search
Back to results

Standard of Care Versus Hemopatch® During Liver Resection (IBERLIVER)

Primary Purpose

Liver Cancer, Hemorrhage Liver, Bile Leak

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Hemopatch
Standard of care
Sponsored by
Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional other trial for Liver Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Age: ≥18 years.
  • Patients with an indication for open liver resection (segmental or non-segmental).
  • Target bleeding site of generalized bleeding that persists on the cut surface of the liver in which hemostasis cannot be achieved by conventional methods.
  • Willing and able to complete the clinical trial procedures, as described in the protocol.
  • Signed written informed consent to participate in this clinical trial.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Presence of coagulation disorder, Klatskin tumour. Cirrhosis, re-hepatectomies and biliary resections
  • Concurrent participation in another clinical trial with a medical device or medicinal product or with interfering endpoints.
  • Concurrent or previous therapy with systemic pharmacologic agents promoting blood clotting including but not limited to tranexamic acid, activated factor VII, fibrinogen and aprotinin.
  • Known allergy or hypersensitivity to a component of the investigational treatments Hemopatch® ,to riboflavin or to proteins of bovine origin.
  • Pregnancy or breast-feeding.
  • Inability to understand the nature and the extent of the trial and the procedures required.

Criteria to be checked during surgery (intraoperative exclusion criteria):

  • Infected wound area.
  • Persistent major bleeding after primary hemostasis.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Hemopatch

    Standard of care

    Arm Description

    Use of hemopatch like a control of bile leakage/sealant during liver resection surgery.

    Application of standards of care, may include other sealant / hemostatic devices as patches or liquid/gels, during liver resection surgery.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Control of bile leakage
    analysis of bilirubin (mg/dL),in the drain fluid

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Bleeding
    Total volume of blood, quantified though aspiration and drainage (Quantification of total number of deciliters (dL) of blood gathered)
    Analysis of hemoglobin
    Quantification of hemoglobin (mg/dL), in the drain fluid
    Bleeding complications
    Presence (YES or NO compatible imagen of hemorrhage )of post-hepatectomy hemorrhage or Hematoma formation (Valid imaging tests of presence or absence can be checked by : abdomen ecography, TAC or RNM)
    Transfusion requirements
    Quantification of number of packed red blood cells

    Full Information

    First Posted
    April 4, 2017
    Last Updated
    November 8, 2017
    Sponsor
    Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03166683
    Brief Title
    Standard of Care Versus Hemopatch® During Liver Resection
    Acronym
    IBERLIVER
    Official Title
    Standard of Care Versus a New Collagen and Polyethylene Glycol Haemostatic/Sealant Patch (Hemopatch) During Liver Resection. A Multicentre, Non-inferiority Prospective Randomized Study (IBERLIVER-study)
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    November 2017
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    December 2017 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    April 2020 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    September 2020 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Fundación Pública Andaluza para la gestión de la Investigación en Sevilla

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    This multicentre prospective and randomized study aims to compare the sealant effect after surgical liver resection of a new collagen - polyethylene glycol hemostatic / sealant patch (Hemopatch) vs standard of care.
    Detailed Description
    Liver resection is the only potentially curative treatment in malignant or benign hepatobiliary lesions. Biliary leakage is a postoperative complication (5-10%) which may have considerable consequences. Surgical techniques and devices to facilitate the control of bile leakage have been developed in the last decades and have minimized operative risks of liver resection. Nevertheless, hepatic parenchymal transection can be associated with bile leakage due to the division of small ducts. In order to achieve control over parenchyma from the section surface and to prevent intraperitoneal complications attributed to bile leakage/bleeding various locally applicable agents are in use. This control of bile leakage include fibrin sealant and synthetic glues. Evidence from randomized controlled trials regarding the use of fibrin sealants on their own or combined with a collagenfleece has shown Little efficacy. A new collagen and polyethylene glycol hemostatic/sealant patch (Hemopatch) [Baxter, Vienna, Austria] is indicated for local hemostasis of capillary bleeding and bleeding of parenchymal organs. The felt structure being rich in surface gives a framework for the adhesion of blood platelets, thus providing an additional impetus as a sealant agent. The investigators aim to demonstrate the sealing capability of hemopatch and to prove its non-inferiority to the standard of care (may include other sealant / hemostatic devices as patches or liquid/gels). There will be 2 groups to compare. The study group where Hemopatch is applied at the end of surgery. And the control group, where standard of care measures will be applied at the end of surgery. The end-point is the assessment of control of bile leakage at 1, 2, 3, and 4 day, during the hospital stay and or at 30 days for both treatment group. The secondary end-points are bleeding complications (re-bleeding, hematoma formation), volume of fluid drained on day 1 to day 4 after surgery, hemoglobin variation from pre-operative until discharge and post-operatory complications until 30th day pos-op.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Liver Cancer, Hemorrhage Liver, Bile Leak, Surgery, Tumor Liver

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Other
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    Prospective, randomized (1:1) study of 2 treatment groups (hemopatch versus standard of care) in liver resection surgery. Non-inferiority study
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    284 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Hemopatch
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Use of hemopatch like a control of bile leakage/sealant during liver resection surgery.
    Arm Title
    Standard of care
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Application of standards of care, may include other sealant / hemostatic devices as patches or liquid/gels, during liver resection surgery.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Hemopatch
    Intervention Description
    Liver resection surgery with collagen and polyethylene glycol haemostatic/sealant patch placement
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Standard of care
    Intervention Description
    Standard of care include other sealant / hemostatic devices as patches or liquid/gels
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Control of bile leakage
    Description
    analysis of bilirubin (mg/dL),in the drain fluid
    Time Frame
    From day 1 to day 4
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Bleeding
    Description
    Total volume of blood, quantified though aspiration and drainage (Quantification of total number of deciliters (dL) of blood gathered)
    Time Frame
    From the surgery day until day 30
    Title
    Analysis of hemoglobin
    Description
    Quantification of hemoglobin (mg/dL), in the drain fluid
    Time Frame
    From the surgery day until day 30
    Title
    Bleeding complications
    Description
    Presence (YES or NO compatible imagen of hemorrhage )of post-hepatectomy hemorrhage or Hematoma formation (Valid imaging tests of presence or absence can be checked by : abdomen ecography, TAC or RNM)
    Time Frame
    From the surgery day until day 30
    Title
    Transfusion requirements
    Description
    Quantification of number of packed red blood cells
    Time Frame
    From the surgery day until day 30
    Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
    Title
    Bile leakage severity
    Description
    Classification A,B,C. According to International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS)
    Time Frame
    From the surgery day until day 30
    Title
    Morbidity
    Description
    Postoperative Ileus (refers to obstipation and intolerance of oral intake due to non mechanical factors that disrupt the normal coordinated propulsive motor activity of the gastrointestinal tract following abdominal or non abdominal surgery) Allergic reaction (Signs and symptoms are urticarial rash; pruritus; flushing; angioedema of the face, extremities, or laryngeal tissues (leading to throat tightness with stridor, or rarely asphyxiation); wheezing; gastrointestinal symptoms; and/or hypotension after use Hemopatch) Intrabdominal Infection (It describes a diverse set of diseases. It is broadly defined as peritoneal inflammation in response to microorganisms, resulting in purulence in the peritoneal cavity.)
    Time Frame
    From the surgery day until day 30
    Title
    Mortality
    Description
    Death: number of patients dying during study
    Time Frame
    From the surgery day until day 30

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Age: ≥18 years. Patients with an indication for open liver resection (segmental or non-segmental). Target bleeding site of generalized bleeding that persists on the cut surface of the liver in which hemostasis cannot be achieved by conventional methods. Willing and able to complete the clinical trial procedures, as described in the protocol. Signed written informed consent to participate in this clinical trial. Exclusion Criteria: Presence of coagulation disorder, Klatskin tumour. Cirrhosis, re-hepatectomies and biliary resections Concurrent participation in another clinical trial with a medical device or medicinal product or with interfering endpoints. Concurrent or previous therapy with systemic pharmacologic agents promoting blood clotting including but not limited to tranexamic acid, activated factor VII, fibrinogen and aprotinin. Known allergy or hypersensitivity to a component of the investigational treatments Hemopatch® ,to riboflavin or to proteins of bovine origin. Pregnancy or breast-feeding. Inability to understand the nature and the extent of the trial and the procedures required. Criteria to be checked during surgery (intraoperative exclusion criteria): Infected wound area. Persistent major bleeding after primary hemostasis.
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Clara Rosso Fernández, PhD
    Phone
    0034955013414
    Email
    claram.rosso.sspa@juntadeandalucia.es
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Lydia Barrera, PhD
    Phone
    0034955014236
    Email
    lydia.barrera.exts@juntadeandalucia.es
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Miguel Angel Gómez Bravo, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Hospitales Universitarios Virgen del Rocío
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Yes
    IPD Sharing Plan Description
    Anonymized data for IPD is planned to be shared with all participants within 6 months of data completion
    IPD Sharing Time Frame
    12 MONTHS
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    27002742
    Citation
    Baumgartner B, Draxler W, Lewis KM. Treatment of Severe Aortic Bleeding Using Hemopatch in Swine on Dual Antiplatelet Therapy. J Invest Surg. 2016 Dec;29(6):343-351. doi: 10.3109/08941939.2016.1154627. Epub 2016 Mar 22.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    18292662
    Citation
    Erdogan D, Busch OR, van Delden OM, Rauws EA, Gouma DJ, van Gulik TM. Incidence and management of bile leakage after partial liver resection. Dig Surg. 2008;25(1):60-6. doi: 10.1159/000118024. Epub 2008 Feb 22.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    17414601
    Citation
    Figueras J, Llado L, Miro M, Ramos E, Torras J, Fabregat J, Serrano T. Application of fibrin glue sealant after hepatectomy does not seem justified: results of a randomized study in 300 patients. Ann Surg. 2007 Apr;245(4):536-42. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000245846.37046.57.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    23374363
    Citation
    Guillaud A, Pery C, Campillo B, Lourdais A, Sulpice L, Boudjema K. Incidence and predictive factors of clinically relevant bile leakage in the modern era of liver resections. HPB (Oxford). 2013 Mar;15(3):224-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2012.00580.x. Epub 2012 Oct 4. Erratum In: HPB (Oxford). 2013 May;15(5):401. Laurent, Sulpice [corrected to Sulpice, Laurent].
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    24729905
    Citation
    Lewis KM, McKee J, Schiviz A, Bauer A, Wolfsegger M, Goppelt A. Randomized, controlled comparison of advanced hemostatic pads in hepatic surgical models. ISRN Surg. 2014 Mar 4;2014:930803. doi: 10.1155/2014/930803. eCollection 2014.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25106082
    Citation
    Lewis KM, Schiviz A, Hedrich HC, Regenbogen J, Goppelt A. Hemostatic efficacy of a novel, PEG-coated collagen pad in clinically relevant animal models. Int J Surg. 2014;12(9):940-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2014.07.017. Epub 2014 Aug 6.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    25085811
    Citation
    Lewis KM, Spazierer D, Slezak P, Baumgartner B, Regenbogen J, Gulle H. Swelling, sealing, and hemostatic ability of a novel biomaterial: A polyethylene glycol-coated collagen pad. J Biomater Appl. 2014 Nov;29(5):780-8. doi: 10.1177/0885328214545500. Epub 2014 Aug 1.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    21762295
    Citation
    Rahbari NN, Garden OJ, Padbury R, Maddern G, Koch M, Hugh TJ, Fan ST, Nimura Y, Figueras J, Vauthey JN, Rees M, Adam R, Dematteo RP, Greig P, Usatoff V, Banting S, Nagino M, Capussotti L, Yokoyama Y, Brooke-Smith M, Crawford M, Christophi C, Makuuchi M, Buchler MW, Weitz J. Post-hepatectomy haemorrhage: a definition and grading by the International Study Group of Liver Surgery (ISGLS). HPB (Oxford). 2011 Aug;13(8):528-35. doi: 10.1111/j.1477-2574.2011.00319.x. Epub 2011 Jun 7.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12732991
    Citation
    Nagano Y, Togo S, Tanaka K, Masui H, Endo I, Sekido H, Nagahori K, Shimada H. Risk factors and management of bile leakage after hepatic resection. World J Surg. 2003 Jun;27(6):695-8. doi: 10.1007/s00268-003-6907-x. Epub 2003 May 13.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26708861
    Citation
    Ruggiero R, Docimo L, Tolone S, De Palma M, Musella M, Pezzolla A, Gubitosi A, Parmeggiani D, Pirozzi R, Gili S, Parisi S, D'Alessandro A, Docimo G. Effectiveness of an advanced hemostatic pad combined with harmonic scalpel in thyroid surgery. A prospective study. Int J Surg. 2016 Apr;28 Suppl 1:S17-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2015.12.044. Epub 2015 Dec 17.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    22555445
    Citation
    Sadamori H, Yagi T, Matsuda H, Shinoura S, Umeda Y, Fujiwara T. Intractable bile leakage after hepatectomy for hepatocellular carcinoma in 359 recent cases. Dig Surg. 2012;29(2):149-56. doi: 10.1159/000337313. Epub 2012 May 3.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26159119
    Citation
    Sakamoto K, Tamesa T, Yukio T, Tokuhisa Y, Maeda Y, Oka M. Risk Factors and Managements of Bile Leakage After Hepatectomy. World J Surg. 2016 Jan;40(1):182-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-015-3156-8.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    12375753
    Citation
    Tanaka S, Hirohashi K, Tanaka H, Shuto T, Lee SH, Kubo S, Takemura S, Yamamoto T, Uenishi T, Kinoshita H. Incidence and management of bile leakage after hepatic resection for malignant hepatic tumors. J Am Coll Surg. 2002 Oct;195(4):484-9. doi: 10.1016/s1072-7515(02)01288-7.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    27466878
    Citation
    Weltert L, D'Aleo S, Chirichilli I, Falco M, Turani F, Bellisario A, De Paulis R. Prospective Randomized Clinical Trial of HEMOPATCH Topical Sealant in Cardiac Surgery. Surg Technol Int. 2016 Oct;XXIX:sti29/756. Epub 2016 Jul 29.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    11141224
    Citation
    Yamashita Y, Hamatsu T, Rikimaru T, Tanaka S, Shirabe K, Shimada M, Sugimachi K. Bile leakage after hepatic resection. Ann Surg. 2001 Jan;233(1):45-50. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200101000-00008.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    Standard of Care Versus Hemopatch® During Liver Resection

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs