Impact of Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy on HCC
Primary Purpose
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Radiation Segmentectomy
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma focused on measuring Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Radioembolization, Radiation Segmentectomy
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age greater than 18 years, regardless of race or gender
- Hepatocellular Carcinoma confirmed by histology for non-cirrhotic patients or non-invasive criteria according to AASLD for cirrhotic patients
- Child-Pugh class A or B7 without ascites
- Single tumor nodule ≤ 3 cm with a maximum distance of 5 mm from portal vein, hepatic vein, inferior vena cava, diaphragm, heart, stomach, bowel, liver capsule, gallbladder, bile duct
- No prior locoregional treatment or external beam therapy of current HCC (recurrent HCC after resection may be included)
- No confirmed extrahepatic metastases
- No evidence of macrovascular invasion
- ECOG 0
- Albumin > 3.0 g/dL
- PLT ≥ 40 x103/μL
- WBC ≥ 1.5 x103/μL
- AST/ALT ≤ 5 times the upper limit of normal (U/L)
- Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg /dL
- No indication for any possible curative treatment after multidisciplinary assessment (surgery, ablation)
- No contraindication to angiography or selective visceral catheterization
- No history of severe allergy or intolerance to contrast agents, narcotics, sedatives.
- Negative serum pregnancy test
- Signed informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
- Not meeting the inclusion criteria
Sites / Locations
- Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm Type
Other
Arm Label
Radiation Segmentectomy
Arm Description
Radiation Segmentectomy on Resectable HCC
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Number of Participants With Local Tumor Response According to mRECIST
Efficacy of 90Yttrium (Y90) Radiation Segmentectomy on Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma as measured by tumor response according to mRECIST.
CR = Disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions PR = At least a 30% decrease in the diameter of the viable (enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesion SD = Any cases that do not qualify for either partial response or progressive disease PD = An increase of at least 20% in the diameter of viable (enhancing) target lesion
Secondary Outcome Measures
Median Time to Progression (TTP)
Time until progression of the target lesion and overall disease based on mRECIST
Cumulative Incidence of Participants With Local Progression
Cumulative incidence function estimation of the incidence of the occurrence of local progression (event) at 1 year and 2 years while taking the competing risk of transplant into account.
Local progression was defined per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (mRECIST) for target lesions and assessed by MRI with local progression defined as an >20% increase in the diameter of the viable (enhancing) target lesion, taking as a reference of the baseline enhancing tumor size.
Quantifying Dose to Target Lesion
The dose was calculated using PET/CT calculated dose estimation delivered to the tumor. Counts on PET/CT post-treatment were used to estimate the dose delivered to the tumor.
Number of Treatment-related Adverse Events
Number of treatment related adverse events according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0 (CTCAE).
Number of Participants With Access Site-related Adverse Events
Number of participants with access site-related adverse events
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Laboratory Adverse Events
Number of participants with treatment-related laboratory adverse events assessed 6 weeks post-treatment then every 3 months since treatment for 24 months
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03248375
First Posted
August 10, 2017
Last Updated
January 18, 2023
Sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03248375
Brief Title
Impact of Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy on HCC
Official Title
The Impact of 90Yttrium (Y90) Radiation Segmentectomy on Hepatocellular Carcinoma and Cirrhosis
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 3, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2021 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
Yes
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The aim of this pilot study is to assess the efficacy of radiation segmentectomy with Theraspheres in patients with unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma that would qualify for thermal ablation as per the BCLC guidelines, but are unable to receive thermal ablation due to unfavorable location of target lesions.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Keywords
Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Radioembolization, Radiation Segmentectomy
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Model Description
Individuals with the targeted medical condition is given the experimental therapy and then followed over time to observe their response.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
N/A
Enrollment
29 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Radiation Segmentectomy
Arm Type
Other
Arm Description
Radiation Segmentectomy on Resectable HCC
Intervention Type
Radiation
Intervention Name(s)
Radiation Segmentectomy
Intervention Description
The administration of radioactivity in a branch of an artery of the liver
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Local Tumor Response According to mRECIST
Description
Efficacy of 90Yttrium (Y90) Radiation Segmentectomy on Unresectable Hepatocellular Carcinoma as measured by tumor response according to mRECIST.
CR = Disappearance of any intratumoral arterial enhancement in all target lesions PR = At least a 30% decrease in the diameter of the viable (enhancement in the arterial phase) target lesion SD = Any cases that do not qualify for either partial response or progressive disease PD = An increase of at least 20% in the diameter of viable (enhancing) target lesion
Time Frame
2 years
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Median Time to Progression (TTP)
Description
Time until progression of the target lesion and overall disease based on mRECIST
Time Frame
2 years
Title
Cumulative Incidence of Participants With Local Progression
Description
Cumulative incidence function estimation of the incidence of the occurrence of local progression (event) at 1 year and 2 years while taking the competing risk of transplant into account.
Local progression was defined per modified Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors Criteria (mRECIST) for target lesions and assessed by MRI with local progression defined as an >20% increase in the diameter of the viable (enhancing) target lesion, taking as a reference of the baseline enhancing tumor size.
Time Frame
1 year and 2 years
Title
Quantifying Dose to Target Lesion
Description
The dose was calculated using PET/CT calculated dose estimation delivered to the tumor. Counts on PET/CT post-treatment were used to estimate the dose delivered to the tumor.
Time Frame
0 days
Title
Number of Treatment-related Adverse Events
Description
Number of treatment related adverse events according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events v 5.0 (CTCAE).
Time Frame
For 2 years with visits 6 weeks post treatment then every 3 months since treatment for 24 months for assessment of laboratory and clinical symptoms
Title
Number of Participants With Access Site-related Adverse Events
Description
Number of participants with access site-related adverse events
Time Frame
For 2 years with visits 6 weeks post treatment then every 3 months since treatment for 24 months for assessment of laboratory and clinical symptoms
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-related Laboratory Adverse Events
Description
Number of participants with treatment-related laboratory adverse events assessed 6 weeks post-treatment then every 3 months since treatment for 24 months
Time Frame
For 2 years with visits 6 weeks post treatment then every 3 months since treatment for 24 months for assessment of laboratory changes
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age greater than 18 years, regardless of race or gender
Hepatocellular Carcinoma confirmed by histology for non-cirrhotic patients or non-invasive criteria according to AASLD for cirrhotic patients
Child-Pugh class A or B7 without ascites
Single tumor nodule ≤ 3 cm with a maximum distance of 5 mm from portal vein, hepatic vein, inferior vena cava, diaphragm, heart, stomach, bowel, liver capsule, gallbladder, bile duct
No prior locoregional treatment or external beam therapy of current HCC (recurrent HCC after resection may be included)
No confirmed extrahepatic metastases
No evidence of macrovascular invasion
ECOG 0
Albumin > 3.0 g/dL
PLT ≥ 40 x103/μL
WBC ≥ 1.5 x103/μL
AST/ALT ≤ 5 times the upper limit of normal (U/L)
Creatinine ≤ 2.0 mg /dL
No indication for any possible curative treatment after multidisciplinary assessment (surgery, ablation)
No contraindication to angiography or selective visceral catheterization
No history of severe allergy or intolerance to contrast agents, narcotics, sedatives.
Negative serum pregnancy test
Signed informed consent form
Exclusion Criteria:
Not meeting the inclusion criteria
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Aaron Fischman, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10029
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
11029989
Citation
Wong JB, McQuillan GM, McHutchison JG, Poynard T. Estimating future hepatitis C morbidity, mortality, and costs in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2000 Oct;90(10):1562-9. doi: 10.2105/ajph.90.10.1562.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11391528
Citation
Yao FY, Ferrell L, Bass NM, Watson JJ, Bacchetti P, Venook A, Ascher NL, Roberts JP. Liver transplantation for hepatocellular carcinoma: expansion of the tumor size limits does not adversely impact survival. Hepatology. 2001 Jun;33(6):1394-403. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2001.24563.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11772979
Citation
Llovet JM, Mas X, Aponte JJ, Fuster J, Navasa M, Christensen E, Rodes J, Bruix J. Cost effectiveness of adjuvant therapy for hepatocellular carcinoma during the waiting list for liver transplantation. Gut. 2002 Jan;50(1):123-8. doi: 10.1136/gut.50.1.123.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12540794
Citation
Llovet JM, Bruix J. Systematic review of randomized trials for unresectable hepatocellular carcinoma: Chemoembolization improves survival. Hepatology. 2003 Feb;37(2):429-42. doi: 10.1053/jhep.2003.50047.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10973388
Citation
Curley SA, Izzo F, Ellis LM, Nicolas Vauthey J, Vallone P. Radiofrequency ablation of hepatocellular cancer in 110 patients with cirrhosis. Ann Surg. 2000 Sep;232(3):381-91. doi: 10.1097/00000658-200009000-00010.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15590181
Citation
Cheng JC, Wu JK, Lee PC, Liu HS, Jian JJ, Lin YM, Sung JL, Jan GJ. Biologic susceptibility of hepatocellular carcinoma patients treated with radiotherapy to radiation-induced liver disease. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2004 Dec 1;60(5):1502-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2004.05.048.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16183482
Citation
Dawson LA, Ten Haken RK. Partial volume tolerance of the liver to radiation. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2005 Oct;15(4):279-83. doi: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2005.04.005.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19357924
Citation
Gaba RC, Lewandowski RJ, Kulik LM, Riaz A, Ibrahim SM, Mulcahy MF, Ryu RK, Sato KT, Gates V, Abecassis MM, Omary RA, Baker TB, Salem R. Radiation lobectomy: preliminary findings of hepatic volumetric response to lobar yttrium-90 radioembolization. Ann Surg Oncol. 2009 Jun;16(6):1587-96. doi: 10.1245/s10434-009-0454-0. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18003987
Citation
Young JY, Rhee TK, Atassi B, Gates VL, Kulik L, Mulcahy MF, Larson AC, Ryu RK, Sato KT, Lewandowski RJ, Omary RA, Salem R. Radiation dose limits and liver toxicities resulting from multiple yttrium-90 radioembolization treatments for hepatocellular carcinoma. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2007 Nov;18(11):1375-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2007.07.016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19640737
Citation
Riaz A, Lewandowski RJ, Kulik LM, Mulcahy MF, Sato KT, Ryu RK, Omary RA, Salem R. Complications following radioembolization with yttrium-90 microspheres: a comprehensive literature review. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2009 Sep;20(9):1121-30; quiz 1131. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2009.05.030. Epub 2009 Jul 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20175033
Citation
Lencioni R, Llovet JM. Modified RECIST (mRECIST) assessment for hepatocellular carcinoma. Semin Liver Dis. 2010 Feb;30(1):52-60. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1247132. Epub 2010 Feb 19.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20421150
Citation
Riaz A, Gates VL, Atassi B, Lewandowski RJ, Mulcahy MF, Ryu RK, Sato KT, Baker T, Kulik L, Gupta R, Abecassis M, Benson AB 3rd, Omary R, Millender L, Kennedy A, Salem R. Radiation segmentectomy: a novel approach to increase safety and efficacy of radioembolization. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2011 Jan 1;79(1):163-71. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2009.10.062. Epub 2010 Apr 24.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23332890
Citation
Bargellini I, Bozzi E, Campani D, Carrai P, De Simone P, Pollina L, Cioni R, Filipponi F, Bartolozzi C. Modified RECIST to assess tumor response after transarterial chemoembolization of hepatocellular carcinoma: CT-pathologic correlation in 178 liver explants. Eur J Radiol. 2013 May;82(5):e212-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2012.12.009. Epub 2013 Jan 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
12599233
Citation
Komorizono Y, Oketani M, Sako K, Yamasaki N, Shibatou T, Maeda M, Kohara K, Shigenobu S, Ishibashi K, Arima T. Risk factors for local recurrence of small hepatocellular carcinoma tumors after a single session, single application of percutaneous radiofrequency ablation. Cancer. 2003 Mar 1;97(5):1253-62. doi: 10.1002/cncr.11168.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23428355
Citation
Golfieri R, Renzulli M, Mosconi C, Forlani L, Giampalma E, Piscaglia F, Trevisani F, Bolondi L; Bologna Liver Oncology Group (BLOG). Hepatocellular carcinoma responding to superselective transarterial chemoembolization: an issue of nodule dimension? J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2013 Apr;24(4):509-17. doi: 10.1016/j.jvir.2012.12.013. Epub 2013 Feb 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35617978
Citation
Kim E, Sher A, Abboud G, Schwartz M, Facciuto M, Tabrizian P, Knesaurek K, Fischman A, Patel R, Nowakowski S, Llovet J, Taouli B, Lookstein R. Radiation segmentectomy for curative intent of unresectable very early to early stage hepatocellular carcinoma (RASER): a single-centre, single-arm study. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2022 Sep;7(9):843-850. doi: 10.1016/S2468-1253(22)00091-7. Epub 2022 May 23.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Impact of Y90 Radiation Segmentectomy on HCC
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs