search
Back to results

Diaphragm Electrical Activity of Preterm Infants on nCPAP With Binasal Prongs Versus RAM Cannula

Primary Purpose

Preterm Infants, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, CPAP

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
respiratory support- interface
respiratory support- interface
Sponsored by
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Preterm Infants

Eligibility Criteria

23 Weeks - 32 Weeks (Child)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Clinically stable preterm infants (defined as: cardiovascular stability with normal blood pressure and heart rate for GA and no recent increase in apneic episodes or spells and confirmed by the attending neonatologist) with birth weights less than 1500 gr and/or gestational age bellow 32 weeks, admitted to the NICU at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre on nasal continuous positive airway pressure of 5 to 8 cmH20 support, for at least 48 h and requiring less than 35% of oxygen.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Infants with congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract, phrenic nerve damage, diaphragmatic paralysis, esophageal perforation; infants with congenital or acquired neurological deficit (including significant intraventricular hemorrhage greater than Grade II), neonatal seizure; infants with significant congenital heart disease (including symptomatic PDA); infant with congenital anomalies of the diaphragm; infant with congenital anomalies of the respiratory tracts (e.g. Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation (CCAM)) infants requiring ongoing treatment for sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), antibiotics for lung infections, narcotic analgesics, or gastric motility agents will be excluded. Infants on nasal CPAP and requiring more than 35% oxygen will be excluded from the study. Infants with significant gastric residuals and vomiting, infants with facial anomalies, infants with pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum, and infants in the immediate postoperative period will be excluded. Infants with nasal excoriations will be excluded from the study as they may be electively placed on the RAM cannula to prevent further nasal trauma.

Sites / Locations

  • Sunnybrook Health Science CentreRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Arm Label

CPAP with binasal prongs

CPAP with RAM cannula

Arm Description

Edi will be recorded while the infant is on nasal CPAP with the binasal prongs, with a PEEP of 5-8 cm H2O, for 2 hours. Then, the infant will be switched the interface to the RAM cannula, with a PEEP 2 cmH2O higher, during 2 hours.

Edi will be recorded while the infant is on nasal CPAP with the RAM cannula with a PEEP 2 cmH20 higher than the levels the infant was receiving before starting the study protocol, for 2 hours. Then, the infant will be switched the interface to the binasal prongs with a PEEP between 5-8 cmH2O, during 2 hours.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Differences in Edi min between CPAP with binasal prongs versus with the RAM cannula
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Difference in neural respiratory rate
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
Difference in neural inspiratory time
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
Difference in Edi peak
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
Difference in transcutaneous pCO2
Measured difference in transcutaneous pCO2 between the 2 different respiratory support modes(nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
Difference in number of apnea episodes
Difference in number of apnea episodes between the 2 different respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
Needs of oxygen
Needs of O2 measured by FiO2 on the 2 different respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).

Full Information

First Posted
April 17, 2017
Last Updated
September 19, 2018
Sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03121781
Brief Title
Diaphragm Electrical Activity of Preterm Infants on nCPAP With Binasal Prongs Versus RAM Cannula
Official Title
Effect of Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) With RAM Cannula Versus Standard Binasal Prongs on Diaphragm Electrical Activity in Very Low Birth Weight (VLBW) Preterm Infants
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
November 1, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 31, 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2019 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Preterm babies have immature lungs and frequent pauses in their breathing which often necessitates breathing support. Nasal Continuous Positive Airway Pressure (nCPAP) is one of the most commonly used tools, but the standard interfaces (prongs or mask) may cause nasal-septal injury and discomfort. The RAM cannula is another interface that consists in soft and curved prongs to avoid this nasal injury, but as the seal is not 100%, suboptimal delivery of airway distending pressure could result if they are used to deliver CPAP, as compared to standard interfaces. The investigators plan to study very low birth weight preterm babies who are generally well but require some support with their breathing. By inserting a special feeding tube with sensors into the stomach, the investigators can measure the electrical activity of the diaphragm (EAdi), which is an important muscle for breathing. By analyzing EAdi in babies receiving nCPAP either with prongs or ram cannula, the investigators will be able to measure and compare how each method of support affects a baby's breathing. This important study will help us determine the most appropriate breathing support for preterm babies.
Detailed Description
Continuous Positive Airway Pressure is one of the most researched and accepted methods of delivering NIV to term and preterm infants. Different interfaces have been used, most frequently binasal prongs or mask. The RAM cannula is a relatively new interface for delivering CPAP in preterm infants, specially to avoid nasal injury and discomfort. However, there are few studies in artificial models with different results in term of the percentage of pressure that is really delivered when we use the RAM cannula. The objective of this study is to to investigate in VLBW preterm infants who require respiratory support by nasal CPAP, whether or not using the RAM cannula as the interface will allow to provide the level of respiratory support equivalent to that with the traditional binasal prongs, measured by diaphragm electrical activity (Edi). The investigators hypothesize that in VLBW preterm infants with respiratory distress syndrome (RDS), the use of CPAP with RAM cannula as the interface may provide lower PEEP (positive end expiratory pressure) than set and increased resistance to gas flow, leading to increased respiratory effort for the patient as reflected by an increase in Edi. This study will help Neonatologist determine if the amount of support provided with the RAM cannula as interface is equivalent to the support we achieve with the standard interfaces, to select the patients that could benefit from using this interface. The investigators will be able to utilize this information to decide on the most appropriate respiratory support modality for preterm patients.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Preterm Infants, Respiratory Distress Syndrome, CPAP, RAM Cannula, Diaphragm Electrical Activity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Randomization will be done by sealed envelopes, ready for use once consent is obtained.Each envelope will contain a card with the assigned treatment group: protocol 1 or protocol 2. Protocol 1: we start the study on CPAP with binasal prongs. Edi will be recorded while the infant is on nasal CPAP with the binasal prongs, with a PEEP of 5-8 cm H2O, for 2 hours. Then, the infant will be switched the interface to the RAM cannula, with a PEEP 2 cmH2O higher, during 2 hours. Protocol 2: we start the study on CPAP with RAM cannula. Edi will be recorded while the infant is on nasal CPAP with the RAM cannula with a PEEP 2 cmH20 higher than the levels the infant was receiving before starting the study protocol, for 2 hours. Then, the infant will be switched the interface to the binasal prongs with a PEEP between 5-8 cmH2O, during 2 hours.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
CPAP with binasal prongs
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Edi will be recorded while the infant is on nasal CPAP with the binasal prongs, with a PEEP of 5-8 cm H2O, for 2 hours. Then, the infant will be switched the interface to the RAM cannula, with a PEEP 2 cmH2O higher, during 2 hours.
Arm Title
CPAP with RAM cannula
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Edi will be recorded while the infant is on nasal CPAP with the RAM cannula with a PEEP 2 cmH20 higher than the levels the infant was receiving before starting the study protocol, for 2 hours. Then, the infant will be switched the interface to the binasal prongs with a PEEP between 5-8 cmH2O, during 2 hours.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
respiratory support- interface
Intervention Description
change interface to RAM cannula
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
respiratory support- interface
Intervention Description
change interface to binasal prongs
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Differences in Edi min between CPAP with binasal prongs versus with the RAM cannula
Description
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula)
Time Frame
4 hours
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference in neural respiratory rate
Description
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
Time Frame
4 hours
Title
Difference in neural inspiratory time
Description
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
Time Frame
4 hours
Title
Difference in Edi peak
Description
Measured by the electrical activity of the diaphragm between respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
Time Frame
4 hours
Title
Difference in transcutaneous pCO2
Description
Measured difference in transcutaneous pCO2 between the 2 different respiratory support modes(nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
Time Frame
4 hours
Title
Difference in number of apnea episodes
Description
Difference in number of apnea episodes between the 2 different respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
Time Frame
4 hours
Title
Needs of oxygen
Description
Needs of O2 measured by FiO2 on the 2 different respiratory support modes (nCPAP with binasal prongs and RAM cannula).
Time Frame
4 hours

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
23 Weeks
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
32 Weeks
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Clinically stable preterm infants (defined as: cardiovascular stability with normal blood pressure and heart rate for GA and no recent increase in apneic episodes or spells and confirmed by the attending neonatologist) with birth weights less than 1500 gr and/or gestational age bellow 32 weeks, admitted to the NICU at Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre on nasal continuous positive airway pressure of 5 to 8 cmH20 support, for at least 48 h and requiring less than 35% of oxygen. Exclusion Criteria: Infants with congenital anomalies of the gastrointestinal tract, phrenic nerve damage, diaphragmatic paralysis, esophageal perforation; infants with congenital or acquired neurological deficit (including significant intraventricular hemorrhage greater than Grade II), neonatal seizure; infants with significant congenital heart disease (including symptomatic PDA); infant with congenital anomalies of the diaphragm; infant with congenital anomalies of the respiratory tracts (e.g. Congenital Cystic Adenomatoid Malformation (CCAM)) infants requiring ongoing treatment for sepsis, necrotizing enterocolitis (NEC), antibiotics for lung infections, narcotic analgesics, or gastric motility agents will be excluded. Infants on nasal CPAP and requiring more than 35% oxygen will be excluded from the study. Infants with significant gastric residuals and vomiting, infants with facial anomalies, infants with pneumothorax or pneumomediastinum, and infants in the immediate postoperative period will be excluded. Infants with nasal excoriations will be excluded from the study as they may be electively placed on the RAM cannula to prevent further nasal trauma.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Michael Dunn, MD
Phone
(416) 480-6100
Ext
87777
Email
michael.dunn@sunnybrook.ca
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Carolina Lopez-Sanguos, MD
Phone
6479265754
Email
caro_ls4@msn.com
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Dunn, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Staff Neonatologist - NICU
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Sunnybrook Health Science Centre
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N3M5
Country
Canada
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Dunn, MD
Phone
(416) 480-6100
Ext
87777
Email
michael.dunn@sunnybrook.ca

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Diaphragm Electrical Activity of Preterm Infants on nCPAP With Binasal Prongs Versus RAM Cannula

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs