Correlation of Imaging Findings With Clinical Findings and Patient Outcomes in Prostate Cancer
Primary Purpose
Prostate Cancer
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MRI guided biopsy
TRUS biopsy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Prostate Cancer focused on measuring TRUS biopsy, Pelvic MRI
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patients with a suspicion (elevated PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal exam)/ diagnosis of prostate cancer
Inclusion criteria for sub-group follow-up scans:
1a. Patients who have undergone standard TRUS biopsy or TRUS with targeted biopsy (i.e cognitive TRUS, MR-TRUS fusion or TRUS + in-gantry biopsy)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients with ferromagnetic or otherwise non-MRI compatible aneurysm clips.
- The presence of an implanted pacemaker or implanted defibrillator device.
- Patients with contraindications for MRI due to embedded foreign metallic objects. Bullets, shrapnel, metalwork fragments, or other metallic material adds unnecessary risk to the patient.
- Implanted medical device not described above that is not MRI-compatible;
- Known history of severe claustrophobia;
- For patients with known history of allergic reaction to magnetic resonance (MR) contrast material or abnormal kidney function (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 mL/min), a contrast enhanced exam will not be performed; however, a non-contrast exam may be performed;
- Minors will be excluded.
- Prisoners and members of other vulnerable populations will be excluded from this study as these populations will not provide any additional unique information to or uniquely benefit from the study.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
MRI guided biopsy + TRUS biopsy
Arm Description
Patients will undergo an MRI guided biopsy and standard trans-rectal ultrasonography-guided (TRUS) biopsy. Results will be compared to see which can more accurately diagnose and manage prostate cancer
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of patients with the most likely diagnosis based on the five-point scale - PIRADS
Prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) scale: 1. Benign; 2. Probably benign; 3. Indeterminate; 4. Probably malignant; 5. Malignant
Number of patients with true diagnosis based on biopsy pathology
1. Benign; 2. Probably benign; 3. Indeterminate; 4. Probably malignant; 5. Malignant
Secondary Outcome Measures
biopsy and MRI based diagnosis match in at least 8/10 patients
The score based on the true diagnosis and most likely diagnosis as agreed on by classifiers is the same in at least 80% of patients
Ratio of positive diagnosis as detected by pelvic MRI guided biopsy compared to standard TRUS biopsy
The diagnostic performance of MRI guided biopsy techniques will be compared with standard TRUS biopsy using a single sample of patients undergoing both biopsy techniques. It has been reported that MRI consistently detects a larger number of clinically significant prostate cancers (sensitivity - 0.91 for MRI-guided biopsy vs 0.76 for TRUS biopsy), while avoiding the detection of cancers that are clinically insignificant, as compared to TRUS biopsy.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03122470
First Posted
April 17, 2017
Last Updated
March 15, 2023
Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03122470
Brief Title
Correlation of Imaging Findings With Clinical Findings and Patient Outcomes in Prostate Cancer
Official Title
Assessment of Advanced Imaging Techniques in the Evaluation and Management of Prostate Cancer
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
PI departure - study not conducted.
Study Start Date
August 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 20, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
June 20, 2023 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
MRI is being increasingly relied upon for detection, staging and management of prostate cancer. In this study patients with risk of prostate cancer will be recommended to have a pelvic MRI prior to the standard biopsy of the prostate and standard treatment of any detected prostate cancer. The results of the MRI will be compared to standard diagnosis techniques to see if cancer can be more accurately detected.
Detailed Description
The study team hypothesizes that strategic use of advanced MRI methods will provide a more accurate and less invasive approach for diagnosis and management of prostate cancer. The primary objectives are:
To develop advanced MRI methods and optimal MRI protocols for detection, staging, and follow-up of prostate cancer.
To evaluate the diagnostic performance of MRI-guided biopsy methods and correlate MRI findings with the pathological grade of cancer.
To correlate prostate MRI findings and biopsy results with patient progress and outcomes.
To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of MRI in disease re-classification in patients on active surveillance.
Secondary Objectives:
To apply computer-aided advanced image analytic techniques (Computer-assisted diagnostics- CAD) to extract MRI features of patient clinical scans that correlate with diagnosis and grade of prostate cancer.
To study MRI features of lesions that mimic prostate cancer on imaging eg - chronic prostatitis, post treatment changes.
To evaluate the impact of MRI in decision making and choice of treatment by physicians and patients.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Prostate Cancer
Keywords
TRUS biopsy, Pelvic MRI
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
MRI guided biopsy + TRUS biopsy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will undergo an MRI guided biopsy and standard trans-rectal ultrasonography-guided (TRUS) biopsy. Results will be compared to see which can more accurately diagnose and manage prostate cancer
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
MRI guided biopsy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Prostate MRI, Pelvic MRI
Intervention Description
The MRI guided biopsy will preferentially be performed using a 3 tesla (3T) Siemens Verio, or 3T Siemens Skyra machine. The multiparametric MRI exam will consist of T1-, T2- and diffusion weighted imaging with or without post-contrast perfusion studies. magnetic resonance fingerprinting (MRF) will be performed before contrast injection. The MRI will be interpreted by two specified radiologists from the research team.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
TRUS biopsy
Other Intervention Name(s)
Prostate Biopsy
Intervention Description
The TRUS biopsy will be performed per current standard of care. Biopsy cores will be sent to pathology in separately labeled specimen cups. The final pathological results will be compared with pre-biopsy MRI findings.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of patients with the most likely diagnosis based on the five-point scale - PIRADS
Description
Prostate imaging reporting and data system (PIRADS) scale: 1. Benign; 2. Probably benign; 3. Indeterminate; 4. Probably malignant; 5. Malignant
Time Frame
Up to two weeks after MRI
Title
Number of patients with true diagnosis based on biopsy pathology
Description
1. Benign; 2. Probably benign; 3. Indeterminate; 4. Probably malignant; 5. Malignant
Time Frame
Up to two weeks after MRI
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
biopsy and MRI based diagnosis match in at least 8/10 patients
Description
The score based on the true diagnosis and most likely diagnosis as agreed on by classifiers is the same in at least 80% of patients
Time Frame
Up to two weeks after MRI
Title
Ratio of positive diagnosis as detected by pelvic MRI guided biopsy compared to standard TRUS biopsy
Description
The diagnostic performance of MRI guided biopsy techniques will be compared with standard TRUS biopsy using a single sample of patients undergoing both biopsy techniques. It has been reported that MRI consistently detects a larger number of clinically significant prostate cancers (sensitivity - 0.91 for MRI-guided biopsy vs 0.76 for TRUS biopsy), while avoiding the detection of cancers that are clinically insignificant, as compared to TRUS biopsy.
Time Frame
Up to two weeks after MRI
10. Eligibility
Sex
Male
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
90 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patients with a suspicion (elevated PSA and/or abnormal digital rectal exam)/ diagnosis of prostate cancer
Inclusion criteria for sub-group follow-up scans:
1a. Patients who have undergone standard TRUS biopsy or TRUS with targeted biopsy (i.e cognitive TRUS, MR-TRUS fusion or TRUS + in-gantry biopsy)
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients with ferromagnetic or otherwise non-MRI compatible aneurysm clips.
The presence of an implanted pacemaker or implanted defibrillator device.
Patients with contraindications for MRI due to embedded foreign metallic objects. Bullets, shrapnel, metalwork fragments, or other metallic material adds unnecessary risk to the patient.
Implanted medical device not described above that is not MRI-compatible;
Known history of severe claustrophobia;
For patients with known history of allergic reaction to magnetic resonance (MR) contrast material or abnormal kidney function (glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 mL/min), a contrast enhanced exam will not be performed; however, a non-contrast exam may be performed;
Minors will be excluded.
Prisoners and members of other vulnerable populations will be excluded from this study as these populations will not provide any additional unique information to or uniquely benefit from the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Lee Ponsky, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Cancer Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Correlation of Imaging Findings With Clinical Findings and Patient Outcomes in Prostate Cancer
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs