Steroid Delivery to the Frontal Sinus Opening With a Bioabsorbable Implant vs. a Bioabsorbable Nasal Dressing
Primary Purpose
Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis)
Status
Terminated
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Bioabsorbable steroid releasing sinus implant
Bioabsorbable nasal dressing impregnated with steroid
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis)
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adults aged 18 and older
- Diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps based on the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines
- Patient scheduled for bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery with evidence of bilateral frontal sinus disease based on Computed Tomography (Lund-Mackay score greater than or equal to 1)
- At the time of surgery bilateral frontal sinusotomy of type Draf 2a or 2b was performed using the same technique on both sides
- Bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery performed successfully without complication
- Frontal sinus opening diameter greater than 4.0 mm achieved (4 mm olive tipped suction easily passed into frontal sinus)
Exclusion Criteria:
- Any patient who had frontal sinus surgery for tumor
- Allergy to mometesone and/or triamcinolone
- Frontal sinusotomy type Draf 1 or Draf 3 performed
- One or both frontal sinus openings not amenable to implant placement
- Patients with chronic oral steroid dependent conditions
- Invasive fungal sinusitis
- Immune deficiency
Sites / Locations
- University of Rochester Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Bioabsorbable steroid releasing sinus implant & nasal dressing impregnated with steroid
Arm Description
Patients will undergo bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery which will include bilateral frontal sinusotomy of Draf 2a or 2b type as previously described in the literature. At the conclusion of the procedure, if the patient still meets all inclusion criteria, one frontal sinus will be randomly assigned using the envelop method to receive a bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant and the other frontal sinus will receive a bioabsorbable nasal dressing impregnated with steroid
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants Whose Propel Sinus Stent Appeared Worse, the Same, or Better Than the Bioabsorbable Nasal Dressing
Grading by a blinded independent sinus expert as to whether the propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is better, worse or the same, in terms of overall appearance after implant removal
Secondary Outcome Measures
Adhesion/Scarring Scale - Left Side
Average adhesion/scarring Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant placement - Left side
Adhesion/Scarring Scale - Right Side
Average adhesion/scarring Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid placement
Polypoid Edema Scale - Left Side
Average polypoid edema Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant placement
Polypoid Edema Scale - Right Side
Average polypoid edema Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid placement
Frontal Sinus Opening Size
Frontal sinus opening greater than or equal to 4 mm for bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant vs. bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid
Visualization of Frontal Sinus Roof
Odds ratio of frontal sinus roof visualized for bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant vs. bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03188822
First Posted
June 13, 2017
Last Updated
December 7, 2022
Sponsor
University of Rochester
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03188822
Brief Title
Steroid Delivery to the Frontal Sinus Opening With a Bioabsorbable Implant vs. a Bioabsorbable Nasal Dressing
Official Title
A Prospective, Randomized, Controlled Trial of Steroid Delivery to the Frontal Sinus Opening With a Bioabsorbable Steroid Releasing Implant vs. a Bioabsorbable Nasal Dressing With Added Steroid
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Study enrollment was too slow to complete the study in a reasonable time
Study Start Date
August 25, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 28, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 2, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Rochester
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare how two different post-surgical treatments that both deliver steroids to the frontal sinus opening affect your healing after frontal sinus surgery.
Detailed Description
This is a single center, randomized & controlled trial comparing the efficacy of the Propel mini stent or Propel contour stent vs. Nasopore impregnated with Triamcinolone Acetonide at reducing frontal sinus opening stenosis and polypoid edema after endoscopic sinus surgery in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis. Eligible subjects who undergo standard of care bilateral frontal sinusotomy will have each frontal sinus randomly assigned to either a Propel mini or contour steroid eluding stent or a Nasopore nasal dressing impregnated with 2.5 ml of Triamcinolone Acetonide 40 mg/ml. Specific Propel stent will be chosen based on the shape of frontal sinus opening and best fit as decided by the operating Surgeon. Patients will be reassessed on approximately post-operative day 7, 14, 30, 90 days, 6 months, and 12 months at their standard of care follow-up visits. On the day 14 visit, the frontal sinus Propel stent and Nasopore will be completely removed per Standard of care. Video will be taken of the frontal sinus opening, and assessed for scarring/adhesions, presence of polypoid edema, frontal sinus patency, need for oral steroids or other interventions. Additionally, endoscopic scoring of frontal sinus by the above measures will be evaluated by 2 independent sinus surgeon reviewers. The reviewers will also be asked to rank the two frontal sinus openings as better, same or worse, compared to the opposite side
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Chronic Rhinosinusitis (Diagnosis)
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
9 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Bioabsorbable steroid releasing sinus implant & nasal dressing impregnated with steroid
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients will undergo bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery which will include bilateral frontal sinusotomy of Draf 2a or 2b type as previously described in the literature. At the conclusion of the procedure, if the patient still meets all inclusion criteria, one frontal sinus will be randomly assigned using the envelop method to receive a bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant and the other frontal sinus will receive a bioabsorbable nasal dressing impregnated with steroid
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Bioabsorbable steroid releasing sinus implant
Intervention Description
After completion of indicated frontal sinus surgery, patients will have a bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant placed in the frontal sinus opening, which will remain in place for 14 days.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Bioabsorbable nasal dressing impregnated with steroid
Intervention Description
After completion of indicated frontal sinus surgery, patients will have a bioabsorbable nasal dressing impregnated with steroid placed in the frontal sinus opening, which will remain in place for 14 days.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants Whose Propel Sinus Stent Appeared Worse, the Same, or Better Than the Bioabsorbable Nasal Dressing
Description
Grading by a blinded independent sinus expert as to whether the propel sinus stent frontal sinusotomy side is better, worse or the same, in terms of overall appearance after implant removal
Time Frame
12 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Adhesion/Scarring Scale - Left Side
Description
Average adhesion/scarring Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant placement - Left side
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Adhesion/Scarring Scale - Right Side
Description
Average adhesion/scarring Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid placement
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Polypoid Edema Scale - Left Side
Description
Average polypoid edema Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant placement
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Polypoid Edema Scale - Right Side
Description
Average polypoid edema Likert scale score (range from 0 to 4 with higher numbers indicating worse health) for appearance of the Frontal sinus opening after bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid placement
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Frontal Sinus Opening Size
Description
Frontal sinus opening greater than or equal to 4 mm for bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant vs. bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid
Time Frame
12 months
Title
Visualization of Frontal Sinus Roof
Description
Odds ratio of frontal sinus roof visualized for bioabsorbable steroid releasing implant vs. bioabsorbable nasal dressing with added steroid
Time Frame
12 months
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adults aged 18 and older
Diagnosis of chronic rhinosinusitis with nasal polyps based on the American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery guidelines
Patient scheduled for bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery with evidence of bilateral frontal sinus disease based on Computed Tomography (Lund-Mackay score greater than or equal to 1)
At the time of surgery bilateral frontal sinusotomy of type Draf 2a or 2b was performed using the same technique on both sides
Bilateral endoscopic sinus surgery performed successfully without complication
Frontal sinus opening diameter greater than 4.0 mm achieved (4 mm olive tipped suction easily passed into frontal sinus)
Exclusion Criteria:
Any patient who had frontal sinus surgery for tumor
Allergy to mometesone and/or triamcinolone
Frontal sinusotomy type Draf 1 or Draf 3 performed
One or both frontal sinus openings not amenable to implant placement
Patients with chronic oral steroid dependent conditions
Invasive fungal sinusitis
Immune deficiency
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Li-Xing Man, MSc, MD, MPA
Organizational Affiliation
University of Rochester
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Rochester Department of Otolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery
City
Rochester
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14642
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25832968
Citation
Rosenfeld RM, Piccirillo JF, Chandrasekhar SS, Brook I, Ashok Kumar K, Kramper M, Orlandi RR, Palmer JN, Patel ZM, Peters A, Walsh SA, Corrigan MD. Clinical practice guideline (update): adult sinusitis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2015 Apr;152(2 Suppl):S1-S39. doi: 10.1177/0194599815572097.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22469599
Citation
Fokkens WJ, Lund VJ, Mullol J, Bachert C, Alobid I, Baroody F, Cohen N, Cervin A, Douglas R, Gevaert P, Georgalas C, Goossens H, Harvey R, Hellings P, Hopkins C, Jones N, Joos G, Kalogjera L, Kern B, Kowalski M, Price D, Riechelmann H, Schlosser R, Senior B, Thomas M, Toskala E, Voegels R, Wang de Y, Wormald PJ. EPOS 2012: European position paper on rhinosinusitis and nasal polyps 2012. A summary for otorhinolaryngologists. Rhinology. 2012 Mar;50(1):1-12. doi: 10.4193/Rhino12.000.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21038021
Citation
Ragab SM, Lund VJ, Scadding G, Saleh HA, Khalifa MA. Impact of chronic rhinosinusitis therapy on quality of life: a prospective randomized controlled trial. Rhinology. 2010 Sep 1;48(3):305-11. doi: 10.4193/Rhin08.137.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15467628
Citation
Chandra RK, Palmer JN, Tangsujarittham T, Kennedy DW. Factors associated with failure of frontal sinusotomy in the early follow-up period. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2004 Oct;131(4):514-8. doi: 10.1016/j.otohns.2004.03.022.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24616299
Citation
Valdes CJ, Bogado M, Samaha M. Causes of failure in endoscopic frontal sinus surgery in chronic rhinosinusitis patients. Int Forum Allergy Rhinol. 2014 Jun;4(6):502-6. doi: 10.1002/alr.21307. Epub 2014 Mar 10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27450618
Citation
DeConde AS, Smith TL. Outcomes After Frontal Sinus Surgery: An Evidence-Based Review. Otolaryngol Clin North Am. 2016 Aug;49(4):1019-33. doi: 10.1016/j.otc.2016.03.024.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15844495
Citation
Rowe-Jones JM, Medcalf M, Durham SR, Richards DH, Mackay IS. Functional endoscopic sinus surgery: 5 year follow up and results of a prospective, randomised, stratified, double-blind, placebo controlled study of postoperative fluticasone propionate aqueous nasal spray. Rhinology. 2005 Mar;43(1):2-10.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18075447
Citation
Wright ED, Agrawal S. Impact of perioperative systemic steroids on surgical outcomes in patients with chronic rhinosinusitis with polyposis: evaluation with the novel Perioperative Sinus Endoscopy (POSE) scoring system. Laryngoscope. 2007 Nov;117(11 Pt 2 Suppl 115):1-28. doi: 10.1097/MLG.0b013e31814842f8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26068957
Citation
Huang Z, Hwang P, Sun Y, Zhou B. Steroid-eluting sinus stents for improving symptoms in chronic rhinosinusitis patients undergoing functional endoscopic sinus surgery. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 10;(6):CD010436. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010436.pub2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20513050
Citation
Cote DW, Wright ED. Triamcinolone-impregnated nasal dressing following endoscopic sinus surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study. Laryngoscope. 2010 Jun;120(6):1269-73. doi: 10.1002/lary.20905.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27363723
Citation
Smith TL, Singh A, Luong A, Ow RA, Shotts SD, Sautter NB, Han JK, Stambaugh J, Raman A. Randomized controlled trial of a bioabsorbable steroid-releasing implant in the frontal sinus opening. Laryngoscope. 2016 Dec;126(12):2659-2664. doi: 10.1002/lary.26140. Epub 2016 Jul 1. Erratum In: Laryngoscope. 2020 Mar;130(3):836.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Steroid Delivery to the Frontal Sinus Opening With a Bioabsorbable Implant vs. a Bioabsorbable Nasal Dressing
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs