search
Back to results

A Phase I/III Study to Evaluate Efficacy, PK and Safety Between CT-P13 SC and CT-P13 IV in Patients With Active RA

Primary Purpose

Rheumatoid Arthritis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Korea, Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
CT-P13
CT-P13
CT-P13
CT-P13
CT-P13
CT-P13
Sponsored by
Celltrion
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Rheumatoid Arthritis

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patient is male or female between 18 and 75 years old, inclusive.
  • Patient has a diagnosis of RA according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria for at least 6 months
  • Patient has active disease as defined by the presence of 6 or more swollen joints (of 28 assessed), 6 or more tender joints (of 28 assessed) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration >0.6 mg/dL
  • Patient who completed at least 3 months of treatment of oral or parenteral dosing with Methotrexate between 12.5 to 25 mg/kg (between 10 to 25 mg/week in Korea) and on stable dosing with Methotrexate for at least 4 weeks prior to the first administration of the study drug.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient who has previously received a biological agent for the treatment of RA and/or a TNFα inhibitor for the treatment of other disease
  • Patient who has allergies to any of the excipients of infliximab or any other murine and/or human proteins or patient with a hypersensitivity to immunoglobulin product
  • Patient who had current or past history of chronic infection with hepatitis C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 or -2 or current infection with hepatitis B
  • Patient who had acute infection requiring oral antibiotics within 2 weeks or parenteral injection of antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to the first administration of the study drug, other serious infection within 6 months prior to the first administration of study drug or recurrent herpes zoster or other chronic or recurrent infection within 6 weeks prior to the first administration of the study drug.
  • Patient who had an indeterminate result for interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) or latent tuberculosis (TB) at Screening. For Part 2, if IGRA result was indeterminate at Screening, 1 retest was possible during the screening. If the repeated IGRA result was negative, the patient could be included in the study.

Sites / Locations

  • Hanyang University Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm 5

Arm 6

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Cohort 1: CT-P13 IV 3 mg/kg

Cohort 2: CT-P13 SC 90 mg

Cohort 3: CT-P13 SC 120 mg

Cohort 4: CT-P13 SC 180 mg

Arm 1: CT-P13 SC 120 mg

Arm 2: CT-P13 IV 3 mg/kg

Arm Description

CT-P13 Intravenous (IV) (Infliximab), 3 mg/kg by IV infusion every 8 weeks (Part 1)

CT-P13 Subcutaneous (SC) (Infliximab), 90 mg by SC injection every other week (Part 1)

CT-P13 SC (Infliximab), 120 mg by SC injection every other week (Part 1)

CT-P13 SC (Infliximab), 180 mg by SC injection every other week (Part 1)

CT-P13 SC (Infliximab), 120 mg by SC injection every other week with placebo intravenous infusion at Weeks 6, 14 and 22 (Part 2)

CT-P13 IV (Infliximab), 3 mg/kg by IV infusion every 8 weeks with placebo subcutaneous injection at Week 6 and every 2 weeks thereafter up to Week 28 (Part 2)

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUCτ) of Infliximab at Steady State (Part 1)
For Part 1, the primary pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoint of the AUCτ (area under the concentration-time curve) at steady state between Week 22 and Week 30 was analyzed in patients who received all doses (full) of study drug up to Week 30 (prior to Week 30) in the PK population. All patients in SC cohorts were randomly assigned at Week 14 in a 1:1 ratio to either Group A or B for PK monitoring visit period (Week 22 and Week 30). Therefore, AUCτ was calculated at Week 22 for Cohort 1: CT-P13 IV 3 mg/kg, Weeks 22 and 26 for Group A of SC cohorts, and Weeks 24 and 28 for Group B of SC cohorts.
Change From Baseline of Disease Activity Score Using 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) (CRP) at Week 22 (Part 2)
For Part 2, the primary efficacy endpoint was to demonstrate that CT-P13 SC 120 mg is non-inferior to CT-P13 IV 3 mg/kg at Week 22, as determined by clinical response according to mean change from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 22, using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). Change from baseline for ANCOVA was defined as decrease from baseline and calculated as (DAS28 [CRP] at baseline - DAS28 [CRP] at Week 22). DAS28 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) equals(=) (0.56 multiplied by [*] the square root [√] of TJC28 [tender joint count]) plus (+) (0.28 * √ of SJC28 [swollen joint count]) + (0.36 * the natural logarithm [ln](CRP [mg/L] + 1)) + (0.014 * patient global disease activity [GH] on visual analogue assessment [VAS]) + 0.96. DAS28 (CRP) provides a number on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of patients with RA. DAS28 (CRP) score above 5.1 indicates high disease activity, whereas DAS28 (CRP) score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Mean Actual Value of Disease Activity Score Using 28 Joint Counts (DAS28 [CRP]) (Part 2)
The secondary endpoint was defined as descriptive statistics of actual value in disease activity measured by DAS28 (CRP) up to Week 54. The results up to Week 6 represented the efficacy of CT-P13 IV loading dose (3 mg/kg) regardless of randomized treatment arm (CT-P13 SC or CT-P13 IV) in both treatment arms. DAS28 (CRP) was calculated according to the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = (0.56* √ of TJC28) + (0.28 * √ of SJC28) + (0.36 * ln(CRP [mg/L] + 1)) + (0.014 * GH on VAS) + 0.96. DAS28 (CRP) provides a number on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the patients with RA. DAS28 (CRP) score above 5.1 indicates high disease activity, whereas DAS28 (CRP) score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity.
Number of Patients Achieving Clinical Response According to American College of Rheumatology 20% Response (ACR20) (Part 2)
The secondary endpoint was defined as number of patients achieving clinical response according to ACR20 (20% response, defined by ACR) between CT-P13 SC and CT-P13 IV groups. The results up to Week 6 represented the efficacy of CT-P13 IV loading dose (3 mg/kg) regardless of randomized treatment arm (CT-P13 SC or CT-P13 IV). Responder according to the ACR20 criteria defined as, if they are fulfilled, a decrease of at least 20% in number of tender joints and swollen joints (0-28), and 20% improvement in 3 of the followings: patient assessment of pain on VAS (0-100 mm), patient global assessment of disease activity on VAS (0-100 mm) and physician global assessment of disease activity on VAS (0-100 mm), health assessment questionnaire disability index and CRP or ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate).
Observed Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Infliximab (Part 2)
For evaluation of pharmacokinetics (PK), the secondary endpoint was defined as the analysis of trough concentration (concentration before the next study drug administration) of Infliximab up to Week 54. The samples were collected at Weeks 0, 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks up to Week 54. During PK monitoring visit (Weeks 22-30), samples were collected every 2 weeks according steady state PK sampling time point. All patients were randomly assigned at Week 14 in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to one of 4 groups (Groups A, B, C or D) for PK monitoring visit period. No PK results were obtained at Weeks 6 and 14 for SC group and Weeks 12, 20, 24, 26 and 28 for IV group due to 2 weeks and 8 weeks dosing interval, respectively.
Mean Actual Value in Serum CRP Concentration (Pharmacodynamic Parameter) (Part 2)
For evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD), the secondary endpoint was defined as concentration of CRP between 2 treatment groups up to Week 54. The blood samples for CRP were collected at Weeks 0, 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks up to Week 54. Patient who received the other treatment than that to which they were assigned at any point was defined as mis-randomized. One patient in IV group was mis-randomized and analyzed as SC group for PD analysis.

Full Information

First Posted
May 7, 2017
Last Updated
March 27, 2020
Sponsor
Celltrion
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03147248
Brief Title
A Phase I/III Study to Evaluate Efficacy, PK and Safety Between CT-P13 SC and CT-P13 IV in Patients With Active RA
Official Title
A Randomized, Parallel-Group, Phase I/III Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Safety Between Subcutaneous CT-P13 and Intravenous CT-P13 in Patients With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 12, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 21, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 15, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Celltrion

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a Phase I/III Study to Evaluate Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Safety between CT-P13 SC and CT-P13 IV in Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).
Detailed Description
A new subcutaneous infliximab formulation is developed by Celltrion, Inc. as an alternative to the intravenous regimen where subcutaneous infliximab injection typically takes less than 2 minutes. The availability of a subcutaneous formulation of infliximab would increase the treatment options available to patients, particularly those wishing to self-administer their therapy. This Phase I/III Study randomized, double-blinded (Part 2 only), multicenter, parallel-group study was designed to evaluate Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics and Safety between Subcutaneous CT-P13 and Intravenous CT-P13 in Patients with Active RA.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Rheumatoid Arthritis

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Part 1 was open label.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
407 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Cohort 1: CT-P13 IV 3 mg/kg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
CT-P13 Intravenous (IV) (Infliximab), 3 mg/kg by IV infusion every 8 weeks (Part 1)
Arm Title
Cohort 2: CT-P13 SC 90 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
CT-P13 Subcutaneous (SC) (Infliximab), 90 mg by SC injection every other week (Part 1)
Arm Title
Cohort 3: CT-P13 SC 120 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
CT-P13 SC (Infliximab), 120 mg by SC injection every other week (Part 1)
Arm Title
Cohort 4: CT-P13 SC 180 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
CT-P13 SC (Infliximab), 180 mg by SC injection every other week (Part 1)
Arm Title
Arm 1: CT-P13 SC 120 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
CT-P13 SC (Infliximab), 120 mg by SC injection every other week with placebo intravenous infusion at Weeks 6, 14 and 22 (Part 2)
Arm Title
Arm 2: CT-P13 IV 3 mg/kg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
CT-P13 IV (Infliximab), 3 mg/kg by IV infusion every 8 weeks with placebo subcutaneous injection at Week 6 and every 2 weeks thereafter up to Week 28 (Part 2)
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
CT-P13
Other Intervention Name(s)
Infliximab
Intervention Description
CT-P13 (3 mg/kg) by IV infusion administered as a 2 hour IV infusion per dose every 8 weeks
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
CT-P13
Other Intervention Name(s)
Infliximab
Intervention Description
CT-P13 (90 mg) by single SC injection every other week
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
CT-P13
Other Intervention Name(s)
Infliximab
Intervention Description
CT-P13 (120 mg) by single SC injection every other week
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
CT-P13
Other Intervention Name(s)
Infliximab
Intervention Description
CT-P13 (180 mg) by double SC 90 mg injections every other week
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
CT-P13
Other Intervention Name(s)
Infliximab
Intervention Description
CT-P13 (120 mg) by single SC injection every other week with placebo IV at Weeks 6, 14 and 22.
Intervention Type
Biological
Intervention Name(s)
CT-P13
Other Intervention Name(s)
Infliximab
Intervention Description
CT-P13 (3 mg/kg) by IV infusion administered as a 2 hour IV infusion per dose every 8 weeks with placebo SC at Week 6 and every other week thereafter up to Week 28
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Area Under the Concentration-time Curve (AUCτ) of Infliximab at Steady State (Part 1)
Description
For Part 1, the primary pharmacokinetic (PK) endpoint of the AUCτ (area under the concentration-time curve) at steady state between Week 22 and Week 30 was analyzed in patients who received all doses (full) of study drug up to Week 30 (prior to Week 30) in the PK population. All patients in SC cohorts were randomly assigned at Week 14 in a 1:1 ratio to either Group A or B for PK monitoring visit period (Week 22 and Week 30). Therefore, AUCτ was calculated at Week 22 for Cohort 1: CT-P13 IV 3 mg/kg, Weeks 22 and 26 for Group A of SC cohorts, and Weeks 24 and 28 for Group B of SC cohorts.
Time Frame
Weeks 22 (pre-dose to 216 hours post-dose), 24 (14 days after start of administration [SOA] at Week 22), 26 (pre-dose) and 28 (42 days after SOA at Week 22), and Week 30 (pre-dose)
Title
Change From Baseline of Disease Activity Score Using 28 Joint Counts (DAS28) (CRP) at Week 22 (Part 2)
Description
For Part 2, the primary efficacy endpoint was to demonstrate that CT-P13 SC 120 mg is non-inferior to CT-P13 IV 3 mg/kg at Week 22, as determined by clinical response according to mean change from baseline in DAS28 (CRP) at Week 22, using Analysis of Covariance (ANCOVA). Change from baseline for ANCOVA was defined as decrease from baseline and calculated as (DAS28 [CRP] at baseline - DAS28 [CRP] at Week 22). DAS28 (CRP) was calculated using the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) equals(=) (0.56 multiplied by [*] the square root [√] of TJC28 [tender joint count]) plus (+) (0.28 * √ of SJC28 [swollen joint count]) + (0.36 * the natural logarithm [ln](CRP [mg/L] + 1)) + (0.014 * patient global disease activity [GH] on visual analogue assessment [VAS]) + 0.96. DAS28 (CRP) provides a number on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of patients with RA. DAS28 (CRP) score above 5.1 indicates high disease activity, whereas DAS28 (CRP) score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity.
Time Frame
Week 22
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Mean Actual Value of Disease Activity Score Using 28 Joint Counts (DAS28 [CRP]) (Part 2)
Description
The secondary endpoint was defined as descriptive statistics of actual value in disease activity measured by DAS28 (CRP) up to Week 54. The results up to Week 6 represented the efficacy of CT-P13 IV loading dose (3 mg/kg) regardless of randomized treatment arm (CT-P13 SC or CT-P13 IV) in both treatment arms. DAS28 (CRP) was calculated according to the following formula: DAS28 (CRP) = (0.56* √ of TJC28) + (0.28 * √ of SJC28) + (0.36 * ln(CRP [mg/L] + 1)) + (0.014 * GH on VAS) + 0.96. DAS28 (CRP) provides a number on a scale from 0 to 10 indicating the current activity of the patients with RA. DAS28 (CRP) score above 5.1 indicates high disease activity, whereas DAS28 (CRP) score below 3.2 indicates low disease activity.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, Week 14, Week 22, Week 30, and Week 54
Title
Number of Patients Achieving Clinical Response According to American College of Rheumatology 20% Response (ACR20) (Part 2)
Description
The secondary endpoint was defined as number of patients achieving clinical response according to ACR20 (20% response, defined by ACR) between CT-P13 SC and CT-P13 IV groups. The results up to Week 6 represented the efficacy of CT-P13 IV loading dose (3 mg/kg) regardless of randomized treatment arm (CT-P13 SC or CT-P13 IV). Responder according to the ACR20 criteria defined as, if they are fulfilled, a decrease of at least 20% in number of tender joints and swollen joints (0-28), and 20% improvement in 3 of the followings: patient assessment of pain on VAS (0-100 mm), patient global assessment of disease activity on VAS (0-100 mm) and physician global assessment of disease activity on VAS (0-100 mm), health assessment questionnaire disability index and CRP or ESR (erythrocyte sedimentation rate).
Time Frame
Week 2, Week 6, Week 14, Week 22, Week 30, and Week 54
Title
Observed Trough Serum Concentration (Ctrough) of Infliximab (Part 2)
Description
For evaluation of pharmacokinetics (PK), the secondary endpoint was defined as the analysis of trough concentration (concentration before the next study drug administration) of Infliximab up to Week 54. The samples were collected at Weeks 0, 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks up to Week 54. During PK monitoring visit (Weeks 22-30), samples were collected every 2 weeks according steady state PK sampling time point. All patients were randomly assigned at Week 14 in a 1:1:1:1 ratio to one of 4 groups (Groups A, B, C or D) for PK monitoring visit period. No PK results were obtained at Weeks 6 and 14 for SC group and Weeks 12, 20, 24, 26 and 28 for IV group due to 2 weeks and 8 weeks dosing interval, respectively.
Time Frame
SC group: Weeks 0, 2, 12, 20, 22, 24, 26, 28, 36, 44, and 52; IV group: Weeks 0, 2, 6, 14, 22, 36, 44, and 52
Title
Mean Actual Value in Serum CRP Concentration (Pharmacodynamic Parameter) (Part 2)
Description
For evaluation of pharmacodynamic (PD), the secondary endpoint was defined as concentration of CRP between 2 treatment groups up to Week 54. The blood samples for CRP were collected at Weeks 0, 2 and 6, and every 8 weeks up to Week 54. Patient who received the other treatment than that to which they were assigned at any point was defined as mis-randomized. One patient in IV group was mis-randomized and analyzed as SC group for PD analysis.
Time Frame
Baseline, Week 2, Week 6, Week 14, Week 22, Week 30, Week 38, Week 46, and Week 54

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patient is male or female between 18 and 75 years old, inclusive. Patient has a diagnosis of RA according to the 2010 American College of Rheumatology (ACR)/European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) classification criteria for at least 6 months Patient has active disease as defined by the presence of 6 or more swollen joints (of 28 assessed), 6 or more tender joints (of 28 assessed) and serum C-reactive protein (CRP) concentration >0.6 mg/dL Patient who completed at least 3 months of treatment of oral or parenteral dosing with Methotrexate between 12.5 to 25 mg/kg (between 10 to 25 mg/week in Korea) and on stable dosing with Methotrexate for at least 4 weeks prior to the first administration of the study drug. Exclusion Criteria: Patient who has previously received a biological agent for the treatment of RA and/or a TNFα inhibitor for the treatment of other disease Patient who has allergies to any of the excipients of infliximab or any other murine and/or human proteins or patient with a hypersensitivity to immunoglobulin product Patient who had current or past history of chronic infection with hepatitis C or human immunodeficiency virus (HIV)-1 or -2 or current infection with hepatitis B Patient who had acute infection requiring oral antibiotics within 2 weeks or parenteral injection of antibiotics within 4 weeks prior to the first administration of the study drug, other serious infection within 6 months prior to the first administration of study drug or recurrent herpes zoster or other chronic or recurrent infection within 6 weeks prior to the first administration of the study drug. Patient who had an indeterminate result for interferon-γ release assay (IGRA) or latent tuberculosis (TB) at Screening. For Part 2, if IGRA result was indeterminate at Screening, 1 retest was possible during the screening. If the repeated IGRA result was negative, the patient could be included in the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
MoonSun Choi
Organizational Affiliation
Celltrion
Official's Role
Study Chair
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hanyang University Medical Center
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
33230526
Citation
Westhovens R, Wiland P, Zawadzki M, Ivanova D, Kasay AB, El-Khouri EC, Balazs E, Shevchuk S, Eliseeva L, Stanislavchuk M, Yatsyshyn R, Hrycaj P, Jaworski J, Zhdan V, Trefler J, Shesternya P, Lee SJ, Kim SH, Suh JH, Lee SG, Han NR, Yoo DH. Efficacy, pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous versus intravenous CT-P13 in rheumatoid arthritis: a randomized phase I/III trial. Rheumatology (Oxford). 2021 May 14;60(5):2277-2287. doi: 10.1093/rheumatology/keaa580.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Phase I/III Study to Evaluate Efficacy, PK and Safety Between CT-P13 SC and CT-P13 IV in Patients With Active RA

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs