search
Back to results

Decision-Making Processes While Online Grocery Shopping

Primary Purpose

Nutrition Poor

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Default option
Psychoeducation
Incentive
Sponsored by
University at Albany
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Nutrition Poor focused on measuring Proof-of-principle, Feasibility

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • age 18 or older
  • fluent in written and spoken English
  • able to provide informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • significant dietary restrictions (i.e., meat avoidance, food allergies, religious dietary restrictions, etc.)
  • likely presence of current eating disorder diagnosis (score >/= 2 on SCOFF screening measure)

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Default

    Psychoeducation

    Incentive

    Arm Description

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Nutritional quality
    The Thrifty Food Plan Calculator (TFPC) was used to quantify the nutritional quality of groceries selected by study participants. The TFPC was developed using U.S. Department of Agriculture nutrition and consumption data and is designed to have users input information about the relative amount of money spent on various categories of food and provides comprehensive information on caloric, macro-, and micronutrient content of the foods selected based on participant age and gender.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Full Information

    First Posted
    July 28, 2017
    Last Updated
    May 9, 2019
    Sponsor
    University at Albany
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03248583
    Brief Title
    Decision-Making Processes While Online Grocery Shopping
    Official Title
    Decision-Making Processes While Online Grocery Shopping
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    May 2019
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    January 13, 2016 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    September 29, 2016 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    September 29, 2016 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University at Albany

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No
    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Individuals living with food insecurity are disproportionately affected by overweight and obesity and associated chronic health problems. There remains a lack of sustainable and scalable interventions targeting widespread barriers to access to healthy foods in this population to increase the nutritional quality of foods purchased for preparation and consumption at home. This randomized controlled proof-of-principle trial was designed to examine the feasibility and initial efficacy of a "default option" in enhancing the nutritional quality of groceries selected via the online shopping service of a local grocery store under conditions that mimic the financial constraints typical of individuals living with food insecurity. In behavioral economics, the "default option" refers to the option a consumer selects if no active choice is made. The notion of the default option is based on the concept of "asymmetrical" or "libertarian paternalism," which seeks to subtly shift consumer behavior in a manner that promotes welfare, but without overtly interfering with the individual's freedom to choose. It was hypothesized that the "default" option effectively increases the nutritional quality of foods purchased online, compared to monetary incentives and psychoeducation about nutrition. Female undergraduate students (n = 60) selected food for one week using the online shopping service of a local grocery store with a budget corresponding to maximum weekly Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) benefits. Before completing the task again, participants were randomized to: (1) a small monetary "incentive" for selecting groceries that meet nutritional guidelines (n = 17), (2) an "educational" brochure (n = 24), or (3) a "default" pre-filled online shopping cart containing a nutritionally balanced selection of groceries to which they could freely make changes (n = 18). Primary outcome measures capture the nutritional quality of groceries selected/ purchased.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Nutrition Poor
    Keywords
    Proof-of-principle, Feasibility

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Prevention
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    Participant
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    60 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Default
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Title
    Psychoeducation
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Title
    Incentive
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Default option
    Intervention Description
    The "default option" is a behavioral economics construct that refers to the option a consumer selects if no active choice is made (e.g. opt-out 401K plans, which significantly increase enrollment, compared to active sign up). Participants in the default condition were presented with a pre-filled online shopping cart containing a combination of groceries that meet macro- and micronutrient requirements for their gender and age, and told that they are free to delete, add, and exchange any item they wish to finalize their selections.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Psychoeducation
    Intervention Description
    Participants in the psychoeducation condition were instructed to read a brief psychoeducational brochure adapted from materials currently utilized by the New York State Office of Temporary and Disability Assistance ("Eat Smart New York").
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Incentive
    Intervention Description
    Participants in the incentive condition were informed that they will receive a gift card to a major retailer of their choice if they select groceries that meet recommended nutritional guidelines for macro- and micronutrient requirements. Participants were given examples of macro- and micronutrients to ensure that the instructions were clear.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Nutritional quality
    Description
    The Thrifty Food Plan Calculator (TFPC) was used to quantify the nutritional quality of groceries selected by study participants. The TFPC was developed using U.S. Department of Agriculture nutrition and consumption data and is designed to have users input information about the relative amount of money spent on various categories of food and provides comprehensive information on caloric, macro-, and micronutrient content of the foods selected based on participant age and gender.
    Time Frame
    Single laboratory visit, <1.5 hours

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Female
    Gender Based
    Yes
    Gender Eligibility Description
    Participant eligibility was based in part on self-representation of gender identity as female.
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: age 18 or older fluent in written and spoken English able to provide informed consent Exclusion Criteria: significant dietary restrictions (i.e., meat avoidance, food allergies, religious dietary restrictions, etc.) likely presence of current eating disorder diagnosis (score >/= 2 on SCOFF screening measure)

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    Undecided
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    29604181
    Citation
    Coffino JA, Hormes JM. A Default Option to Enhance Nutrition Within Financial Constraints: A Randomized, Controlled Proof-of-Principle Trial. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2018 Jun;26(6):961-967. doi: 10.1002/oby.22151. Epub 2018 Mar 31.
    Results Reference
    derived

    Learn more about this trial

    Decision-Making Processes While Online Grocery Shopping

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs