search
Back to results

Prospective Endoscopic Follow-up of Patients With Submucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (The PREFER Trial)

Primary Purpose

Submucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Barrett Esophagus, High-risk Mucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma

Status
Recruiting
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Endoscopic follow-up
Sponsored by
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Submucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma focused on measuring Barrett's esophagus, Submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma, Endoscopic treatment, Endoscopic follow-up, High-risk mucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Patients with submucosal or high-risk mucosal EAC diagnosed in an ER specimen, revised by a panel of expert gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists.
  • Signed informed consent.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior history of high-risk mucosal or ≥T1sm.
  • Synchronous esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.
  • Suspicion on lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis on EUS, ultrasound of the neck or CT-thorax-abdomen performed six weeks after ER during baseline measurement.
  • Tumor-positive deep resection margin (R1) in ER specimen.
  • Patients unable to give signed informed consent.

Sites / Locations

  • Westmead hospitalRecruiting
  • UZ GasthuisbergRecruiting
  • CHU NantesRecruiting
  • Universitätsklinikum Augsburg
  • EVK DuesseldorfRecruiting
  • MRI TUMRecruiting
  • Barmherzige Brüder RegensburgRecruiting
  • Academic Medical CenterRecruiting
  • VuMCRecruiting
  • Catharina HospitalRecruiting
  • University Medical Center GroningenRecruiting
  • St. Antonius HospitalRecruiting
  • RadboudumcRecruiting
  • Erasmus MC - University Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Haga Medical CenterRecruiting
  • Isala ClinicsRecruiting
  • Hirslanden private hospital groupRecruiting
  • University College London Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm Type

Experimental

Arm Label

Endoscopic follow-up

Arm Description

Patients treated with endoscopic resection (ER) for a submucosal or high-risk mucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma without lymphnode- or distant metastases (T1bN0M0 EAC) will undergo endoscopic follow-up.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

5-year disease-specific mortality/survival (descriptive statistics in SPSS, percentages, survival analysis)
Disease specific mortality is decribed as mortality directly linked to the esophageal adenocarcinoma (i.e., metastasized EAC, metastasized disease with a simultaneously primary cancer present and it cannot be ruled out (based on histology) that the metastases are related to the other primary cancer, death due to complications of the endoscopic procedure, death due to complications after surgery or CRT, no clear cause of death in patients who have metastases or untreated local recurrence). If patients are diagnosed with distant metastases, and subsequently die of a non-tumor related cause, patients will still be documented as tumor-related death. Will be measured in number of patients and percentages. Survival analysis using Kaplan Meier will be performed.
Overall survival (descriptive statistics in SPSS, percentages, survival analysis)
Overall survival of study population (tumor-related + non-tumor-related deaths). Measured in numbers and percentages, survival analysis (KM).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Lymph node metastasis, confirmed by cytology and/or histology (descriptive statistics in SPSS, number of patients (%))
Confirmed by cytology and/or histology by performing FNA during EUS or biopsies.
Local recurrence eligible for endoscopic therapy (descriptive statistics in SPSS, number of patients (%))
In case a local recurrence is found during FU endoscopy, histopathology have to show if it is recurrent cancer.
Local recurrence requiring surgical therapy (descriptive statistics in SPSS, number of patients (%))
In case a local cancer recurrence is not amendable for endoscopic re-treatment, for example due to extensive disease or fibrosis, a patient will be referred for surgery if possible.
Distant metastasis, histologically proven (descriptive statistics in SPSS, number of patients (%))
Primary tumor of distant metastasis should be histopathologically evalueted by taking biopsies.
Quality of life during follow-up endoscopies (questionnaires)
Quality of life is assessed by using questionnaires on set time points during the whole study.

Full Information

First Posted
July 17, 2017
Last Updated
January 12, 2021
Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03222635
Brief Title
Prospective Endoscopic Follow-up of Patients With Submucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (The PREFER Trial)
Official Title
Endoscopic Management of Patients With T1bN0M0 Esophageal Adenocarcinoma: a Prospective Multicenter Registry.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Recruiting
Study Start Date
July 25, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 25, 2025 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
July 25, 2025 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Aim of this prospective multicenter study is to evaluate the safety of an endoscopic follow-up strategy in patients treated with endoscopic resection (ER) for submucosal or high-risk mucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma (T1bN0M0 or HR T1aN0M0 EAC).
Detailed Description
Traditionally, the risk of lymph node metastasis associated with submucosal EAC was considered too high to offer patients endoscopic follow-up. Only in elderly patients with comorbidity, more often an endoscopic protocol is selected. However, the risk of lymph node metastasis associated with submucosal EAC is mainly based on surgical series. Recently a number of studies, which included patients treated endoscopically, were published indicating that the risk of lymph node metastasis may be much lower than generally assumed.Therefore, a less invasive and organ preserving approach may not only be an option in the frail and elderly, but for all patients with submucosal EAC's. Yet, no data exists on the risk of lymph node metastasis in high risk T1a EAC. The risk is assumed to be lower than for EACs invading into the submucosal layer. However, a recent (unpublished) retrospective analysis from our own research group shows that this risk may be higher than previously assumed. In this nationwide retrospective study, we analysed lymph node metastasis rates and EAC related mortality rates concerning patients with high risk T1a, low risk T1b or high risk T1b EAC who received endoscopic treatment. The study was performed in 9 Barrett Expert Centers in the Netherlands (2008-2019). 120 patients were included in the analysis, and results showed the highest lymph node metastasis risk in the high risk T1a patient group Aim of this multicenter study is to prospectively evaluate the safety of endoscopic follow-up in patients treated by endoscopic resection for submucosal (T1bN0M0) EAC. High-resolution upper endoscopy with white-light endoscopy and narrow-band imaging supplemented with an EUS are performed every three months during the first two years after ER. After 1 year, a CT-thorax/abdomen will be performed to check for distant metastasis. During the third and fourth year of follow-up, EUS and upper endoscopy are performed every six months. From the fifth year on, EUS and upper endoscopy are performed annually.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Submucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma, Barrett Esophagus, High-risk Mucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma
Keywords
Barrett's esophagus, Submucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma, Endoscopic treatment, Endoscopic follow-up, High-risk mucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Sample size T1b patients = n=141. No sample size will be calculated for the HR T1a patient group, since there is no available data yet to calculate a reliable sample size with. The high risk T1a patient group will be analysed separately from the T1b patient group and included high risk T1a patients will therefore not be counted as true inclusions for the PREFER study's calculated sample size of 141 patients.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
141 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Endoscopic follow-up
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients treated with endoscopic resection (ER) for a submucosal or high-risk mucosal esophageal adenocarcinoma without lymphnode- or distant metastases (T1bN0M0 EAC) will undergo endoscopic follow-up.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Endoscopic follow-up
Intervention Description
Endoscopic follow-up by means of regular upper endoscopies and endoscopic ultrasounds
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
5-year disease-specific mortality/survival (descriptive statistics in SPSS, percentages, survival analysis)
Description
Disease specific mortality is decribed as mortality directly linked to the esophageal adenocarcinoma (i.e., metastasized EAC, metastasized disease with a simultaneously primary cancer present and it cannot be ruled out (based on histology) that the metastases are related to the other primary cancer, death due to complications of the endoscopic procedure, death due to complications after surgery or CRT, no clear cause of death in patients who have metastases or untreated local recurrence). If patients are diagnosed with distant metastases, and subsequently die of a non-tumor related cause, patients will still be documented as tumor-related death. Will be measured in number of patients and percentages. Survival analysis using Kaplan Meier will be performed.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Overall survival (descriptive statistics in SPSS, percentages, survival analysis)
Description
Overall survival of study population (tumor-related + non-tumor-related deaths). Measured in numbers and percentages, survival analysis (KM).
Time Frame
5 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Lymph node metastasis, confirmed by cytology and/or histology (descriptive statistics in SPSS, number of patients (%))
Description
Confirmed by cytology and/or histology by performing FNA during EUS or biopsies.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Local recurrence eligible for endoscopic therapy (descriptive statistics in SPSS, number of patients (%))
Description
In case a local recurrence is found during FU endoscopy, histopathology have to show if it is recurrent cancer.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Local recurrence requiring surgical therapy (descriptive statistics in SPSS, number of patients (%))
Description
In case a local cancer recurrence is not amendable for endoscopic re-treatment, for example due to extensive disease or fibrosis, a patient will be referred for surgery if possible.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Distant metastasis, histologically proven (descriptive statistics in SPSS, number of patients (%))
Description
Primary tumor of distant metastasis should be histopathologically evalueted by taking biopsies.
Time Frame
5 years
Title
Quality of life during follow-up endoscopies (questionnaires)
Description
Quality of life is assessed by using questionnaires on set time points during the whole study.
Time Frame
5 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Patients with submucosal or high-risk mucosal EAC diagnosed in an ER specimen, revised by a panel of expert gastrointestinal (GI) pathologists. Signed informed consent. Exclusion Criteria: Prior history of high-risk mucosal or ≥T1sm. Synchronous esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Suspicion on lymph node metastasis or distant metastasis on EUS, ultrasound of the neck or CT-thorax-abdomen performed six weeks after ER during baseline measurement. Tumor-positive deep resection margin (R1) in ER specimen. Patients unable to give signed informed consent.
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Esther Nieuwenhuis, MD
Phone
+31645916097
Email
e.a.nieuwenhuis@amsterdamumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
W. D. Rosmolen, Master
Phone
+31205663252
Email
w.d.rosmolen@amsterdamumc.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
J. J. Bergman, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. E. Pouw, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Westmead hospital
City
Sydney
Country
Australia
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
M. Bourke, MD, PhD
Facility Name
UZ Gasthuisberg
City
Leuven
Country
Belgium
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. Bisschops, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. Bisschops, MD, PhD
Facility Name
CHU Nantes
City
Nantes
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Emmanuel Coron
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Augsburg
City
Augsburg
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
H. Messmann
Email
Helmut.Messmann@uk-augsburg.de
Facility Name
EVK Duesseldorf
City
Duesseldorf
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Horst Neuhaus
Facility Name
MRI TUM
City
Münich
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Christoph Schlag
Facility Name
Barmherzige Brüder Regensburg
City
Regensburg
Country
Germany
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Oliver Pech
Facility Name
Academic Medical Center
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
E. Nieuwenhuis, MD
Phone
+31205661613
Email
e.a.nieuwenhuis@amsterdamumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
W. D. Rosmolen, Master
Phone
+31205663252
Email
w.d.rosmolen@amsterdamumc.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
J. J. Bergman, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. E. Pouw, MD, PhD
Facility Name
VuMC
City
Amsterdam
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
E. Nieuwenhuis, MD
Phone
+31645916097
Email
e.a.nieuwenhuis@amsterdamumc.nl
Facility Name
Catharina Hospital
City
Eindhoven
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
E. J. Schoon, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
E. J. Schoon, MD, PhD
Facility Name
University Medical Center Groningen
City
Groningen
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
W. B. Nagengast, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
W. B. Nagengast, MD, PhD
Facility Name
St. Antonius Hospital
City
Nieuwegein
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
B. L. Weusten, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
B. L. Weusten, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Radboudumc
City
Nijmegen
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
P. Siersema, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Erasmus MC - University Medical Center
City
Rotterdam
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
A. D. Koch, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
A. D. Koch, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Haga Medical Center
City
The Hague
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
M. Houben, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
M. Houben, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Isala Clinics
City
Zwolle
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
B. E. Schenk, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
B. E. Schenk, MD, PhD
Facility Name
Hirslanden private hospital group
City
Zürich
Country
Switzerland
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
S. Seewald
Facility Name
University College London Hospital
City
London
Country
United Kingdom
Individual Site Status
Not yet recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. Haidry, MD, PhD
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
R. Haidry, MD, PhD

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No

Learn more about this trial

Prospective Endoscopic Follow-up of Patients With Submucosal Esophageal Adenocarcinoma (The PREFER Trial)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs