Modulating Oscillations and Working Memory in Patients With Subdural Electrodes
Primary Purpose
Working Memory, Epilepsy
Status
Enrolling by invitation
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Direct Cortical Stimulation
Direct Cortical Stimulation Sham
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional basic science trial for Working Memory focused on measuring Facial recognition
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- History of medically intractable epilepsy
- Capable of giving informed consent
- Aged 18 - 80 years, either sex
Exclusion Criteria:
- Past or current history of other neurological illnesses including ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, brain neoplasm.
- Major systemic illness
- Severe cognitive impairment defined as mini-mental state examination of less than 20
- Severe psychiatric illness
- Excessive use of alcohol or other substances
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Sham
Stimulation
Arm Description
Device: Direct Cortical Stimulation Sham. Trials in which stimulation is not applied. These trials are initiated using a generic trigger generator.
Device: Direct Cortical Stimulation. 150 stimulations with stimulations lasting 5 seconds at different target electrodes at two target frequencies (e.g. 5 Hz and 10 Hz) 2 milliampere in amplitude (Pulse shape - Biphasic square pulse 200 microsecond in duration per phase). Stimulation will be applied concurrently with the task and stimulation trials will be randomly interleaved with sham trials.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Working Memory Task Performance - Accuracy
In this task, a sequence of items (alphabets or numerals) is presented followed by a delay. Following this, a single item which may or may not have been in the sequence is presented and the subject will be asked to indicate whether the item was in the previously presented sequence. A total of 150 trials will be performed with randomly interleaved sham trials where no stimulation is applied. Accuracy will be quantified in percentage correct.
Working Memory Task Performance - Reaction Time
In this task, a sequence of items (alphabets or numerals) is presented followed by a delay. Following this, a single item which may or may not have been in the sequence is presented and the subject will be asked to indicate whether the item was in the previously presented sequence. A total of 150 trials will be performed with randomly interleaved sham trials where no stimulation is applied. Reaction times will be quantified in milliseconds.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Intracranial EEG
Spectral analysis and functional connectivity analysis of electrophysiology data will be performed using methods like multi-taper fft, wavelets, phase locking, Granger causality etc. The measures will be compared between sham and stimulation trials to identify if stimulation enhances neuronal entrainment. The correlation between the measures described above and the task performance will also be estimated.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03111290
First Posted
February 22, 2017
Last Updated
February 27, 2023
Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03111290
Brief Title
Modulating Oscillations and Working Memory in Patients With Subdural Electrodes
Official Title
Modulating Oscillations and Working Memory in Patients With Subdural Electrodes
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Enrolling by invitation
Study Start Date
January 2014 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Collaborators
National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke (NINDS), National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Purpose: To investigate whether rhythmic direct electrical stimulation (DES) causes entrainment of endogenous neural oscillatory activity and whether such activity improve cognition.
Participants: Drug-resistant epilepsy patients undergoing epilepsy surgery cortical mapping with continuous electrocorticography (ECoG) with intracranial electrodes.
Procedures (methods): Rhythmic electrical stimulation will be delivered via intracranial electrodes during routine extra-operative cortical mapping. Long-term ECoG, Pre-stimulation ECoG, peri-stimulation ECoG, and post-stimulation ECoG data will be analyzed to assess for entrainment of neural oscillations.
Detailed Description
The aim of this study is to characterize the entrainment of endogenous neural oscillatory activity using direct electrical stimulation (DES) of the brain and understand the effects on cognition.
In this study, the investigators will apply rhythmic DES to patients who are undergoing routine DES for cortical mapping as a part of their epilepsy surgery evaluation with the aim of entraining cortical neural oscillations at specific frequencies relevant to cognitive processing and neuropsychiatric disease. The investigators hypothesize that rhythmic DES within a naturally occurring oscillatory frequency will cause entrainment at that frequency (e.g. 10Hz rhythmic DES will entrain a 10 Hz alpha oscillation). Also, the investigators posit that rhythmic DES at the theta (5Hz), alpha(10Hz), and gamma (50Hz) frequencies will cause enhancement of neural oscillations in the gamma band.
The study follows a within-participant crossover design. Participants will perform one of the tasks described below and each task consists of multiple trials of varying difficulty. Stimulation will be applied concurrently through electrodes implanted for clinical determination of seizure focus. Equal number of stimulation and sham trials will be pseudo-randomly interleaved to get a balanced design (balanced across trial difficulty and trial type).
The investigators will apply electrical stimulation in the form of pulse trains. The applied electrical stimulation intensity, duration and frequency follow the parameters used for clinical assessments of language and seizure focus and fall below the clinically approved limits.
The investigators will measure participants performance on a simple working memory task during the above-described cortical electrical stimulation protocol. Alternately, participants can perform a face recognition task.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Working Memory, Epilepsy
Keywords
Facial recognition
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Basic Science
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
30 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Sham
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Device: Direct Cortical Stimulation Sham. Trials in which stimulation is not applied. These trials are initiated using a generic trigger generator.
Arm Title
Stimulation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Device: Direct Cortical Stimulation. 150 stimulations with stimulations lasting 5 seconds at different target electrodes at two target frequencies (e.g. 5 Hz and 10 Hz) 2 milliampere in amplitude (Pulse shape - Biphasic square pulse 200 microsecond in duration per phase). Stimulation will be applied concurrently with the task and stimulation trials will be randomly interleaved with sham trials.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Direct Cortical Stimulation
Intervention Description
A train of periodic electrical pulses is delivered between two local electrodes implanted in the brain
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Direct Cortical Stimulation Sham
Intervention Description
Sham trials where no electric pulse is delivered
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Working Memory Task Performance - Accuracy
Description
In this task, a sequence of items (alphabets or numerals) is presented followed by a delay. Following this, a single item which may or may not have been in the sequence is presented and the subject will be asked to indicate whether the item was in the previously presented sequence. A total of 150 trials will be performed with randomly interleaved sham trials where no stimulation is applied. Accuracy will be quantified in percentage correct.
Time Frame
1 Hour
Title
Working Memory Task Performance - Reaction Time
Description
In this task, a sequence of items (alphabets or numerals) is presented followed by a delay. Following this, a single item which may or may not have been in the sequence is presented and the subject will be asked to indicate whether the item was in the previously presented sequence. A total of 150 trials will be performed with randomly interleaved sham trials where no stimulation is applied. Reaction times will be quantified in milliseconds.
Time Frame
1 Hour
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Intracranial EEG
Description
Spectral analysis and functional connectivity analysis of electrophysiology data will be performed using methods like multi-taper fft, wavelets, phase locking, Granger causality etc. The measures will be compared between sham and stimulation trials to identify if stimulation enhances neuronal entrainment. The correlation between the measures described above and the task performance will also be estimated.
Time Frame
Intracranial EEG will be collected simultaneously when the participants perform the task. 1 Hour
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Facial Recognition Task Performance - Accuracy
Description
Participants who consent will be administered this task. On a given trial, participants will be presented with images of two faces side-by-side. The faces will either match in terms of emotion category (e.g., 2 anger faces) or not (e.g., an anger face and a fear face). Faces presented together will always be of the same gender but different identities. Participants will be asked to determine whether the two faces presented depict the same emotion category. Participants will have 5 seconds to make the decision and indicate by pressing a key in the keyboard. Accuracy will be quantified in percent correct.
Time Frame
1 Hour
Title
Facial Recognition Task Performance - Reaction Time
Description
Participants who consent will be administered this task. On a given trial, participants will be presented with images of two faces side-by-side. The faces will either match in terms of emotion category (e.g., 2 anger faces) or not (e.g., an anger face and a fear face). Faces presented together will always be of the same gender but different identities. Participants will be asked to determine whether the two faces presented depict the same emotion category. Participants will have 5 seconds to make the decision and indicate by pressing a key in the keyboard. Reaction times will be quantified in milliseconds.
Time Frame
1 Hour
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
History of medically intractable epilepsy
Capable of giving informed consent
Aged 18 - 80 years, either sex
Exclusion Criteria:
Past or current history of other neurological illnesses including ischemic stroke, intracerebral hemorrhage, brain neoplasm.
Major systemic illness
Severe cognitive impairment defined as mini-mental state examination of less than 20
Severe psychiatric illness
Excessive use of alcohol or other substances
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Flavio Frohlich, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Hae Won Shin, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
De-identified electrophysiology data and task information (e.g. timing of each trial, timing of responses) will be shared at the end of the study in a central repository (e.g. zenodo)
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27023427
Citation
Alagapan S, Schmidt SL, Lefebvre J, Hadar E, Shin HW, Frӧhlich F. Modulation of Cortical Oscillations by Low-Frequency Direct Cortical Stimulation Is State-Dependent. PLoS Biol. 2016 Mar 29;14(3):e1002424. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002424. eCollection 2016 Mar.
Results Reference
background
Available IPD and Supporting Information:
Available IPD/Information Type
Summary Data Set
Available IPD/Information URL
http://dx.doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.45811
Available IPD/Information Comments
Dataset supporting Alagapan et al. 2016 PLoS Biology
Learn more about this trial
Modulating Oscillations and Working Memory in Patients With Subdural Electrodes
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs