Clinical Evaluation of Fitting Investigational Contact Lenses Phase 2
Primary Purpose
Visual Acuity
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
JJVC Fitting Guides
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Visual Acuity
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- The subject must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
- The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
- Healthy adult males or females that are at least 40 years of age and no more than 70 years of age.
- The subject must either be wearing a presbyopic contact lens correction (e.g., reading spectacles over contact lenses, multifocal or monovision contact lenses, etc.) or if not respond positively to at least one symptom on the "Presbyopic Symptoms Questionnaire".
- The subject is a current soft spherical or toric contact lens wearer (defined as a minimum of 6 hours of wear per day at least two days of the week for a minimum of 1 month prior to the study).
- The subject's distance spherical equivalent or spherical component (if the eye has - 1.00 to -1.50 D of refractive cylinder) of their refraction must be in the range -1.25 D to -3.75 D or +1.25 D to +3.75 D in each eye.
- The subject's refractive cylinder cannot be greater than -1.50D in either eye.
- The subject's refractive cylinder axis must be 90°±30° or 180°±30° in each eye.
- The subject's ADD power must be in the range of +0.75 D to +2.50 D in each eye.
- The subject must have best corrected visual acuity of 20/20-3 or better in each eye.
- The subject must have a wearable pair of spectacles if required for their distance vision.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Ocular or systemic allergies or disease, or use of medication which might interfere with contact lens wear.
- Pregnancy or lactation.
- Currently diagnosed with diabetes.
- Infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immune-suppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
- Clinically significant (Grade 3 or 4) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection, or any other corneal or ocular abnormalities which would contraindicate contact lens wear.
- Entropion, ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, dry eye, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions.
- Any previous, or planned, ocular or intraocular surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, lid procedures, cataract surgery, retinal surgery, etc.).
- A history of amblyopia, strabismus or binocular vision abnormality.
- Any ocular infection or inflammation.
- Any ocular abnormality that may interfere with contact lens wear.
- Use of any ocular medication, with the exception of rewetting drops.
- History of herpetic keratitis.
- Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 30 days prior to study enrollment.
- Employee of clinical site (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician)
Sites / Locations
- Vistakon Research Clinic
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Toric Multifocal Contact Lens
Multifocal Contact Lens
Arm Description
JJVC Investigational Toric Multifocal Contact Lens for Presbyopia
1-Day Acuvue® Moist Brand Multifocal Contact Lens
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Fitting Modifications to Optimize Vision
The ECP followed the fitting guide to assess the vision provided by the study lenses and determined if a lens change was needed. The ECP modified the lenses based upon the subject's responses in accordance with the Fitting Guide. Two modifications were allowed. The number of modifications required by the ECP to optimize vision was recorded.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 1
Subjects responses to individual item "Considering Your Experience With The Study Contact Lenses, Which Statement Best Describes Your Overall Satisfaction Of These Contact Lenses?". This item had a response set of extremely satisfied, very satisfied, moderately satisfied, slightly satisfied and not at all satisfied. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 2
Subjects responses to individual item "Based On Your Experience Today, How Likely Are You To Purchase This Contact Lens?". This item had a response set of extremely likely, very likely, somewhat likely, slightly likely and not at all likely. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 3
Subjects responses to individual item "Please Think About Your Experience Today With The Study Contact Lenses. Please Indicate How You Satisfied You Are With The Overall Contact Lens Fitting Process?". This item had a response set of very satisfied, satisfied, unsure, dissatisfied and very dissatisfied. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 4
Subjects responses to individual item "Where Would You Expect To Go Looking For Information About This Contact Lens? Please Select All That Apply.". The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 5
Subjects responses to individual item "If You Were To Purchase The Study Contact Lenses, With What Frequency Would You Expect To Wear Them?". This item had a response set of All of the time, Usually, Frequently, Sometimes, Rarely and never. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 6
Subjects responses to individual item "What Are Your Current Vision Correction Solutions?". The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 7
Subjects responses to individual item "How did the new lens you tried as a part of this clinical study Compare To Your Current Vision Correction Solutions?". This item had a response set of Much better, somewhat better, about the same, somewhat worse and much worse. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 8
Subjects responses to individual item "Considering your experience with the study contact lens, how excited are you about this lens being available to purchase?". This item had a response set of Very Excited, Excited, Unsure, Unexcited and Very Unexcited. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 9
Subjects responses to individual item "How would you rate your overall visual performance with the study contact lens?". This item had a response set of Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 10
Subjects responses to individual item "Considering Your Experience With The Study Contact Lenses, Which Statement Best Describes Your Overall Opinion Of These Contact Lenses?". This item had a response set of Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03168542
First Posted
May 22, 2017
Last Updated
September 21, 2018
Sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03168542
Brief Title
Clinical Evaluation of Fitting Investigational Contact Lenses Phase 2
Official Title
Clinical Evaluation of Fitting Investigational Contact Lenses Phase 2
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
September 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
May 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 4, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 4, 2017 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study is a single arm, non-randomized, open label, bilateral, non- dispensing clinical trial with only one visit. The Eye Care Providers will be provided with a fitting guide and will determine the initial study lens selection. Each subject will wear either the investigational contact lenses or marketed contact lenses for approximately 30-90 minutes. This study aims to evaluate the ECPs impression of the fitting guide for a novel multifocal lens and also their success in fitting the lenses.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Visual Acuity
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
While this study utilizes two contact lenses, the purpose was to evaluate the JJVC fitting guide. This was a non-randomized study in which eye care practitioners used the JJVC fitting guide to fit subjects with a study contact lens. Subjects may fit either in a bilateral or a contralateral fashion.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
23 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Toric Multifocal Contact Lens
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
JJVC Investigational Toric Multifocal Contact Lens for Presbyopia
Arm Title
Multifocal Contact Lens
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
1-Day Acuvue® Moist Brand Multifocal Contact Lens
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
JJVC Fitting Guides
Intervention Description
Subjects who are habitual soft spherical or toric contact lens wearers, at least 40 years of age and no more than 70 years of age, will be fitted, according to the fitting guide, with either the Multifocal Contact Lens or an Investigational Toric Multifocal Contact Lens if refractive cylinder power of the eye is between -1.00 to -1.50. The Intervention is approximately 30-90 minutes during a 1 day visit.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Fitting Modifications to Optimize Vision
Description
The ECP followed the fitting guide to assess the vision provided by the study lenses and determined if a lens change was needed. The ECP modified the lenses based upon the subject's responses in accordance with the Fitting Guide. Two modifications were allowed. The number of modifications required by the ECP to optimize vision was recorded.
Time Frame
15 Minutes Post Lens Fitting
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 1
Description
Subjects responses to individual item "Considering Your Experience With The Study Contact Lenses, Which Statement Best Describes Your Overall Satisfaction Of These Contact Lenses?". This item had a response set of extremely satisfied, very satisfied, moderately satisfied, slightly satisfied and not at all satisfied. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Time Frame
15 Minutes Post Lens Insertion
Title
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 2
Description
Subjects responses to individual item "Based On Your Experience Today, How Likely Are You To Purchase This Contact Lens?". This item had a response set of extremely likely, very likely, somewhat likely, slightly likely and not at all likely. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Time Frame
15 Minutes Post Lens Insertion
Title
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 3
Description
Subjects responses to individual item "Please Think About Your Experience Today With The Study Contact Lenses. Please Indicate How You Satisfied You Are With The Overall Contact Lens Fitting Process?". This item had a response set of very satisfied, satisfied, unsure, dissatisfied and very dissatisfied. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported
Time Frame
15 Minutes Post Lens Insertion
Title
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 4
Description
Subjects responses to individual item "Where Would You Expect To Go Looking For Information About This Contact Lens? Please Select All That Apply.". The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Time Frame
15 Minutes Post Lens Insertion
Title
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 5
Description
Subjects responses to individual item "If You Were To Purchase The Study Contact Lenses, With What Frequency Would You Expect To Wear Them?". This item had a response set of All of the time, Usually, Frequently, Sometimes, Rarely and never. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Time Frame
15 Minutes Post Lens Insertion
Title
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 6
Description
Subjects responses to individual item "What Are Your Current Vision Correction Solutions?". The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Time Frame
15 Minutes Post Lens Insertion
Title
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 7
Description
Subjects responses to individual item "How did the new lens you tried as a part of this clinical study Compare To Your Current Vision Correction Solutions?". This item had a response set of Much better, somewhat better, about the same, somewhat worse and much worse. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Time Frame
15 Minutes Post Lens Insertion
Title
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 8
Description
Subjects responses to individual item "Considering your experience with the study contact lens, how excited are you about this lens being available to purchase?". This item had a response set of Very Excited, Excited, Unsure, Unexcited and Very Unexcited. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Time Frame
15 Minutes Post Lens Insertion
Title
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 9
Description
Subjects responses to individual item "How would you rate your overall visual performance with the study contact lens?". This item had a response set of Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Time Frame
15 Minutes Post Lens Insertion
Title
Subject's Responses to Individual Item 10
Description
Subjects responses to individual item "Considering Your Experience With The Study Contact Lenses, Which Statement Best Describes Your Overall Opinion Of These Contact Lenses?". This item had a response set of Excellent, Very Good, Good, Fair and Poor. The percentage of subject's in each response category was reported.
Time Frame
15 Minutes Post Lens Insertion
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
40 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
70 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
The subject must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
Healthy adult males or females that are at least 40 years of age and no more than 70 years of age.
The subject must either be wearing a presbyopic contact lens correction (e.g., reading spectacles over contact lenses, multifocal or monovision contact lenses, etc.) or if not respond positively to at least one symptom on the "Presbyopic Symptoms Questionnaire".
The subject is a current soft spherical or toric contact lens wearer (defined as a minimum of 6 hours of wear per day at least two days of the week for a minimum of 1 month prior to the study).
The subject's distance spherical equivalent or spherical component (if the eye has - 1.00 to -1.50 D of refractive cylinder) of their refraction must be in the range -1.25 D to -3.75 D or +1.25 D to +3.75 D in each eye.
The subject's refractive cylinder cannot be greater than -1.50D in either eye.
The subject's refractive cylinder axis must be 90°±30° or 180°±30° in each eye.
The subject's ADD power must be in the range of +0.75 D to +2.50 D in each eye.
The subject must have best corrected visual acuity of 20/20-3 or better in each eye.
The subject must have a wearable pair of spectacles if required for their distance vision.
Exclusion Criteria:
Ocular or systemic allergies or disease, or use of medication which might interfere with contact lens wear.
Pregnancy or lactation.
Currently diagnosed with diabetes.
Infectious diseases (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immune-suppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
Clinically significant (Grade 3 or 4) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities or bulbar injection, or any other corneal or ocular abnormalities which would contraindicate contact lens wear.
Entropion, ectropion, extrusions, chalazia, recurrent styes, dry eye, glaucoma, history of recurrent corneal erosions.
Any previous, or planned, ocular or intraocular surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, lid procedures, cataract surgery, retinal surgery, etc.).
A history of amblyopia, strabismus or binocular vision abnormality.
Any ocular infection or inflammation.
Any ocular abnormality that may interfere with contact lens wear.
Use of any ocular medication, with the exception of rewetting drops.
History of herpetic keratitis.
Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 30 days prior to study enrollment.
Employee of clinical site (e.g., Investigator, Coordinator, Technician)
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Vistakon Research Clinic
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32256
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Learn more about this trial
Clinical Evaluation of Fitting Investigational Contact Lenses Phase 2
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs