ACDF Comparison Trial
Primary Purpose
Cervical Spine Disc Disease, Surgery, Fusion of Spine
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Allograft Fusion
Cohere PEEK Fusion Group
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Cervical Spine Disc Disease focused on measuring Anterior Cervical Spine Fusion
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18 or more years of age
- Able to provide informed consent
- Has documented diagnosis of cervical spine radiculopathy and/or myelopathy
- Is undergoing standard-of-care ACDF
Exclusion Criteria:
- Prior cervical spine surgery
- Single-level ACDF
- Has a systemic infection or cervical spine infection
- Has a medical condition that may interfere with bone and soft tissue healing
- Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may preclude accurate data collection or evaluation.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Active Comparator
Arm Label
Allograft Fusion Group
Cohere PEEK Fusion Group
Arm Description
The anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of an autologous iliac crest tricortical bone graft.
The anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of a Cohere porous PEEK fusion device.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Rate of successful fusion.
To compare post-operative bone fusion following standard-of-care ACDF using allograft fusion or Cohere porous PEEK fusion.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Overall success rate - composite score.
To be considered an overall success, patients have to achieve all of the following: a ≥15 point improvement in their NDI scores, maintenance or improvement in their neurologic status, no serious adverse events related to the implant or surgical procedure, and no subsequent surgery or intervention that is classified as "failure."
Full Information
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03187171
Brief Title
ACDF Comparison Trial
Official Title
Comparison of Outcomes After ACDF Using Allograft Fusion Versus PEEK Fusion: a Prospective Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
May 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Funding
Study Start Date
December 1, 2018 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
April 23, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 23, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Duke University
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This research protocol seeks to compare radiological and clinical outcomes of cervical spine disease patients following standard-of-care anterior cervical discectomy and fusion (ACDF) using allograft fusion versus Cohere porous polyetheretherketone (PEEK) fusion device.
This clinical study presents little to no additional risk to study subjects beyond those associated with standard-of-care ACDF surgery. Adults age 18 and over who are undergoing an ACDF procedure will be enrolled in the study. The study consists of a completing a series of questionnaires and obtaining radiographs. The primary endpoint of the study will be the rate of successful spinal fusion for each group. For evaluation of the primary endpoint and additional assessments, descriptive statistics including mean, standard deviation, minimum, median, and maximum for continuous variables and frequency distribution for categorical variables will be provided, as well as tabular listings. All complications will be itemized including incidence, duration, and relationship to the device used and/or procedures performed.
Detailed Description
This is a prospective randomized comparative outcomes study, in which all subjects who fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria and who agreed to be part of the study will be randomized to either Allograft or Cohere polyetheretherketone (PEEK) fusion group and will be followed for approximately 12 months following surgery according to the standard-of-care.
Pain and function will be assessed using neck disability index (NDI), 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36), and Numeric Rating Scale (NRS). A trained study team member will record a standardized neurologic examination, including motor, sensory, and reflexes. Neurologic success is defined as maintenance or improvement of all 3 neurologic parameters (motor, sensory, and reflexes). The clinical results will also be assessed using the Japanese Orthopedic Association (JOA) scoring system for cervical myelopathy.
Flexion and extension radiographs will be obtained pre-operatively, at 6-months and 12-months after surgery. A CT scan will be obtained at 6 months, if fusion has occurred no CT is needed at 12 months, if fusion did not occur another computerized tomography (CT) scan will obtained at 12 months. From previous literature, successful fusion is defined as ≤2° of angular motion on lateral flexion and extension radiographs, the presence of bridging trabecular bone between the vertebrae being fused, and the absence of any radiolucent zones spanning more than 50% of the allograft surface. Two independent blinded radiologists will assess the radiographs. In the event of disagreement about fusion healing, a third independent reading will be obtained from a third radiologist.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cervical Spine Disc Disease, Surgery, Fusion of Spine, Degenerative Disc Disease
Keywords
Anterior Cervical Spine Fusion
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
This is a prospective randomized comparative outcomes study, in which all subjects who fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria and who agreed to be part of the study will be randomized to either Allograft or Cohere PEEK fusion group and will be followed for approximately 12 months following surgery according to the standard-of-care.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Allograft Fusion Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of an autologous iliac crest tricortical bone graft.
Arm Title
Cohere PEEK Fusion Group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
The anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of a Cohere porous PEEK fusion device.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Allograft Fusion
Intervention Description
ACDF is a surgical technique used to treat a variety of cervical spine disorders, such as nerve root or spinal cord compression, cervical spondylosis, and cervical spinal stenosis. The anterior approach to the cervical spine for discectomy and fusion by the insertion of an autologous iliac crest tricortical bone graft was first described by Robinson and Smith in 1955. In 1958, Cloward described a wide anterior cylindrical discectomy performed with a special reamer combined with anterior fusion by the insertion of autologous iliac bone graft of the same shape. At Duke University Health Systems, both allografts and Cohere porous PEEK fusion device are used for ACDF.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Cohere PEEK Fusion Group
Other Intervention Name(s)
Fusion Device, PEEK Cage
Intervention Description
Bagby et al. developed the first interbody fusion cage. Cages of different shapes and materials are used to perform ACDF which, in some cases, could be associated with plate fixation. At Duke University Health Systems, both allografts and Cohere porous PEEK fusion device are used for ACDF.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of successful fusion.
Description
To compare post-operative bone fusion following standard-of-care ACDF using allograft fusion or Cohere porous PEEK fusion.
Time Frame
18 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall success rate - composite score.
Description
To be considered an overall success, patients have to achieve all of the following: a ≥15 point improvement in their NDI scores, maintenance or improvement in their neurologic status, no serious adverse events related to the implant or surgical procedure, and no subsequent surgery or intervention that is classified as "failure."
Time Frame
18 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
99 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
18 or more years of age
Able to provide informed consent
Has documented diagnosis of cervical spine radiculopathy and/or myelopathy
Is undergoing standard-of-care ACDF
Exclusion Criteria:
Prior cervical spine surgery
Single-level ACDF
Has a systemic infection or cervical spine infection
Has a medical condition that may interfere with bone and soft tissue healing
Any condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may preclude accurate data collection or evaluation.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Michael Haglund, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Duke University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
ACDF Comparison Trial
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs