Safety and Efficacy of Propranolol in the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia
Primary Purpose
Tardive Dyskinesia
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Propranolol Hydrochloride
Placebo Oral Tablet
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Tardive Dyskinesia focused on measuring Propranolol, Safety, Efficacy, Tardive Dyskinesia treatment
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- age 18-75 years
- diagnosis of classical TD by a movement disorder expert for at least 6 months with a baseline score of at least 2 on two of the seven items on the AIMS severity scale
- stable on medication (either on or off dopamine blocking agents) for at least six months.
Exclusion Criteria:
- breastfeeding
- pregnant
- unstable psychiatric disease
- history of asthma or COPD
- baseline heart rate less than 60
- history of orthostatic hypertension or its presence at screening
- history of congestive heart failure or unstable angina pectoris
- resting SBP <100 and DBP < 60
- AV-block II or III without pacemaker
- history of diabetes mellitus
- previous adverse effects from use of beta-blockers
- current use of a β-blocker and the other following drugs: quinidine, amiodarone, propafenone, digoxin, verapamil, diltiazem, clonidine, and warfarin
- tremor, dystonia, akathisia or other non-tardive movement disorder
- any medical illness that precludes treatment with propranolol.
Sites / Locations
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Placebo Comparator
Arm Label
Propranolol Hydrochloride
Placebo Oral Tablet
Arm Description
Two week up-titration to reach a total dose of 20mg per oral four times per day over the first two weeks then will remain on a stable dose for six weeks. The patients will be treated for eight weeks, complete a one week washout and then crossed over to another arm for eight weeks.
Identical placebo. The patients will be treated for eight weeks, complete a one week washout and then crossed over to another arm for eight weeks.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) score.
AIMS is a rating scale that scores each individual involuntary movement type at different body locations on a five-point anchored scale. For this study, items 1-7 represent the severity portion (rated 0-4) of the scale and will be used as the primary end point. This measure will be completed at the time of the visit by the enrolling physician. In addition, a standardized video documenting the motor portion of the AIMS will be completed at baseline and eight weeks for both segments of the study. These will be placed in a randomized order and scored using the AIMS severity scale by two blinded raters using consensus measures. A comparison of the change in score from placebo to active by the blinded video raters will be the primary outcome measure.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) score.
The CGI provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure that takes into account all available information, including a knowledge of the patient's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the patient's ability to function.
The CGI-Severity (CGI-S) asks the clinician one question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?" which is rated on the following seven-point scale: 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients.
This rating is based upon observed and reported symptoms, behavior, and function in the past seven days. As symptoms and behavior can fluctuate over a week; the score should reflect the average severity level across the seven days.
Change in the Clinical Global Impression -Improvement (CGI-I) score.
The CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) is similarly simple in its format. Each time the patient is seen after medication has been initiated, the clinician compares the patient's overall clinical condition to the one week period just prior to the initiation of medication use (the so-called baseline visit). The CGI-I score obtained at the baseline (initiation) visit serves as a basis for making this assessment. Only the following one query is rated on a seven-point scale: "Compared to the patient's condition at admission to the project [prior to medication initiation], this patient's condition is: 1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment."
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03254186
First Posted
August 16, 2017
Last Updated
February 22, 2019
Sponsor
Emory University
Collaborators
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03254186
Brief Title
Safety and Efficacy of Propranolol in the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia
Official Title
Safety and Efficacy of Propranolol in the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
No participants
Study Start Date
September 18, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
February 1, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 1, 2019 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Emory University
Collaborators
Atlanta Clinical and Translational Science Institute
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a disabling, embarrassing and often irreversible iatrogenic movement disorder that can occur in anyone exposed to drugs that block dopamine receptors, including first and second generation antipsychotics and antiemetic agents. There is no way to prevent TD except preventing exposure to the inciting agents and there are no approved symptomatic therapies. Propranolol is an FDA-approved β-blocker with limited data supporting its use as a treatment for TD.
The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of propranolol in the treatment of TD in a double-blind, cross-over prospective manner. If propranolol is found to be an effective therapy, it will fulfill a great need in the treatment of TD with a medication that is known to be safe and inexpensive.
Detailed Description
Tardive dyskinesia (TD) is a disabling, embarrassing and often irreversible iatrogenic movement disorder that can occur in anyone exposed to drugs that block dopamine receptors, including first and second generation antipsychotics and antiemetic agents. There is no way to prevent TD except preventing exposure to the inciting agents and there are no approved symptomatic therapies. Propranolol is an FDA-approved β-blocker with limited data supporting its use as a treatment for TD.
The goal of this study is to determine the efficacy of propranolol in the treatment of TD in a double-blind, cross-over prospective manner. Patients with a diagnosis of TD will be randomized to propranolol or identical placebo. The patients will be treated for eight weeks, complete a one week washout and then crossed over for another eight weeks. Hence, the subjects will be their own controls. Participation in this pilot trial will provide placebo controlled blinded data that will assist in planning a larger phase II trial. If propranolol is found to be an effective therapy, it will fulfill a great need in the treatment of TD with a medication that is known to be safe and inexpensive.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tardive Dyskinesia
Keywords
Propranolol, Safety, Efficacy, Tardive Dyskinesia treatment
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2, Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Propranolol Hydrochloride
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Two week up-titration to reach a total dose of 20mg per oral four times per day over the first two weeks then will remain on a stable dose for six weeks. The patients will be treated for eight weeks, complete a one week washout and then crossed over to another arm for eight weeks.
Arm Title
Placebo Oral Tablet
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Identical placebo. The patients will be treated for eight weeks, complete a one week washout and then crossed over to another arm for eight weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Propranolol Hydrochloride
Other Intervention Name(s)
Inderal
Intervention Description
Propranolol is started 10 mg tablet twice per day per oral, two week up-titration to reach a total dose of 20mg per oral four times per day over the first two weeks, then will remain on a stable dose for six weeks.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo Oral Tablet
Other Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Identical placebo is started one tablet twice per day per oral, increase over the first two weeks to reach one tablet four times per day, then will remain on this dose for six weeks.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Abnormal Involuntary Movement Scale (AIMS) score.
Description
AIMS is a rating scale that scores each individual involuntary movement type at different body locations on a five-point anchored scale. For this study, items 1-7 represent the severity portion (rated 0-4) of the scale and will be used as the primary end point. This measure will be completed at the time of the visit by the enrolling physician. In addition, a standardized video documenting the motor portion of the AIMS will be completed at baseline and eight weeks for both segments of the study. These will be placed in a randomized order and scored using the AIMS severity scale by two blinded raters using consensus measures. A comparison of the change in score from placebo to active by the blinded video raters will be the primary outcome measure.
Time Frame
Visit 1, 3 4, 6, 7 (up to 18 weeks)
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in the Clinical Global Impression of Severity (CGI-S) score.
Description
The CGI provides an overall clinician-determined summary measure that takes into account all available information, including a knowledge of the patient's history, psychosocial circumstances, symptoms, behavior, and the impact of the symptoms on the patient's ability to function.
The CGI-Severity (CGI-S) asks the clinician one question: "Considering your total clinical experience with this particular population, how mentally ill is the patient at this time?" which is rated on the following seven-point scale: 1=normal, not at all ill; 2=borderline mentally ill; 3=mildly ill; 4=moderately ill; 5=markedly ill; 6=severely ill; 7=among the most extremely ill patients.
This rating is based upon observed and reported symptoms, behavior, and function in the past seven days. As symptoms and behavior can fluctuate over a week; the score should reflect the average severity level across the seven days.
Time Frame
Visit 1, 3 4, 6 (up to 18 weeks)
Title
Change in the Clinical Global Impression -Improvement (CGI-I) score.
Description
The CGI-Improvement (CGI-I) is similarly simple in its format. Each time the patient is seen after medication has been initiated, the clinician compares the patient's overall clinical condition to the one week period just prior to the initiation of medication use (the so-called baseline visit). The CGI-I score obtained at the baseline (initiation) visit serves as a basis for making this assessment. Only the following one query is rated on a seven-point scale: "Compared to the patient's condition at admission to the project [prior to medication initiation], this patient's condition is: 1=very much improved since the initiation of treatment; 2=much improved; 3=minimally improved; 4=no change from baseline (the initiation of treatment); 5=minimally worse; 6= much worse; 7=very much worse since the initiation of treatment."
Time Frame
Visit 3 and 6 (up to 18 weeks)
Other Pre-specified Outcome Measures:
Title
Change in the Short Form-36 question health survey (SF-36v2) score.
Description
The Short Form-36 question health survey (SF-36v2) measures a subject's functional health and well-being from their own point of view. SF-36v2 is comprised of 36 questions spanning eight health domains: physical functioning, role-physical, bodily pain, general health, vitality, social functioning, role-emotional, and mental health. The eight scaled scores are the weighted sums of the questions in their section. Each scale is directly transformed into a 0-100 scale on the assumption that each question carries equal weight. The lower the score the more disability. The higher the score the less disability i.e., a score of zero is equivalent to maximum disability and a score of 100 is equivalent to no disability. The health domain scales contribute to the scoring of two summary measures: physical health and mental health.
Time Frame
Visit 1, 3 4, 6 (up to 18 weeks)
Title
Change in the Craniocervical Dystonia Questionnaire (CDQ-24) score.
Description
A modified version of the CDQ-24, a questionnaire to evaluate the quality of life in patients with face/neck movement disorders such as cervical dystonia and blepharospasm. The 24 questions of the CDQ-24 are divided in five areas:stigma (6), emotional wellbeing (5), pain (3), activities of daily living (6) and family/social life (4). Each question has five possible answers, in which 0 (zero) is the best and 4 is the worst. The total score of the CDQ-24 ranges from 0 (best Quality of Life) to 100 (worst Quality of Life).
Time Frame
Visit 1, 3 4, 6 (up to 18 weeks)
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
age 18-75 years
diagnosis of classical TD by a movement disorder expert for at least 6 months with a baseline score of at least 2 on two of the seven items on the AIMS severity scale
stable on medication (either on or off dopamine blocking agents) for at least six months.
Exclusion Criteria:
breastfeeding
pregnant
unstable psychiatric disease
history of asthma or COPD
baseline heart rate less than 60
history of orthostatic hypertension or its presence at screening
history of congestive heart failure or unstable angina pectoris
resting SBP <100 and DBP < 60
AV-block II or III without pacemaker
history of diabetes mellitus
previous adverse effects from use of beta-blockers
current use of a β-blocker and the other following drugs: quinidine, amiodarone, propafenone, digoxin, verapamil, diltiazem, clonidine, and warfarin
tremor, dystonia, akathisia or other non-tardive movement disorder
any medical illness that precludes treatment with propranolol.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jaime Hatcher-Martin, MD, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Emory University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
Learn more about this trial
Safety and Efficacy of Propranolol in the Treatment of Tardive Dyskinesia
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs