search
Back to results

An Equivalence Study of Generic Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.015% and Picato Gel 0.015% in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis

Primary Purpose

ACTINIC KERATOSIS

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ingenol Mebutate (Picato®)
Generic Ingenol Mebutate
Vehicle Foam
Sponsored by
Actavis Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for ACTINIC KERATOSIS

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 95 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Subject was male or non-pregnant female 18 years of age or older.
  • Females must have been post-menopausal, surgically sterile, or using an effective method of birth control. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have had a negative urine pregnancy test (UPT) at Visit 1/Baseline.
  • Subject provided written informed consent.
  • Subject had a clinical diagnosis of AK at Visit 1/Baseline with at least four, but no more than eight visible and discrete non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic AK lesions, each at least 4 mm in diameter, within a contiguous 25 cm2 treatment area ("the Treatment Area") located on the face or scalp.
  • Subject was willing and able to apply the test article as directed, comply with study instructions, and commit to all follow-up visits for the duration of the study.
  • Subject was in good general health and free of any disease state or physical condition that might have impaired evaluation of AK lesions or which, in the investigator's opinion, exposed the subject to an unacceptable risk by study participation.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • 1. Subject was pregnant, lactating, or was planning to become pregnant during the study.
  • Subject had a location of the selected contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area that (a) was within 5 cm of an incompletely healed wound or (b) was in an area containing a lesion that was previously treated with ingenol mebutate.
  • Subject had hyperkeratotic, hypertrophic, or large mat-like AKs (e.g., AK >1 cm2 in size) within the contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area.
  • Subject had more than eight AKs, independent of size, within the selected contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area
  • Subject had atopic dermatitis, basal cell carcinoma, eczema, psoriasis, rosacea, squamous cell carcinoma, xeroderma pigmentosum, or any other possibly confounding skin conditions within the region of the head that contained the selected Treatment Area (i.e., face or scalp).
  • Subject had any skin pathology or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, could have interfered with the evaluation of the test article or required the use of interfering topical, systemic, or surgical therapy.
  • Subject was immunosuppressed (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic malignancy, graft host disease, etc.).
  • Subject experienced an unsuccessful outcome from previous ingenol mebutate therapy (an unsuccessful outcome was defined as after a reasonable therapeutic trial with no compliance issues and the topical drug did not work).
  • Subject used topical creams, lotions, or gels of any kind within the selected Treatment Area within one day prior to entry into the study.
  • Subject had the need or planned to be exposed to artificial tanning devices or excessive sunlight during the study or had used artificial tanners within two weeks of Visit 1/Baseline.
  • Subject had used any of the following topical medications on the face or scalp:

    • Corticosteroids within two weeks of Visit 1/Baseline;
    • Keratolytic-containing therapeutic products or medicated or irritant topical salves within two weeks of Visit 1/Baseline, including, but not limited to, alpha hydroxy acids (e.g., glycolic acid, lactic acid etc. >5%), beta hydroxy acid (salicylic acid >2%), and urea >5%;
    • Topical retinoids (e.g., tazarotene, adapalene, tretinoin) within two weeks of Visit 1/Baseline;
    • Light treatments (e.g., psoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy, ultraviolet B) within four weeks of Visit 1/Baseline;
    • Photodynamic therapy within eight weeks of Visit 1/Baseline;
    • 5-fluorouracil, diclofenac, imiquimod, or ingenol mebutate within eight weeks of Visit 1/Baseline; or
    • Other topical therapy for actinic keratosis within 2 cm of the selected contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area within eight weeks of Visit 1/Baseline.
  • Subject had cryodestruction or chemodestruction, surgical excision, curettage, dermabrasion, chemical peel, or laser resurfacing on the Treatment Area (i.e., face or scalp) within two weeks prior to Visit 1/Baseline.
  • Subject used any of the following systemic medications:

    • Corticosteroid therapy within one month;
    • Interferon/interferon inducers, cytotoxic drugs, immuno-modulators, or immunosuppressive therapies within one month;
    • Retinoid therapy within six months prior to Visit 1/Baseline.
  • Subject had lesions suspicious for skin cancer (skin cancer not ruled out by biopsy) or untreated skin cancers within the selected contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area on the face or scalp.
  • Subject was enrolled in an investigational drug or device study.
  • Subject used an investigational drug or investigational device treatment within one month prior to Visit 1/Baseline.
  • Subject had a history of sensitivity to any of the ingredients in the test articles (see Section 9.4.2).
  • Subject had any condition which, in the investigator's opinion, would have made it unsafe or precluded the subject's ability to fully participate in this research study.
  • Subject was unable to communicate or cooperate with the investigator due to language problems, poor mental development, impaired cerebral function, or physical limitations.
  • Subject was known to be noncompliant or was unlikely to comply with the requirements of the study protocol (e.g., due to alcoholism, drug dependency, mental incapacity) in the opinion of the investigator.
  • Subject was previously enrolled in the same study.

Sites / Locations

  • Dermatology Specialists, Inc.
  • Horizons Clinical Research Ctr., LLC
  • The Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research
  • Moore Clinical Research
  • Savin Medical Group Research Center
  • Tory P. Sullivan, M.D., P.A.
  • MedaPhase, Inc.
  • Northwest Clinical Trials, Inc.
  • Arlington Dermatology
  • Christie Clinic, LLC
  • University Dermatology & Vein Clinic, LLC
  • Forefront Dermatology
  • Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
  • The Indiana Clinical Trials Center
  • The South Bend Clinic,LLC
  • Minnesota Clinical Study Center
  • MediSearch Clinical Trials
  • Academic Dermatology Associates
  • Dermatology Consulting Services
  • Omega Medical Research, 400 Bald Hill Road, Warwick, RI 02886
  • Palmetto Clinical Trial Services
  • Dermatology Associates of Knoxville, PC
  • DermReseach New Braunfels

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Picato

Generic Ingenol Mebutate

Vehicle Foam

Arm Description

Picato® (ingenol mebutate) gel, 0.15% (Leo Pharma Inc.) [Reference Listed Drug (RLD)]

Generic ingenol mebutate gel, 0.15% [Test]

Vehicle gel of the test product

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Complete Clearance of AK Lesions
Treatment success (complete clearance of AK lesions) at Day 57, where complete clearance of AK lesions was defined as having no (zero) clinically visible AK lesions in the Treatment Area

Secondary Outcome Measures

Full Information

First Posted
June 14, 2017
Last Updated
January 13, 2020
Sponsor
Actavis Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03200912
Brief Title
An Equivalence Study of Generic Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.015% and Picato Gel 0.015% in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis
Official Title
A Multicenter Randomized Doubleblind Vehicle-controlled Parallel Comparison Study to Determine Therapeutic Equivalence of Generic Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.015% and Picato® Gel 0.015% in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis on the Face or Scalp
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 19, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 7, 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 22, 2017 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Actavis Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The objective of this study was to evaluate the safety and therapeutic equivalence of generic ingenol mebutate gel, 0.015% to Picato gel, 0.015% by establishing the therapeutic comparability of the two active products and the superiority of the two active products over the vehicle gel in the treatment of AK on the face and scalp.
Detailed Description
Picato® (ingenol mebutate) gel is the first and only ingenol mebutate product approved by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2012 for the topical treatment of AKs on the face and scalp (0.015% formulation) and on the trunk and extremities (0.05% formulation). The FDA approved regimen for ingenol mebutate gel, 0.015% for the treatment of AKs on the face and scalp is once-daily application of one unit dose tube for three consecutive days applied to one contiguous skin area of approximately 25 cm2 (e.g., 5 cm x 5 cm).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
ACTINIC KERATOSIS

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
507 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Picato
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Picato® (ingenol mebutate) gel, 0.15% (Leo Pharma Inc.) [Reference Listed Drug (RLD)]
Arm Title
Generic Ingenol Mebutate
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Generic ingenol mebutate gel, 0.15% [Test]
Arm Title
Vehicle Foam
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Vehicle gel of the test product
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ingenol Mebutate (Picato®)
Other Intervention Name(s)
RLD
Intervention Description
Brand product
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Generic Ingenol Mebutate
Other Intervention Name(s)
Test
Intervention Description
Generic formulated to have the same therapeutic effect of the brand
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vehicle Foam
Other Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
It does not contain active ingredient. A placebo to test the sensitivity of the active treatments.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Complete Clearance of AK Lesions
Description
Treatment success (complete clearance of AK lesions) at Day 57, where complete clearance of AK lesions was defined as having no (zero) clinically visible AK lesions in the Treatment Area
Time Frame
57 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
95 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Subject was male or non-pregnant female 18 years of age or older. Females must have been post-menopausal, surgically sterile, or using an effective method of birth control. Women of childbearing potential (WOCBP) must have had a negative urine pregnancy test (UPT) at Visit 1/Baseline. Subject provided written informed consent. Subject had a clinical diagnosis of AK at Visit 1/Baseline with at least four, but no more than eight visible and discrete non-hyperkeratotic, non-hypertrophic AK lesions, each at least 4 mm in diameter, within a contiguous 25 cm2 treatment area ("the Treatment Area") located on the face or scalp. Subject was willing and able to apply the test article as directed, comply with study instructions, and commit to all follow-up visits for the duration of the study. Subject was in good general health and free of any disease state or physical condition that might have impaired evaluation of AK lesions or which, in the investigator's opinion, exposed the subject to an unacceptable risk by study participation. Exclusion Criteria: 1. Subject was pregnant, lactating, or was planning to become pregnant during the study. Subject had a location of the selected contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area that (a) was within 5 cm of an incompletely healed wound or (b) was in an area containing a lesion that was previously treated with ingenol mebutate. Subject had hyperkeratotic, hypertrophic, or large mat-like AKs (e.g., AK >1 cm2 in size) within the contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area. Subject had more than eight AKs, independent of size, within the selected contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area Subject had atopic dermatitis, basal cell carcinoma, eczema, psoriasis, rosacea, squamous cell carcinoma, xeroderma pigmentosum, or any other possibly confounding skin conditions within the region of the head that contained the selected Treatment Area (i.e., face or scalp). Subject had any skin pathology or condition that, in the investigator's opinion, could have interfered with the evaluation of the test article or required the use of interfering topical, systemic, or surgical therapy. Subject was immunosuppressed (e.g., human immunodeficiency virus, systemic malignancy, graft host disease, etc.). Subject experienced an unsuccessful outcome from previous ingenol mebutate therapy (an unsuccessful outcome was defined as after a reasonable therapeutic trial with no compliance issues and the topical drug did not work). Subject used topical creams, lotions, or gels of any kind within the selected Treatment Area within one day prior to entry into the study. Subject had the need or planned to be exposed to artificial tanning devices or excessive sunlight during the study or had used artificial tanners within two weeks of Visit 1/Baseline. Subject had used any of the following topical medications on the face or scalp: Corticosteroids within two weeks of Visit 1/Baseline; Keratolytic-containing therapeutic products or medicated or irritant topical salves within two weeks of Visit 1/Baseline, including, but not limited to, alpha hydroxy acids (e.g., glycolic acid, lactic acid etc. >5%), beta hydroxy acid (salicylic acid >2%), and urea >5%; Topical retinoids (e.g., tazarotene, adapalene, tretinoin) within two weeks of Visit 1/Baseline; Light treatments (e.g., psoralen plus ultraviolet A therapy, ultraviolet B) within four weeks of Visit 1/Baseline; Photodynamic therapy within eight weeks of Visit 1/Baseline; 5-fluorouracil, diclofenac, imiquimod, or ingenol mebutate within eight weeks of Visit 1/Baseline; or Other topical therapy for actinic keratosis within 2 cm of the selected contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area within eight weeks of Visit 1/Baseline. Subject had cryodestruction or chemodestruction, surgical excision, curettage, dermabrasion, chemical peel, or laser resurfacing on the Treatment Area (i.e., face or scalp) within two weeks prior to Visit 1/Baseline. Subject used any of the following systemic medications: Corticosteroid therapy within one month; Interferon/interferon inducers, cytotoxic drugs, immuno-modulators, or immunosuppressive therapies within one month; Retinoid therapy within six months prior to Visit 1/Baseline. Subject had lesions suspicious for skin cancer (skin cancer not ruled out by biopsy) or untreated skin cancers within the selected contiguous 25 cm2 Treatment Area on the face or scalp. Subject was enrolled in an investigational drug or device study. Subject used an investigational drug or investigational device treatment within one month prior to Visit 1/Baseline. Subject had a history of sensitivity to any of the ingredients in the test articles (see Section 9.4.2). Subject had any condition which, in the investigator's opinion, would have made it unsafe or precluded the subject's ability to fully participate in this research study. Subject was unable to communicate or cooperate with the investigator due to language problems, poor mental development, impaired cerebral function, or physical limitations. Subject was known to be noncompliant or was unlikely to comply with the requirements of the study protocol (e.g., due to alcoholism, drug dependency, mental incapacity) in the opinion of the investigator. Subject was previously enrolled in the same study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Oleg Khatsenko, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Actavis Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Dermatology Specialists, Inc.
City
Oceanside
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92056
Country
United States
Facility Name
Horizons Clinical Research Ctr., LLC
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80220
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center for Clinical and Cosmetic Research
City
Aventura
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33180
Country
United States
Facility Name
Moore Clinical Research
City
Brandon
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33511
Country
United States
Facility Name
Savin Medical Group Research Center
City
Miami Lakes
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33014
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tory P. Sullivan, M.D., P.A.
City
North Miami Beach
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33162
Country
United States
Facility Name
MedaPhase, Inc.
City
Newnan
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30263
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwest Clinical Trials, Inc.
City
Boise
State/Province
Idaho
ZIP/Postal Code
83704
Country
United States
Facility Name
Arlington Dermatology
City
Arlington Heights
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60005
Country
United States
Facility Name
Christie Clinic, LLC
City
Champaign
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61820
Country
United States
Facility Name
University Dermatology & Vein Clinic, LLC
City
Darien
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60561
Country
United States
Facility Name
Forefront Dermatology
City
Carmel
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46032
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dawes Fretzin Clinical Research Group, LLC
City
Indianapolis
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46256
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Indiana Clinical Trials Center
City
Plainfield
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46168
Country
United States
Facility Name
The South Bend Clinic,LLC
City
South Bend
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
46617
Country
United States
Facility Name
Minnesota Clinical Study Center
City
Fridley
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55432
Country
United States
Facility Name
MediSearch Clinical Trials
City
Saint Joseph
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
64506
Country
United States
Facility Name
Academic Dermatology Associates
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87106
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dermatology Consulting Services
City
High Point
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27262
Country
United States
Facility Name
Omega Medical Research, 400 Bald Hill Road, Warwick, RI 02886
City
Warwick
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02886
Country
United States
Facility Name
Palmetto Clinical Trial Services
City
Fountain Inn
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29644
Country
United States
Facility Name
Dermatology Associates of Knoxville, PC
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37917
Country
United States
Facility Name
DermReseach New Braunfels
City
New Braunfels
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
78130
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

An Equivalence Study of Generic Ingenol Mebutate Gel 0.015% and Picato Gel 0.015% in Subjects With Actinic Keratosis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs