search
Back to results

COLLISION Trial - Colorectal Liver Metastases: Surgery vs Thermal Ablation (COLLISION)

Primary Purpose

ColoRectal Cancer, Liver Metastasis Colon Cancer, Liver Metastases

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Thermal ablation
Surgical resection
Sponsored by
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for ColoRectal Cancer focused on measuring Hepatic resection, Liver surgery, Thermal ablation, Radiofrequency ablation, Microwave ablation, RFA, MWA

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Most important inclusion criteria:

  • At least one CRLM size ≤ 3 cm eligible for both surgical resection and thermal ablation (target lesions);
  • Additional unresectable CRLM should be ≤ 3 cm and ablatable (unresectable lesions);
  • Additional unablatable CRLM should be resectable (unablatable lesions);
  • Maximum number of CRLM 10;
  • Resectability and ablatability should be re-confirmed intra-operatively by US plus full exploration for hepatic, peritoneal and regional lymph node metastases;
  • ASA 1-3.

Most important exclusion criteria:

  • No target lesions suitable for both resection and ablation;
  • Radical treatment unfeasible or unsafe (e.g. insufficient FLR);
  • The presence of extrahepatic nodal or non-nodal metastases;
  • Immunotherapy or chemotherapy ≤ 6 weeks prior to the procedure;
  • Any surgical resection or focal ablative liver therapy for CRLM prior to inclusion

Sites / Locations

  • Amsterdam University Medical Center - location VUmcRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Surgical resection

Thermal ablation

Arm Description

Patients included will undergo resection of hepatic metastases, allowing thermal ablation for additional unresectable lesions.

Patients included will undergo ultrasound guided thermal ablation of hepatic metastases, allowing resection for additional unablatable lesions.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall survival (OS)
Counting from the date of randomization to the date of death of the patient or to the last day of follow-up.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Disease free survival
The time from focal therapy to the time of events.
Time to progression
The time from focal therapy to the time of events.

Full Information

First Posted
January 11, 2017
Last Updated
December 18, 2022
Sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Collaborators
Medtronic - MITG
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03088150
Brief Title
COLLISION Trial - Colorectal Liver Metastases: Surgery vs Thermal Ablation
Acronym
COLLISION
Official Title
COLLISION Trial - Colorectal Liver Metastases: Surgery vs Thermal Ablation, a Phase III Single-blind Prospective Randomized Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
July 13, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Amsterdam UMC, location VUmc
Collaborators
Medtronic - MITG

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective is to prove non-inferiority of thermal ablation compared to hepatic resection in patients with at least one resectable and ablatable colorectal liver metastases (≤3cm) and no extrahepatic disease.
Detailed Description
Study design: COLLISION is a single-blind prospective multi-center phase-III randomized controlled trial. We hypothesize that thermal ablation is non-inferior to surgery for the selected patient groups in terms of the primary objective (overall survival). The Cox proportional hazards model (1-sided; non-inferiority or superiority) is used for sample size calculations. Given the superior safety profile we consider a hazard ratio of 1.3 to represent the upper limit of non-inferiority (non-inferiority margin). An HR of 1.3 corresponds to a 56.5% chance of the ablated patients to die first ((P = HR/(1 + HR) = 1.3/(1 + 1.3) = 0.565 (56.5%)). With 3 years of patient accrual and five years of follow-up we will have reached 60% of events (death) in approximately 6.5 years (overall probability of event, pE =0.6). The calculated sample size therefore is 599 (NS).To account for a 10% drop-out ratio (NDO=69) prior to randomization and a 3% loss to follow-up (NLTFU=18) after randomization we need to include 687 patients (NI). A total number of 618 patients will be randomized (NR) into one of two arms: arm A will undergo surgical resection (n=309) and arm B thermal ablation (n=309) for appointed target lesions. Study population: Patients with ≥1 resectable and ablatable CRLM (≤3cm), no extrahepatic disease and a good performance status (WHO 0-2) are considered eligible. Supplementary resections for resectable lesions >3cm and thermal ablations for unresectable CRLM ≤3cm are allowed with a maximum number of CRLM of 10. Intervention: Eligible patients will be stratified into low-, intermediate- and high disease burden after assessment by an expert panel. The panel, consisting of at least two diagnostic radiologists, two interventional radiologists and two hepatobiliary and/or oncological surgeons, will appoint lesions that are resectable and ablatable as target lesions, resectable and unablatable lesions as unablatable lesions and ablatable but unresectable lesions as unresectable lesions. All unablatable lesions should be resectable and all unresectable lesions should be ≤3cm and ablatable. With the exception of patients that are suitable for laparoscopic resection or percutaneous ablation (low disease burden), eligibility needs to be reconfirmed during the surgical procedure. Hereafter patients will be randomized to undergo surgical resection of the target lesions (allowing thermal ablation for additional unresectable lesions) or thermal ablation (allowing resection for additional unablatable lesions). For open procedures randomization will be performed shortly after surgical inspection and IOUS with the patient under general anaesthesia. Both the experimenter(s) and the participant will be unaware of the eventual treatment arm prior to the procedure; after the procedure the patient will remain unaware (single-blind). Conferring to national guidelines follow-up will include imaging, laboratory tests including tumour markers (CEA) and clinical examination every 3 months for the first year and every 6 months hereafter. Follow-up cross-sectional imaging should include at least an abdominal ceCT or upper abdominal ceMRI at the given time-points. Participating centres are free to add 18F-FDG PET-CTs at specific time-points or to use alternating specific modalities, as long as the follow-up protocol is pre-approved by the trial coordinators and as long as follow-up imaging is identical for both treatment arms. Quality of life questionnaires will be assessed at baseline, every 3 months for the first year and every 6 months hereafter accordingly. Patients with recurrences that are considered unsuitable for additional focal therapy will be re-referred to their medical oncologist to assess additional systemic chemotherapy. In the event of chemotherapeutic down-staging hereafter, focal therapy can be reconsidered.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
ColoRectal Cancer, Liver Metastasis Colon Cancer, Liver Metastases, Surgery
Keywords
Hepatic resection, Liver surgery, Thermal ablation, Radiofrequency ablation, Microwave ablation, RFA, MWA

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
618 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Surgical resection
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients included will undergo resection of hepatic metastases, allowing thermal ablation for additional unresectable lesions.
Arm Title
Thermal ablation
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients included will undergo ultrasound guided thermal ablation of hepatic metastases, allowing resection for additional unablatable lesions.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Thermal ablation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Radiofrequency ablation, RFA, Microwave ablation, MWA
Intervention Description
Patients will undergo either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or microwave ablation (MWA).
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Surgical resection
Intervention Description
In case of randomization to surgical resection, the surgeon will remove all target lesions as well as all additional unablatable lesions.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall survival (OS)
Description
Counting from the date of randomization to the date of death of the patient or to the last day of follow-up.
Time Frame
5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Disease free survival
Description
The time from focal therapy to the time of events.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Time to progression
Description
The time from focal therapy to the time of events.
Time Frame
5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Most important inclusion criteria: At least one CRLM size ≤ 3 cm eligible for both surgical resection and thermal ablation (target lesions); Additional unresectable CRLM should be ≤ 3 cm and ablatable (unresectable lesions); Additional unablatable CRLM should be resectable (unablatable lesions); Maximum number of CRLM 10; Resectability and ablatability should be re-confirmed intra-operatively by US plus full exploration for hepatic, peritoneal and regional lymph node metastases; ASA 1-3. Most important exclusion criteria: No target lesions suitable for both resection and ablation; Radical treatment unfeasible or unsafe (e.g. insufficient FLR); The presence of extrahepatic nodal or non-nodal metastases; Immunotherapy or chemotherapy ≤ 6 weeks prior to the procedure; Any surgical resection or focal ablative liver therapy for CRLM prior to inclusion
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
RS Puijk, MD
Phone
020 444 4444
Email
interventieradiologie@vumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
MR Meijerink, MD, PhD
Phone
020 444 4444
Email
interventieradiologie@vumc.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
MR Meijerink, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, NL
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Amsterdam University Medical Center - location VUmc
City
Amsterdam
State/Province
NH
ZIP/Postal Code
1081
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
M.R. Meijerink, MD, PhD
Phone
0204444444
Email
interventieradiologie@vumc.nl

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
30111304
Citation
Puijk RS, Ruarus AH, Vroomen LGPH, van Tilborg AAJM, Scheffer HJ, Nielsen K, de Jong MC, de Vries JJJ, Zonderhuis BM, Eker HH, Kazemier G, Verheul H, van der Meijs BB, van Dam L, Sorgedrager N, Coupe VMH, van den Tol PMP, Meijerink MR; COLLISION Trial Group. Colorectal liver metastases: surgery versus thermal ablation (COLLISION) - a phase III single-blind prospective randomized controlled trial. BMC Cancer. 2018 Aug 15;18(1):821. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4716-8.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

COLLISION Trial - Colorectal Liver Metastases: Surgery vs Thermal Ablation

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs