Evaluation of Efficacy, Duration of Remission and Safety of a Light and Occlusive Patch Therapy for Plaque Psoriasis
Primary Purpose
Psoriasis
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Luma Light System
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Psoriasis
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Male or female of any race, greater than 18 years of age.
- Verbal and written informed consent obtained from the subject.
- Has a clinical diagnosis of plaque psoriasis at the Screening and Baseline visits.
- Has an IGA score of 2 to 4 that is consistent between the Screening and Baseline visits.
- TPA score of 5-12 and a score of at least 1 for each of the 3 different psoriasis signs and symptoms (erythema, plaque elevation, and scaling) at the baseline visits.
- Has at least 2 plaques of at least 6cm by 3cm with TPA scores not differing from each other by a score of more than 1 that are at least 2 inches apart at the baseline visit.
- Is in good general health as determined by the Investigator based on the subject's medical history.
- Females of childbearing potential must have negative urine or blood pregnancy test results. Females of childbearing potential agree to use acceptable methods of contraception from the screening visit continuously until 30 days after end of treatment.
- Subject agrees to use only the Sponsor provided cleanser and lotion during the study phase unless given permission by Investigator to use other topicals on non-target plaques.
- Subject is willing and able to return for all study visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Presence of psoriasis that was previously treated with prescription medications prior to the Screening visit and was non-responsive to treatment, as determined by the Investigator.
- Presence of any concurrent skin condition that could interfere with the evaluation of the study device, as determined by the Investigator.
- Female who is pregnant, nursing an infant, or planning a pregnancy during the Active Treatment Phase.
- Treatment with any investigational drug or device within 2 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the Baseline visit, or concurrent participation in another clinical trial with an investigational drug or device.
- History of melanoma.
- Subject has any medical, social or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude them from receiving the pre-treatment, required treatment, and post-treatment procedures and evaluations.
- Subject has known allergy or adverse reaction to skin adhesives or hydrogels or coal tar.
Sites / Locations
- Redwood Dermatology ResearchRecruiting
- Dermatology Associates of Knoxville, PCRecruiting
- Texas Dermatology and Laser SpecialistsRecruiting
- Jordan Valley Dermatology CenterRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
No Intervention
Experimental
Arm Label
Non-treatment Control
Luma Light System
Arm Description
Control arm will not have any intervention
The experimental arm will be a combination of an occlusive dressing and NBUVB light.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Target Plaque Assessment (TPA) at 6 weeks
Local efficacy will be evaluated with a 0-4 point scale for three signs and symptoms of psoriasis: erythema, plaque elevation, and scaling. Change in TPA score will be used to measure the efficacy of the Luma Light System at 6 weeks after treatment initiation compared to control. TPA change scores will be computed by subtracting scores at baseline from scores at 6 weeks. It is hypothesized that the decline in TPA scores will be greater for the Luma Light System (Arm B) than for the control (Arm A).
Secondary Outcome Measures
Frequency and severity of device and / or procedure related adverse events
Profile the safety of the Luma Light System (Arm B) in terms of the frequency and severity of device and / or procedure related adverse events. Evaluation of adverse events, including significant changes from baseline in cutaneous tolerability (burning/stinging, pain, and pruritus) of a combination of a home NBUVB lamp with an occlusive hydrogel patch (Arm B).
TPA at 2, 4, 22 and 30 weeks
TPA measurement of efficacy at weeks 2, 4, 14, 22 and 30 of Luma Light System (Arm B) compared to control (Arm A). TPA change scores will be computed by subtracting scores at baseline from scores at each specified study visit.
Duration of remission
Duration of remission of plaques of the Luma Light System (Arm B) compared to control (Arm A). Duration of remission is defined by days between plaque clearing and whichever comes first: either the 30 week visit 8, withdrawal from the study for any reason or follow-up TPA score of 2 or higher. A plaque is considered cleared with a scale and thickness score of 0 and an erythema score of 1 or 0. If a plaque does not reach this score the remission duration will be zero.
Subject Satisfaction
Subject satisfaction with treatment and perceived plaque improvement of the Luma Light System (Arm B) at 4 weeks compared to control (Arm A).
Compliance
Compliance to Luma Light System (Arm B) in terms of percent daily treatments delivered.
TPA less than 2 at 4 weeks
Percentage of subjects who reach a TPA score of less than 2 in treatment Arms A and B in 4 and 6 weeks.
TPA less than 2 at 6 weeks
Percentage of subjects who reach a TPA score of less than 2 in treatment Arms A and B
Subject Satisfaction
Subject satisfaction with treatment and perceived plaque improvement of the Luma Light System (Arm B) at 6 weeks compared to control (Arm A).
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03180866
Brief Title
Evaluation of Efficacy, Duration of Remission and Safety of a Light and Occlusive Patch Therapy for Plaque Psoriasis
Official Title
Evaluation of Efficacy, Duration of Remission and Safety of a Light and Occlusive Patch Therapy for Plaque Psoriasis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
June 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
December 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
March 2018 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
March 2018 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Illumicure Inc
4. Oversight
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This is a proof of concept, investigator blinded study to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a novel combination of a home narrow band ultraviolet B (NBUVB) lamp with an occlusive dressing in adult subjects with mild to moderate psoriasis vulgaris. Two interpatient arms will be used to compare the efficacy of combination of NBUVB with an occlusive dressing (active) to no treatment (control). 32 patients will be enrolled in this 30 week study.
Detailed Description
This is a multi-center, investigator blinded, randomized study designed to assess the efficacy, duration of effect, safety and tolerability of Luma Light System for plaque psoriasis. Two selected areas to be treated will be determined by the Investigator at Baseline. Excluded areas include the palms, the soles of the feet, the intertriginous areas, the knee, the elbow, the face and the scalp. Target Plaque Assessment (TPA), tolerability assessment and any adverse events (AEs) will be obtained at each visit. The subject may use topical prescriptions (steroids, vitamin D analogs, retinoids, etc.) for non-target plaques during this trial with approval of the investigator as long as they keep a 1" border around the target plaques where no prescription topical is applied. Any treatment that is not part of the trial that the subject uses for psoriasis should be noted in the subject's file.
Start of Observation Phase with Screening Visit: Subjects will be given an IRB approved consent to read and sign at the screening Visit. No study related procedures will be performed prior to signing this consent. The Investigator will review the inclusion/exclusion criteria, evaluate the Subject's medical history, before determining the Subject's eligibility to participate in the study. A pregnancy test will be performed for all females of childbearing potential at the Screening Visit. Prior to the trial start, each subject will undergo a minimum 2 weeks or maximum of 13 weeks Observation Phase (starting with Visit 1 Screening) during which the subject will be supplied a standard cleanser and lotion in order to evaluate the stability of the plaque severity prior to entering the Active Treatment Phase. The Observation Phase will be up to 13 weeks if the subject needs to taper off an oral medication or biologic (see Washout and Excluded Medications section).
Start of Active Treatment Phase with Baseline Visit: If the Subject is determined to be eligible for the study, he/she will return to the clinic for the Baseline Visit. At this visit inclusion/exclusion criteria will be confirmed, patient will be enrolled in the study, randomization of the plaques will occur and baseline assessments will be performed including TPA. The test product will be dispensed, the user will be trained on how to use the product and the first treatment will be applied.
The Active Treatment Phase will be 6 weeks or until target plaque has cleared, whichever comes first. During the Active Treatment Phase, the plaque randomized to Arm B will receive the active occlusive hydrogel patch and will be changed every 5 days or less as needed. During the Active Treatment Phase, the plaque randomized to Arm A will receive the window patch and replaced as needed. The light will be applied to the target plaque assigned to Arm B every day with the hydrogel patch in place. The subject will return to the clinic every two weeks (Visit 3, 4 and 5) for assessments. Subjects who terminate early will be asked to complete all Week 6/ET assessments prior to commencement of any alternative therapy for psoriasis (if possible). Subjects who discontinue from the study during the Active Treatment Phase may be replaced and only will be followed if an AE is present.
Start of Follow-up Phase: Subjects will return for efficacy and safety follow-up visits at 8 week intervals after the Active Treatment Phase for 24 weeks (Visit 6, 7 and 8) to assess durability of remission. If subject decides to start active treatment with a prescription product on a plaque that was treated during the Active Treatment Phase (not including supplied lotion and cleanser, shampoos for hair or their normal topical therapeutic products to psoriatic areas that are not part of the study treatment areas) then that target plaque will no longer considered to be in remission. No systemic treatments will be allowed during the Follow-up Phase but if the subject or physician determines that it is necessary, the subject will no longer be considered in remission at the time of commencement of the systemic treatment. If the subject uses a prescription product on a target plaque or starts a systemic treatment, the investigator will capture why this occurs.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Psoriasis
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
InvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
The subject will act as their own control as one target plaque will receive treatment and one will not. This information will not be made available to the Investigators or the bio-statistician.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Non-treatment Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Control arm will not have any intervention
Arm Title
Luma Light System
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The experimental arm will be a combination of an occlusive dressing and NBUVB light.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Luma Light System
Intervention Description
The Luma Light System combines a NBUVB light with an occlusive dressing.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Target Plaque Assessment (TPA) at 6 weeks
Description
Local efficacy will be evaluated with a 0-4 point scale for three signs and symptoms of psoriasis: erythema, plaque elevation, and scaling. Change in TPA score will be used to measure the efficacy of the Luma Light System at 6 weeks after treatment initiation compared to control. TPA change scores will be computed by subtracting scores at baseline from scores at 6 weeks. It is hypothesized that the decline in TPA scores will be greater for the Luma Light System (Arm B) than for the control (Arm A).
Time Frame
6 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Frequency and severity of device and / or procedure related adverse events
Description
Profile the safety of the Luma Light System (Arm B) in terms of the frequency and severity of device and / or procedure related adverse events. Evaluation of adverse events, including significant changes from baseline in cutaneous tolerability (burning/stinging, pain, and pruritus) of a combination of a home NBUVB lamp with an occlusive hydrogel patch (Arm B).
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
TPA at 2, 4, 22 and 30 weeks
Description
TPA measurement of efficacy at weeks 2, 4, 14, 22 and 30 of Luma Light System (Arm B) compared to control (Arm A). TPA change scores will be computed by subtracting scores at baseline from scores at each specified study visit.
Time Frame
2, 4, 22 and 30 weeks
Title
Duration of remission
Description
Duration of remission of plaques of the Luma Light System (Arm B) compared to control (Arm A). Duration of remission is defined by days between plaque clearing and whichever comes first: either the 30 week visit 8, withdrawal from the study for any reason or follow-up TPA score of 2 or higher. A plaque is considered cleared with a scale and thickness score of 0 and an erythema score of 1 or 0. If a plaque does not reach this score the remission duration will be zero.
Time Frame
30 weeks
Title
Subject Satisfaction
Description
Subject satisfaction with treatment and perceived plaque improvement of the Luma Light System (Arm B) at 4 weeks compared to control (Arm A).
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
Compliance
Description
Compliance to Luma Light System (Arm B) in terms of percent daily treatments delivered.
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
TPA less than 2 at 4 weeks
Description
Percentage of subjects who reach a TPA score of less than 2 in treatment Arms A and B in 4 and 6 weeks.
Time Frame
4 weeks
Title
TPA less than 2 at 6 weeks
Description
Percentage of subjects who reach a TPA score of less than 2 in treatment Arms A and B
Time Frame
6 weeks
Title
Subject Satisfaction
Description
Subject satisfaction with treatment and perceived plaque improvement of the Luma Light System (Arm B) at 6 weeks compared to control (Arm A).
Time Frame
6 weeks
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Male or female of any race, greater than 18 years of age.
Verbal and written informed consent obtained from the subject.
Has a clinical diagnosis of plaque psoriasis at the Screening and Baseline visits.
Has an IGA score of 2 to 4 that is consistent between the Screening and Baseline visits.
TPA score of 5-12 and a score of at least 1 for each of the 3 different psoriasis signs and symptoms (erythema, plaque elevation, and scaling) at the baseline visits.
Has at least 2 plaques of at least 6cm by 3cm with TPA scores not differing from each other by a score of more than 1 that are at least 2 inches apart at the baseline visit.
Is in good general health as determined by the Investigator based on the subject's medical history.
Females of childbearing potential must have negative urine or blood pregnancy test results. Females of childbearing potential agree to use acceptable methods of contraception from the screening visit continuously until 30 days after end of treatment.
Subject agrees to use only the Sponsor provided cleanser and lotion during the study phase unless given permission by Investigator to use other topicals on non-target plaques.
Subject is willing and able to return for all study visits.
Exclusion Criteria:
Presence of psoriasis that was previously treated with prescription medications prior to the Screening visit and was non-responsive to treatment, as determined by the Investigator.
Presence of any concurrent skin condition that could interfere with the evaluation of the study device, as determined by the Investigator.
Female who is pregnant, nursing an infant, or planning a pregnancy during the Active Treatment Phase.
Treatment with any investigational drug or device within 2 weeks or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) prior to the Baseline visit, or concurrent participation in another clinical trial with an investigational drug or device.
History of melanoma.
Subject has any medical, social or psychological conditions that, in the opinion of the Investigator, preclude them from receiving the pre-treatment, required treatment, and post-treatment procedures and evaluations.
Subject has known allergy or adverse reaction to skin adhesives or hydrogels or coal tar.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Liza Marie
Phone
707-755-3946
Email
liza@redwoodfamilyderm.com
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Redwood Dermatology Research
City
Santa Rosa
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95403
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Liza Marie, RN
Phone
707-755-3946
Email
liza@redwoodfamilyderm.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jeffrey Sugarman, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Dermatology Associates of Knoxville, PC
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37917
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kim Hall, CCRC
Phone
865-524-2547
Ext
1136
Email
dermreseach@yahoo.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Edward Primka, MD
Facility Name
Texas Dermatology and Laser Specialists
City
San Antonio
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78218
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kirsten Katz
Phone
210-852-2779
Email
kirsten@texasdls.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gabe Leal
Phone
210-852-2779
Email
gabe@texasdls.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
John C Browning, MD
Facility Name
Jordan Valley Dermatology Center
City
West Jordan
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84008
Country
United States
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kristy Pincock, CRC
Phone
810-316-0266
Email
kpincock@jordanvalleydermatology.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Judy Stinson, LPN, CRC
Phone
810-316-0266
Email
jstinson@jordanvalleydermatology.com
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Douglas W Forsha, MD
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Evaluation of Efficacy, Duration of Remission and Safety of a Light and Occlusive Patch Therapy for Plaque Psoriasis
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs