search
Back to results

Graft Selection in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction (Grafttype)

Primary Purpose

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hamstring tendon autograft
Pattella tendon autograft
Quadriceps tendon autograft
Sponsored by
Orthopedisch Centrum Oost Nederland
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries focused on measuring autograft

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients active in sports, Tegner =/>5
  • Primary ACL rupture, evident from anamnesis (acute trauma, snapping sensation, swelling within several hours, feeling of instability), physical examination (positive Lachman test, anterior drawertest and/or pivot shift test), radiograph and MRl
  • Willing to comply to the suggested (nationwide standard) rehabilitation protocol, supen/ised by a NFVS registerd sport-physical therapist
  • <6 months between initial trauma and surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • History of knee surgery on the same side
  • History of tendon removal on the same side
  • Accompanying ligament injury ofthe knee, evident from anamnesis, physical examination, radiograph and MRl, defined as an ACL rupture in combination with a posterior cruciate ligament or collateral ligament injury,
  • Peroperative discovery of cartilage damage; larger than 2cm2 and more than 50% depth
  • Peroperative discovery of meniscus injury witch requires a meniscectomy of more than 20% or meniscus sutures
  • Osteoarthritis of Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or more, as evident from the radiograph
  • Severe malalignment of the leg
  • Tendency to form excessive scar tissue, such as arthrofibrosis
  • Muscular, neurological or vascular anomalies that influence healingtime or rehabilitation
  • Infection
  • Known hypersensitivity to any of the used materials
  • Long term relevant medication use such as prednisolone or cytostatics
  • Pregnancy at the time of inclusion or surgery
  • Known osteoporosis

Sites / Locations

  • Martini Hospital Groningen
  • OCONRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Hamstring tendon autograft

Patella tendon autograft

Quadriceps tendon autograft

Arm Description

ACL reconstruction surgery with hamstring tendon autograft

ACL reconstruction surgery with pattella tendon autograft

ACL reconstruction surgery with quadriceps tendon autograft

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Physical examination ACL Failure
Presence / absence of anterior cruciate ligament failure. Failure is defined as pathologicai laxity, complaints of knee instability in the absence of any pathological laxity and/or discontinuïty ofthe graft on MRl or arthroscopy.

Secondary Outcome Measures

quality of life (ACL-QoL)
level of self-reported quality of life
functional knee and health status (IKDC)
level of functional knee and current health status
physical examination of knee (in)stability
instability in the absence of any pathological laxity and/or discontinuïty of the graft on MRl or arthroscopy.
Knee and Injury Osetoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire (KOOS)
self-reported level of physical activity in daily life
sports intensity questionnaire (Tegner Activity Level)
self-reported level of pivoting sports execution
questionnaire
level of physical activity (Lysholm score)
knee pain
self-reported level of pain during activity and rest on visual analogue scale
Instability knee
VAS score (patient perception)
satisfaction with result of ACL surgery
self-reported level of satisfaction with ACL surgery on visual analogue scale
physical examination
degree of knee (in)stability during jumping tests (Leg Symmetry Index)
physical examination
degree of knee (in)stability in strenght (Leg Symmetry Index)
Lachman test
physical examination: degree of knee (in)stability measured by rollimeter (operated-nonoperated side ratio)
Degree of Osteoarthritis on x-ray
Kellgren-Lawrence classification will be applied to assess the degree of osteoarthritis

Full Information

First Posted
February 23, 2017
Last Updated
June 22, 2020
Sponsor
Orthopedisch Centrum Oost Nederland
Collaborators
Martini Hospital Groningen, Gelderse Vallei Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03073083
Brief Title
Graft Selection in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction
Acronym
Grafttype
Official Title
Graft Selection in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Patella, Hamstrings or Quadriceps Tendon Autograft
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
June 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
March 6, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2029 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2029 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Orthopedisch Centrum Oost Nederland
Collaborators
Martini Hospital Groningen, Gelderse Vallei Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
A rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a severe injury of the knee. The current gold Standard treatment for young and active patients with instability, is a surgical ACL reconstruction. However, there still is no consensus on which graft is best suited for this.The aim of the current multi-center randomized controlled trial was to investigate the hypothesis that an anatomic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a (flat) quadriceps tendon autograft is at least as effective as reconstruction of the ruptured anterior cruciate ligament with a patella tendon autograft or a hamstringtendon autograft, in terms of failure, measured 2 years postoperatively. Failure is defined gedefinieerd as pathologicai laxity, complaints of knee instability in the absence of any pathological laxity and/or discontinuïty ofthe graft on MRl or arthroscopy.
Detailed Description
A rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) is a severe injury of the knee. The current gold Standard treatment for young and active patients with instability, is a surgical ACL reconstruction. However, there still is no consensus on which graft is best suited for this. Paradigms on the different types of auto grafts and their weaknesses and benefits originate mostly from the eighties and nineties, when the patella tendon was being replaced by the hamstring graft as the 'new' gold standerd. Nowadays, the philosophy of isometrie tunnel placement has been abandoned, and has been replaced by the philosophy of anatomie reconstructions. The question then arises: Are the results of the comparative studies, and the current paradigms, still applicable, now that the philosophy has transitioned from isometric to anatomic tunnel placement? Irrespective of the disadvantages compared to the patellatendon autograft, such as a higher re-rupture and revision percentage when used in patients under 25 years old, the hamstring autograft is currently the most used graft for ACL reconstruction worldwide. The question then arises: is it justified that the hamstringgraft is the most used graft worldwide? Rehabilitation protocols are often not, or poorly, described, despite it's significant effect on the outcome and co morbidity of an ACL reconstruction. Especially anterior knee pain, which is often mentioned as a disadvantage of the patellagraft, is significantly influenced by rehabilitation protocols. The introduction and implementation of a nation-wide evidence-based rehabilitation protocol in The Netherlands created uniformity of rehabilitation treatment, and the possibility to generalize scientific conclusions. The question then arises: Due to new insights in rehabilitation and implementation of new protocols, is the anterior knee pain, the often mentioned disadvantage ofthe patelia tendon graft, stiil a relevant disadvantage? The quadriceps tendon autograft is a less often used graft. Nevertheless, research has shown that it seems like a good alternative for the patella tendon and hamstring autograft. Functional outcome is similar, while less donorsite morbidity is reported compared to the patellatendon and hamstring autograft. The question then arises: Is it fair that the quadriceps tendon is rarely used as an autograft for ACL reconstruction? Increasing knowledge of the anatomy of the ACL results in new insights in the methods to achieve true anatomie ACL reconstruction. New arguments support the use of the patella tendon - and even the quadriceps tendon - over the use of the hamstringgraft, because their anatomic similarities to the anterior cruciate ligament might be better suited to restore knee kinematics. The question then arises: are the flat-shaped patella tendon autograft and quadriceps tendon autograft better suited to restore the anatomy of the ruptured ACL than the round hamstring graft? Hypothesis Tlie hypothesis is that anatomic reconstruction ofthe ruptured anterior cruciate ligament with a (flat) quadriceps tendon autograft is at least as effective as reconstruction of the ruptured anterior cruciate ligament with a patella tendon autograft or a hamstring tendon autograft, in terms of failure, measured 2 years postoperatively. Failure is defined as pathological laxity, complaints of knee instability in the absence of any pathological laxity and/or discontinuïty of the graft on MRl or arthroscopy. Objective of the study: Primary objective: To investigate the hypothesis that an anatomic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a (flat) quadriceps tendon autograft is at least as effective as reconstruction of the ruptured anterior cruciate ligament with a patella tendon autograft or a hamstring tendon autograft, in terms of failure, measured 2 years postoperatively. Failure is defined gedefinieerd as pathologicai laxity, complaints of knee instability in the absence of any pathological laxity and/or discontinuïty of the graft on MRl or arthroscopy. Secondary objectives: patiënt reported outcome measures (PROMs), clinimetrics, radiological assessment, duration of rehabilitation necessary for return to sports and daily activities and the level of sport activities to which the patiënt returned, in patients treated with an anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using a patellatendon autograft, hamstringtendon autograft of quadricepstendon autograft, as measured in the short-term (6 weeks, 6,9,12 months postoperatively), mid-term (2 years postoperatively) and long-term (5 and 10 years postoperatively). Study design: Multicenter blocked stratified randomised controlled trial with varying block sizes (n=3, 6, 9, 12). Patients with an anterior cruciate ligament rupture, confirmed by an orthopaedie surgeon (as evident from anamnesis, physical examination and radiographic imaging) who meet the inclusion criteria and do not have any of the exclusion criteria, will be asked to partieipate in this study. Baseline measurements will be performed, after informed consent is obtained. Allocation of treatment of the included patients will be performed in the operating room (OR), where patients will be randomised (blocked and stratified) per clinic, to have ACL reconstruction with a patella tendon autograft, hamstring tendon autograft or quadriceps tendon autograft. Stratification will be based on age (18-25 and >25), level of sport activities (Tegner Activity Level Scale 5-7 and 8-10) and surgeon. Follow-up identical to the follow-up of standard care, with standard checkups after 6 weeks, 6, 9, months and 1 and 2 years. Two extra follow-up moments (after 5 and 10 years) will be planned.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Anterior Cruciate Ligament Injuries
Keywords
autograft

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized controlled trial
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
439 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Hamstring tendon autograft
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
ACL reconstruction surgery with hamstring tendon autograft
Arm Title
Patella tendon autograft
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
ACL reconstruction surgery with pattella tendon autograft
Arm Title
Quadriceps tendon autograft
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
ACL reconstruction surgery with quadriceps tendon autograft
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Hamstring tendon autograft
Other Intervention Name(s)
all-inside AMPS technique Arthrex
Intervention Description
ACL reconstruction surgery with hamstring tendon
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Pattella tendon autograft
Other Intervention Name(s)
Smith and Nephew
Intervention Description
ACL reconstruction surgery with patella tendon
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Quadriceps tendon autograft
Other Intervention Name(s)
all-inside AMPS technique Arthrex
Intervention Description
ACL reconstruction surgery with quadriceps tendon
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Physical examination ACL Failure
Description
Presence / absence of anterior cruciate ligament failure. Failure is defined as pathologicai laxity, complaints of knee instability in the absence of any pathological laxity and/or discontinuïty ofthe graft on MRl or arthroscopy.
Time Frame
2 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
quality of life (ACL-QoL)
Description
level of self-reported quality of life
Time Frame
preoperative, 6 wks, 6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
functional knee and health status (IKDC)
Description
level of functional knee and current health status
Time Frame
preoperative, 6 wks, 6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
physical examination of knee (in)stability
Description
instability in the absence of any pathological laxity and/or discontinuïty of the graft on MRl or arthroscopy.
Time Frame
preoperative, 6 wks, 6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
Knee and Injury Osetoarthritis Outcome Score questionnaire (KOOS)
Description
self-reported level of physical activity in daily life
Time Frame
preoperative, 6 wks, 6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
sports intensity questionnaire (Tegner Activity Level)
Description
self-reported level of pivoting sports execution
Time Frame
preoperative, 6 wks, 6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
questionnaire
Description
level of physical activity (Lysholm score)
Time Frame
preoperative, 6 wks, 6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
knee pain
Description
self-reported level of pain during activity and rest on visual analogue scale
Time Frame
preoperative, 6 wks, 6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
Instability knee
Description
VAS score (patient perception)
Time Frame
preoperative, 6 wks, 6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
satisfaction with result of ACL surgery
Description
self-reported level of satisfaction with ACL surgery on visual analogue scale
Time Frame
6 wks, 6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
physical examination
Description
degree of knee (in)stability during jumping tests (Leg Symmetry Index)
Time Frame
6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
physical examination
Description
degree of knee (in)stability in strenght (Leg Symmetry Index)
Time Frame
preoperative, 6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
Lachman test
Description
physical examination: degree of knee (in)stability measured by rollimeter (operated-nonoperated side ratio)
Time Frame
6 wks, 6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
Degree of Osteoarthritis on x-ray
Description
Kellgren-Lawrence classification will be applied to assess the degree of osteoarthritis
Time Frame
Baseline, 1,2,5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Knee instability during jumping movements
Description
Measured during jumping test. At OCON patients will be equiped with 3D accelerometer sensors in order to quantify the degree of (in)stability of the affected knee during the execution of jump tests under the supervision of a specialized sports physiotherapist
Time Frame
1 and 2 years after ACL reconstruction surgery
Title
Complications and other adverse events
Description
number and type complications and adverse events
Time Frame
6 wks, 6 months, 9 months, 1, 2, 5 10 years after ACL reconstruction surgery

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients active in sports, Tegner =/>5 Primary ACL rupture, evident from anamnesis (acute trauma, snapping sensation, swelling within several hours, feeling of instability), physical examination (positive Lachman test, anterior drawertest and/or pivot shift test), radiograph and MRl Willing to comply to the suggested (nationwide standard) rehabilitation protocol, supen/ised by a NFVS registerd sport-physical therapist <6 months between initial trauma and surgery Exclusion Criteria: History of knee surgery on the same side History of tendon removal on the same side Accompanying ligament injury ofthe knee, evident from anamnesis, physical examination, radiograph and MRl, defined as an ACL rupture in combination with a posterior cruciate ligament or collateral ligament injury, Peroperative discovery of cartilage damage; larger than 2cm2 and more than 50% depth Peroperative discovery of meniscus injury witch requires a meniscectomy of more than 20% or meniscus sutures Osteoarthritis of Kellgren and Lawrence grade 2 or more, as evident from the radiograph Severe malalignment of the leg Tendency to form excessive scar tissue, such as arthrofibrosis Muscular, neurological or vascular anomalies that influence healingtime or rehabilitation Infection Known hypersensitivity to any of the used materials Long term relevant medication use such as prednisolone or cytostatics Pregnancy at the time of inclusion or surgery Known osteoporosis
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
R.A.G Hoogeslag, MD
Phone
0031887085375
Email
wetenschap@ocon.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R.A.G Hoogeslag, MD
Organizational Affiliation
OCON
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Martini Hospital Groningen
City
Groningen
ZIP/Postal Code
9728 NT
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R Brouwer, MD
Phone
03188524 5970
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. Brouwer
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
A de Vries
Facility Name
OCON
City
Hengelo
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. Huis in 't Veld, Phd
Phone
0031887085375
Email
wetenschap@ocon.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R.A.G Hoogeslag, MD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R Huis in 't Veld

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Graft Selection in Anatomic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs