search
Back to results

The Impact of a Diabetes Risk Prediction Model in Primary Care.

Primary Purpose

Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Primary Prevention

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Germany
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
external validated risk prediction model
Sponsored by
German Diabetes Center
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus focused on measuring prevention, risk score, behaviour, physical activity

Eligibility Criteria

35 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion criteria for participation of medical practitioners:

  • general practitioners, medical practitioners and internists working as general practitioners with and without further training in diabetology according to German Diabetes Association standards
  • provide the routine health check

Exclusion criteria for participation of medical practitioners:

  • treat exclusively patients with private insurance
  • treat exclusively diabetes patients in a specialized medical practice

Inclusion criteria for participation of participants

  • appointment for the routine health check
  • insured in statutory health insurance
  • age > 35 years
  • Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≥ 27 kg/m2

Exclusion criteria for participation of participants

  • type 1 or type 2 diabetes diagnosis or already abnormal blood glucose level (fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or 2 hours oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) ≥ 200mg/dl or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6,5%) before the routine health check
  • no sufficient German language skills to fill in the questionnaires
  • presence of an incurable disease with a prognosis of less than one year
  • severe mental illness or dementia
  • severe underlying disease, which largely impairs physical activity
  • pregnancy
  • participation in another clinical study 30 days before study inclusion

Sites / Locations

  • German Diabetes Center, Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

No Intervention

Arm Label

Intervention group

Control group

Arm Description

In the intervention group the routine health check is expanded by usage of a non-invasive diabetes risk score.

In the control group the routine health check is conducted.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Difference of participant's physical activity at twelve months after the routine health check between the groups.
Self-reported outcome, international validated questionnaire Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Last 7 Days Format (IPAQ-SF), which has been shown to be a reliable and valid tool to obtain comparable estimates of physical activity.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Improvement in the counseling process assessed by PCPs.
Self-reported outcome, analyzed as difference in proportion of counseling regarding preventive strategies on balanced nutrition, body weight reduction, physical activity, and smoking secession between the groups. Questions are derived from a previous study.
Improvement in the counseling process assessed by participants.
Self-reported outcome, analyzed as difference in proportion of counseling regarding preventive strategies on balanced nutrition, body weight reduction, physical activity, and smoking secession between the groups. Questions are derived from a previous study.
Improvement of shared decision making, assessed by participants.
Self-reported outcome, modified questionnaire to assess the difference in proportion of shared decision making for diabetes prevention opportunities between the groups.
Improvement of shared decision making, assessed by PCPs.
Self-reported outcome, modified questionnaire to assess the difference in proportion of shared decision making for diabetes prevention opportunities between the groups.
Improved motivation to change lifestyle, assessed by participants.
Self-reported outcome, questions are based on the stage of change model to assess the stage of motivation according to weight reduction, physical activity, healthy diet, smoking cessation and were derived from previous studies. We will assess the difference of motivation change between the groups.
Change in Body-Mass-Index (BMI)
At baseline, weight and height is objectively measured by the PCP, in the follow-up weight will be self-reported. We will analyse group differences in change of BMI at 6 and 12 months follow-up.
Change in participant's quality of life.
Self-reported outcome, question has been derived from previous studies. We will assess the change of quality of life between the groups.
Change in participant's level of depression and anxiety.
Self-reported outcomes, depression and anxiety will be assessed with a validated questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). We will assess the change of depression and anxiety between the groups.
Change of participant's perceived risk of developing diabetes.
Self-reported outcome by participants, questions derived from previous studies. We will assess the change in perceived risk between the groups.
Acceptance of PCPs according to the application of a diabetes risk score for routine use in clinical practice.
Self-reported outcome, differences between the groups will be analyzed. Questions are derived from previous studies.
Acceptance of participants according to the application of a diabetes risk score for routine use in clinical practice.
Self-reported outcome, questions derived from previous studies.

Full Information

First Posted
July 13, 2017
Last Updated
August 9, 2021
Sponsor
German Diabetes Center
Collaborators
Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians North Rhine, German Institute of Human Nutrition
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03234322
Brief Title
The Impact of a Diabetes Risk Prediction Model in Primary Care.
Official Title
A Cluster Randomized Trial to Investigate the Impact of a Type 2 Diabetes Risk Prediction Model on Change in Physical Activity Within Routine Health Checks in Primary Care.
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
August 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 13, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 10, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 10, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
German Diabetes Center
Collaborators
Association of Statutory Health Insurance Physicians North Rhine, German Institute of Human Nutrition

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Little evidence exists on the impact of diabetes risk scores, e.g. on physicians and patient's behavior, perceived risk of persons, shared-decision making and particularly on patient´s health. The aim of this study is to investigate the impact of a non-invasive diabetes risk prediction model in the primary health care setting as component of routine health checks on change in physical activity.
Detailed Description
Diabetes risk scores are predictive models to estimate the probability for an individual to develop diabetes within a defined time period. In the last years, many diabetes risk prediction models were developed worldwide. It has been proposed that using diabetes risk scores as first step of diabetes screening is more practical than blood glucose tests as the latter are time consuming and costly. Given the rapid development of diabetes risk scores and a simultaneous reluctance of primary care physicians (PCPs) to implement diabetes risk scores in everyday practice, there is an urgent need to expand our knowledge of the impact of diabetes risk scores in the primary health care setting. Thus, the aim of the study is to investigate the impact of a non-invasive risk prediction model in the primary health care setting as component of routine health checks on change in physical activity.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus, Primary Prevention
Keywords
prevention, risk score, behaviour, physical activity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
A pragmatic blinded parallel group superiority cluster randomized controlled trial. Clusters are PCPs (general practitioners, medical practitioners and internists working as general practitioners).
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
315 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In the intervention group the routine health check is expanded by usage of a non-invasive diabetes risk score.
Arm Title
Control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
In the control group the routine health check is conducted.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
external validated risk prediction model
Other Intervention Name(s)
The German Diabetes Risk Score
Intervention Description
The risk prediction model will be integrated into a routine health check. The diabetes risk prediction model contains modifiable non-invasive risk factors and consists of eleven questions on age, height, waist circumference, hypertension, physical activity, smoking status, intake of whole-grain bread, intake of red meat, coffee consumption, and family history of diabetes (parents and siblings) to predict the five-year diabetes risk. The filled diabetes risk score will be used in the counseling interview with the PCP at the end of the health check as a practical guide to discuss individual tailored preventive strategies.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Difference of participant's physical activity at twelve months after the routine health check between the groups.
Description
Self-reported outcome, international validated questionnaire Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Last 7 Days Format (IPAQ-SF), which has been shown to be a reliable and valid tool to obtain comparable estimates of physical activity.
Time Frame
at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Improvement in the counseling process assessed by PCPs.
Description
Self-reported outcome, analyzed as difference in proportion of counseling regarding preventive strategies on balanced nutrition, body weight reduction, physical activity, and smoking secession between the groups. Questions are derived from a previous study.
Time Frame
at baseline and up to one year after the PCP entered the study
Title
Improvement in the counseling process assessed by participants.
Description
Self-reported outcome, analyzed as difference in proportion of counseling regarding preventive strategies on balanced nutrition, body weight reduction, physical activity, and smoking secession between the groups. Questions are derived from a previous study.
Time Frame
at 6 months follow-up
Title
Improvement of shared decision making, assessed by participants.
Description
Self-reported outcome, modified questionnaire to assess the difference in proportion of shared decision making for diabetes prevention opportunities between the groups.
Time Frame
at baseline
Title
Improvement of shared decision making, assessed by PCPs.
Description
Self-reported outcome, modified questionnaire to assess the difference in proportion of shared decision making for diabetes prevention opportunities between the groups.
Time Frame
at baseline
Title
Improved motivation to change lifestyle, assessed by participants.
Description
Self-reported outcome, questions are based on the stage of change model to assess the stage of motivation according to weight reduction, physical activity, healthy diet, smoking cessation and were derived from previous studies. We will assess the difference of motivation change between the groups.
Time Frame
at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Title
Change in Body-Mass-Index (BMI)
Description
At baseline, weight and height is objectively measured by the PCP, in the follow-up weight will be self-reported. We will analyse group differences in change of BMI at 6 and 12 months follow-up.
Time Frame
at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Title
Change in participant's quality of life.
Description
Self-reported outcome, question has been derived from previous studies. We will assess the change of quality of life between the groups.
Time Frame
at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Title
Change in participant's level of depression and anxiety.
Description
Self-reported outcomes, depression and anxiety will be assessed with a validated questionnaire, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS-D). We will assess the change of depression and anxiety between the groups.
Time Frame
at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Title
Change of participant's perceived risk of developing diabetes.
Description
Self-reported outcome by participants, questions derived from previous studies. We will assess the change in perceived risk between the groups.
Time Frame
at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up
Title
Acceptance of PCPs according to the application of a diabetes risk score for routine use in clinical practice.
Description
Self-reported outcome, differences between the groups will be analyzed. Questions are derived from previous studies.
Time Frame
at baseline, and up to one year after the PCP entered the study
Title
Acceptance of participants according to the application of a diabetes risk score for routine use in clinical practice.
Description
Self-reported outcome, questions derived from previous studies.
Time Frame
at 6 months follow-up
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change on participant's individual diabetes risk.
Description
Self-reported outcome. Individual diabetes risk will be derived from the diabetes risk score in the intervention group at baseline, which is a validated questionnaire. In the follow-up questionnaires at 6 and 12 months, the questions of the diabetes risk score are included in the questionnaire of both groups.
Time Frame
at baseline, 6 and 12 months follow-up

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
35 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria for participation of medical practitioners: general practitioners, medical practitioners and internists working as general practitioners with and without further training in diabetology according to German Diabetes Association standards provide the routine health check Exclusion criteria for participation of medical practitioners: treat exclusively patients with private insurance treat exclusively diabetes patients in a specialized medical practice Inclusion criteria for participation of participants appointment for the routine health check insured in statutory health insurance age > 35 years Body Mass Index (BMI) of ≥ 27 kg/m2 Exclusion criteria for participation of participants type 1 or type 2 diabetes diagnosis or already abnormal blood glucose level (fasting glucose ≥ 126 mg/dl or 2 hours oral glucose tolerance test (oGTT) ≥ 200mg/dl or glycated hemoglobin (HbA1c) ≥6,5%) before the routine health check no sufficient German language skills to fill in the questionnaires presence of an incurable disease with a prognosis of less than one year severe mental illness or dementia severe underlying disease, which largely impairs physical activity pregnancy participation in another clinical study 30 days before study inclusion
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Wolfgang Rathmann, Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
German Diabetes Center
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
German Diabetes Center, Institute for Biometrics and Epidemiology
City
Düsseldorf
State/Province
North Rhine-Westphalia
ZIP/Postal Code
40225
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
Twelve months after data publication, de-identified data can be provided to other researchers upon request.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
12 months
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Universities and other non-profit organizations
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
24485859
Citation
Dhippayom T, Chaiyakunapruk N, Krass I. How diabetes risk assessment tools are implemented in practice: a systematic review. Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2014 Jun;104(3):329-42. doi: 10.1016/j.diabres.2014.01.008. Epub 2014 Jan 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22123912
Citation
Noble D, Mathur R, Dent T, Meads C, Greenhalgh T. Risk models and scores for type 2 diabetes: systematic review. BMJ. 2011 Nov 28;343:d7163. doi: 10.1136/bmj.d7163.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27898672
Citation
Godino JG, van Sluijs EM, Marteau TM, Sutton S, Sharp SJ, Griffin SJ. Lifestyle Advice Combined with Personalized Estimates of Genetic or Phenotypic Risk of Type 2 Diabetes, and Objectively Measured Physical Activity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. PLoS Med. 2016 Nov 29;13(11):e1002185. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1002185. eCollection 2016 Nov.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20421559
Citation
Muller-Riemenschneider F, Holmberg C, Rieckmann N, Kliems H, Rufer V, Muller-Nordhorn J, Willich SN. Barriers to routine risk-score use for healthy primary care patients: survey and qualitative study. Arch Intern Med. 2010 Apr 26;170(8):719-24. doi: 10.1001/archinternmed.2010.66.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35551495
Citation
Seidel-Jacobs E, Kohl F, Tamayo M, Rosenbauer J, Schulze MB, Kuss O, Rathmann W. Impact of applying a diabetes risk score in primary care on change in physical activity: a pragmatic cluster randomised trial. Acta Diabetol. 2022 Aug;59(8):1031-1040. doi: 10.1007/s00592-022-01895-y. Epub 2022 May 13.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
30326888
Citation
Jacobs E, Tamayo M, Rosenbauer J, Schulze MB, Kuss O, Rathmann W. Protocol of a cluster randomized trial to investigate the impact of a type 2 diabetes risk prediction model on change in physical activity in primary care. BMC Endocr Disord. 2018 Oct 16;18(1):72. doi: 10.1186/s12902-018-0299-2.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

The Impact of a Diabetes Risk Prediction Model in Primary Care.

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs