search
Back to results

Clinical Evaluation of Zirconia Crowns and Anterior Strip Crowns

Primary Purpose

Dental Caries

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
NuSmile Zirconia crowns by NuSmile company
Composite resin strip crowns by 3M company
Sponsored by
King Abdulaziz University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Dental Caries focused on measuring caries, full coverage, strip crown, Zirconia crown, primary anterior teeth, crown

Eligibility Criteria

4 Years - 6 Years (Child)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Healthy Children with no history of any systemic illness or any developmental disease of the teeth and jaws that would have affected dietary patterns, caries, susceptibility or the selection of restorative materials to the best of current knowledge.
  • Minimal of two surfaces of caries in the targeted tooth.
  • Patient with Early Childhood Caries as defined by American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD), 2016.
  • Cooperative patient who had behavioral rating "positive" or "definitely positive" followed the Frankl behavior classification scale. (Frankl et al. 1962)
  • Opposing teeth present.
  • Written consent was obtained from the parent/guardian after explaining the full details of the treatment procedure and its possible outcomes, discomfort, risks, and benefits.
  • No patient was excluded on the basis of gender, race, social or economic background.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Teeth with proximity to exfoliation and resorption of the root passed its half.
  • Patients with allergy or hypersensitivity to nickel in case of posterior group teeth.
  • Presence of single surface caries not involving the proximal surfaces.
  • Teeth that has been subjected to trauma.
  • Anxious, uncooperative patients who need to be treated under general anesthesia.
  • Children who suffer from bruxism.
  • Children with special needs.
  • Presence of tooth wear on the opposing teeth (in case of anterior teeth), or absence of opposing.

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    NuSmile Zirconia crowns

    Composite resin strip crowns

    Arm Description

    NuSmile Zirconia crowns is an esthetic primary anterior crown used to restore carious primary anterior teeth.

    Composite resin strip crowns is an esthetic conventional primary anterior crown used to restore carious primary anterior teeth.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Gingival Health
    This parameter was evaluated using a blunt periodontal probe (Double ended probe Williams 1-2-3-5-7-8-9-10 Goldman Fox Flat) according to the Löe and Silness gingival index [Löe, 1967].
    Plaque index
    This parameter was evaluated using a blunt periodontal probe (Double ended probe Williams 1-2-3-5-7-8-9-10 Goldman Fox Flat) according to the Löe and Silness gingival index [Löe,1967].
    Restoration failure
    This was clinically evaluated with visual assessment of the restoration, according to the US Public Health Service "USPHS", Alpha criteria rating system [Ryge, 1980].
    Tooth wear of opposing dentition
    Tooth wear was evaluated according to the Smith and Knight Tooth Wear Index (Bardsley, 2008; Smith and Knight, 1984)
    Gingival Health
    This parameter was evaluated using a blunt periodontal probe (Double ended probe Williams 1-2-3-5-7-8-9-10 Goldman Fox Flat) according to the Löe and Silness gingival index [Löe, 1967].
    Plaque index
    This parameter was evaluated using a blunt periodontal probe (Double ended probe Williams 1-2-3-5-7-8-9-10 Goldman Fox Flat) according to the Löe and Silness gingival index [Löe, 1967].
    Restoration failure
    This was clinically evaluated with visual assessment of the restoration, according to the US Public Health Service "USPHS", Alpha criteria rating system [Ryge, 1980].
    Tooth wear of opposing dentition
    Tooth wear was evaluated according to the Smith and Knight Tooth Wear Index (Bardsley, 2008; Smith and Knight, 1984)
    Gingival Health
    This parameter was evaluated using a blunt periodontal probe (Double ended probe Williams 1-2-3-5-7-8-9-10 Goldman Fox Flat) according to the Löe and Silness gingival index [Löe, 1967].
    Plaque index
    This parameter was evaluated using a blunt periodontal probe (Double ended probe Williams 1-2-3-5-7-8-9-10 Goldman Fox Flat) according to the Löe and Silness gingival index [Löe, 1967].
    Restoration failure
    This was clinically evaluated with visual assessment of the restoration, according to the US Public Health Service "USPHS", Alpha criteria rating system [Ryge, 1980].
    Tooth wear of opposing dentition
    Tooth wear was evaluated according to the Smith and Knight Tooth Wear Index (Bardsley, 2008; Smith and Knight, 1984)

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    June 2, 2017
    Last Updated
    June 8, 2017
    Sponsor
    King Abdulaziz University
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03184012
    Brief Title
    Clinical Evaluation of Zirconia Crowns and Anterior Strip Crowns
    Official Title
    Clinical Comparison Between Zirconia Crowns Versus Anterior Strip Crowns
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    June 2017
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    November 1, 2015 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 1, 2016 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    January 30, 2017 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    King Abdulaziz University

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    Yes
    Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
    Yes
    Data Monitoring Committee
    Yes

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The hypothesis to be investigated is that no difference will be found upon comparing resin composite strip crowns and NuSmile zirconia crowns (NuSmile ZR) esthetic primary anterior in restoring anterior primary teeth.
    Detailed Description
    The aim of this study is to clinically evaluate the performance of a new NuSmile ZR esthetic primary anterior crowns, compared with anterior resin composite strip crowns in the restoration of 120 teeth (primary incisors and lateral anterior teeth in the deciduous dentition of child patients).

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Dental Caries
    Keywords
    caries, full coverage, strip crown, Zirconia crown, primary anterior teeth, crown

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Model Description
    one group assigned to be treated with Zirconia crowns, the other group assigned to be treated with resin composite strip crowns
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    120 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    NuSmile Zirconia crowns
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    NuSmile Zirconia crowns is an esthetic primary anterior crown used to restore carious primary anterior teeth.
    Arm Title
    Composite resin strip crowns
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Composite resin strip crowns is an esthetic conventional primary anterior crown used to restore carious primary anterior teeth.
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    NuSmile Zirconia crowns by NuSmile company
    Intervention Description
    anterior carious teeth restored with Zirconia crowns
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Composite resin strip crowns by 3M company
    Intervention Description
    anterior carious teeth restored with Strip crowns
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Gingival Health
    Description
    This parameter was evaluated using a blunt periodontal probe (Double ended probe Williams 1-2-3-5-7-8-9-10 Goldman Fox Flat) according to the Löe and Silness gingival index [Löe, 1967].
    Time Frame
    3-month follow-up
    Title
    Plaque index
    Description
    This parameter was evaluated using a blunt periodontal probe (Double ended probe Williams 1-2-3-5-7-8-9-10 Goldman Fox Flat) according to the Löe and Silness gingival index [Löe,1967].
    Time Frame
    3-month follow-up
    Title
    Restoration failure
    Description
    This was clinically evaluated with visual assessment of the restoration, according to the US Public Health Service "USPHS", Alpha criteria rating system [Ryge, 1980].
    Time Frame
    3-month follow-up
    Title
    Tooth wear of opposing dentition
    Description
    Tooth wear was evaluated according to the Smith and Knight Tooth Wear Index (Bardsley, 2008; Smith and Knight, 1984)
    Time Frame
    3-month follow-up
    Title
    Gingival Health
    Description
    This parameter was evaluated using a blunt periodontal probe (Double ended probe Williams 1-2-3-5-7-8-9-10 Goldman Fox Flat) according to the Löe and Silness gingival index [Löe, 1967].
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    Plaque index
    Description
    This parameter was evaluated using a blunt periodontal probe (Double ended probe Williams 1-2-3-5-7-8-9-10 Goldman Fox Flat) according to the Löe and Silness gingival index [Löe, 1967].
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    Restoration failure
    Description
    This was clinically evaluated with visual assessment of the restoration, according to the US Public Health Service "USPHS", Alpha criteria rating system [Ryge, 1980].
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    Tooth wear of opposing dentition
    Description
    Tooth wear was evaluated according to the Smith and Knight Tooth Wear Index (Bardsley, 2008; Smith and Knight, 1984)
    Time Frame
    6-month follow-up
    Title
    Gingival Health
    Description
    This parameter was evaluated using a blunt periodontal probe (Double ended probe Williams 1-2-3-5-7-8-9-10 Goldman Fox Flat) according to the Löe and Silness gingival index [Löe, 1967].
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up
    Title
    Plaque index
    Description
    This parameter was evaluated using a blunt periodontal probe (Double ended probe Williams 1-2-3-5-7-8-9-10 Goldman Fox Flat) according to the Löe and Silness gingival index [Löe, 1967].
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up
    Title
    Restoration failure
    Description
    This was clinically evaluated with visual assessment of the restoration, according to the US Public Health Service "USPHS", Alpha criteria rating system [Ryge, 1980].
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up
    Title
    Tooth wear of opposing dentition
    Description
    Tooth wear was evaluated according to the Smith and Knight Tooth Wear Index (Bardsley, 2008; Smith and Knight, 1984)
    Time Frame
    12-month follow-up

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    4 Years
    Maximum Age & Unit of Time
    6 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Healthy Children with no history of any systemic illness or any developmental disease of the teeth and jaws that would have affected dietary patterns, caries, susceptibility or the selection of restorative materials to the best of current knowledge. Minimal of two surfaces of caries in the targeted tooth. Patient with Early Childhood Caries as defined by American Academy of Pediatric Dentistry (AAPD), 2016. Cooperative patient who had behavioral rating "positive" or "definitely positive" followed the Frankl behavior classification scale. (Frankl et al. 1962) Opposing teeth present. Written consent was obtained from the parent/guardian after explaining the full details of the treatment procedure and its possible outcomes, discomfort, risks, and benefits. No patient was excluded on the basis of gender, race, social or economic background. Exclusion Criteria: Teeth with proximity to exfoliation and resorption of the root passed its half. Patients with allergy or hypersensitivity to nickel in case of posterior group teeth. Presence of single surface caries not involving the proximal surfaces. Teeth that has been subjected to trauma. Anxious, uncooperative patients who need to be treated under general anesthesia. Children who suffer from bruxism. Children with special needs. Presence of tooth wear on the opposing teeth (in case of anterior teeth), or absence of opposing.
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Bashaer S Abdulhadi, MSc
    Organizational Affiliation
    King Abdulaziz University
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    33167954
    Citation
    Alaki SM, Abdulhadi BS, AbdElBaki MA, Alamoudi NM. Comparing zirconia to anterior strip crowns in primary anterior teeth in children: a randomized clinical trial. BMC Oral Health. 2020 Nov 10;20(1):313. doi: 10.1186/s12903-020-01305-1.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Clinical Evaluation of Zirconia Crowns and Anterior Strip Crowns

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs