search
Back to results

Wireless Innovation for Seniors With Diabetes Mellitus (WISDM)

Primary Purpose

Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Dexcom CGM
Sponsored by
Jaeb Center for Health Research
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

Eligibility Criteria

60 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

To be eligible for the study, all participants must meet the following criteria:

  1. Clinical diagnosis of insulin dependent presumed autoimmune type 1 diabetes by the investigator and meeting at least one of the following criteria:

    i. Age > 6 months and < 10 years old at diagnosis OR ii. Positive pancreatic autoantibodies at any time (GAD-65, IA-2, ICA or ZnT8) or positive anti-insulin autoantibody at diagnosis only (within 10 days of starting insulin) OR iii. Presence of 2 or more of the following clinical indicators suggestive of type 1 diabetes:

    1. Age at diagnosis < 40 years
    2. Non-obese at diagnosis according to BMI (< 95th percentile pediatric and < 30 kg/m2 adult)
    3. Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at any time,
    4. Plasma C-peptide level < 0.8 ng/ml (with blood glucose > 80 mg/dL if available) at any time
    5. Family history of type 1 diabetes in a first degree relative (parent, sibling, or child).
  2. Age ≥60 years
  3. HbA1c <10.0% at screening or within 30 days prior to screening visit (the upper limit was selected as a surrogate measure of likelihood of adherence to the protocol with the belief that those with higher HbA1c levels are generally noncompliant with diabetes management and thus not good candidates for the trial)
  4. Insulin regimen involves either use of an insulin pump (a minimum of 40% of study population) or multiple daily injections of insulin (minimum of 40% of study population).
  5. Participant is able to manage his/her diabetes with respect to insulin administration and glucose monitoring (which may include assistance from spouse or other caregiver)
  6. Participant understands the study protocol and agrees to comply with it
  7. Participant comprehends written and spoken English
  8. At least 240 hours (10 out of 14 days) of sensor glucose data with appropriate number of calibrations from the blinded CGM pre-randomization phase

Exclusion Criteria:

Individuals meeting any of the following exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded from study participation.

  1. Use of unblinded CGM, outside of a research study, as part of real-time diabetes management in the last 3 months
  2. At least 10% of time spent with sensor glucose levels < 54 mg/dl during the blinded CGM screening period AND a severe hypoglycemic event in the past 6 months (a severe hypoglycemic event that required assistance of another person due to altered consciousness, and required another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions (see section 8.1).
  3. Extreme visual or hearing impairment that would impair ability to use real-time CGM assessed at screening visit
  4. Known adhesive allergy or skin reaction during the blinded CGM pre-randomization phase that would preclude participation in the randomized trial
  5. Plans to begin non-insulin medication for blood glucose lowering during the course of the study
  6. Stage 4 or 5 renal disease or most recent GFR < 30 ml/min/m2 from local lab within the past 6 months
  7. The presence of a significant medical or psychiatric condition or use of a medication that in the judgment of the investigator may affect completion of any aspect of the protocol, or is likely to be associated with life expectancy of <1 year.
  8. Clinical diagnosis of dementia (cognitive impairment that is mild and not considered sufficient for diagnosis of dementia is acceptable)
  9. Need for use of acetaminophen or acetaminophen-containing products on a regular basis during the 6 months of the trial (unless stipulation no longer required with use of newer generation sensors)
  10. Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months
  11. Participation in an intervention study (including psychological studies) in past 6 weeks.
  12. Expectation that participant will be moving out of the area of the clinical center during the next 6 months, unless the move will be to an area served by another study center.

Sites / Locations

  • University of Southern California
  • Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute
  • University of Colorado - Barbara Davis Center
  • University of Miami
  • Florida Hospital Diabetes Institute
  • Atlanta Diabetes Associates
  • Northwestern University
  • University of Chicago
  • Iowa Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center
  • University of Massachusetts
  • University of Michigan
  • Henry Ford Health System
  • International Diabetes Center
  • Mayo Clinic
  • Washington University
  • Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
  • Columbia University - Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center
  • SUNY Upstate Medical University
  • University of North Carolina
  • Oregon Health & Science University
  • University of Pennsylvania
  • University of Washington Diabetes Care Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Continuous Glucose Monitor group

Blood Glucose Meter group

Arm Description

CGM group participants will be asked to use a Dexcom CGM sensor on a daily basis, inserting a new sensor as needed. Participants will be instructed to use the sensor according to FDA labeling. In addition, participants will be advised to check the blood glucose when symptoms or expectations do not match the CGM reading. Participants will have clinic visits at 10 days, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 26 weeks.

BGM group participants will be asked to use a study blood glucose meter with test strips for a fingerstick blood glucose check with a recommendation of 4 times a day. Participants will be permitted to check a fingerstick glucose as many times a day as they choose. Participants will have a phone visits at 10 days and clinic visits at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 26 weeks. In addition to the in-clinic study visits, the BGM group will have blinded sensor placement visits one week prior to each of the 8, 16, and 26 week visits.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time spent with glucose level <70 mg/dL
The primary outcome will be a treatment group comparison of the percentage of sensor values in the hypoglycemic range (<70 mg/dL), adjusted for the baseline values and factors used to stratify randomization in a regression model. Residual values will be examined for an approximate normal distribution. If values are highly skewed, then a transformation or non-parametric methods will be used instead. The BGM Group will be wearing a blinded CGM for one week at 3 time points in the study (in addition to baseline). For analysis, sensor data from the CGM Group will be used from these same time periods to match up with the blinded CGM placed for the BGM Group. The CGM data will be pooled across each time point of CGM data collection for the primary analysis.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in HbA1c
Mean ± SD values for the change in HbA1c from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be computed for each randomization group and compared in a regression model adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Change in QOL: Preferring Hypoglycemia Scale
Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Change in QOL: Blood glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Questionnaire
Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Change in QOL: Hypoglycemia Fear Survey
Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Change in QOL: Diabetes Distress Questionnaire
Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Change in QOL: PROMIS Measures for QOL
Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Change in QOL: NIH Cognitive Toolbox
Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Change in QOL: NIH Emotions Toolbox
Mean ± SD values for the change in total and composite score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Time spent with glucose level <60 mg/dL
Analyses will be similar to the primary objective.
Time spent with glucose level <54 mg/dL
Analyses will be similar to the primary objective.

Full Information

First Posted
July 26, 2017
Last Updated
September 11, 2019
Sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Collaborators
The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03240432
Brief Title
Wireless Innovation for Seniors With Diabetes Mellitus
Acronym
WISDM
Official Title
Wireless Innovation for Seniors With Diabetes Mellitus (WISDM)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
September 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
September 26, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 6, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
September 10, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Collaborators
The Leona M. and Harry B. Helmsley Charitable Trust, Juvenile Diabetes Research Foundation

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study is to determine if CGM can reduce hypoglycemia and improve quality of life in older adults with T1D.
Detailed Description
Reducing hypoglycemia is an important aspect of management of T1D in older adults, many of whom have hypoglycemic unawareness, cognitive impairment, or both. CGM offers the opportunity to reduce hypoglycemia and its related complications such as fractures from falls and hospitalizations and improve quality of life including reducing hypoglycemic fear and diabetes distress. Despite these potential benefits, CGM is used by only a small proportion of older adults with T1D. Previous studies assessing CGM efficacy have included only a small number of adults ≥ 60 years of age, excluded patients most prone to severe hypoglycemia, focused on improving HbA1c rather than hypoglycemia, and used older generation CGM sensors. These studies are not generalizable to the population of older adults with T1D. The potential benefit of CGM in reducing hypoglycemia in the older adult population has not been well studied. The goal of this study is to assess the potential benefits and risks of CGM in older adults with T1D.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Type 1 Diabetes Mellitus

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Supportive Care
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Continuous Glucose Monitor group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
CGM group participants will be asked to use a Dexcom CGM sensor on a daily basis, inserting a new sensor as needed. Participants will be instructed to use the sensor according to FDA labeling. In addition, participants will be advised to check the blood glucose when symptoms or expectations do not match the CGM reading. Participants will have clinic visits at 10 days, 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 26 weeks.
Arm Title
Blood Glucose Meter group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
BGM group participants will be asked to use a study blood glucose meter with test strips for a fingerstick blood glucose check with a recommendation of 4 times a day. Participants will be permitted to check a fingerstick glucose as many times a day as they choose. Participants will have a phone visits at 10 days and clinic visits at 4 weeks, 8 weeks, 16 weeks, and 26 weeks. In addition to the in-clinic study visits, the BGM group will have blinded sensor placement visits one week prior to each of the 8, 16, and 26 week visits.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Dexcom CGM
Intervention Description
CGM group will be instructed on how to utilize the CGM data for diabetes management. Participants will be encouraged to use CGM values for making diabetes management decisions and will be provided guidelines for when to confirm with a study BGM fingerstick.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time spent with glucose level <70 mg/dL
Description
The primary outcome will be a treatment group comparison of the percentage of sensor values in the hypoglycemic range (<70 mg/dL), adjusted for the baseline values and factors used to stratify randomization in a regression model. Residual values will be examined for an approximate normal distribution. If values are highly skewed, then a transformation or non-parametric methods will be used instead. The BGM Group will be wearing a blinded CGM for one week at 3 time points in the study (in addition to baseline). For analysis, sensor data from the CGM Group will be used from these same time periods to match up with the blinded CGM placed for the BGM Group. The CGM data will be pooled across each time point of CGM data collection for the primary analysis.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in HbA1c
Description
Mean ± SD values for the change in HbA1c from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be computed for each randomization group and compared in a regression model adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Change in QOL: Preferring Hypoglycemia Scale
Description
Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Change in QOL: Blood glucose Monitoring Satisfaction Questionnaire
Description
Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Change in QOL: Hypoglycemia Fear Survey
Description
Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Change in QOL: Diabetes Distress Questionnaire
Description
Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Change in QOL: PROMIS Measures for QOL
Description
Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Change in QOL: NIH Cognitive Toolbox
Description
Mean ± SD values for the change in total score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Change in QOL: NIH Emotions Toolbox
Description
Mean ± SD values for the change in total and composite score from baseline to 26-weeks with 95% confidence intervals or percentiles appropriate to the distribution will be reported for each randomization group, and compared in linear regression models adjusted for baseline level and factors used to stratify randomization.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Time spent with glucose level <60 mg/dL
Description
Analyses will be similar to the primary objective.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Time spent with glucose level <54 mg/dL
Description
Analyses will be similar to the primary objective.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Rate of episodes of severe hypoglycemia
Description
A hypoglycemic event will be defined as severe low blood sugar requiring assistance of another person due to altered or loss of consciousness. The rate of episodes will be tabulated and assessed using a regression model adjusted for baseline number of events.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months (26 weeks)
Title
Rate of episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis events
Description
A diabetic ketoacidosis event will be defined as hyperglycemia meeting all of the following criteria: Symptoms such as polyuria, polydipsia, nausea, or vomiting; Serum ketones >1.5 mmol/L or large/moderate urine ketones; Either arterial blood pH <7.30 or venous pH <7.24 or serum bicarbonate <15; and Treatment provided in a health care facility The rate of episodes of diabetic ketoacidosis will be tabulated and assessed using a regression model adjusted for baseline number of events.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months (26 weeks)
Title
Number of falls
Description
The number of falls and any resulting injuries will be tabulated and compared between treatment groups using a Fisher's exact test.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months (26 weeks)
Title
Number of ER visits
Description
The number of ER visits will be tabulated and compared between treatment groups using a Fisher's exact test.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months (26 weeks)
Title
Number of hospitalizations
Description
The number of hospitalizations will be tabulated and compared between treatment groups using a Fishers's exact test.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months (26 weeks)
Title
Number of device-related adverse events
Description
The study investigator will determine if an adverse event (severe hypoglycemic events, diabetic ketoacidosis events, falls, hospitalizations, ER visits, etc.) may have been caused by the study intervention (CGM) by any of the following: Component disconnections CGM sensors lasting fewer than 7 days CGM tape adherence issues Battery lifespan deficiency due to inadequate charging or extensive wireless communication Intermittent device component disconnections/communication failures not leading to system replacement Device issues clearly addressed in the user guide manual that do not require additional troubleshooting Skin reactions from CGM sensor placement that don't meet criteria for AE reporting The number of device-related adverse events will be tabulated and compared between treatment groups using a Fisher's exact test.
Time Frame
baseline to 6 months (26 weeks)
Title
Hyperglycemia: time >180 mg/dL
Description
Time spent >180 mg/dL will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Hyperglycemia: time >250 mg/dL
Description
Time spent >250 mg/dL will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Hyperglycemia: time >300mg/dL
Description
Time spent >300mg/dL will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Hyperglycemia: area under the curve 180 mg/dL
Description
The area under the curve for 180 mg/dL will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Hyperglycemia: high blood glucose index
Description
High blood glucose index will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Time in range 70-180 mg/dL
Description
The time in range (70-180 mg/dL) will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Mean glucose
Description
Mean glucose will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline
Title
Glycemic variability (coefficient of variation)
Description
Glycemic variability will be compared between groups using the methods described above for the primary objective.
Time Frame
6 months (26 weeks) from baseline

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: To be eligible for the study, all participants must meet the following criteria: Clinical diagnosis of insulin dependent presumed autoimmune type 1 diabetes by the investigator and meeting at least one of the following criteria: i. Age > 6 months and < 10 years old at diagnosis OR ii. Positive pancreatic autoantibodies at any time (GAD-65, IA-2, ICA or ZnT8) or positive anti-insulin autoantibody at diagnosis only (within 10 days of starting insulin) OR iii. Presence of 2 or more of the following clinical indicators suggestive of type 1 diabetes: Age at diagnosis < 40 years Non-obese at diagnosis according to BMI (< 95th percentile pediatric and < 30 kg/m2 adult) Diabetic ketoacidosis (DKA) at any time, Plasma C-peptide level < 0.8 ng/ml (with blood glucose > 80 mg/dL if available) at any time Family history of type 1 diabetes in a first degree relative (parent, sibling, or child). Age ≥60 years HbA1c <10.0% at screening or within 30 days prior to screening visit (the upper limit was selected as a surrogate measure of likelihood of adherence to the protocol with the belief that those with higher HbA1c levels are generally noncompliant with diabetes management and thus not good candidates for the trial) Insulin regimen involves either use of an insulin pump (a minimum of 40% of study population) or multiple daily injections of insulin (minimum of 40% of study population). Participant is able to manage his/her diabetes with respect to insulin administration and glucose monitoring (which may include assistance from spouse or other caregiver) Participant understands the study protocol and agrees to comply with it Participant comprehends written and spoken English At least 240 hours (10 out of 14 days) of sensor glucose data with appropriate number of calibrations from the blinded CGM pre-randomization phase Exclusion Criteria: Individuals meeting any of the following exclusion criteria at baseline will be excluded from study participation. Use of unblinded CGM, outside of a research study, as part of real-time diabetes management in the last 3 months At least 10% of time spent with sensor glucose levels < 54 mg/dl during the blinded CGM screening period AND a severe hypoglycemic event in the past 6 months (a severe hypoglycemic event that required assistance of another person due to altered consciousness, and required another person to actively administer carbohydrate, glucagon, or other resuscitative actions (see section 8.1). Extreme visual or hearing impairment that would impair ability to use real-time CGM assessed at screening visit Known adhesive allergy or skin reaction during the blinded CGM pre-randomization phase that would preclude participation in the randomized trial Plans to begin non-insulin medication for blood glucose lowering during the course of the study Stage 4 or 5 renal disease or most recent GFR < 30 ml/min/m2 from local lab within the past 6 months The presence of a significant medical or psychiatric condition or use of a medication that in the judgment of the investigator may affect completion of any aspect of the protocol, or is likely to be associated with life expectancy of <1 year. Clinical diagnosis of dementia (cognitive impairment that is mild and not considered sufficient for diagnosis of dementia is acceptable) Need for use of acetaminophen or acetaminophen-containing products on a regular basis during the 6 months of the trial (unless stipulation no longer required with use of newer generation sensors) Inpatient psychiatric treatment in the past 6 months Participation in an intervention study (including psychological studies) in past 6 weeks. Expectation that participant will be moving out of the area of the clinical center during the next 6 months, unless the move will be to an area served by another study center.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Kellee Miller
Organizational Affiliation
Jaeb Center for Health Research
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Southern California
City
Beverly Hills
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90211
Country
United States
Facility Name
Scripps Whittier Diabetes Institute
City
La Jolla
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92037
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Colorado - Barbara Davis Center
City
Aurora
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80045
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Miami
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33136
Country
United States
Facility Name
Florida Hospital Diabetes Institute
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32804
Country
United States
Facility Name
Atlanta Diabetes Associates
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30318
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern University
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Chicago
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60637
Country
United States
Facility Name
Iowa Diabetes and Endocrinology Research Center
City
West Des Moines
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
50265
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Massachusetts
City
Worcester
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
01655
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Michigan
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48105
Country
United States
Facility Name
Henry Ford Health System
City
Detroit
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48202
Country
United States
Facility Name
International Diabetes Center
City
Minneapolis
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55416
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Washington University
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States
Facility Name
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
Facility Name
Columbia University - Naomi Berrie Diabetes Center
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10032
Country
United States
Facility Name
SUNY Upstate Medical University
City
Syracuse
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
13210
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27517
Country
United States
Facility Name
Oregon Health & Science University
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97239
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Pennsylvania
City
Philadelphia
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
19104
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Washington Diabetes Care Center
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98105
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35294272
Citation
Miller KM, Kanapka LG, Rickels MR, Ahmann AJ, Aleppo G, Ang L, Bhargava A, Bode BW, Carlson A, Chaytor NS, Gannon G, Goland R, Hirsch IB, Kiblinger L, Kruger D, Kudva YC, Levy CJ, McGill JB, O'Malley G, Peters AL, Philipson LH, Philis-Tsimikas A, Pop-Busui R, Salam M, Shah VN, Thompson MJ, Vendrame F, Verdejo A, Weinstock RS, Young L, Pratley R. Benefit of Continuous Glucose Monitoring in Reducing Hypoglycemia Is Sustained Through 12 Months of Use Among Older Adults with Type 1 Diabetes. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2022 Jun;24(6):424-434. doi: 10.1089/dia.2021.0503. Epub 2022 Apr 11.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
32543682
Citation
Pratley RE, Kanapka LG, Rickels MR, Ahmann A, Aleppo G, Beck R, Bhargava A, Bode BW, Carlson A, Chaytor NS, Fox DS, Goland R, Hirsch IB, Kruger D, Kudva YC, Levy C, McGill JB, Peters A, Philipson L, Philis-Tsimikas A, Pop-Busui R, Shah VN, Thompson M, Vendrame F, Verdejo A, Weinstock RS, Young L, Miller KM; Wireless Innovation for Seniors With Diabetes Mellitus (WISDM) Study Group. Effect of Continuous Glucose Monitoring on Hypoglycemia in Older Adults With Type 1 Diabetes: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2020 Jun 16;323(23):2397-2406. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.6928.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Wireless Innovation for Seniors With Diabetes Mellitus

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs