search
Back to results

Lumen Apposing Metal Stents vs Lumen Apposing Metal Stent Plus Double Pigtail Stent for Endoscopic Drainage (Axios)

Primary Purpose

Pancreatic Pseudocyst

Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Lumen Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS)
LAMS plus double pigtail stent
Sponsored by
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Pancreatic Pseudocyst

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Male and Female patients between the ages of 18 and 80
  • Must be presenting with symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections
  • Scheduled to undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of PFCs with LAMS placement at Vanderbilt Medical Center as part of routine care
  • Willing and able to give informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unwilling/unable to give informed consent
  • Patients with PFCs consisting of < 30% solid component as assessed at the time of EUS

Sites / Locations

  • Vanderbilt University Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Lumen Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS)

LAMS plus double pigtail stent

Arm Description

Subjects randomized to LAMS alone will undergo EUS-guided transmural placement of an Axios stent with a 15 mm luminal diameter.

Subjects randomized to LAMS plus double pigtail stent will undergo EUS-guided transmural placement of a single Axios stent with a 15 mm luminal diameter. Following this, wire access across the stent lumen will be achieved using a 0.035 inch hydrophilic guidewire, and a double pigtail plastic biliary stent (6 French, 7 French, or 10 French at the discretion of the endoscopist) will be deployed over the wire.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Decrease in Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC)
Greater than 50% decrease in size of PFC (in mm) compared to pre-intervention size (in mm) as measured on cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) imaging

Secondary Outcome Measures

Clinical Success Rate for Draining of Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC)
Clinical success for drainage of PFC, defined as complete resolution of PFC on follow-up computed tomography (CT) imaging and stent removal within 3 months
Number of Endoscopic Interventions Required for Resolution of PFC Prior to Stent Removal
Number of endoscopic interventions required for resolution of Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC) prior to stent removal
Incidence of Hospital Readmissions Following Initial Endoscopic Intervention and Prior to Resolution of Pancreatic Fluid Collection Stent Removal
Incidence of hospital readmissions following initial endoscopic intervention and prior to resolution of Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC) stent removal
Incidence of Surgical or Percutaneous Radiologic Intervention for PFC Following Initial Endoscopy Intervention
Incidence of surgical or percutaneous radiologic intervention for Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC) following initial endoscopy intervention
Incidence of Early (<30 Days) Endoscopic Reintervention
Incidence of early (<30 days) endoscopic reintervention following initial endoscopic intervention

Full Information

First Posted
February 7, 2017
Last Updated
August 18, 2021
Sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03049215
Brief Title
Lumen Apposing Metal Stents vs Lumen Apposing Metal Stent Plus Double Pigtail Stent for Endoscopic Drainage
Acronym
Axios
Official Title
Lumen Apposing Metal Stents vs Lumen Apposing Metal Stent Plus Double Pigtail Stent for Endoscopic Drainage of Pancreatic Fluid Collections: a Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Study terminated due to low/difficulty enrollment
Study Start Date
November 6, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Vanderbilt University Medical Center

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The study hypothesis is that placement of LAMS plus an overlapping double pigtail stent for endoscopic transmural drainage of PFCs with solid debris will result in improved drainage and require fewer endoscopic interventions compared to placement of LAMS alone.
Detailed Description
The study hypothesis is that placement of LAMS plus an overlapping double pigtail stent for endoscopic transmural drainage of PFCs with solid debris will result in improved drainage and require fewer endoscopic interventions compared to placement of LAMS alone. Adult patients with symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections who are scheduled to undergo EUS-guided drainage of PFCs with LAMS placement will be eligible for study participation. The initial portion of this procedure consists of diagnostic EUS for imaging and assessment of the PFC. This EUS examination is able to distinguish the relative liquid and solid components of PFCs, detail which may not be evident by CT imaging. Adult patients with PFCs consisting of >30% solid component as assessed at the time of EUS will be eligible for randomization. This threshold was selected as the enrollment criteria in order to select patients with a significant solid necrotic component to the lesion, as prior study of patients undergoing LAMS placement for drainage of PFCs have used >70% fluid content as the definition for a PFC with predominantly liquid contents. Allocation to study arm will be determined by the contents of sealed envelope. Subjects randomized to LAMS alone will undergo EUS-guided transmural placement of an Axios stent with a 15 mm luminal diameter. The choice of transgastric or transduodenal LAMS placement will be at the discretion of the endoscopist and contingent upon PFC location and window relative to the EUS transducer. Subjects randomized to LAMS plus double pigtail stent will undergo EUS-guided transmural placement of a single Axios stent with a 15 mm luminal diameter; following this, wire access across the stent lumen will be achieved using a 0.035 inch hydrophilic guidewire, and a double pigtail plastic biliary stent (6 French, 7 French, or 10 French at the discretion of the endoscopist) will be deployed over the wire. The use of fluoroscopy for stent deployment will be at the discretion of the endoscopist. The primary end point: Greater than 50% decrease in size of PFC (in mm), compared to pre-intervention size (in mm), on cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) imaging at 30 days following stent placement. This was selected as the primary outcome in order to maintain consistency with the primary outcomes of a prior multicenter study of LAMS placement for PFCs.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Pancreatic Pseudocyst

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Subjects will be randomized to either: LAMS alone and undergo EUS-guided transmural placement of an Axios stent with a 15 mm luminal diameter or LAMS plus double pigtail stent and undergo EUS-guided transmural placement of a single Axios stent with a 15 mm luminal diameter
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
2 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lumen Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS)
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects randomized to LAMS alone will undergo EUS-guided transmural placement of an Axios stent with a 15 mm luminal diameter.
Arm Title
LAMS plus double pigtail stent
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects randomized to LAMS plus double pigtail stent will undergo EUS-guided transmural placement of a single Axios stent with a 15 mm luminal diameter. Following this, wire access across the stent lumen will be achieved using a 0.035 inch hydrophilic guidewire, and a double pigtail plastic biliary stent (6 French, 7 French, or 10 French at the discretion of the endoscopist) will be deployed over the wire.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Lumen Apposing Metal Stent (LAMS)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Axios Stent
Intervention Description
The AXIOS Stent and Electrocautery-Enhanced Delivery System is an endoscopic device designed to enable the ultrasound trained interventional endoscopist to deliver a transenteric stent between the gastrointestinal tract and a pancreatic pseudocyst.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
LAMS plus double pigtail stent
Intervention Description
The AXIOS Stent and Electrocautery-Enhanced Delivery System is an endoscopic device designed to enable the ultrasound trained interventional endoscopist to deliver a transenteric stent between the gastrointestinal tract and a pancreatic pseudocyst. The double pigtail stent is a routinely used plastic biliary stent.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Decrease in Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC)
Description
Greater than 50% decrease in size of PFC (in mm) compared to pre-intervention size (in mm) as measured on cross-sectional computed tomography (CT) imaging
Time Frame
30 days following placement of stent
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Clinical Success Rate for Draining of Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC)
Description
Clinical success for drainage of PFC, defined as complete resolution of PFC on follow-up computed tomography (CT) imaging and stent removal within 3 months
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Number of Endoscopic Interventions Required for Resolution of PFC Prior to Stent Removal
Description
Number of endoscopic interventions required for resolution of Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC) prior to stent removal
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Incidence of Hospital Readmissions Following Initial Endoscopic Intervention and Prior to Resolution of Pancreatic Fluid Collection Stent Removal
Description
Incidence of hospital readmissions following initial endoscopic intervention and prior to resolution of Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC) stent removal
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Incidence of Surgical or Percutaneous Radiologic Intervention for PFC Following Initial Endoscopy Intervention
Description
Incidence of surgical or percutaneous radiologic intervention for Pancreatic Fluid Collection (PFC) following initial endoscopy intervention
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Incidence of Early (<30 Days) Endoscopic Reintervention
Description
Incidence of early (<30 days) endoscopic reintervention following initial endoscopic intervention
Time Frame
30 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Male and Female patients between the ages of 18 and 80 Must be presenting with symptomatic pancreatic fluid collections Scheduled to undergo endoscopic ultrasound (EUS)-guided drainage of PFCs with LAMS placement at Vanderbilt Medical Center as part of routine care Willing and able to give informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Unwilling/unable to give informed consent Patients with PFCs consisting of < 30% solid component as assessed at the time of EUS
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Patrick Yachimski, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Vanderbilt University Medical Center
City
Nashville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37232
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Lumen Apposing Metal Stents vs Lumen Apposing Metal Stent Plus Double Pigtail Stent for Endoscopic Drainage

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs