Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Short Versus Long Oesophageal Myotomy in POEM for Achalasia Cardia.
Primary Purpose
Achalasia Cardia
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
India
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Per oral endoscopic myotomy
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Achalasia Cardia focused on measuring Achalasia cardia, myotomy, Per oral endoscopic myotomy, laparoscopic fundoplication
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Type 1 and 2 achalasia with eckerd score >3 (0-12 scale achalasia) -.
- Age 18-75 years.
- Treatment naïve or history of pneumatic balloon dilatation.
- Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent form to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Type 3 achalasia cardia or any other esophageal motility disorder
- Previous surgery of the esophagus or stomach
- Active severe esophagitis
- Large lower esophageal diverticula
- Large > 3cm hiatal hernia
- Sigmoid esophagus
- Known gastroesophageal malignancy
- Inability to tolerate sedated upper endoscopy due to cardiopulmonary instability, severe pulmonary disease or other contraindication to endoscopy
- Cirrhosis with portal hypertension, varices, and/or ascites
Sites / Locations
- Mohan Ramchandani
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Short myotomy
Long myotomy
Arm Description
Per oral endoscopic myotomy extending from 3 cm cephalad to 3 cm distal to EGJ
Per oral endoscopic myotomy extending from 6-8cm cephalad to and 3 cm distal to EGJ.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Comparison of clinical efficacy between short and long myotomy groups
Clinical success defined as Eckardt score≤3 compared between the two groups
Secondary Outcome Measures
Difference in operating time between short and long esophageal myotomy during POEM
Operating time defined as time taken from mucosal incision to closure of incision after completion of the procedure. Procedure duration was calculated in both the groups and compared
Intraoperative adverse events
Adverse events encountered during the procedure will be noted. Clinical success with reference to improvement in eckerd score. Change in LES pressure by Manometry ( Assessed at 1and 3 months) Assessment of Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) by Potential of Hydrogen (pH) -impedance and Endoscopy (Assessed at 1 and 3 months) Change in barium column height on timed barium Esophagogram (Assessed at pre procedure at 1 and 3 months).
LES pressure reduction
In both the arms reduction in mean LES pressure will be compared at 1 and 3 months
Comparison of changes in Eckardt score
In both the groups Eckardt score ( based on symptoms of Dysphagia, Chest pain, regurgitation and weight loss) will be compared
Comparison of gastroesophageal Reflux disease (GERD) Rates
Both the groups will under go clinical evaluation, esophagograstroscopy and ph metry
Change in barium column height on barium esophagogram
In both the groups time barium swallow studies will be done to evaluate the oesophageal emptying at 5 minutes.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03186248
First Posted
June 9, 2017
Last Updated
December 25, 2019
Sponsor
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03186248
Brief Title
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Short Versus Long Oesophageal Myotomy in POEM for Achalasia Cardia.
Official Title
Comparison of Short Versus Long Oesophageal Myotomy in Cases With Idiopathic Achalasia: A Randomized Single Blinded Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 15, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 20, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, India
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Aim of this study is to compare the outcomes of a short esophageal myotomy extending from 3 cm cephalad to the EGJ, to 3 cm distal to it with a long esophageal myotomy with an additional proximal extension (at least 6 cm cephalad to the EGJ, to 3 cm distal) for POEM procedures. Principle of POEM is to reduce pressure gradient across LES by Myotomy. Hypothesis is that performing short myotomy will result in similar efficacy in achalasia cardia while reducing the total time taken for the procedure and ultimately will result in less complications.
Detailed Description
The primary goal of treatment of achalasia cardia (either LHM or POEM) is to divide the muscle at LES to reduce the pressure so that food bolus can pass down into the esophagus. However, there is little evidence regarding the optimal length of this myotomy for either procedure. During LHM the proximal length of myotomy is extended upto 6-8 cm in esophagus and distally to 3 cm in stomach. There are no data on long term outcomes between differential proximal myotomy lengths. The conventionally the esophageal myotomy is extended to 6-8 cm, this is based on technical considerations, as it is the maximum length that can safely be achieved via a laparoscopic, transhiatal approach. High pressure zone of Esophago gastric junction (EGJ) complex extends for 4 cm on an average with 2 cm on esophageal side. It is hypothesized that If shorter proximal myotomy that ablates just the EGJ complex could achieve the same normalization of EGJ physiology as a longer one, there could be several advantages to this modification. It will take less mediastinal dissection of the esophagus, potentially reducing the chances of esophageal perforation, vagal injury and pleural tears. During POEM, a shorter myotomy would allow for creation of a shorter submucosal tunnel, decreasing operative time along with potentially decreasing the incidence of mucosal perforations, pneumothorax and pneumoperitoneum. Additionally, there is chance that many patients regain some esophageal peristalsis after both LHM and POEM. Patients undergoing POEM for type 1 and type 2 Achalasia cardia will be randomised into 2 groups of short oesophageal (3 cm) and long oesophageal ( 6-8 cm) myotomy.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Achalasia Cardia
Keywords
Achalasia cardia, myotomy, Per oral endoscopic myotomy, laparoscopic fundoplication
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Double blind randomized clinical trial
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
Double blind randomized clinical trial
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
71 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Short myotomy
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Per oral endoscopic myotomy extending from 3 cm cephalad to 3 cm distal to EGJ
Arm Title
Long myotomy
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Per oral endoscopic myotomy extending from 6-8cm cephalad to and 3 cm distal to EGJ.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Per oral endoscopic myotomy
Intervention Description
General anesthesia will be administered and an esophagogastroduodenoscopy will be performed. Mucosal incision proximal to the gastroesophageal junction (GEJ) will be identified depending on short or long myotomy. A 1.5- to 2-cm mucosal incision will be performed after raising a submucosal wheal. The endoscope will be inserted to create a submucosal tunnel with a combination of blunt dissection, carbon dioxide insufflation, hydro dissection and careful electrocautery. The tunnel will be extended past the GEJ, 3 cm onto the gastric cardia. after myotomy, the mucosal incision will then be closed using standard endoscopic clips.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Comparison of clinical efficacy between short and long myotomy groups
Description
Clinical success defined as Eckardt score≤3 compared between the two groups
Time Frame
1 year
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference in operating time between short and long esophageal myotomy during POEM
Description
Operating time defined as time taken from mucosal incision to closure of incision after completion of the procedure. Procedure duration was calculated in both the groups and compared
Time Frame
Intra-opeartive
Title
Intraoperative adverse events
Description
Adverse events encountered during the procedure will be noted. Clinical success with reference to improvement in eckerd score. Change in LES pressure by Manometry ( Assessed at 1and 3 months) Assessment of Gastro Esophageal Reflux Disease (GERD) by Potential of Hydrogen (pH) -impedance and Endoscopy (Assessed at 1 and 3 months) Change in barium column height on timed barium Esophagogram (Assessed at pre procedure at 1 and 3 months).
Time Frame
At the time of index procedure
Title
LES pressure reduction
Description
In both the arms reduction in mean LES pressure will be compared at 1 and 3 months
Time Frame
1 and 3 months
Title
Comparison of changes in Eckardt score
Description
In both the groups Eckardt score ( based on symptoms of Dysphagia, Chest pain, regurgitation and weight loss) will be compared
Time Frame
1, 3 and 12 months
Title
Comparison of gastroesophageal Reflux disease (GERD) Rates
Description
Both the groups will under go clinical evaluation, esophagograstroscopy and ph metry
Time Frame
3 months
Title
Change in barium column height on barium esophagogram
Description
In both the groups time barium swallow studies will be done to evaluate the oesophageal emptying at 5 minutes.
Time Frame
1 and 3 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Type 1 and 2 achalasia with eckerd score >3 (0-12 scale achalasia) -.
Age 18-75 years.
Treatment naïve or history of pneumatic balloon dilatation.
Willing and able to comply with the study procedures and provide written informed consent form to participate in the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Type 3 achalasia cardia or any other esophageal motility disorder
Previous surgery of the esophagus or stomach
Active severe esophagitis
Large lower esophageal diverticula
Large > 3cm hiatal hernia
Sigmoid esophagus
Known gastroesophageal malignancy
Inability to tolerate sedated upper endoscopy due to cardiopulmonary instability, severe pulmonary disease or other contraindication to endoscopy
Cirrhosis with portal hypertension, varices, and/or ascites
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
mahiboob sayyed, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Asian Institute of Gastroenterology
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Mohan Ramchandani
City
Hyderabad
State/Province
Telangana
ZIP/Postal Code
500082
Country
India
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Randomized Clinical Trial Comparing Short Versus Long Oesophageal Myotomy in POEM for Achalasia Cardia.
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs