Efficacy of Dotarem® (Gd-DOTA) Versus Gadovist® (Gd-DO3A-butrol) for Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Primary Purpose
Coronary Artery Disease, Cardiomyopathy
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cardiac MRI taken using contrast agent, Dotarem® (Gd-DOTA)
Cardiac MRI with contrast agent, Gadovist
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring CAD
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing clinically referred CMR.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients who are unable to give informed consent.
- Individuals with severe claustrophobia.
- Individuals unable to lie flat for 90 minutes (the anticipated amount of time to complete the MRI procedure).
- Individuals who are pregnant.
- Patients with implants or pacemakers.
- Patients that have hypersensitivity to components of gadolinium.
- Patients with renal failure.
- Patients who had any trauma or surgery which may have left ferromagnetic material in the body.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI using Dotarem contrast agent
3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI using a Gadovist contrast agent
Arm Description
60 randomly selected participants with suspected or known cardiovascular disease will have a 3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI with contrast agent, Dotarem
60 randomly selected participants with suspected or known cardiovascular disease will have a 3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI with contrast agent, Gadovist
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Compare visual image quality of LGE-CMR when performed with Dotarem or Gadovist in a randomized fashion.
All LGE-CMR scans scoring for visual image quality using a 5-point scale: 1 = LV myocardium not visible, 2 = severe artifact interfering with ability to visualize LV myocardial borders limiting assessment for presence of LGE (poor), 3 = LV myocardial borders are well delineated but there is moderate artifact affecting ability to identify LGE (fair), 4 = LV myocardium is well delineated with minor artifacts affecting ability to identify LGE (good), 5 = LV myocardium well delineated with no artifacts affecting ability to identify LGE (excellent).
Compare quantitative signal enhancement of LGE when performed with Dotarem or Gadovist in a randomized fashion.
Assessment of the intensity of hyperenhancement with Dotarem and Gadovist using a semi-automated computer software.
Compare association of LGE and clinical cardiovascular outcomes when performed with Dotarem or Gadovistin a randomized fashion.
Patient screened for outcomes (e.g. acute myocardial infraction, sudden cardiac death, heart failure, stroke, cardiovascular hemorrhage, other death from cardiovascular causes)
Secondary Outcome Measures
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03057561
First Posted
January 18, 2017
Last Updated
January 17, 2019
Sponsor
Dipan Shah
Collaborators
Guerbet
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03057561
Brief Title
Efficacy of Dotarem® (Gd-DOTA) Versus Gadovist® (Gd-DO3A-butrol) for Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
Official Title
Efficacy of Dotarem® (Gd-DOTA) Versus Gadovist® (Gd-DO3A-butrol) for Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance and Relationship to Outcomes: A Pilot Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 1, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
June 30, 2021 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Dipan Shah
Collaborators
Guerbet
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This project is designed to demonstrate equivalence of Dotarem enhanced LGE-CMR (late gadolinium enhancement cardiac MRI) with Gadoviost enhanced LGE-CMR from the standpoint of visual image quality, quantitative image quality, and association with clinical outcomes.
Detailed Description
Gadolinium-containing contrast agents (GdCAs) are intravenous agents used for contrast enhancement with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and with magnetic resonance angiography (MRA). The GdCAs (gadodiamide, gadopentetic acid, gadobenic acid, gadoxetic acid, gadoteridol, gadobutrol and gadoteric acid) have been in use for few decades for different types of MR scan varying from product to product, including liver, brain, and whole body scan.
Recently, there has been a great interest in employing contrast-related techniques to assess for fibrosis in the myocardium of the heart. As opposed to nuclear methods, viability assessment by MRI is a nonstress examination that provides high-resolution detail, including functional assessment of the left ventricle in approximately 30 minutes. Assessment of myocardial viability is performed using 5- to 20-minute delayed, gadolinium-enhanced MRI. On delayed MRI, there is a relatively decreased washout of the gadolinium contrast agent in areas of myocardium that have been replaced by fibrosis or scar. In normal viable myocardium, the gadolinium contrast agent washes out more rapidly than it does from the fibrosis or scar. Since the difference between normal and abnormal myocardium is based on washout kinetics, images that are delayed by 5 to 20 minutes after contrast injection will optimally depict the fibrosis or scar.
The differences in gadolinium enhancement on MRI of viable myocardium and fibrosis or scar have been known for many years. Recently, however, MRI pulse sequences have been developed that greatly improve the conspicuity of the enhanced areas of myocardium that have been replaced by fibrosis or scar. The pulse sequence used is an inversion-recovery prepared gradient-echo sequence. In this method, an inversion pulse is used to null the signal from normal myocardium. Myocardium that is replaced by fibrosis or scar retains gadolinium and shows very high signal intensity compared with the suppressed, darker myocardium.
Gadovist has been the standard gadolinium contrasts used in the U.S. in CMR imaging for the past few years. On the other hand, Dotarem, a widely used contrast agent in Europe, has been introduced to be used in the U.S. market.The sensitivity of Dotarem to that of Magnevist in determining the location and extent of scar in patients scanned with CMR will be Gadovist in this study.
The CMR laboratory at the Houston Methodist DeBakey Heart & Vascular Center is one of the largest dedicated CMR laboratories in the U.S. performing 3,000 clinical CMR procedures per year. The laboratory has been in existence since 2008 and is currently equipped with 2 dedicated MRI scanners: 1.5T Siemens Avanto and 3.0T Siemens Verio. Through a research agreement with Siemens Medical Solutions, the laboratory has access to numerous works-in progress sequences as they are developed. The laboratory is equipped with an MRI compatible patient monitoring system, infusion pump, and power injector and is staffed by a team of 5 dedicated CMR technologists, 2 clinical nurses, 1 CMR fellow, an MRI scientist, and 2 attending cardiologists.
One hundred twenty patients with known or suspected cardiovascular disease will be recruited for this study. Patients will be randomized (in a 1:1 fashion) to receive either Dotarem or Gadovist for LGE-CMR such that there will be 60 patients in the Dotarem cohort and 60 patients in the Gadovist cohort.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease, Cardiomyopathy
Keywords
CAD
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Evaluating the efficacy of Dotarem enhanced MRI compared to Gadovist enhanced MRI in identifying myocardial fibrosis. Patients will be randomized (in a 1:1 fashion) to receive either Dotarem or Gadovist for LGE-CMR such that there will be 60 patients in the Dotarem cohort and 60 patients in the Gadovist cohort
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Blinded reader of scans will not know whether subject received Dotarem or Gadovist.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
120 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI using Dotarem contrast agent
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
60 randomly selected participants with suspected or known cardiovascular disease will have a 3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI with contrast agent, Dotarem
Arm Title
3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI using a Gadovist contrast agent
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
60 randomly selected participants with suspected or known cardiovascular disease will have a 3.0 Tesla Cardiac MRI with contrast agent, Gadovist
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cardiac MRI taken using contrast agent, Dotarem® (Gd-DOTA)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cardiac MRI with contrast, CMR with tracer or contrast agent, Dotarem (Gd-DOTA) contrast agent
Intervention Description
Gadolinium based contrast agent used in cardiac MRI scanning using 3.0 Tesla MRI
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cardiac MRI with contrast agent, Gadovist
Other Intervention Name(s)
Cardiac MRI with contrast, CMR with tracer or contrast agent, Gadovist® (Gd-DO3A-butrol) contast agent
Intervention Description
Brand of Gd-DO3A-butrol; contrast agent used in cardiac MRI scanning using 3.0 Tesla MRI
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Compare visual image quality of LGE-CMR when performed with Dotarem or Gadovist in a randomized fashion.
Description
All LGE-CMR scans scoring for visual image quality using a 5-point scale: 1 = LV myocardium not visible, 2 = severe artifact interfering with ability to visualize LV myocardial borders limiting assessment for presence of LGE (poor), 3 = LV myocardial borders are well delineated but there is moderate artifact affecting ability to identify LGE (fair), 4 = LV myocardium is well delineated with minor artifacts affecting ability to identify LGE (good), 5 = LV myocardium well delineated with no artifacts affecting ability to identify LGE (excellent).
Time Frame
Two years
Title
Compare quantitative signal enhancement of LGE when performed with Dotarem or Gadovist in a randomized fashion.
Description
Assessment of the intensity of hyperenhancement with Dotarem and Gadovist using a semi-automated computer software.
Time Frame
Two Years
Title
Compare association of LGE and clinical cardiovascular outcomes when performed with Dotarem or Gadovistin a randomized fashion.
Description
Patient screened for outcomes (e.g. acute myocardial infraction, sudden cardiac death, heart failure, stroke, cardiovascular hemorrhage, other death from cardiovascular causes)
Time Frame
Eight years
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients undergoing clinically referred CMR.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients who are unable to give informed consent.
Individuals with severe claustrophobia.
Individuals unable to lie flat for 90 minutes (the anticipated amount of time to complete the MRI procedure).
Individuals who are pregnant.
Patients with implants or pacemakers.
Patients that have hypersensitivity to components of gadolinium.
Patients with renal failure.
Patients who had any trauma or surgery which may have left ferromagnetic material in the body.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Dipan Shah, MD
Organizational Affiliation
The Methodist Hospital Research Institute
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Learn more about this trial
Efficacy of Dotarem® (Gd-DOTA) Versus Gadovist® (Gd-DO3A-butrol) for Late Gadolinium Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs