search
Back to results

Trial to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Lenvatinib (18 mg vs. 14 mg) in Combination With Everolimus in Participants With Renal Cell Carcinoma

Primary Purpose

Renal Cell Carcinoma

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
lenvatinib
everolimus
Sponsored by
Eisai Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Renal Cell Carcinoma focused on measuring Renal Cell Carcinoma, lenvatinib, everolimus, E7080, VEGF-targeted treatment

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Histological or cytological confirmation of predominant clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (original tissue diagnosis of RCC is acceptable)
  • Documented evidence of advanced RCC
  • One prior disease progression episode on or after vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted treatment (for example, but not limited to, sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, cabozantinib, bevacizumab, axitinib, vatalanib, AV951/tivozanib) administered for the treatment of RCC. Prior programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatment in addition to 1 prior VEGF-targeted treatment is allowed.
  • At least 1 measurable target lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) meeting the following criteria:

    • Lymph node (LN) lesion that measures at least 1 dimension as >=1.5 centimeter (cm) in the short axis;
    • Non-nodal lesion that measures >=1.0 cm in the longest diameter;
    • The lesion is suitable for repeat measurement using computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI). Lesions that have had external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or locoregional therapy must show radiographic evidence of disease progression based on RECIST 1.1 to be deemed a target lesion.
  • Male or female participants age >=18 years (or any age >=18 years if that age is considered to be an adult per the local jurisdiction) at the time of informed consent
  • Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of >=70
  • Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with or without antihypertensive medications, defined as BP less than or equal to (<=) 150/90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) at Screening and no change in antihypertensive medications within 1 week before Cycle 1/Day 1
  • Adequate renal function defined as calculated creatinine clearance >=30 milliliters per minute (mL/min) per the Cockcroft and Gault formula
  • Adequate bone marrow function defined by:

    • Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >=1500/millimeters cubed (mm^3) (>=1.5*10^9/Liters [L]);
    • Platelets >=100,000/mm^3 (>=100*10^9/L);
    • Hemoglobin >=9 grams per deciliter (g/dL)
  • Adequate blood coagulation function defined by International Normalized Ratio (INR) <=1.5 (except for participants on warfarin therapy where INR must be <=3.0 prior to randomization)
  • Adequate liver function defined by:

    • Total bilirubin <=1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) except for unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia of Gilbert's syndrome;
    • Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) <=3* the ULN (in the case of liver metastases <=5* the ULN). Participants with bone metastases with ALP values greater than 3 times can be included.
  • Participant must voluntarily agree to provide written informed consent
  • Participant must be willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol

Exclusion Criteria:

  • More than 1 prior VEGF-targeted treatment for advanced RCC
  • Participants with Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases are not eligible, unless they have completed local therapy for at least 4 weeks and have discontinued the use of corticosteroids for this indication or are on a tapering regimen of corticosteroids (defined as <=10 mg prednisolone equivalent) before starting treatment in this study. Any signs (example, radiologic) or symptoms of brain metastases must be stable for at least 4 weeks before starting study treatment.
  • Active malignancy (except for RCC or definitively treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or bladder) within the past 24 months
  • Any anti-cancer treatment (except for radiation therapy) within 21 days, or any investigational agent within 30 days prior to the first dose of study drug; participants should have recovered from any toxicity related to previous anti-cancer treatment to Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 0 or 1.
  • Prior radiation therapy within 21 days prior to the start of study treatment with the exception of palliative radiotherapy to bone lesions, which is allowed if completed 2 weeks prior to study treatment start
  • Known intolerance to study drug (or any of the excipients) and/or known hypersensitivity to rapamycins (example, sirolimus, everolimus, temsirolimus) or any of the excipients
  • Participants with proteinuria greater than (>) 1+ on urinalysis will undergo 24-hour urine collection for quantitative assessment of proteinuria. Participants with urine protein >=1 g/24 hour will be ineligible.
  • Fasting total cholesterol ˃300 mg/dL (or ˃7.75 millimoles [mmol]/L) and/or fasting triglycerides level ˃2.5* the ULN. Note: these participants can be included after initiation or adjustment of lipid-lowering medication.
  • Uncontrolled diabetes as defined by fasting glucose >1.5 times the ULN. Note: these participants can be included after initiation or adjustment of glucose-lowering medication.
  • Prolongation of QT corrected (QTc) interval to >480 milliseconds (ms)
  • Participants who have not recovered adequately from any toxicity and/or complications from major surgery prior to starting therapy
  • Gastrointestinal malabsorption, gastrointestinal anastomosis, or any other condition that might affect the absorption of lenvatinib or everolimus
  • Bleeding or thrombotic disorders or participants at risk for severe hemorrhage. The degree of tumor invasion/infiltration of major blood vessels (example, carotid artery) should be considered because of the potential risk of severe hemorrhage associated with tumor shrinkage/necrosis following lenvatinib therapy.
  • Clinically significant hemoptysis or tumor bleeding within 2 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug
  • Significant cardiovascular impairment within 6 months prior to the first dose of study drug; history of congestive heart failure greater than New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, unstable angina, myocardial infarction or stroke, or cardiac arrhythmia associated with significant cardiovascular impairment or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below the institutional normal range as determined by screening multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiogram.
  • Active infection (any infection requiring systemic treatment)
  • Any medical or other condition that in the opinion of the investigator(s) would preclude the participant's participation in a clinical study
  • Females who are breastfeeding or pregnant at Screening or Baseline (as documented by a positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [β-hCG] (or human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG]) test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 International Units per Liter [IU/L] or equivalent units of β-hCG [or hCG]). A separate baseline assessment is required if a negative screening pregnancy test was obtained more than 72 hours before the first dose of study drug.
  • Females of childbearing potential who (Note: all females will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless they are postmenopausal [amenorrheic for at least 12 consecutive months, in the appropriate age group, and without other known or suspected cause] or have been sterilized surgically [that is, bilateral tubal ligation, total hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy, all with surgery at least 1 month before dosing].):

    • do not agree to use a highly effective method of contraception for the entire study period and for up to 8 weeks after study drug discontinuation, that is:

      • total abstinence (if it is their preferred and usual lifestyle)
      • an intrauterine device (IUD) or hormone releasing system (IUS)
      • a contraceptive implant
      • an oral contraceptive (with additional barrier method) (Note: Participants must be on a stable dose of the same oral hormonal contraceptive product for at least 4 weeks before dosing with study drug and for the duration of the study.) OR
    • do not have a vasectomized partner with confirmed azoospermia

For sites outside of the European Union, it is permissible that if a highly effective method of contraception is not appropriate or acceptable to the participant, then the participant must agree to use a medically acceptable method of contraception, that is, double barrier methods of contraception, such as condom plus diaphragm or cervical/vault cap with spermicide.

Sites / Locations

  • City of Hope National Medical Center
  • Innovative Clinical Research Institute, LLC
  • Baptist Health Medical Group Oncology, LLC - US Oncology
  • Optimal Research
  • Oklahoma Cancer Specialist and Research Institute , LLC
  • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
  • University of Tennessee Medical Center
  • Texas Oncology PA - US Oncology
  • Macquarie University
  • Northern Cancer Institute, Saint Leonards
  • Adelaide Cancer Center
  • Sunshine Hospital
  • Fiona Stanley Hospital
  • Alberta Health Service - Tom Baker Cancer Centre
  • British Columbia Cancer Agency
  • Juravinski Cancer Centre
  • London Health Sciences Centre
  • Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre
  • Sunnybrook Research Institute- University of Toronto
  • Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital
  • Masarykuv onkologicky ustav
  • Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc
  • Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
  • Nemocnice Na Bulovce
  • Helsingin Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala
  • Tampereen yliopistollinen sairaala
  • Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala
  • Vaasan Keskussairaala
  • Alexandra Hospital
  • Metropolitan hospital
  • University General Hospital of Patras
  • Interbalkan Medical Center of Thessaloniki
  • EUROMEDICA General Clinic of Thessaloniki
  • Papageorgiou General Hospital of Thessaloniki
  • IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
  • Presidio Ospedaliero San Donato
  • AORN A Cardarelli
  • Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
  • National Cancer Center
  • Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital
  • Asan Medical Center
  • Samsung Medical Center
  • Severance Hospital - Yonsei University Health System
  • The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital
  • Hagaziekenhuis
  • MC Haaglanden
  • Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
  • Szpital Specjalistyczny w Brzozowie
  • Copernicus PL Sp. z o.o. Wojewodzkie Centrum Onkologii
  • NZOZ Vesalius
  • SP ZOZ Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie
  • Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej
  • Samodzielny Publiczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Opolskie Centrum Onkologii
  • Mrukmed. Lekarz Beata Madej-Mruk i Partner. Spolka Partnerska
  • MAGODENT Sp. z o.o. Szpital Elblaska
  • Centro Hospitalar E Universitário de Coimbra EPE
  • Champalimaud Cancer Center
  • Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, E.P.E. - Hospital de Santa Maria
  • Centro Hospitalar do Porto - Hospital de Santo António
  • Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Do Porto Francisco Gentil Epe
  • Medisprof SRL
  • Prof Dr I Chiricuta Institute of Oncology
  • Oncology Center Sfantul Nectarie
  • Oncocenter Clinical Oncology
  • Altay Regional Oncology Center
  • Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
  • Central Clinical Hospital With Polyclinic of President Administration of RF
  • Moscow City Oncology Hospital #62
  • Moscow Scientific Research Oncology Institute P.A. Herzen
  • Federal State Institution Medical Radiology Research Center
  • Clinical Oncology Dispensary
  • Regional Clinical Oncology Hospital
  • Hospital Universitario A Coruna
  • Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol
  • Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
  • Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau
  • C.H. Regional Reina Sofia
  • ICO l'Hospitalet - Hospital Duran i Reynals
  • Hospital Clinico San Carlos
  • Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
  • Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
  • MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid
  • Hospital Universitario Son Espases
  • Clinica Universidad Navarra
  • Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia
  • China Medical University Hospital
  • Taichung Veterans General Hospital
  • National Taiwan University Hospital
  • Taipei Veterans General Hospital
  • Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
  • Christie Hospital
  • Mount Vernon Hospital
  • Singleton Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Lenvatinib 14 mg plus everolimus 5 mg

Lenvatinib 18 mg plus everolimus 5 mg

Arm Description

Participants will receive oral lenvatinib 14 mg once daily (QD) plus oral everolimus 5 mg QD as the starting dose for Cycle 1. If there are no intolerable Grade 2 or any >= Grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that require dose reduction in the first 28-day cycle (that is, the first 4 weeks of treatment), the lenvatinib dose will be escalated to 18 mg QD (plus everolimus 5 mg) beginning in Cycle 2 or later (cycle length equal to [=] 28 days) during randomization phase. After the data cutoff for the primary analysis, participants will receive study treatment as continuous 56-day cycles.

Participants will receive oral lenvatinib 18 mg QD plus oral everolimus 5 mg QD as the starting dose in Cycle 1 or later (cycle length =28 days) during randomization phase. After the data cutoff for the primary analysis, participants will receive study treatment as continuous 56-day cycles.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Objective Response Rate at Week 24 (ORR24W)
ORR24W was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at the Week 24 (after randomization) time point, during treatment or within 28 days after the last dose date but on or prior to the start of new anticancer therapy based on investigator assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. CR: defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to less than (<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR: defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. To be considered a BOR, all responses had to be confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the initial assessment of response.
Percentage of Participants With Intolerable Grade 2 or Any Grade >=Grade 3 TEAEs Within 24 Weeks
TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) with an onset that had occurred after receiving study drug. A severity grade was defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. As per NCI-CTCAE, Grade 1 scales as Mild; Grade 2 scales as Moderate; Grade 3 scales as severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; Grade 4 scales as life-threatening consequences; and Grade 5 scales as death related to AE.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Progression-free Survival (PFS)
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD by investigator assessment or date of death, whichever occurred first according to RECIST v1.1. PD: at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter [mm]) in the sum of diameter (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Median PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates for each treatment group and presented with 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI).
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR or PR at the at the end of treatment based on investigator assessment according to RECIST v1.1. CR: defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to <10 mm. PR: defined as at least a 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. To be considered a BOR, all responses had to be confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the initial assessment of response.
Number of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEs
TEAEs were defined as those adverse events (AEs) that occurred (or worsened, if present at Baseline) after the first dose of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of study drug. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered an investigational product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any AE if it resulted in death or life-threatening AE or required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or resulted in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Toxicity
Percentage of participants who discontinued treatment due to toxicity, defined as the percentage of participants who discontinued study treatment due to TEAEs. Toxicity (except hypertension and non-infectious pneumonitis) was assessed according to NCI-CTCAE v4.03.
Time to Treatment Failure Due to Toxicity
Time to treatment failure due to toxicity was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date that a participant discontinued study treatment due to TEAEs. Toxicity (except hypertension and non-infectious pneumonitis) was assessed according to CTCAE v4.03.
Overall Survival (OS)
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, participants will be censored either at the date that the participant was last known to be alive or the date of data cutoff for the primary analysis, whichever comes earlier. Median OS was to be calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimate and presented with 2-sided 95% confidence interval.
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Syndrome Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Scores
The FKSI-DRS consisted of 9 items that experts and participants had indicated are important targets for the treatment of advanced kidney cancer, and that clinical experts had indicated are primarily disease-related, as opposed to treatment-related. Symptoms assessed on the FKSI-DRS included lack of energy, fatigue, weight loss, pain, bone pain, shortness of breath, cough, fever, or hematuria. Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much) where total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 36 (best), where higher scores correspond to better outcomes.
HRQoL Assessed by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 Scores
The EORT QLQ-C30 consisted of 30 questions comprising 9 multiple-item scales and 6 single items. Multiple-item scales of QLQ-C30 consisted of 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social) and 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain) and a global health status/QOL score. Six single-item scales of QLQ-C30 involved dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties. First 28 questions used a 4-point scale (1 = Not at all to 4 = Very much); and last 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 = Very poor to 7 = Excellent). Scores for all scales range from 0 to 100. For the overall HRQoL and functioning scales, a higher score was correlated with better HRQoL, whereas a higher score for symptom scales represented worse HRQoL.
HRQoL Assessed by European Quality of Life (EuroQol) Five-Dimensional, 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
The EQ-5D-3L is a health profile questionnaire assessing quality of life along 5 dimensions. Participants rate 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) by choosing from 3 answering options (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The summed score ranges from 5-15 with "5" corresponding to no problems and "15" corresponding to severe problems in the 5 dimensions. The EQ-5D index was calculated by applying preference-based weights (tariffs) to the scores of the five health state dimensions. Index values can range from -1 to 1, with 0 representing a health state equivalent to death and 1 representing perfect health. EQ-5D-3L also included an EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) that ranges between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health). Decrease from baseline in EQ-5D-3L signifies improvement. Total index EQ-5D-3L summary score was weighted with a range of -0.594 (worst) to 1.0 (best).
Progression-free Survival After Next Line of Therapy (PFS2)
PFS2, defined as the time from randomization to the date of PD after next line of therapy or death from any cause, whichever occurred first based on investigator assessment according to RECIST v1.1. PD: at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Median PFS2 was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates for each treatment group and presented with 2-sided 95% CI.

Full Information

First Posted
May 22, 2017
Last Updated
August 31, 2023
Sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03173560
Brief Title
Trial to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Lenvatinib (18 mg vs. 14 mg) in Combination With Everolimus in Participants With Renal Cell Carcinoma
Official Title
A Randomized, Open-Label (Formerly Double-Blind), Phase 2 Trial to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Lenvatinib at Two Different Starting Doses (18 mg vs. 14 mg QD) in Combination With Everolimus (5 mg QD) in Renal Cell Carcinoma Following One Prior VEGF-Targeted Treatment
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
August 17, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 14, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 31, 2023 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Eisai Inc.
Collaborators
Merck Sharp & Dohme LLC

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Study E7080-G000-218 is a Randomized, open-label (formerly Double-blind), Phase 2 Trial conducted to assess whether a starting dose of lenvatinib 14 milligrams (mg) in combination with everolimus 5 mg once daily (QD) will provide comparable efficacy (based on objective response rate [ORR] at 24 weeks [ORR24W]) with an improved safety profile compared to lenvatinib 18 mg in combination with everolimus 5 mg (based on treatment-emergent intolerable Grade 2, or any greater than or equal to (>=) Grade 3 adverse events (AEs) in the first 24 weeks after randomization).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Renal Cell Carcinoma
Keywords
Renal Cell Carcinoma, lenvatinib, everolimus, E7080, VEGF-targeted treatment

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Masking Description
Study was initially double-blind.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
343 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Lenvatinib 14 mg plus everolimus 5 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive oral lenvatinib 14 mg once daily (QD) plus oral everolimus 5 mg QD as the starting dose for Cycle 1. If there are no intolerable Grade 2 or any >= Grade 3 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) that require dose reduction in the first 28-day cycle (that is, the first 4 weeks of treatment), the lenvatinib dose will be escalated to 18 mg QD (plus everolimus 5 mg) beginning in Cycle 2 or later (cycle length equal to [=] 28 days) during randomization phase. After the data cutoff for the primary analysis, participants will receive study treatment as continuous 56-day cycles.
Arm Title
Lenvatinib 18 mg plus everolimus 5 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Participants will receive oral lenvatinib 18 mg QD plus oral everolimus 5 mg QD as the starting dose in Cycle 1 or later (cycle length =28 days) during randomization phase. After the data cutoff for the primary analysis, participants will receive study treatment as continuous 56-day cycles.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
lenvatinib
Intervention Description
lenvatinib capsules.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
everolimus
Intervention Description
everolimus tablets.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Objective Response Rate at Week 24 (ORR24W)
Description
ORR24W was defined as the percentage of participants with a best overall response (BOR) of complete response (CR) or partial response (PR) at the Week 24 (after randomization) time point, during treatment or within 28 days after the last dose date but on or prior to the start of new anticancer therapy based on investigator assessment according to Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) version 1.1. CR: defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to less than (<) 10 millimeters (mm). PR: defined as at least a 30 percent (%) decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. To be considered a BOR, all responses had to be confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the initial assessment of response.
Time Frame
At Week 24
Title
Percentage of Participants With Intolerable Grade 2 or Any Grade >=Grade 3 TEAEs Within 24 Weeks
Description
TEAE was defined as an adverse event (AE) with an onset that had occurred after receiving study drug. A severity grade was defined by the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (NCI-CTCAE) version 4.03. As per NCI-CTCAE, Grade 1 scales as Mild; Grade 2 scales as Moderate; Grade 3 scales as severe or medically significant but not immediately life threatening; Grade 4 scales as life-threatening consequences; and Grade 5 scales as death related to AE.
Time Frame
Up to Week 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Progression-free Survival (PFS)
Description
PFS was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD by investigator assessment or date of death, whichever occurred first according to RECIST v1.1. PD: at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 millimeter [mm]) in the sum of diameter (SOD) of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Median PFS was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates for each treatment group and presented with 2-sided 95% confidence interval (CI).
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of the first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first or up to date of data cutoff for the primary analysis (up to 29 months)
Title
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Description
ORR was defined as the percentage of participants with a BOR of CR or PR at the at the end of treatment based on investigator assessment according to RECIST v1.1. CR: defined as the disappearance of all target and non-target lesions (non-lymph nodes). All pathological lymph nodes (whether target or non-target) must have a reduction in their short axis to <10 mm. PR: defined as at least a 30 % decrease in the sum of diameters of target lesions, taking as reference the baseline sum diameters. To be considered a BOR, all responses had to be confirmed no less than 4 weeks after the initial assessment of response.
Time Frame
From date of randomization up to first documentation of PD or date of death, whichever occurred first or up to the date of data cut off for the primary analysis (up to 29 months)
Title
Number of Participants With TEAEs and Serious TEAEs
Description
TEAEs were defined as those adverse events (AEs) that occurred (or worsened, if present at Baseline) after the first dose of study drug through 28 days after the last dose of study drug. An AE was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participants or clinical investigation participant administered an investigational product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with medicinal product. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any AE if it resulted in death or life-threatening AE or required inpatient hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization or resulted in persistent or significant incapacity or substantial disruption of the ability to conduct normal life functions or was a congenital anomaly/birth defect.
Time Frame
From date of first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose of study drug, or date of data cut off for the primary analysis (up to 29 months)
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Discontinued Treatment Due to Toxicity
Description
Percentage of participants who discontinued treatment due to toxicity, defined as the percentage of participants who discontinued study treatment due to TEAEs. Toxicity (except hypertension and non-infectious pneumonitis) was assessed according to NCI-CTCAE v4.03.
Time Frame
From date of first dose of study drug up to 28 days after last dose of study drug, or date of data cut off for the primary analysis (up to 29 months)
Title
Time to Treatment Failure Due to Toxicity
Description
Time to treatment failure due to toxicity was defined as the time from the date of randomization to the date that a participant discontinued study treatment due to TEAEs. Toxicity (except hypertension and non-infectious pneumonitis) was assessed according to CTCAE v4.03.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization to the date of discontinuation of study treatment due to TEAEs, or date of data cut off for the primary analysis (up to 29 months)
Title
Overall Survival (OS)
Description
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause. In the absence of confirmation of death, participants will be censored either at the date that the participant was last known to be alive or the date of data cutoff for the primary analysis, whichever comes earlier. Median OS was to be calculated using Kaplan-Meier estimate and presented with 2-sided 95% confidence interval.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization until the date of death from any cause, or up to date of data cut off for the primary analysis (up to 29 months)
Title
Health-Related Quality of Life (HRQoL) Assessed by Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy Kidney Syndrome Index-Disease-Related Symptoms (FKSI-DRS) Scores
Description
The FKSI-DRS consisted of 9 items that experts and participants had indicated are important targets for the treatment of advanced kidney cancer, and that clinical experts had indicated are primarily disease-related, as opposed to treatment-related. Symptoms assessed on the FKSI-DRS included lack of energy, fatigue, weight loss, pain, bone pain, shortness of breath, cough, fever, or hematuria. Each item was scored on a 5-point Likert-type scale (0 = not at all; 4 = very much) where total score ranged from 0 (worst) to 36 (best), where higher scores correspond to better outcomes.
Time Frame
At baseline (prior to first dose of study drug), on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle (cycle length =28 days), and at the Off-treatment visit (up to 29 months)
Title
HRQoL Assessed by European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) Quality of Life Questionnaire (QLQ)-C30 Scores
Description
The EORT QLQ-C30 consisted of 30 questions comprising 9 multiple-item scales and 6 single items. Multiple-item scales of QLQ-C30 consisted of 5 functional scales (physical, role, emotional, cognitive, and social) and 3 symptom scales (fatigue, nausea and vomiting, pain) and a global health status/QOL score. Six single-item scales of QLQ-C30 involved dyspnea, insomnia, appetite loss, constipation, diarrhea and financial difficulties. First 28 questions used a 4-point scale (1 = Not at all to 4 = Very much); and last 2 questions used a 7-point scale (1 = Very poor to 7 = Excellent). Scores for all scales range from 0 to 100. For the overall HRQoL and functioning scales, a higher score was correlated with better HRQoL, whereas a higher score for symptom scales represented worse HRQoL.
Time Frame
At baseline (prior to first dose of study drug), on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle (cycle length =28 days), and at the Off-treatment visit (up to 29 months)
Title
HRQoL Assessed by European Quality of Life (EuroQol) Five-Dimensional, 3-Level (EQ-5D-3L) Index Score and Visual Analogue Scale (VAS)
Description
The EQ-5D-3L is a health profile questionnaire assessing quality of life along 5 dimensions. Participants rate 5 dimensions of health (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression) by choosing from 3 answering options (1=no problems; 2=some problems; 3=extreme problems). The summed score ranges from 5-15 with "5" corresponding to no problems and "15" corresponding to severe problems in the 5 dimensions. The EQ-5D index was calculated by applying preference-based weights (tariffs) to the scores of the five health state dimensions. Index values can range from -1 to 1, with 0 representing a health state equivalent to death and 1 representing perfect health. EQ-5D-3L also included an EQ visual analogue scale (VAS) that ranges between 100 (best imaginable health) and 0 (worst imaginable health). Decrease from baseline in EQ-5D-3L signifies improvement. Total index EQ-5D-3L summary score was weighted with a range of -0.594 (worst) to 1.0 (best).
Time Frame
At baseline (prior to first dose of study drug), on Day 1 of each subsequent cycle (cycle length =28 days), and at the Off-treatment visit (up to 29 months)
Title
Progression-free Survival After Next Line of Therapy (PFS2)
Description
PFS2, defined as the time from randomization to the date of PD after next line of therapy or death from any cause, whichever occurred first based on investigator assessment according to RECIST v1.1. PD: at least 20% increase (including an absolute increase of at least 5 mm) in the SOD of target lesions, taking as reference the smallest sum and/or unequivocal progression of existing non-target lesions and/or appearance of 1 or more new lesions. Median PFS2 was analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier product-limit estimates for each treatment group and presented with 2-sided 95% CI.
Time Frame
From the time of randomization to the date of PD after next line of therapy or death from any cause or the date of data cutoff for the primary analysis, whichever occurs first (up to 29 months)

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Histological or cytological confirmation of predominant clear cell renal cell carcinoma (RCC) (original tissue diagnosis of RCC is acceptable) Documented evidence of advanced RCC One prior disease progression episode on or after vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF)-targeted treatment (for example, but not limited to, sunitinib, sorafenib, pazopanib, cabozantinib, bevacizumab, axitinib, vatalanib, AV951/tivozanib) administered for the treatment of RCC. Prior programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1)/programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) treatment in addition to 1 prior VEGF-targeted treatment is allowed. At least 1 measurable target lesion according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (RECIST 1.1) meeting the following criteria: Lymph node (LN) lesion that measures at least 1 dimension as >=1.5 centimeter (cm) in the short axis; Non-nodal lesion that measures >=1.0 cm in the longest diameter; The lesion is suitable for repeat measurement using computerized tomography/magnetic resonance imaging (CT/MRI). Lesions that have had external beam radiotherapy (EBRT) or locoregional therapy must show radiographic evidence of disease progression based on RECIST 1.1 to be deemed a target lesion. Male or female participants age >=18 years (or any age >=18 years if that age is considered to be an adult per the local jurisdiction) at the time of informed consent Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS) of >=70 Adequately controlled blood pressure (BP) with or without antihypertensive medications, defined as BP less than or equal to (<=) 150/90 millimeters of mercury (mmHg) at Screening and no change in antihypertensive medications within 1 week before Cycle 1/Day 1 Adequate renal function defined as calculated creatinine clearance >=30 milliliters per minute (mL/min) per the Cockcroft and Gault formula Adequate bone marrow function defined by: Absolute neutrophil count (ANC) >=1500/millimeters cubed (mm^3) (>=1.5*10^9/Liters [L]); Platelets >=100,000/mm^3 (>=100*10^9/L); Hemoglobin >=9 grams per deciliter (g/dL) Adequate blood coagulation function defined by International Normalized Ratio (INR) <=1.5 (except for participants on warfarin therapy where INR must be <=3.0 prior to randomization) Adequate liver function defined by: Total bilirubin <=1.5 times the upper limit of normal (ULN) except for unconjugated hyperbilirubinemia of Gilbert's syndrome; Alkaline phosphatase (ALP), alanine aminotransferase (ALT), and aspartate aminotransferase (AST) <=3* the ULN (in the case of liver metastases <=5* the ULN). Participants with bone metastases with ALP values greater than 3 times can be included. Participant must voluntarily agree to provide written informed consent Participant must be willing and able to comply with all aspects of the protocol Exclusion Criteria: More than 1 prior VEGF-targeted treatment for advanced RCC Participants with Central Nervous System (CNS) metastases are not eligible, unless they have completed local therapy for at least 4 weeks and have discontinued the use of corticosteroids for this indication or are on a tapering regimen of corticosteroids (defined as <=10 mg prednisolone equivalent) before starting treatment in this study. Any signs (example, radiologic) or symptoms of brain metastases must be stable for at least 4 weeks before starting study treatment. Active malignancy (except for RCC or definitively treated basal or squamous cell carcinoma of the skin, or carcinoma in-situ of the cervix or bladder) within the past 24 months Any anti-cancer treatment (except for radiation therapy) within 21 days, or any investigational agent within 30 days prior to the first dose of study drug; participants should have recovered from any toxicity related to previous anti-cancer treatment to Common Toxicity Criteria (CTC) grade 0 or 1. Prior radiation therapy within 21 days prior to the start of study treatment with the exception of palliative radiotherapy to bone lesions, which is allowed if completed 2 weeks prior to study treatment start Known intolerance to study drug (or any of the excipients) and/or known hypersensitivity to rapamycins (example, sirolimus, everolimus, temsirolimus) or any of the excipients Participants with proteinuria greater than (>) 1+ on urinalysis will undergo 24-hour urine collection for quantitative assessment of proteinuria. Participants with urine protein >=1 g/24 hour will be ineligible. Fasting total cholesterol ˃300 mg/dL (or ˃7.75 millimoles [mmol]/L) and/or fasting triglycerides level ˃2.5* the ULN. Note: these participants can be included after initiation or adjustment of lipid-lowering medication. Uncontrolled diabetes as defined by fasting glucose >1.5 times the ULN. Note: these participants can be included after initiation or adjustment of glucose-lowering medication. Prolongation of QT corrected (QTc) interval to >480 milliseconds (ms) Participants who have not recovered adequately from any toxicity and/or complications from major surgery prior to starting therapy Gastrointestinal malabsorption, gastrointestinal anastomosis, or any other condition that might affect the absorption of lenvatinib or everolimus Bleeding or thrombotic disorders or participants at risk for severe hemorrhage. The degree of tumor invasion/infiltration of major blood vessels (example, carotid artery) should be considered because of the potential risk of severe hemorrhage associated with tumor shrinkage/necrosis following lenvatinib therapy. Clinically significant hemoptysis or tumor bleeding within 2 weeks prior to the first dose of study drug Significant cardiovascular impairment within 6 months prior to the first dose of study drug; history of congestive heart failure greater than New York Heart Association (NYHA) Class II, unstable angina, myocardial infarction or stroke, or cardiac arrhythmia associated with significant cardiovascular impairment or left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) below the institutional normal range as determined by screening multigated acquisition (MUGA) scan or echocardiogram. Active infection (any infection requiring systemic treatment) Any medical or other condition that in the opinion of the investigator(s) would preclude the participant's participation in a clinical study Females who are breastfeeding or pregnant at Screening or Baseline (as documented by a positive beta-human chorionic gonadotropin [β-hCG] (or human chorionic gonadotropin [hCG]) test with a minimum sensitivity of 25 International Units per Liter [IU/L] or equivalent units of β-hCG [or hCG]). A separate baseline assessment is required if a negative screening pregnancy test was obtained more than 72 hours before the first dose of study drug. Females of childbearing potential who (Note: all females will be considered to be of childbearing potential unless they are postmenopausal [amenorrheic for at least 12 consecutive months, in the appropriate age group, and without other known or suspected cause] or have been sterilized surgically [that is, bilateral tubal ligation, total hysterectomy, or bilateral oophorectomy, all with surgery at least 1 month before dosing].): do not agree to use a highly effective method of contraception for the entire study period and for up to 8 weeks after study drug discontinuation, that is: total abstinence (if it is their preferred and usual lifestyle) an intrauterine device (IUD) or hormone releasing system (IUS) a contraceptive implant an oral contraceptive (with additional barrier method) (Note: Participants must be on a stable dose of the same oral hormonal contraceptive product for at least 4 weeks before dosing with study drug and for the duration of the study.) OR do not have a vasectomized partner with confirmed azoospermia For sites outside of the European Union, it is permissible that if a highly effective method of contraception is not appropriate or acceptable to the participant, then the participant must agree to use a medically acceptable method of contraception, that is, double barrier methods of contraception, such as condom plus diaphragm or cervical/vault cap with spermicide.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
City of Hope National Medical Center
City
Duarte
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Innovative Clinical Research Institute, LLC
City
Whittier
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90603
Country
United States
Facility Name
Baptist Health Medical Group Oncology, LLC - US Oncology
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33143
Country
United States
Facility Name
Optimal Research
City
Honolulu
State/Province
Hawaii
ZIP/Postal Code
96819
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oklahoma Cancer Specialist and Research Institute , LLC
City
Tulsa
State/Province
Oklahoma
ZIP/Postal Code
74146
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pittsburgh Medical Center
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15232
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Tennessee Medical Center
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37920
Country
United States
Facility Name
Texas Oncology PA - US Oncology
City
Fort Worth
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
76104
Country
United States
Facility Name
Macquarie University
City
Macquarie Park
State/Province
New South Wales
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Northern Cancer Institute, Saint Leonards
City
Saint Leonards
State/Province
New South Wales
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Adelaide Cancer Center
City
Kurralta Park
State/Province
South Australia
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Sunshine Hospital
City
Saint Albans
State/Province
Victoria
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Fiona Stanley Hospital
City
Murdoch
State/Province
Western Australia
Country
Australia
Facility Name
Alberta Health Service - Tom Baker Cancer Centre
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2N 4N2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
British Columbia Cancer Agency
City
Kelowna
State/Province
British Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
V1Y 5L3
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Juravinski Cancer Centre
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8V 5C2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
London Health Sciences Centre
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 4L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Ottawa Hospital Cancer Centre
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1H 8L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Sunnybrook Research Institute- University of Toronto
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Sir Mortimer B Davis Jewish General Hospital
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H3T 1E2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Masarykuv onkologicky ustav
City
Brno
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Fakultni nemocnice Olomouc
City
Olomouc
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Fakultni nemocnice v Motole
City
Prague
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Nemocnice Na Bulovce
City
Prague
Country
Czechia
Facility Name
Helsingin Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala
City
Helsinki
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Tampereen yliopistollinen sairaala
City
Tampere
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Turun Yliopistollinen Keskussairaala
City
Turku
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Vaasan Keskussairaala
City
Vaasa
Country
Finland
Facility Name
Alexandra Hospital
City
Athens
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Metropolitan hospital
City
Athens
Country
Greece
Facility Name
University General Hospital of Patras
City
Patras
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Interbalkan Medical Center of Thessaloniki
City
Pylaia
Country
Greece
Facility Name
EUROMEDICA General Clinic of Thessaloniki
City
Thessaloniki
Country
Greece
Facility Name
Papageorgiou General Hospital of Thessaloniki
City
Thessaloniki
Country
Greece
Facility Name
IRCCS Istituto Nazionale dei Tumori
City
Milano
State/Province
Lombardia
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Presidio Ospedaliero San Donato
City
Arezzo
ZIP/Postal Code
52100
Country
Italy
Facility Name
AORN A Cardarelli
City
Napoli
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliera San Camillo Forlanini
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00152
Country
Italy
Facility Name
National Cancer Center
City
Goyang-si
State/Province
Gyeonggido
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Chonnam National University Hwasun Hospital
City
Chŏnam
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Asan Medical Center
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Samsung Medical Center
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Severance Hospital - Yonsei University Health System
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
The Catholic University of Korea, Seoul Saint Mary's Hospital
City
Seoul
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Hagaziekenhuis
City
Den Haag
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
MC Haaglanden
City
Den Haag
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Leids Universitair Medisch Centrum
City
Leiden
Country
Netherlands
Facility Name
Szpital Specjalistyczny w Brzozowie
City
Brzozow
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Copernicus PL Sp. z o.o. Wojewodzkie Centrum Onkologii
City
Gdansk
Country
Poland
Facility Name
NZOZ Vesalius
City
Krakow
Country
Poland
Facility Name
SP ZOZ Szpital Uniwersytecki w Krakowie
City
Krakow
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centrum Onkologii Ziemi Lubelskiej
City
Lublin
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Samodzielny Publiczny Zaklad Opieki Zdrowotnej Opolskie Centrum Onkologii
City
Opole
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Mrukmed. Lekarz Beata Madej-Mruk i Partner. Spolka Partnerska
City
Rzeszow
Country
Poland
Facility Name
MAGODENT Sp. z o.o. Szpital Elblaska
City
Warszawa
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Centro Hospitalar E Universitário de Coimbra EPE
City
Coimbra
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Champalimaud Cancer Center
City
Lisboa
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Centro Hospitalar Lisboa Norte, E.P.E. - Hospital de Santa Maria
City
Lisbon
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Centro Hospitalar do Porto - Hospital de Santo António
City
Porto
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Instituto Portugues de Oncologia Do Porto Francisco Gentil Epe
City
Porto
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Medisprof SRL
City
Cluj-Napoca
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Prof Dr I Chiricuta Institute of Oncology
City
Cluj-Napoca
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Oncology Center Sfantul Nectarie
City
Craiova
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Oncocenter Clinical Oncology
City
Timisoara
Country
Romania
Facility Name
Altay Regional Oncology Center
City
Barnaul
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Chelyabinsk Regional Clinical Oncology Dispensary
City
Chelyabinsk
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Central Clinical Hospital With Polyclinic of President Administration of RF
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Moscow City Oncology Hospital #62
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Moscow Scientific Research Oncology Institute P.A. Herzen
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Federal State Institution Medical Radiology Research Center
City
Obninsk
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Clinical Oncology Dispensary
City
Omsk
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Regional Clinical Oncology Hospital
City
Yaroslavl
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario A Coruna
City
A Coruna
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Germans Trias i Pujol
City
Badalona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Clinic de Barcelona
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital de la Santa Creu I Sant Pau
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
C.H. Regional Reina Sofia
City
Cordoba
Country
Spain
Facility Name
ICO l'Hospitalet - Hospital Duran i Reynals
City
Hospitalet de Llobregat
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Clinico San Carlos
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28040
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario 12 de Octubre
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Ramon y Cajal
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
MD Anderson Cancer Center Madrid
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Son Espases
City
Palma de Mallorca
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Clinica Universidad Navarra
City
Pamplona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Fundacion Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia
City
Valencia
Country
Spain
Facility Name
China Medical University Hospital
City
Taichung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Taichung Veterans General Hospital
City
Taichung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
National Taiwan University Hospital
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Taipei Veterans General Hospital
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre
City
Glasgow
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Christie Hospital
City
Manchester
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Mount Vernon Hospital
City
Northwood
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Singleton Hospital
City
Swansea
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35881028
Citation
Bergerot C, Young Rha S, Pal S, Koralewski P, Stroyakovskiy D, Alekseev B, Parnis F, Castellano D, Lyun Lee J, Sunela K, Ciuleanu T, Heng D, Glen H, Wang J, Bennett L, Pan J, O'Hara K, Puente J. Health-Related Quality of Life Outcomes With Two Different Starting Doses of Lenvatinib in Combination With Everolimus for Previously Treated Renal Cell Carcinoma. Oncologist. 2023 Jan 18;28(1):59-71. doi: 10.1093/oncolo/oyac142.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Trial to Assess Safety and Efficacy of Lenvatinib (18 mg vs. 14 mg) in Combination With Everolimus in Participants With Renal Cell Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs