search
Back to results

Geriatric Assessment & Genetic Profiling to Personalize Therapy in Older Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Primary Purpose

Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cytarabine
Decitabine
Idarubicin
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin-Cytarabine
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Questionnaire Administration
Azacitidine
Venetoclax
glasdegib
Sponsored by
University of Nebraska
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria:

  1. A new diagnosis of de novo, secondary or treatment-related AML, other AML equivalent such as myeloid sarcoma, myelodysplastic syndrome in transformation to AML, or high-grade treatment-related myeloid neoplasm
  2. Patients aged ≥60 years
  3. Karnofsky Performance Status ≥60%
  4. Subjects must be able and willingly give signed informed consent

Exclusion criteria:

  1. Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Patients with brief exposure to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), arsenic trioxide (ATO) or similar product for suspected APL, who later turn out not to have APL, are eligible for the study.
  2. Relapsed or refractory AML, who require salvage therapy
  3. Prior exposure to decitabine or azacitidine will be an exclusion criterion for the use of decitabine or azacitidine alone.
  4. Patients, who require urgent initiation of chemotherapy (other than debulking agent such as hydroxyurea or cyclophosphamide) due to leukemia-related emergencies such as leukostasis, or disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. Patients will not be excluded solely based on prior use of debulking agent. Prior or current use of leukapheresis will be allowed.
  5. Uncontrolled serious infection at the time of enrollment. Infections are considered controlled if appropriate therapy has been instituted and, at the time of enrollment, patients do not have signs of infection progression. Progression of infection is defined as hemodynamic instability attributable to sepsis, new symptoms, worsening physical signs or radiographic findings attributable to infection. Persisting fever without other signs or symptoms will not be interpreted as progressing infection
  6. Uncontrolled clinically significant arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia or congestive heart failure within the past 2 weeks, that is considered by the treating physician as a contraindication for initiation of chemotherapy.
  7. Ejection fraction <45% will be an exclusion criteria for intensive chemotherapy. Such patients may receive low intensity therapy.
  8. Clinically significant kidney (e.g. GFR ≤45ml/minute or Creatinine of ≥2 mg/dl) or liver dysfunction (e.g. AST/ALT and/or bilirubin ≥2 times ULN) at the time of enrollment that may prevent from safely using chemotherapy. Such patients may be allowed to receive low-intensity chemotherapy. Patients with elevated bilirubin secondary to Gilbert syndrome will not be excluded.
  9. Any other condition that may not allow safe use of chemotherapy based on the clinical judgment of the treating oncologist.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Nebraska Medical Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Group I

Group II

Arm Description

INTENSIVE INDUCTION THERAPY: Patients receive cytarabine intravenously (IV) on days 1-7 and idarubicin over 10-15 minutes on days 1-3 (7+3), or liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1, 3 and 5. Gemtuzumab or midostaurin are added to 7+3 as per the standard of care. Treatment continues for 1 course in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. INTENSIVE CONSOLIDATION THERAPY: Patients who go into remission, receive cytarabine IV over 1-3 hours twice daily (BID) on days 1, 3, and 5. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 2-4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients treated with liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine receive liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3. Treatment repeats every 5-8 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity.

LOW-INTENSITY: Patients receive venetoclax in combination with azacitidine or decitabine or other standard of care low-intensity therapy such as azacitidine or decitabine alone or in combination with FLT3 inhibitor such as midostaurin, low-dose cytarabine in combination with glasdegib. Venetoclax dose varies depending on drug interaction with antifungal agents. Given daily continuous for >= 3 months orally. Glasdegib dose is 100 mg oral daily. Decitabine IV over 1-3 hours daily for 5-10 days. Treatment repeats every 4-5 weeks for >= 3 courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or receipt of allogeneic stem cell transplant. Azacitidine IV infusion over 10 to 40 minutes days 1 -7. Treatment repeats every 4-5 weeks for >= 3 courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or receipt of allogeneic stem cell transplant.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Rate of complete remission and mortality in the entire cohort of older patients
All analyses will be performed based on intent-to-treat principle. The method of inversion will be used to generate an interval estimate for the proportion of 90-day mortality.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Rate of complete remission and mortality in subsets of older patients who receive intensive and low-intensity chemotherapy
All analyses will be performed based on intent-to-treat principle. The method of inversion will be used to generate an interval estimate for the proportion of 90-day mortality.
Baseline functional status measure by geriatric assessment
Will assess the impact of baseline functional status on the rate of complete remission and mortality.
Baseline functional status
Will evaluate the influence of baseline functional status on the quality of life and neurocognitive status. The association between categories of functional status and quality of life will be explored using analysis of variance (ANOVA); if assumptions of ANOVA fail, Kruskal Wallis will be used. The association between functional status (fit or vulnerable) and neurocognitive status (< 25 or 26 or higher) will be explored using a chi-square test. A generalized linear mixed model will be utilized to evaluate changes in quality of life over time. The proportion (and associated 95% confidence interval) of patients with definitely or probably modifiable impairments will be presented.
Functional status
The association between functional status and grade 3/4 toxicities will be explored using ANOVA; if assumptions of ANOVA fail, Kruskal Wallis will be used.
Symptom burden
Will determine the symptom burden at diagnosis and 10, 30 and 90 days following initiation of chemotherapy.
Mortality
Mortality at 90 days will be calculated as the time from date of diagnosis to date of death due to any cause by 90 days from diagnosis.
Quality of life as measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3.0
Composite scores, as determined by EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0, will be utilized to determine quality of life status. A generalized linear mixed model will be utilized to evaluate changes in quality of life over time.
Neurocognitive status as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Composite scores, as determined by MOCA test, will be utilized to determine neurocognitive status.

Full Information

First Posted
July 19, 2017
Last Updated
September 28, 2023
Sponsor
University of Nebraska
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03226418
Brief Title
Geriatric Assessment & Genetic Profiling to Personalize Therapy in Older Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia
Official Title
A Phase II Study of the Impact of Clinicogenetic Risk-Stratified Management on Outcomes of Acute Myeloid Leukemia in Older Patients
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
July 7, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 7, 2024 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
October 7, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Nebraska
Collaborators
National Cancer Institute (NCI)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This phase II trial of the impact of clinicogenetic risk-stratified management on outcomes of acute myeloid leukemia in older patients is to determine the rate of complete remission and mortality at 90 days in the entire cohort of older patients (≥60 years) with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia, who receive clinicogenetic risk-stratified therapy allocation. Subjects will receive standard of care intensive or low-intensity induction based on cytogenetic and geriatric assessment-based risk stratification. Subjects will be evaluated for disease status, survival, quality of life and neurocognitive status for 90 days and then followed for a total of 2 years for survival data.
Detailed Description
PRIMARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the rate of complete remission and mortality at 90 days in the entire cohort of older patients (>= 60 years) with newly diagnosed acute myeloid leukemia (AML) who receive clinicogenetic risk-stratified therapy allocation. SECONDARY OBJECTIVES: I. To determine the rate of complete remission and mortality at 90 days in subsets of older patients who receive intensive and low-intensity chemotherapy. II. To assess the impact of baseline functional status (measured by geriatric assessment) on the rate of complete remission and mortality at 90 days in older patients, who receive clinicogenetic risk-stratified therapy allocation. III. To evaluate the influence of baseline functional status on the quality of life, grades 3 and 4 toxicities (Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events [CTCAE] version 4.03 grades) and neurocognitive status at baseline and at 90 days in older patients. IV. To determine the symptom burden at diagnosis and 10, 30 and 90 days following initiation of chemotherapy. V. To determine proportion of patients with impairments detected by geriatric assessment. OUTLINE: Patients are assigned to 1 or 2 groups based on cytogenetic and geriatric assessment-based risk stratification. GROUP I: INTENSIVE INDUCTION THERAPY: Patients receive cytarabine intravenously (IV) on days 1-7 and idarubicin over 10-15 minutes on days 1-3 (7+3), or liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1, 3 and 5. Gemtuzumab or midostaurin are added to 7+3 as per the standard of care. Treatment continues for 1 course in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. INTENSIVE CONSOLIDATION THERAPY: Patients who go into remission, receive cytarabine IV over 1-3 hours twice daily (BID) on days 1, 3, and 5. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 2-4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients treated with liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine receive liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3. Treatment repeats every 5-8 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. GROUP II: LOW-INTENSITY INDUCTION: Patients receive oral venetoclax and azacitidine IV on days 1-7 or decitabine IV on days 1-5. Alternate standard of care low-intensity therapies are allowed at the discretion of treating physician. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 1-4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. LOW-INTENSITY CONSOLIDATION: Patients who achieve complete remission, receive oral venetoclax and azacitidine IV on days 1-7 or decitabine IV on days 1-5 or other standard of care low-intensity chemotherapy. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 3 or more courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or receipt of allogeneic stem cell transplant. After completion of study treatment, patients are followed up for up to 2 years.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Adult Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Secondary Acute Myeloid Leukemia, Therapy-Related Acute Myeloid Leukemia

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
75 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Group I
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
INTENSIVE INDUCTION THERAPY: Patients receive cytarabine intravenously (IV) on days 1-7 and idarubicin over 10-15 minutes on days 1-3 (7+3), or liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1, 3 and 5. Gemtuzumab or midostaurin are added to 7+3 as per the standard of care. Treatment continues for 1 course in the absence of unacceptable toxicity. INTENSIVE CONSOLIDATION THERAPY: Patients who go into remission, receive cytarabine IV over 1-3 hours twice daily (BID) on days 1, 3, and 5. Treatment repeats every 4 weeks for 2-4 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity. Patients treated with liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine receive liposome-encapsulated daunorubicin-cytarabine IV over 90 minutes on days 1 and 3. Treatment repeats every 5-8 weeks for 2 courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity.
Arm Title
Group II
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
LOW-INTENSITY: Patients receive venetoclax in combination with azacitidine or decitabine or other standard of care low-intensity therapy such as azacitidine or decitabine alone or in combination with FLT3 inhibitor such as midostaurin, low-dose cytarabine in combination with glasdegib. Venetoclax dose varies depending on drug interaction with antifungal agents. Given daily continuous for >= 3 months orally. Glasdegib dose is 100 mg oral daily. Decitabine IV over 1-3 hours daily for 5-10 days. Treatment repeats every 4-5 weeks for >= 3 courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or receipt of allogeneic stem cell transplant. Azacitidine IV infusion over 10 to 40 minutes days 1 -7. Treatment repeats every 4-5 weeks for >= 3 courses in the absence of disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or receipt of allogeneic stem cell transplant.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Cytarabine
Other Intervention Name(s)
.beta.-Cytosine arabinoside, 1-.beta.-D-Arabinofuranosyl-4-amino-2(1H)pyrimidinone, 1-.beta.-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine, 1-Beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-4-amino-2(1H)pyrimidinone, 1-Beta-D-arabinofuranosylcytosine, 1.beta.-D-Arabinofuranosylcytosine, 2(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 4-Amino-1-beta-D-arabinofuranosyl-, 2(1H)-Pyrimidinone, 4-amino-1.beta.-D-arabinofuranosyl-, Alexan, Ara-C, ARA-cell, Arabine, Arabinofuranosylcytosine, Arabinosylcytosine, Aracytidine, Aracytin, Aracytine, Beta-cytosine Arabinoside, CHX-3311, Cytarabinum, Cytarbel, Cytosar, Cytosine Arabinoside, Cytosine-.beta.-arabinoside, Cytosine-beta-arabinoside, Erpalfa, Starasid, Tarabine PFS, U 19920, U-19920, Udicil, WR-28453
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Decitabine
Other Intervention Name(s)
5-Aza-2'-deoxycytidine, Aza-TdC, Dacogen, Decitabine for Injection, Deoxyazacytidine, Dezocitidine
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Idarubicin
Other Intervention Name(s)
4-Demethoxydaunomycin, 4-demethoxydaunorubicin, 4-DMDR
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Laboratory Biomarker Analysis
Intervention Description
Correlative studies
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Liposome-encapsulated Daunorubicin-Cytarabine
Other Intervention Name(s)
CPX-351, Cytarabine-Daunorubicin Liposome for Injection, Liposomal AraC-Daunorubicin CPX-351, Liposomal Cytarabine-Daunorubicin, Liposome-encapsulated Combination of Daunorubicin and Cytarabine, Vyxeos
Intervention Description
Given IV
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Quality-of-Life Assessment
Other Intervention Name(s)
Quality of Life Assessment
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Questionnaire Administration
Intervention Description
Ancillary studies
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Azacitidine
Other Intervention Name(s)
VIDAZA
Intervention Description
Given by infusion
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Venetoclax
Other Intervention Name(s)
Venclexta, Venclyxto
Intervention Description
oral tablet
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
glasdegib
Other Intervention Name(s)
Daurismo
Intervention Description
oral tablet
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of complete remission and mortality in the entire cohort of older patients
Description
All analyses will be performed based on intent-to-treat principle. The method of inversion will be used to generate an interval estimate for the proportion of 90-day mortality.
Time Frame
At 90 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Rate of complete remission and mortality in subsets of older patients who receive intensive and low-intensity chemotherapy
Description
All analyses will be performed based on intent-to-treat principle. The method of inversion will be used to generate an interval estimate for the proportion of 90-day mortality.
Time Frame
At 90 days
Title
Baseline functional status measure by geriatric assessment
Description
Will assess the impact of baseline functional status on the rate of complete remission and mortality.
Time Frame
At 90 days
Title
Baseline functional status
Description
Will evaluate the influence of baseline functional status on the quality of life and neurocognitive status. The association between categories of functional status and quality of life will be explored using analysis of variance (ANOVA); if assumptions of ANOVA fail, Kruskal Wallis will be used. The association between functional status (fit or vulnerable) and neurocognitive status (< 25 or 26 or higher) will be explored using a chi-square test. A generalized linear mixed model will be utilized to evaluate changes in quality of life over time. The proportion (and associated 95% confidence interval) of patients with definitely or probably modifiable impairments will be presented.
Time Frame
Up to 90 days
Title
Functional status
Description
The association between functional status and grade 3/4 toxicities will be explored using ANOVA; if assumptions of ANOVA fail, Kruskal Wallis will be used.
Time Frame
Up to 90 days
Title
Symptom burden
Description
Will determine the symptom burden at diagnosis and 10, 30 and 90 days following initiation of chemotherapy.
Time Frame
Up to 90 days following initiation of chemotherapy
Title
Mortality
Description
Mortality at 90 days will be calculated as the time from date of diagnosis to date of death due to any cause by 90 days from diagnosis.
Time Frame
From the time of diagnosis to death, assessed up to 90 days
Title
Quality of life as measured by European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Core Quality of Life Questionnaire (EORTC QLQ-C30) version 3.0
Description
Composite scores, as determined by EORTC QLQ-C30 version 3.0, will be utilized to determine quality of life status. A generalized linear mixed model will be utilized to evaluate changes in quality of life over time.
Time Frame
Up to 4 years
Title
Neurocognitive status as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Description
Composite scores, as determined by MOCA test, will be utilized to determine neurocognitive status.
Time Frame
Up to 4 years

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria: A new diagnosis of de novo, secondary or treatment-related AML, other AML equivalent such as myeloid sarcoma, myelodysplastic syndrome in transformation to AML, or high-grade treatment-related myeloid neoplasm Patients aged ≥60 years Karnofsky Performance Status ≥60% Subjects must be able and willingly give signed informed consent Exclusion criteria: Acute promyelocytic leukemia (APL). Patients with brief exposure to all-trans retinoic acid (ATRA), arsenic trioxide (ATO) or similar product for suspected APL, who later turn out not to have APL, are eligible for the study. Relapsed or refractory AML, who require salvage therapy Prior exposure to decitabine or azacitidine will be an exclusion criterion for the use of decitabine or azacitidine alone. Patients, who require urgent initiation of chemotherapy (other than debulking agent such as hydroxyurea or cyclophosphamide) due to leukemia-related emergencies such as leukostasis, or disseminated intravascular coagulopathy. Patients will not be excluded solely based on prior use of debulking agent. Prior or current use of leukapheresis will be allowed. Uncontrolled serious infection at the time of enrollment. Infections are considered controlled if appropriate therapy has been instituted and, at the time of enrollment, patients do not have signs of infection progression. Progression of infection is defined as hemodynamic instability attributable to sepsis, new symptoms, worsening physical signs or radiographic findings attributable to infection. Persisting fever without other signs or symptoms will not be interpreted as progressing infection Uncontrolled clinically significant arrhythmia, myocardial ischemia or congestive heart failure within the past 2 weeks, that is considered by the treating physician as a contraindication for initiation of chemotherapy. Ejection fraction <45% will be an exclusion criteria for intensive chemotherapy. Such patients may receive low intensity therapy. Clinically significant kidney (e.g. GFR ≤45ml/minute or Creatinine of ≥2 mg/dl) or liver dysfunction (e.g. AST/ALT and/or bilirubin ≥2 times ULN) at the time of enrollment that may prevent from safely using chemotherapy. Such patients may be allowed to receive low-intensity chemotherapy. Patients with elevated bilirubin secondary to Gilbert syndrome will not be excluded. Any other condition that may not allow safe use of chemotherapy based on the clinical judgment of the treating oncologist.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Vijaya R Bhatt, MD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Nebraska
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Nebraska Medical Center
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68198
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35450817
Citation
Bhatt VR, Wichman C, Al-Kadhimi ZS, Koll TT, Fisher AL, Mahato RI, Hyde RK, Berger A, Armitage JO, Holstein SA, Maness LJ, Gundabolu K. Integrating geriatric assessment and genetic profiling to personalize therapy selection in older adults with acute myeloid leukemia. J Geriatr Oncol. 2022 Jul;13(6):871-874. doi: 10.1016/j.jgo.2022.04.005. Epub 2022 Apr 18.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Geriatric Assessment & Genetic Profiling to Personalize Therapy in Older Adults With Acute Myeloid Leukemia

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs