search
Back to results

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial

Primary Purpose

Coronary Artery Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (isolated LIMA-LAD)
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (PCI)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Sponsored by
Emilia Bagiella
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Coronary Artery Disease focused on measuring Hybrid Coronary Revascularization, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Signed informed consent, inclusive of release of medical information, and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) documentation (US sites)
  • Age ≥ 18 years
  • Clinical indication for coronary revascularization
  • Coronary anatomy requiring revascularization as follows(2)

    • Multivessel CAD involving the LAD (proximal or mid) and/or LM (ostial, mid-shaft or distal) with at least 1 other epicardial coronary artery requiring treatment (LCX or RCA), OR
    • Single vessel disease involving the LAD and a major diagonal, with both requiring independent revascularization with at least one stent if randomized to HCR and stents for both the LAD and diagonal if randomized to multivessel PCI Note: If the patient qualifies based only on a LM lesion, then there must be involvement of the distal bifurcation (Medina 1,1,1) intended for treatment with a 2-stent approach (separate stents into the LAD and LCX) if randomized to PCI. However, if the patient also has non-LM disease in the RCA and/or non-ostial LAD and/or non-ostial LCX that requires separate treatment, any LM lesion is a valid criterion for enrollment, whether LM ostial, shaft or distal bifurcation disease, and any strategy of treating the LM may be employed, including not treating the ostial LCX, a provisional approach or a planned 2-stent strategy as appropriate. Similarly, if the patient qualifies based only on LAD-Dg disease, whether a bifurcation lesion or separate lesions in the LAD and Dg, without RCA or LCX disease, then both the LAD and Dg must be true lesions intended for stents (planned 2-stent approach). However, if the patient has LAD-Dg disease and a lesion in the RCA or LCX that also requires treatment, the LAD-Dg disease can then be treated in any fashion (2-stents, a provisional approach, or the Dg not even dilated if it is small), according to operator preference
  • Suitable candidate for both PCI with metallic DES and HCR as determined by clinical assessment and angiogram review by an interventional cardiologist and a cardiac surgeon at the enrolling clinical site
  • Ability to tolerate and no plans to interrupt dual anti-platelet therapy for ≥ 6 months if presentation with stable CAD, or ≥ 12 months if presentation with biomarker positive acute coronary syndrome (ACS)
  • Willing to comply with all protocol required follow-up

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Previous cardiac surgery of any kind, including CABG
  • Previous thoracic surgery involving the left pleural space
  • Previous LM or LAD stent (a) with evidence of in-stent restenosis or (b) within 1 cm of a qualifying lesion
  • Previous PCI of the LM and/or LAD within 12 months prior to randomization
  • PCI with bare metal stent (BMS) within 12 months prior to randomization
  • Any complication or unsuccessful revascularization with PCI within 30 days prior to randomization.

Note: A patient may be considered eligible for enrollment if PCI with DES in non-LM and non-LAD territory was performed within 30 days prior to randomization, as long as revascularization was successful and uncomplicated, or has been performed more than 30 days prior even if unsuccessful or complicated

  • Planned treatment with bioresorbable vascular scaffold(s) after randomization
  • Total occlusion (TIMI 0 or 1 flow) of the LM, LAD or LCX.
  • Cardiogenic shock at time of screening
  • STEMI within 72 hours prior to randomization
  • Need for concomitant vascular or other cardiac surgery during the index hospitalization (including, but not limited to, valve surgery, aortic resection, left ventricular aneurysmectomy, and carotid endarterectomy or stenting)
  • Indication for chronic oral anticoagulation therapy at the time of randomization
  • Any prior lung resection
  • ESRD on dialysis
  • Patients who could not be switched from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel, should that be needed prior to a CABG, during reverse HCR
  • Extra-cardiac illness that is expected to limit survival to less than 5 years
  • Allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or devices used in the trial
  • Therapy with an investigational drug, device or biologic within 1 year prior to randomization, or plan to enroll patient in additional investigational study during participation in this trial
  • Unable to give informed consent or potential for noncompliance with the study protocol in the judgment of the investigator
  • Pregnant at time of screening or unwilling to use effective birth control measures while dual antiplatelet therapy is required.

Sites / Locations

  • Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
  • University of Southern California
  • Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
  • University of California Los Angeles
  • Stanford University
  • Yale University
  • HealthPark Lee Memorial Health Systems
  • Orlando Health Heart Institute
  • Emory University Hospital Midtown
  • University of Chicago Medical Center
  • University of Iowa
  • University of Maryland
  • Universty of Minnesota
  • Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center
  • Montefiore - Einstein
  • Buffalo General Medical Center/Gates Vascular Institute
  • Mount Sinai Beth Israel
  • Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital
  • Lenox Hill Hospital
  • St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center
  • Duke University
  • WakeMed Health and Hospitals
  • Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
  • Ohio State University
  • University of Toledo Medical Center
  • Pinnacle Health Cardiovascular System
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • Einstein Healthcare Network
  • Allegheny General Hospital
  • The Reading Health System
  • Lankenau Medical Center
  • Medical University of South Carolina
  • Erlanger Health System
  • Houston Methodist Hospital
  • Baylor Research Institute at The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano
  • University of Virginia
  • Inova Fairfax Medical Campus
  • Gundersen Health System
  • University of Wisconsin
  • University of Alberta
  • Vancouver General Hospital
  • London Health Sciences Centre
  • University of Ottawa Heart Institute
  • St Michael's Hospital
  • Jewish General Hospital
  • Centre Intégré Universitaire/Sacre Coeur

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Group

Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

Arm Description

HCR is defined, for the purposes of this trial, as a planned off-pump minimally invasive (sternal-sparing), isolated LIMA-LAD revascularization, combined with percutaneous revascularization of at least one non-LAD target.

PCI will be performed using standard techniques at the discretion of the operator. Only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health Canada approved commercially available metallic drug-eluting stents may be used in this protocol.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Major Adverse Coronary and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE)
The current sample size of 200 patients will not provide sufficient power to test the original null hypothesis of the trial. However, it will allow for an estimate of the MACCE rate in the two groups. A 2-year follow-up will be used to capture and understand the difference in MACCE between the two procedures. This reasoning is based on the NHLBI-funded Hybrid Revascularization Observational Study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01121263), which enrolled 200 HCR and 98 multi-vessel PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES) patients, and demonstrated similar risk-adjusted MACCE rates over the first 12 months following the intervention but divergence by approximately 18 months of followup. Therefore, it is important to continue the follow-up of the 200 randomized patients to at least 24 months. Of note, some patients who were enrolled early in the trial will have up to 3 years of follow-up data collected by the time the final patient randomized completes the 2-year time point.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Safety Evaluation
We will compare pre- and post-revascularization values between the two groups: Hemoglobin (g/dL), Creatinine (mg/dL), CK-MB (IU/L) and/or Troponin I or T (ng/mL) (some data from the STS Registry). Antiplatelets and anticoagulants, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, aldosterone antagonists and statins used prior to, during and within 24 hours of the procedure will be analyzed. Data on intra- and peri-procedural AEs in the PCI and HCR groups, including bleeding, will also be available. Information about the index procedure(s) and hospitalization for patients receiving HCR will be extracted from STS, including LOS, transfusions, repeat procedures, and discharge disposition. Data on MACCE events that occur during study-procedure related hospitalizations will be extracted from STS. The Imaging Core Laboratory will analyze the pre and post procedural angiograms. Patients randomized to the HCR procedure and received CABG first will also have data on the patency of the LIMA to LAD graft.
Feasibility of Incorporating Registry Data in a Randomized Clinical Trial
For the HCR group, partial data will be extracted and transferred from the STS registry. Thus, this study will also allow evaluation of the process of data transfer, assessment of the data quality, and eventually determination of the feasibility to conduct a clinical trial with data linked to a registry.
Cost Effectiveness
Health Status as measured by Cost Effectiveness. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated using a microsimulation model, which will predict the accrued health care costs and quality-adjusted life expectancy for each subject at the end of the trial follow-up period and in addition over a lifetime horizon.

Full Information

First Posted
March 20, 2017
Last Updated
May 25, 2022
Sponsor
Emilia Bagiella
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03089398
Brief Title
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial
Official Title
Randomized Trial Of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Versus Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 9, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor-Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Emilia Bagiella
Collaborators
National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to learn which treatment option is better for patients who have multi-vessel coronary artery disease (blockages in more than one vessel supplying blood to the heart muscle). The treatment options this study will compare are: (1) Hybrid Coronary Revascularization [HCR] (a combination of surgery and catheter procedures to open up clogged heart arteries) and (2) Percutaneous Coronary Intervention [PCI] (catheter procedures alone to open up clogged heart arteries). There are no new or "experimental" procedures being tested in this study: both HCR and PCI are well-established procedures and are regularly performed in patients who have coronary artery disease. But, the FDA has not approved the drug-eluting stents used in PCI for all types of coronary artery disease. We have received an Investigational Device Exemption from the FDA to use the drug-eluting stents in this trial in the same way that they are used in clinical practice. The study being proposed here will use rigorous scientific methods and should result in a very high level of certainty about which procedure is best for patients with coronary artery disease.
Detailed Description
The increasing prevalence of coronary artery disease (CAD), advances in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI), and concomitant medical therapy, and the costs of revascularization have resulted in rising interest regarding the appropriate indications and alternatives for coronary revascularization. Hybrid coronary revascularization is the intended combination of CABG and PCI. The HCR strategy combines grafting of the left anterior descending artery (LAD) coronary artery using the left internal mammary artery (LIMA) and PCI of non-LAD coronary stenoses. Essentially, stents are substituted for saphenous vein grafts (SVG) for non-LAD lesions, and the surgical LIMA to LAD bypass is performed, ideally through a limited access, minimally traumatic approach. Unfortunately, the published data to date on HCR must be considered limited and hypothesis generating. Clinicians, payers, and patients are interested in the specific benefits of revascularization alternatives. HCR as a scientifically validated approach would have a major healthcare impact. The ability to deliver a new therapy for CAD that provides durability, but without the obligatory trauma and prolonged recovery time characteristic of conventional CABG would be a major advance in the field of cardiovascular medicine. The NHLBI-funded Hybrid Observational Study demonstrated that equipoise exists between the two coronary revascularization paradigms; however, a rigorously designed randomized clinical trial is now needed to provide sufficient evidence to guide clinical decision making for this important patient population. This trial is a prospective, multi-center randomized comparative effectiveness trial of HCR compared to multi-vessel PCI in patients with multi-vessel CAD involving the LAD or LM territories. The trial is designed as a "large, simple" trial, and some baseline, procedure-related and short-term outcomes data collection will be extracted from existing registry data (Society of Thoracic Surgeons [STS] Data Registry). The overall objective of this trial is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (HCR) compared to multi-vessel PCI with drug-eluting stents (DES) in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease involving the Left Main and/or Left Anterior Descending arteries. The primary objective the trial is to determine whether hybrid coronary revascularization is associated with a reduction in Major Adverse Cardiac and Cerebrovascular Events [MACCE] compared to PCI with DES. The secondary objectives are to determine the impact of HCR compared to PCI on health status and quality of life.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Coronary Artery Disease
Keywords
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization, Coronary Artery Bypass Grafting, Percutaneous Coronary Intervention

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This trial is a prospective, multi-center randomized comparative effectiveness trial of HCR compared to multi-vessel PCI with metallic DES in patients with multi-vessel CAD involving the LAD or LM territories.
Masking
Outcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The DCC Research Coordinator will be blinded to treatment assignment during follow-up telephone calls and will be blinded to aggregate outcomes data.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
HCR is defined, for the purposes of this trial, as a planned off-pump minimally invasive (sternal-sparing), isolated LIMA-LAD revascularization, combined with percutaneous revascularization of at least one non-LAD target.
Arm Title
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
PCI will be performed using standard techniques at the discretion of the operator. Only Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and Health Canada approved commercially available metallic drug-eluting stents may be used in this protocol.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (isolated LIMA-LAD)
Other Intervention Name(s)
Left Internal Mammary Artery (LIMA) to LAD
Intervention Description
sternal-sparing, off-pump, isolated LIMA-LAD revascularization
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Hybrid Coronary Revascularization (PCI)
Other Intervention Name(s)
PCI with metallic DES of non-LAD vessel(s)
Intervention Description
percutaneous revascularization of at least one non-LAD target
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Percutaneous Coronary Intervention
Other Intervention Name(s)
PCI
Intervention Description
Multi-vessel PCI with metallic drug-eluting stents (DES) including the LAD and or LM. Only FDA approved commercially available metallic drug-eluting stents may be used in this protocol.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Major Adverse Coronary and Cerebrovascular Events (MACCE)
Description
The current sample size of 200 patients will not provide sufficient power to test the original null hypothesis of the trial. However, it will allow for an estimate of the MACCE rate in the two groups. A 2-year follow-up will be used to capture and understand the difference in MACCE between the two procedures. This reasoning is based on the NHLBI-funded Hybrid Revascularization Observational Study (ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier NCT01121263), which enrolled 200 HCR and 98 multi-vessel PCI with drug-eluting stent (DES) patients, and demonstrated similar risk-adjusted MACCE rates over the first 12 months following the intervention but divergence by approximately 18 months of followup. Therefore, it is important to continue the follow-up of the 200 randomized patients to at least 24 months. Of note, some patients who were enrolled early in the trial will have up to 3 years of follow-up data collected by the time the final patient randomized completes the 2-year time point.
Time Frame
up to 24 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Safety Evaluation
Description
We will compare pre- and post-revascularization values between the two groups: Hemoglobin (g/dL), Creatinine (mg/dL), CK-MB (IU/L) and/or Troponin I or T (ng/mL) (some data from the STS Registry). Antiplatelets and anticoagulants, beta-blockers, ACE inhibitors, ARBs, aldosterone antagonists and statins used prior to, during and within 24 hours of the procedure will be analyzed. Data on intra- and peri-procedural AEs in the PCI and HCR groups, including bleeding, will also be available. Information about the index procedure(s) and hospitalization for patients receiving HCR will be extracted from STS, including LOS, transfusions, repeat procedures, and discharge disposition. Data on MACCE events that occur during study-procedure related hospitalizations will be extracted from STS. The Imaging Core Laboratory will analyze the pre and post procedural angiograms. Patients randomized to the HCR procedure and received CABG first will also have data on the patency of the LIMA to LAD graft.
Time Frame
up to 24 months
Title
Feasibility of Incorporating Registry Data in a Randomized Clinical Trial
Description
For the HCR group, partial data will be extracted and transferred from the STS registry. Thus, this study will also allow evaluation of the process of data transfer, assessment of the data quality, and eventually determination of the feasibility to conduct a clinical trial with data linked to a registry.
Time Frame
up to 24 months
Title
Cost Effectiveness
Description
Health Status as measured by Cost Effectiveness. Cost-effectiveness will be evaluated using a microsimulation model, which will predict the accrued health care costs and quality-adjusted life expectancy for each subject at the end of the trial follow-up period and in addition over a lifetime horizon.
Time Frame
up to 24 months

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Signed informed consent, inclusive of release of medical information, and Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act (HIPAA) documentation (US sites) Age ≥ 18 years Clinical indication for coronary revascularization Coronary anatomy requiring revascularization as follows(2) Multivessel CAD involving the LAD (proximal or mid) and/or LM (ostial, mid-shaft or distal) with at least 1 other epicardial coronary artery requiring treatment (LCX or RCA), OR Single vessel disease involving the LAD and a major diagonal, with both requiring independent revascularization with at least one stent if randomized to HCR and stents for both the LAD and diagonal if randomized to multivessel PCI Note: If the patient qualifies based only on a LM lesion, then there must be involvement of the distal bifurcation (Medina 1,1,1) intended for treatment with a 2-stent approach (separate stents into the LAD and LCX) if randomized to PCI. However, if the patient also has non-LM disease in the RCA and/or non-ostial LAD and/or non-ostial LCX that requires separate treatment, any LM lesion is a valid criterion for enrollment, whether LM ostial, shaft or distal bifurcation disease, and any strategy of treating the LM may be employed, including not treating the ostial LCX, a provisional approach or a planned 2-stent strategy as appropriate. Similarly, if the patient qualifies based only on LAD-Dg disease, whether a bifurcation lesion or separate lesions in the LAD and Dg, without RCA or LCX disease, then both the LAD and Dg must be true lesions intended for stents (planned 2-stent approach). However, if the patient has LAD-Dg disease and a lesion in the RCA or LCX that also requires treatment, the LAD-Dg disease can then be treated in any fashion (2-stents, a provisional approach, or the Dg not even dilated if it is small), according to operator preference Suitable candidate for both PCI with metallic DES and HCR as determined by clinical assessment and angiogram review by an interventional cardiologist and a cardiac surgeon at the enrolling clinical site Ability to tolerate and no plans to interrupt dual anti-platelet therapy for ≥ 6 months if presentation with stable CAD, or ≥ 12 months if presentation with biomarker positive acute coronary syndrome (ACS) Willing to comply with all protocol required follow-up Exclusion Criteria: Previous cardiac surgery of any kind, including CABG Previous thoracic surgery involving the left pleural space Previous LM or LAD stent (a) with evidence of in-stent restenosis or (b) within 1 cm of a qualifying lesion Previous PCI of the LM and/or LAD within 12 months prior to randomization PCI with bare metal stent (BMS) within 12 months prior to randomization Any complication or unsuccessful revascularization with PCI within 30 days prior to randomization. Note: A patient may be considered eligible for enrollment if PCI with DES in non-LM and non-LAD territory was performed within 30 days prior to randomization, as long as revascularization was successful and uncomplicated, or has been performed more than 30 days prior even if unsuccessful or complicated Planned treatment with bioresorbable vascular scaffold(s) after randomization Total occlusion (TIMI 0 or 1 flow) of the LM, LAD or LCX. Cardiogenic shock at time of screening STEMI within 72 hours prior to randomization Need for concomitant vascular or other cardiac surgery during the index hospitalization (including, but not limited to, valve surgery, aortic resection, left ventricular aneurysmectomy, and carotid endarterectomy or stenting) Indication for chronic oral anticoagulation therapy at the time of randomization Any prior lung resection ESRD on dialysis Patients who could not be switched from prasugrel or ticagrelor to clopidogrel, should that be needed prior to a CABG, during reverse HCR Extra-cardiac illness that is expected to limit survival to less than 5 years Allergy or hypersensitivity to any of the study drugs or devices used in the trial Therapy with an investigational drug, device or biologic within 1 year prior to randomization, or plan to enroll patient in additional investigational study during participation in this trial Unable to give informed consent or potential for noncompliance with the study protocol in the judgment of the investigator Pregnant at time of screening or unwilling to use effective birth control measures while dual antiplatelet therapy is required.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emilia Bagiella, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Alan Moskowitz, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Ichan School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John Puskas, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gregg Stone, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Columbia University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Long Beach Memorial Medical Center
City
Long Beach
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90806
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Southern California
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California Los Angeles
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stanford University
City
Stanford
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94305
Country
United States
Facility Name
Yale University
City
New Haven
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06510
Country
United States
Facility Name
HealthPark Lee Memorial Health Systems
City
Fort Myers
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33908
Country
United States
Facility Name
Orlando Health Heart Institute
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University Hospital Midtown
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30308
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Chicago Medical Center
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Iowa
City
Iowa City
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
52242
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Maryland
City
College Park
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
20742
Country
United States
Facility Name
Universty of Minnesota
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55455
Country
United States
Facility Name
Our Lady of Lourdes Medical Center
City
Camden
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08103
Country
United States
Facility Name
Montefiore - Einstein
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10461
Country
United States
Facility Name
Buffalo General Medical Center/Gates Vascular Institute
City
Buffalo
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mount Sinai Beth Israel
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10003
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University Medical Center/New York Presbyterian Hospital
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lenox Hill Hospital
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10075
Country
United States
Facility Name
St. Joseph's Hospital Health Center
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13203
Country
United States
Facility Name
Duke University
City
Durham
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27710
Country
United States
Facility Name
WakeMed Health and Hospitals
City
Raleigh
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27610
Country
United States
Facility Name
Wake Forest Baptist Medical Center
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27157
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ohio State University
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43210
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Toledo Medical Center
City
Toledo
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Pinnacle Health Cardiovascular System
City
Harrisburg
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17104
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Einstein Healthcare Network
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19141
Country
United States
Facility Name
Allegheny General Hospital
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15212
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Reading Health System
City
West Reading
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19611
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lankenau Medical Center
City
Wynnewood
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19096
Country
United States
Facility Name
Medical University of South Carolina
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
Erlanger Health System
City
Chattanooga
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37403
Country
United States
Facility Name
Houston Methodist Hospital
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baylor Research Institute at The Heart Hospital Baylor Plano
City
Plano
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75093
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Virginia
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22903
Country
United States
Facility Name
Inova Fairfax Medical Campus
City
Falls Church
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22042
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gundersen Health System
City
La Crosse
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
54601
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Wisconsin
City
Madison
State/Province
Wisconsin
ZIP/Postal Code
53706
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Alberta
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6G 2R3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Vancouver General Hospital
City
Vancouver
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V5Z 1M9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
London Health Sciences Centre
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
Country
Canada
Facility Name
University of Ottawa Heart Institute
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1Y 4W7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
St Michael's Hospital
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M5B 1W8
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Jewish General Hospital
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3T 1E2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Centre Intégré Universitaire/Sacre Coeur
City
Montréal
Country
Canada

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
34016423
Citation
Ganyukov VI, Kochergin NA, Shilov AA, Tarasov RS, Skupien J, Kozyrin KA, Barbarash OL, Musialek P. Randomized Clinical Trial of Surgical Versus Percutaneous Versus Hybrid Multivessel Coronary Revascularization: 3 Years' Follow-Up. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 May 24;14(10):1163-1165. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.02.037. No abstract available.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Hybrid Coronary Revascularization Trial

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs