search
Back to results

RFA for Malignant Biliary Obstruction

Primary Purpose

Cholangiocarcinoma, Pancreas Cancer

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Czechia
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Radiofrequency ablation
Biliary stenting
Sponsored by
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Cholangiocarcinoma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age over 18
  • Pathologically confirmed malignant bile duct obstruction (cholangiocarcinoma or pancreatic cancer)
  • Laboratory signs of biliary obstruction
  • Non-resectable disease (distant metastasis, locally advanced disease, patient related factors) based on a multidisciplinary team decision
  • Capability of giving informed consent
  • Life expectancy greater than 3 months

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unstable for ERC
  • Inability to give informed consent
  • Pregnancy
  • Uncorrected coagulopathy
  • Concomitant biliary oncological endoluminal therapy (photodynamic therapy, brachytherapy)
  • Cardiac pacemaker

Sites / Locations

  • Department of Gastroenterology and HepatologyRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

RFA plus stenting

Stenting alone

Arm Description

Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation followed by biliary stenting

Biliary stenting alone

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Survival
number of days/months of survival (being alive) post intervention

Secondary Outcome Measures

Stent patency
number of days/months of patent stent (not occluded) post intervention
Complications
number of complications related to procedure (bleeding, perforation, cholangitis will be combined to report as a complication)
Quality of life
validated questionnaire investigating quality of live post intervention
Augmentation of antitumor immunity
serum level of HSP 70 and selected cytokines will be measured from blood

Full Information

First Posted
May 14, 2017
Last Updated
May 25, 2017
Sponsor
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03166436
Brief Title
RFA for Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Official Title
Radiofrequency Ablation Plus Stenting Versus Stenting Alone for Treatment of Malignant Biliary Obstruction
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
June 8, 2017 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
May 8, 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
May 8, 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Pancreatic cancer and cholangiocarcinoma are the most common causes of malignant biliary obstruction. They are diseases of increasing incidence and unfavorable prognosis. Only a minority of patients have a localized disease and are indicated for surgery with a chance of long-term survival. Locally advanced and metastatic tumors are treated with palliative chemotherapy or chemoradiotherapy; the results of such treatments are unsatisfactory. The average survival of patients with unresectable disease is 6 months and only 5 - 10 % of patients survive 5 years. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy can be used, however only with a palliative effect. Biliary drainage is an integral part of palliative treatment. Endoscopically or percutaneously placed stents improve quality of life, decrease cholestasis and pruritus, but do not significantly improve survival. Biliary stents get occluded over time, possibly resulting in acute cholangitis and require repeated replacement. Endoluminal biliary photodynamic therapy (PDT) and radiofrequency ablation (RFA), locally active endoscopic methods, have been increasingly used in recent years in palliative treatment of patients with malignant biliary obstruction. In photodynamic therapy, improved survival has been shown in two randomized controlled trials; however the technique suffers from technical complexity, high cost and low availability. In RFA, application of low voltage high frequency current during radiofrequency ablation results in tissue destruction by heat. Its antitumor effect may also be related to systemic changes in antitumor immunity. The use of endoluminal biliary RFA has so far been reported only in small retrospective cohorts of patients. The aim of this randomized study is to compare efficacy of RFA plus stenting to stenting alone in palliative treatment of malignant biliary obstruction with survival as primary outcome. Secondary outcomes are stent patency, immediate and late complications, quality of life and effects on anti-tumor immunity in the RFA group.
Detailed Description
Cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer are by far the two most common causes of malignant bile duct obstruction. Cholangiocarcinoma is an adenocarcinoma originating in the bile duct whereas pancreatic cancer is an adenocarcinoma derived from pancreatic ductal cells. The incidence rates of both diseases have been rising over the past decades. Both diseases still have a very unfavorable prognosis with 5 year survival rates as low as 5-10%. Surgery represents the only therapeutic modality with a curative potential, however most patients are non-eligible for surgical treatment at the time of diagnosis. Patients present with either distant metastases, have a locally advanced disease or are unfit for surgery because of advanced age and/or co-morbidities. The prognosis of patients with unresectable bile duct or pancreatic cancer is poor with a median survival time of about 6 months. Chemotherapy and radiotherapy provide only a slight survival benefit and thus have only palliative intent. Most patients with cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer present with bile duct obstruction in the course of their disease. Bile duct obstruction relief is an important part of palliation therapy. Endoscopic retrograde cholangiography with bile duct stenting is the method of choice with a high rate of technical success and a lower complication rate compared to surgery. Biliary stents are either plastic or metal (self-expandable metal stents, SEMS). SEMS can be covered, uncovered or partially covered. Plastic stents are cheaper and easier to exchange but have a shorter patency compared to metal stents. Metal stents have been shown to improve survival of patients with proximal malignant biliary obstruction. Both plastic and metal become occluded in a significant proportion of patients, especially in those with a longer life expectancy. Stent occlusion is often an acute event leading to sepsis and a prompt intervention is required. Failure of achieving adequate drainage may result in severe cholangitis and death. Photodynamic therapy has been used for bile duct tumor ablation for more than a decade. It is a two stage process in which a photosensitizing agent is taken by the tumor tissue and is than activated by light of a specific wave length. Two randomized trials showed improved survival of patients treated with PDT plus stenting compared to stenting alone. However, side effects of photodynamic therapy such as phototoxicity, high costs and limited availability restrict the use of PDT. Radiofrequency ablation (RFA), by means of alternating high-frequency current, generates heat that results in coagulation necrosis of tissue. It is widely used to treat liver tumors or dysplastic Barrett's esophagus. Endoluminal biliary RFA has become possible upon availability of narrow ERCP RFA catheters and represents a new modality of intraductal tumor ablation. The probe can be introduced over a 0.035-inch wire through a standard endoscope, thus allowing endoscopic ablation of malignant bile duct obstruction. The bipolar catheter has multiple circumferential electrodes at the distal tip. The coagulative effect is delivered in the area between the two electrodes. A few human non-randomized case series investigating the safety and efficiency of RFA were reported. Steel at al reported their results in 22 patients with malignant bile duct obstruction (16 patients with pancreatic cancer and 6 patients with cholangiocarcinoma). Immediate, 30 day complication rates and 90 day stent patency were evaluated as primary parameters. Intraductal RFA was followed by a SEMS placement. One patient developed asymptomatic elevation of amylase, one patients developed rigors and two patients developed cholecystitis requiring cholecystectomy. All except 3 patients achieved 90 day stent patency. In a recent study of Sharaiha et al, 26 patients with pancreatic or bile duct cancer underwent RFA followed by plastic or metal stent placement. They were compared to 40 matched controls who underwent only stenting. Technical success rate was 100%. Multivariable Cox proportional regression analysis showed RFA to be an independent predictor of survival [HR 0.29 (0.11-0.76), p = 0.012] together with age and receipt of chemotherapy [HR 1.04 (1.01-1.07), p = 0.011; HR 0.26 (0.10-0.70), p = 0.007]. Surprisingly, SEMS patency rates were the same across all groups. In an Austrian national retrospective study, 84 ablations were performed in 58 patients in 11 centers. Cholangiocarcinoma was present in 45 patients. Technical feasibility was 100%, however multiple complications occurred (1 liver infarct, 5 cholangitis, 3 hemobilia, 2 sepsis, 1 gall-bladder empyema, 1 liver coma). RFA was also investigated in pancreatic cancers only. In a retrospective comparison of 23 patients and 46 controls, the median survival was better in the RFA group (226 vs. 123 days, p=0,01). The median stent patency was not different. The safety profile of RFA seems to be acceptable, however severe complications have occured. In the study of Tal et al, 3 cases of bleeding were reported, two of them resulted in death. In all of these patients, plastic stents were used. Increasing evidence indicates that RFA might stimulate anti-tumor immunity. Active anti-cancer immune responses depend on efficient presentation of tumor antigens and cytokine-mediated stimulatory signaling. Tumor cells are generally regarded as poor stimulators of T-cells. In contrast, antigen-presenting cells (APCs) are highly specialized in this function and are therefore important in the process of stimulation of T-cell responses to tumors. RFA has been shown to stimulate anti-tumor immunity through the induction of heat shock proteins, especially HSP 70. HSPs have the capacity to affect the immunogenicity of tumor cells, to chaperone antigenic peptides and deliver them into APCs, thus activate and regulate innate and adaptive immunity. Based on the available evidence, RFA seems to be a technically feasible technique of malignant bile duct stricture ablation with a favorable safety profile. Retrospective case series have reported improved stent patency and survival in cholangiocarcinoma and pancreatic cancer patients following RFA. Thus, endoluminal RFA may represent a novel treatment modality in patients with malignant biliary obstruction. For this to happen, however, prospectively obtained comparative data with established treatment, i.e. biliary stenting, regarding safety and efficiency are necessary. The investigators aim to compare endoscopic radiofrequency ablation plus stenting vs. stenting alone for malignant bile duct obstruction not eligible for surgical resection in a randomized controlled trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cholangiocarcinoma, Pancreas Cancer

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Randomized controlled study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
140 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
RFA plus stenting
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Endoluminal radiofrequency ablation followed by biliary stenting
Arm Title
Stenting alone
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Biliary stenting alone
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Radiofrequency ablation
Intervention Description
radiofrequency ablation
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Biliary stenting
Intervention Description
biliary stenting
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Survival
Description
number of days/months of survival (being alive) post intervention
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Stent patency
Description
number of days/months of patent stent (not occluded) post intervention
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Complications
Description
number of complications related to procedure (bleeding, perforation, cholangitis will be combined to report as a complication)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Quality of life
Description
validated questionnaire investigating quality of live post intervention
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Augmentation of antitumor immunity
Description
serum level of HSP 70 and selected cytokines will be measured from blood
Time Frame
30 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Age over 18 Pathologically confirmed malignant bile duct obstruction (cholangiocarcinoma or pancreatic cancer) Laboratory signs of biliary obstruction Non-resectable disease (distant metastasis, locally advanced disease, patient related factors) based on a multidisciplinary team decision Capability of giving informed consent Life expectancy greater than 3 months Exclusion Criteria: Unstable for ERC Inability to give informed consent Pregnancy Uncorrected coagulopathy Concomitant biliary oncological endoluminal therapy (photodynamic therapy, brachytherapy) Cardiac pacemaker
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Tomas Hucl, MD, PhD
Phone
00420261362600
Email
tomas.hucl@ikem.cz
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Petra Truxova, Ing
Phone
00420261362619
Email
petra.truxova@ikem.cz
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tomas Hucl, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Institute for Clinical and Experimental Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology
City
Prague
ZIP/Postal Code
14021
Country
Czechia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Tomas Hucl, MD, PhD
Phone
00420261362600
Email
tomas.hucl@ikem.cz
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Petra Truxova, Ing
Phone
00420261362619
Email
petra.truxova@ikem.cz

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24140396
Citation
Rizvi S, Gores GJ. Pathogenesis, diagnosis, and management of cholangiocarcinoma. Gastroenterology. 2013 Dec;145(6):1215-29. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2013.10.013. Epub 2013 Oct 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22895392
Citation
Khan SA, Davidson BR, Goldin RD, Heaton N, Karani J, Pereira SP, Rosenberg WM, Tait P, Taylor-Robinson SD, Thillainayagam AV, Thomas HC, Wasan H; British Society of Gastroenterology. Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of cholangiocarcinoma: an update. Gut. 2012 Dec;61(12):1657-69. doi: 10.1136/gutjnl-2011-301748. Epub 2012 Aug 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23350673
Citation
Rerknimitr R, Angsuwatcharakon P, Ratanachu-ek T, Khor CJ, Ponnudurai R, Moon JH, Seo DW, Pantongrag-Brown L, Sangchan A, Pisespongsa P, Akaraviputh T, Reddy ND, Maydeo A, Itoi T, Pausawasdi N, Punamiya S, Attasaranya S, Devereaux B, Ramchandani M, Goh KL; Asia-Pacific Working Group on Hepatobiliary Cancers. Asia-Pacific consensus recommendations for endoscopic and interventional management of hilar cholangiocarcinoma. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Apr;28(4):593-607. doi: 10.1111/jgh.12128.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21620466
Citation
Vincent A, Herman J, Schulick R, Hruban RH, Goggins M. Pancreatic cancer. Lancet. 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):607-20. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)62307-0. Epub 2011 May 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
1281903
Citation
Davids PH, Groen AK, Rauws EA, Tytgat GN, Huibregtse K. Randomised trial of self-expanding metal stents versus polyethylene stents for distal malignant biliary obstruction. Lancet. 1992 Dec 19-26;340(8834-8835):1488-92. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(92)92752-2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22595446
Citation
Sangchan A, Kongkasame W, Pugkhem A, Jenwitheesuk K, Mairiang P. Efficacy of metal and plastic stents in unresectable complex hilar cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized controlled trial. Gastrointest Endosc. 2012 Jul;76(1):93-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2012.02.048. Epub 2012 May 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14598251
Citation
Ortner ME, Caca K, Berr F, Liebetruth J, Mansmann U, Huster D, Voderholzer W, Schachschal G, Mossner J, Lochs H. Successful photodynamic therapy for nonresectable cholangiocarcinoma: a randomized prospective study. Gastroenterology. 2003 Nov;125(5):1355-63. doi: 10.1016/j.gastro.2003.07.015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16279895
Citation
Zoepf T, Jakobs R, Arnold JC, Apel D, Riemann JF. Palliation of nonresectable bile duct cancer: improved survival after photodynamic therapy. Am J Gastroenterol. 2005 Nov;100(11):2426-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2005.00318.x.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12018113
Citation
Curley SA, Izzo F. Radiofrequency ablation of primary and metastatic hepatic malignancies. Int J Clin Oncol. 2002 Apr;7(2):72-81. doi: 10.1007/s101470200010.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21679712
Citation
Shaheen NJ, Overholt BF, Sampliner RE, Wolfsen HC, Wang KK, Fleischer DE, Sharma VK, Eisen GM, Fennerty MB, Hunter JG, Bronner MP, Goldblum JR, Bennett AE, Mashimo H, Rothstein RI, Gordon SR, Edmundowicz SA, Madanick RD, Peery AF, Muthusamy VR, Chang KJ, Kimmey MB, Spechler SJ, Siddiqui AA, Souza RF, Infantolino A, Dumot JA, Falk GW, Galanko JA, Jobe BA, Hawes RH, Hoffman BJ, Sharma P, Chak A, Lightdale CJ. Durability of radiofrequency ablation in Barrett's esophagus with dysplasia. Gastroenterology. 2011 Aug;141(2):460-8. doi: 10.1053/j.gastro.2011.04.061. Epub 2011 May 6.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23273142
Citation
Zacharoulis D, Lazoura O, Sioka E, Potamianos S, Tzovaras G, Nicholls J, Koukoulis G, Habib N. Habib EndoHPB: a novel endobiliary radiofrequency ablation device. An experimental study. J Invest Surg. 2013 Feb;26(1):6-10. doi: 10.3109/08941939.2012.681832. Epub 2012 Dec 28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21184881
Citation
Steel AW, Postgate AJ, Khorsandi S, Nicholls J, Jiao L, Vlavianos P, Habib N, Westaby D. Endoscopically applied radiofrequency ablation appears to be safe in the treatment of malignant biliary obstruction. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Jan;73(1):149-53. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.09.031.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25033929
Citation
Sharaiha RZ, Natov N, Glockenberg KS, Widmer J, Gaidhane M, Kahaleh M. Comparison of metal stenting with radiofrequency ablation versus stenting alone for treating malignant biliary strictures: is there an added benefit? Dig Dis Sci. 2014 Dec;59(12):3099-102. doi: 10.1007/s10620-014-3264-6. Epub 2014 Jul 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21168839
Citation
Monga A, Gupta R, Ramchandani M, Rao GV, Santosh D, Reddy DN. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation of cholangiocarcinoma: new palliative treatment modality (with videos). Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Oct;74(4):935-7. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2010.10.018. Epub 2010 Dec 18. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24196547
Citation
Dolak W, Schreiber F, Schwaighofer H, Gschwantler M, Plieschnegger W, Ziachehabi A, Mayer A, Kramer L, Kopecky A, Schrutka-Kolbl C, Wolkersdorfer G, Madl C, Berr F, Trauner M, Puspok A; Austrian Biliary RFA Study Group. Endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for malignant biliary obstruction: a nationwide retrospective study of 84 consecutive applications. Surg Endosc. 2014 Mar;28(3):854-60. doi: 10.1007/s00464-013-3232-9. Epub 2013 Oct 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26038094
Citation
Kallis Y, Phillips N, Steel A, Kaltsidis H, Vlavianos P, Habib N, Westaby D. Analysis of Endoscopic Radiofrequency Ablation of Biliary Malignant Strictures in Pancreatic Cancer Suggests Potential Survival Benefit. Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Nov;60(11):3449-55. doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3731-8. Epub 2015 Jun 3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24527176
Citation
Tal AO, Vermehren J, Friedrich-Rust M, Bojunga J, Sarrazin C, Zeuzem S, Trojan J, Albert JG. Intraductal endoscopic radiofrequency ablation for the treatment of hilar non-resectable malignant bile duct obstruction. World J Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Jan 16;6(1):13-9. doi: 10.4253/wjge.v6.i1.13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26486336
Citation
Wu F. Heat-Based Tumor Ablation: Role of the Immune Response. Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;880:131-53. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-22536-4_8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16858185
Citation
Witzigmann H, Berr F, Ringel U, Caca K, Uhlmann D, Schoppmeyer K, Tannapfel A, Wittekind C, Mossner J, Hauss J, Wiedmann M. Surgical and palliative management and outcome in 184 patients with hilar cholangiocarcinoma: palliative photodynamic therapy plus stenting is comparable to r1/r2 resection. Ann Surg. 2006 Aug;244(2):230-9. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000217639.10331.47.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

RFA for Malignant Biliary Obstruction

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs