search
Back to results

Medicated Aerosol Delivery Using A Jet Nebulizer Versus A Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer in COPD Exacerbation

Primary Purpose

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer
Jet Nebulizer
Sponsored by
Medstar Health Research Institute
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Eligibility Criteria

40 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

i. Patients ordered to receive short-acting bronchodilator therapy ii. Patients ≥ 40 years of age iii. Patients with a self-reported history of COPD and/or patients with diagnosed/suspected COPD iv. Patients whose FEV1 is ≤ 50% of predicted or are unable to perform FEV1 maneuver because of airflow-associated respiratory distress or NIV use

Exclusion Criteria:

i. Patients whose indication for SABD therapy is for a clinical indication other than COPD ii. The immediate need for intubation iii. Pregnant women iv. Non-English speakers

Sites / Locations

  • MedStar Washington Hospital Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Jet nebulizer

Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer

Arm Description

short-acting bronchodilator (albuterol and/or ipratropium bromide) according to standard of care practices and physician discretion will be administered with a jet nebulizer

short-acting bronchodilator (albuterol and/or ipratropium bromide) according to standard of care practices and physician discretion will be administered with a vibrating mesh nebulizer

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Hospitalization rate
hospitalization rate among COPD exacerbation patients in the ED receiving SABD via jet nebulizer versus those receiving SABD via VMN

Secondary Outcome Measures

ICU admission
Percent of patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN admitted to an intensive care environment
Hospital length of stay
Hospital length of stay for patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN
NIV in escalation of respiratory support
Percentage of patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN that require NIV in escalation of respiratory support
Duration of NIV support
Duration of NIV support in patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN
Intubation in escalation of respiratory support
Percentage of patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN that require intubation in escalation of respiratory support
Percentage change in FEV1
Percentage change in FEV1 in patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN
Amount of short-acting bronchodilator medication
The amount of SABD aerosol therapy administered to patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN
Hospital readmission within 30 days
Percentage of patients treated with SABD via VMN versus JN that are readmitted to the hospital within thirty days of discharge

Full Information

First Posted
January 30, 2017
Last Updated
October 19, 2021
Sponsor
Medstar Health Research Institute
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03051971
Brief Title
Medicated Aerosol Delivery Using A Jet Nebulizer Versus A Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer in COPD Exacerbation
Official Title
A Pilot Study of Medicated Aerosol Delivery Using A Jet Nebulizer Versus A Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer in COPD Exacerbation
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Study was abandoned.
Study Start Date
March 2017 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
March 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
April 2018 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Medstar Health Research Institute

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Delivery of inhaled short-acting bronchodilators (SABD) is standard of care in the emergency department (ED) for exacerbation of COPD, the goal of such being rapid reversal of airflow obstruction. However, current guidelines for the delivery of SABDs in spontaneously breathing patients make no distinction whether these medications should be delivered via metered dose inhaler (MDI) or jet nebulizer (JN), the specific medication delivery device having no significant effect on hospital admission or reversal of flow obstruction. However, advancements in nebulizer design, namely FDA-approved vibrating mesh technology, have demonstrated significant improvements relative to JNs and metered dose inhalers in efficiency and amount of drug delivered in in vivo and in vitro studies. Currently there are no clinical trials comparing the use of vibrating mesh nebulizers (VMN) to JNs and their effect on clinically important outcomes. This prospective randomized controlled pilot trial seeks to determine if there are differences in hospital admission due to COPD when a vibrating mesh nebulizer is used versus a jet nebulizer.
Detailed Description
Patients ordered to receive a SABD, will be screened for presence of moderate to severe COPD exacerbation; spontaneously breathing patients as well those supported with non-invasive ventilation (NIV) will be screened for inclusion. Upon consent, the patient will be randomized to receive the ordered SABD via a JN (MistyFast, Carefusion-BD, CA) or VMN (Aerogen Ultra, Aerogen, Galway, Ireland). Included subjects will receive therapy with a mouthpiece interface. In the case a patient is unable to tolerate, maintain a tight seal around the mouthpiece or otherwise not perform aerosol therapy with a mouthpiece, a valved-aerosol mask (I-Guard aerosol mask, Salter Labs, Lake Forest, IL) will be utilized. Subjects that require NIV, whether on admission to the ED or in the face of escalating therapy, will receive NIV via a non-vented, oronasal mask and the allocated nebulizer will be placed distal to the leak in the NIV circuit (between the mask and circuit). Patients will receive positive expiratory and/or inspiratory pressure at specific settings determined by the prescribing physician and clinical team. Subjects will be re-evaluated and clinical data collected following delivery of the initial SABD treatment that includes signs of possible side effects. The prescribing physician and clinical team will determine the need for additional SABD therapy beyond the initial therapy. Subjects indicated and ordered for additional administration of SABD will continue to receive SABD with the randomly allocated aerosol delivery device. Subjects will be re-evaluated and assessed for possible side effects after delivery of the additional SABD. The initial order, as well as all subsequent orders for SABD medication will be at the discretion of the physician and clinical team. The type and dosage of medication and the approximate timing of medication delivery designated in the study protocol is according to and correlates with the standard practices. The process of determining need by the clinical team and administering additional SABD, followed by evaluation, will continue up to a total of four SABD treatments. If at any point following a SABD treatment, the clinical team assesses the subject and determines that no additional therapy is indicated, the subject will not receive additional SABD. Clinical data will be collected following each SABD administered (approximately every 30 minutes) and conclude at 120 min after randomization. Subjects requiring the need for endotracheal intubation and mechanical ventilator support, immediate or in escalation of support, will be at the discretion of the attending physician. Subjects requiring endotracheal intubation as escalation of therapy following study enrollment will be included in the study analysis. Those subjects requiring the immediate need for endotracheal intubation prior to randomization will be excluded from the study. Individualized decision regarding hospitalization or discharge to home will be according to the attending physician. Subjects admitted to the hospital for continued inpatient care will continue to receive nebulized bronchodilator therapy, as indicated and ordered, with an aerosol delivery device according to the MWHC bronchodilator protocol and standard practices.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Jet nebulizer
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
short-acting bronchodilator (albuterol and/or ipratropium bromide) according to standard of care practices and physician discretion will be administered with a jet nebulizer
Arm Title
Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
short-acting bronchodilator (albuterol and/or ipratropium bromide) according to standard of care practices and physician discretion will be administered with a vibrating mesh nebulizer
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer
Other Intervention Name(s)
Aergoen Ultra nebulizer
Intervention Description
short-acting bronchodilator medication delivered with a vibrating mesh nebulizer via mouthpiece, valved facemask or non-invasive ventilation mask
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Jet Nebulizer
Other Intervention Name(s)
MistyFast nebulizer
Intervention Description
short-acting bronchodilator medication delivered with a jet nebulizer via mouthpiece, valved facemask or non-invasive ventilation mask
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Hospitalization rate
Description
hospitalization rate among COPD exacerbation patients in the ED receiving SABD via jet nebulizer versus those receiving SABD via VMN
Time Frame
through study completion (approx 1 year)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
ICU admission
Description
Percent of patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN admitted to an intensive care environment
Time Frame
through study completion (approx 1 year)
Title
Hospital length of stay
Description
Hospital length of stay for patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN
Time Frame
through study completion (approx 1 year)
Title
NIV in escalation of respiratory support
Description
Percentage of patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN that require NIV in escalation of respiratory support
Time Frame
through study completion (approx 1 year)
Title
Duration of NIV support
Description
Duration of NIV support in patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN
Time Frame
through study completion (approx 1 year)
Title
Intubation in escalation of respiratory support
Description
Percentage of patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN that require intubation in escalation of respiratory support
Time Frame
through study completion (approx 1 year)
Title
Percentage change in FEV1
Description
Percentage change in FEV1 in patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN
Time Frame
through study completion (approx 1 year)
Title
Amount of short-acting bronchodilator medication
Description
The amount of SABD aerosol therapy administered to patients with COPD exacerbation treated with SABD via VMN versus JN
Time Frame
through study completion (approx 1 year)
Title
Hospital readmission within 30 days
Description
Percentage of patients treated with SABD via VMN versus JN that are readmitted to the hospital within thirty days of discharge
Time Frame
through study completion (approx 1 year)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: i. Patients ordered to receive short-acting bronchodilator therapy ii. Patients ≥ 40 years of age iii. Patients with a self-reported history of COPD and/or patients with diagnosed/suspected COPD iv. Patients whose FEV1 is ≤ 50% of predicted or are unable to perform FEV1 maneuver because of airflow-associated respiratory distress or NIV use Exclusion Criteria: i. Patients whose indication for SABD therapy is for a clinical indication other than COPD ii. The immediate need for intubation iii. Pregnant women iv. Non-English speakers
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eric J Kriner, RRT
Organizational Affiliation
Medstar Washington Hospital Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
MedStar Washington Hospital Center
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20010
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Medicated Aerosol Delivery Using A Jet Nebulizer Versus A Vibrating Mesh Nebulizer in COPD Exacerbation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs