Types of Prosthetic Feet (ProSto)
Primary Purpose
Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower, Between Knee and Ankle
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Slovenia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
C-SACH
B-DER
A-DER
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional device feasibility trial for Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower, Between Knee and Ankle focused on measuring prosthetic feet, gait pattern, one leg standing, walking speed
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- active prosthetic foot user who walks several kilometers per day
- amputation at the trans-tibial level >5 years ago
Exclusion Criteria:
- other medical problems
Sites / Locations
- University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm 3
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
C-SACH
B-DER
A-DER
Arm Description
All the interventions will be administered to the patient in this single-subject trial, each 6 times
All the interventions will be administered to the patient in this single-subject trial, each 6 times
All the interventions will be administered to the patient in this single-subject trial, each 6 times
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Rating
Likert-type, compared to the patient's existing prosthetic foot (-2 much worse, -1 slightly worse, 0 the same, 1 slightly better, 2 much better)
Secondary Outcome Measures
The time that the patient can stand on the prosthetic foot
Measured by the one-leg standing test (average of three repetitions)
Walking velocity
Measured by the 10-meter walking test
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03046394
First Posted
February 6, 2017
Last Updated
May 3, 2017
Sponsor
University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03046394
Brief Title
Comparison Between Three Types of Prosthetic Feet
Acronym
ProSto
Official Title
Comparison Between Three Types of Prosthetic Feet: a Randomized Double-blind Controlled Single-subject Multiple-rater Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 6, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 10, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 3, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
One Solid Ankle Cushion Heel (SACH) and two Dynamic Elastic Response (DER) prosthetic feet will be tried six times in random order by the patient. The patient will be an active prosthetic foot user who walks several kilometers per day and was amputated at the trans-tibial level because of injury. Gait pattern will be rated in comparison with the patient's previous prosthetic foot by a physiatrist, physiotherapist, prosthetist and the patient. One-leg standing and 10-meter walking tests will also be performed.
Detailed Description
The prosthetic feet will be: one SACH foot (by Otto Bock - foot C, advertised for activity category 1) and two DER feet (Dynamic Motion by Otto Bock - foot B, advertised for activity category 2-3; and Triton by Otto Bock - foot A, advertised for activity category 3-4).
All the prosthetic feet are of the same size and chosen for the patient's weight. They will be covered so that neither the patient nor professionals will be able to see which prosthetic foot is being used.
The study is blinded because the prosthetist designated for changing the prosthetic feet will be the only one who will know which prosthetic is being used. The orientational sample size calculation and the randomisation plan were prepared by a statistician.
The first trial will be performed using the patient's own prosthetic foot in order to establish a baseline. The patient will then have to to compare the prosthetic feet with his own existing prosthetic foot and rate the ability to walk on even terrain (100m), uneven terrain (grass, 100m), decline and incline (i.e., slope), and up and down the stairs (one floor) on a five-point Likert-type scale (-2 much worse, -1 slightly worse, 0 the same, 1 slightly better, 2 much better). After each trial he will also perform the one-leg standing test (with three repetitions) and the 10-meter walking test. Before each trial, the patient will be given 15 minutes for adaptation to each new prosthetic foot without the presence of the assessors.
The three expert observers will be: a physical and rehabilitation medicine specialist physician, a certified prosthetist-orthotist, and a physiotherapist. Each has got over 20 years of experience in rehabilitation of patients after amputation and observation of their gait. They will be blind to the currently used prosthetic foot. They will follow the patient and assess his walking using the same rating scale in comparison with the initial trial as the patient.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Amputation; Traumatic, Leg, Lower, Between Knee and Ankle
Keywords
prosthetic feet, gait pattern, one leg standing, walking speed
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Device Feasibility
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Sequential Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
C-SACH
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
All the interventions will be administered to the patient in this single-subject trial, each 6 times
Arm Title
B-DER
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
All the interventions will be administered to the patient in this single-subject trial, each 6 times
Arm Title
A-DER
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
All the interventions will be administered to the patient in this single-subject trial, each 6 times
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
C-SACH
Intervention Description
Solid Ankle Cushion Heel by Otto Bock, advertised for activity category 1
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
B-DER
Intervention Description
Dynamic Motion by Otto Bock, advertised for activity category 2-3
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
A-DER
Intervention Description
Triton by Otto Bock, advertised for activity category 3-4
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rating
Description
Likert-type, compared to the patient's existing prosthetic foot (-2 much worse, -1 slightly worse, 0 the same, 1 slightly better, 2 much better)
Time Frame
Immediately after each trial
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The time that the patient can stand on the prosthetic foot
Description
Measured by the one-leg standing test (average of three repetitions)
Time Frame
Immediately after the rating, repeated 3 times
Title
Walking velocity
Description
Measured by the 10-meter walking test
Time Frame
Immediately after the one-leg standing test
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
active prosthetic foot user who walks several kilometers per day
amputation at the trans-tibial level >5 years ago
Exclusion Criteria:
other medical problems
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Helena Burger, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Rehabilitation Institute, Republic of Slovenia
City
Ljubljana
ZIP/Postal Code
1000
Country
Slovenia
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Comparison Between Three Types of Prosthetic Feet
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs