Fluorescence Targeted Pelvic Lymph Node Mapping
Primary Purpose
Cancer of Rectum, Lymph Node Disease
Status
Terminated
Phase
Phase 1
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Indocyanine Green
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Cancer of Rectum focused on measuring Colorectal surgery, Fluorescence guided surgery
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
- Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
- Participant is undergoing elective curative surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma
- Participant is willing and able to comply with study requirements
Exclusion Criteria:
- Participant has history of or known allergy to indocyanine green
- Participant has history of or known allergy to iodides
- Participant suffers from hyperthyroidism or has a benign thyroid tumour
- Participant has renal failure
- Female participant currently pregnant, planning pregnancy or breast feeding
Sites / Locations
- Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Label
Tumour injection of ICG
Arm Description
Indocyanine green injection into tumour before or during surgery.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number & location of lymph nodes identified with and without fluorescent probe during rectal cancer surgery
Secondary Outcome Measures
Noise to background signal of lymph nodes compared with positivity of lymph nodes.
Positivity defined as whether they contain metastatic disease or not.
Number of lymph nodes lying outside the CRM identified by fluorescence
Fluorescence identification of CRM nodes
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03204994
First Posted
June 28, 2017
Last Updated
August 10, 2019
Sponsor
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03204994
Brief Title
Fluorescence Targeted Pelvic Lymph Node Mapping
Official Title
Investigating the Feasibility of Fluorescence Targeted Pelvic Lymph Node Mapping During Rectal Cancer Surgery
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
August 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Terminated
Why Stopped
Not able to recruit
Study Start Date
August 1, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 1, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 1, 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Trust
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study aims to assess the lymphatic drainage of rectal tumours by using ICG as a fluorescent non-specific marker. As a feasibility study, it will also assess its technique and timing along with its ability to assist in removing lymph nodes when it is clinically indicated.
Detailed Description
Current surgical treatment for rectal cancer includes total mesorectal excision (TME) which involves excision of the rectum in its encompassing fat including the lymph nodes. Rectal cancer can spread to lymph nodes locally inside the TME 'package' and the lateral pelvic lymph nodes. The TME must be fully excised to ensure that the circumferential resection margin (CRM) is disease free or negative. Despite advancing surgical techniques, a positive margin can occur in around 9% of patients with accurate pre-operative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), increasing the risk of local recurrence.
Incidence of lateral pelvic lymph node involvement has been reported between 10-25%. It is thought that lower rectal tumours are more likely to spread to the lateral pelvic nodes. In the far East, LPLN dissection is often added to the TME procedure. Formal LPLND is not utilised in Europe due to operative risks including damage to pelvic nerves, greater blood loss and prolonged operating time. Instead, neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) is utilised to 'sterilise' the lymph nodes. Although a retrospective analysis suggested that LPLN dissection is equivalent to preoperative CRT for preventing local recurrence, there has been evidence to suggest that positive LPLNs after CRT decrease cancer specific survival and relapse free survival. This would suggest that there may be a cohort of patients that would benefit from some form of LPLN dissection, although it is not certain what characteristics of tumours are more likely to metastasise to the LPLNs.
In prostatectomies, where pelvic lymph node dissection is a standard part of the procedure, there has been investigation into fluorescence guided lymph node mapping. Yuen et al utilised ICG guided node mapping in open prostatectomy. In their study, all lymph nodes identified by fluorescence were found to have metastases on pathology whereas non-fluorescent nodes were free from disease. A smaller, retrospective study comparing fluorescence guided lymph node dissection with standard lymph node dissection showed higher sensitivity and specificity in the fluorescence guided technique. Similar results were seen in an early, robotic prostatectomy study.
ICG has been used to map pelvic lymph nodes in colorectal cancer, with the first reported cases being published in 2010. ICG was injected to the tumour base in 25 open rectal resections. A wide field camera is useful for fluorescence in open surgery, however, as most rectal cancer cases are performed using a minimally invasive approach a laparoscopic method is needed. Ishizuka et al used a similar method in low rectal cancers to identify drainage in three different sets of lymph nodes. In 2015, a study of 5 patients using ICG node mapping with the same laparoscopic equipment to be used in this study demonstrated fluorescence in all 5 patients. Both studies 'berry picked' the fluorescing lymph nodes. In the 2010 study, 23 out of 25 patients had fluorescing lymph nodes. In the 2 non-fluorescing nodes LPLD was performed and no diseased nodes were identified. In these studies, they did not observe what types of tumours drain to the LPLDs.
ICG, when injected intravenously, rapidly binds to plasma proteins and is exclusively excreted into bile by the liver. It is known to be well tolerated but there have been reported cases of urticaria and anaphylaxis. Risk of anaphylaxis is 1 in 10,000 and if occurs can be treated using a standard protocol. ICG contains sodium iodide and therefore should be avoided in patients with known allergy to iodides.
This study aims to assess the lymphatic drainage of rectal tumours by using ICG as a fluorescent non-specific marker. As a feasibility study, it will also assess its technique and timing along with its ability to assist in removing lymph nodes when it is clinically indicated.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Cancer of Rectum, Lymph Node Disease
Keywords
Colorectal surgery, Fluorescence guided surgery
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 1, Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
1 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Tumour injection of ICG
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Indocyanine green injection into tumour before or during surgery.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Indocyanine Green
Other Intervention Name(s)
ICG
Intervention Description
Fluorescence guided lymphatic mapping using indocyanine green.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number & location of lymph nodes identified with and without fluorescent probe during rectal cancer surgery
Time Frame
1 day
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Noise to background signal of lymph nodes compared with positivity of lymph nodes.
Description
Positivity defined as whether they contain metastatic disease or not.
Time Frame
1 day
Title
Number of lymph nodes lying outside the CRM identified by fluorescence
Description
Fluorescence identification of CRM nodes
Time Frame
1 day
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Participant is willing and able to give informed consent for participation in the study.
Male or Female, aged 18 years or above.
Participant is undergoing elective curative surgery for rectal adenocarcinoma
Participant is willing and able to comply with study requirements
Exclusion Criteria:
Participant has history of or known allergy to indocyanine green
Participant has history of or known allergy to iodides
Participant suffers from hyperthyroidism or has a benign thyroid tumour
Participant has renal failure
Female participant currently pregnant, planning pregnancy or breast feeding
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Chris Cunningham, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Chief Investigator
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Thomas Barnes, MBChB
Organizational Affiliation
Clinical Research Fellow
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust
City
Oxford
State/Province
Oxfordshire
ZIP/Postal Code
OX3 7LE
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Fluorescence Targeted Pelvic Lymph Node Mapping
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs