search
Back to results

A Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK1358820 in Subjects With Post-stroke Upper Limb Spasticity

Primary Purpose

Spasticity, Post-Stroke

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Japan
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Botulinum toxin A (GSK1358820)
Placebo
Sponsored by
GlaxoSmithKline
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Spasticity, Post-Stroke focused on measuring Botulinum toxin A, Safety, post-stroke upper limb spasticity, Efficacy, GSK1358820, double blind

Eligibility Criteria

20 Years - 80 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • For screening phase (Day -28 to Day -1): Between 20 and 80 years of age at the time of informed consent (ICF).
  • Subjects with at least a 3-month history of upper limb spasticity after the most recent stroke.
  • Subjects who have spastic symptoms in the finger (including the thumb), wrist, and elbow flexors whom the investigator considers the injections of 400 units of the product is necessary for the upper limb based on the muscle spasms and the symptoms of the subject.
  • Subjects who have a previous treatment history of 240 units of the product for the upper limb at least 16 weeks before screening.
  • Subjects who meet following criteria on MAS at screening (Test position : sitting): at least 3 in for the elbow flexors and at least 2 in the finger or wrist flexors.
  • Subjects who have severe upper limb spasticity, which deserves to be treated with 400 units of the product in the divided dose and was previously injected 240 units of the product.
  • Subjects whom the investigator considers that enrolment in the study poses no problems based on the laboratory data results at screening.
  • Subjects who are free from a history of acute decreased lung function (hospitalization with aggravated asthma/ chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, or signs of pneumonia, or abnormal reactive airway diseases suggested on X-rays) within the last 3 months at screening and have stable pulmonary function (oxygen saturation [SpO2]value is >=95%).
  • Body weight >=40 kilograms (kg) at screening.
  • Male or female subjects will be included. Male subjects must content to use highly effective contraceptive methods and sperm donation must be avoided. Female subjects who are not pregnant or lactating are considered eligible if at least one of the following criteria is met; non-childbearing potential, women of childbearing potential who content to follow the guidance about contraception during the study period and at least for 3 months after the last dose of the product, no plan of pregnancy during the study period.
  • Subjects who have ability to sign their name on the ICF.
  • For enrolment in the study (Day 1 [prior to injection]):Subjects who meet the following criteria on MAS score: (Test position : sitting): At least 3 in the elbow flexors and at least 2 in the finger or wrist flexors.
  • If centrally acting muscle relaxants, tetracycline antibiotics, anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, or benzamides are given, the dose and regimen must be stable at least for the last 2 months before Day 1; Subjects who can maintain the same dosage and regimens at least in the blind phase after initial injection (dose reductions and discontinuation of the drugs are acceptable in the open-label phase. However, second dose increase, resumption, and or new treatment will not be performed).
  • If intrathecal baclofen is given, the dose and regimen must be stable at least for the last 1 month before Day 1; Subjects who can maintain the same dosage and regimens at least in the blind phase after initial injection (intravenous bolus is not acceptable, dose reductions and discontinuation of the drugs are acceptable. However, second dose increase, resumption, and or new treatment will not be performed).
  • If antiepileptic agents are given, the dose and regimen must be stable at least for the 1 month before Day 1; Subjects who can maintain the same dose and regimens at least in the blind phase after initial injection (dose reductions and discontinuation of the drugs are acceptable in the open-label phase. However, second dose increase, resumption, and new treatment will not be performed).
  • If a physical therapy, occupational therapy, or a static splint on the study involvement upper limbs is given, the frequency and treatment regimen must be stable at least for the last 3 weeks before Day 1; Subjects who can maintain the same dose and regimens at least in blind phase (In the open-label phase, the frequency and treatment regimen can be changed depending on the condition of spasticity).

Exclusion Criteria:

  • For screening phase (Day -28 to Day -1): Subjects present with spasticity requiring treatment in the non-paralytic side of the upper limb.
  • Subjects who have fixed contracture in the finger (upper limb), wrist, elbow or shoulder muscle, which will be involved in the study.
  • Subjects who have medically significant capsulitis or subluxation in any one of the fingers (upper limb), wrist, elbow and shoulder, which will be involved in the study, or whom a investigator considers the complicated local signs of pain may affect the efficacy evaluation.
  • Subjects's upper limb spasticity is attributed to other than stroke (traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, or cerebral palsy).
  • Subjects who have a 2-fold higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level than the upper limit of normal (ULN).
  • Subjects who have a 1.5-fold higher bilirubin than the ULN (If a bilirubin fractionation shows direct bilirubin < 35%, a 1.5-fold higher free bilirubin than the ULN is acceptable).
  • Subjects whom the investigator considers presence of a current medical history of unstable liver diseases or biliary tract diseases (the condition will be defined by development of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, persistent jaundice or hepatic cirrhosis).
  • Subjects with corrected QT interval (QTc) > 450 milliseconds (msec) or QTc > 480 msec in subjects with bundle branch block.
  • Subjects who use peripherally acting muscle relaxants (dantrolene sodium, suxamethonium chloride, pancuronium bromide, vecuronium bromide, rocuronium bromide, etc.) within 1 week of screening.
  • Subjects who use antibiotic agents with neuromuscular junction inhibitory effects: Aminoglycoside antibiotic agents (streptomycin sulfate, kanamycin sulfate, gentamicin sulfate, neomycin sulfate, spectinomycin hydrochloride, etc.), polypeptides (polymyxin B sulfate), lincomycins (lincomycin hydrochloride, clindamycin), and enviomycin sulfate within 1 week of screening.
  • Subjects who was diagnosed as having a malignant tumor, or have a history of a malignant tumor within the last 5 years (except completely resected basal cell carcinoma or planocellular carcinoma at least 12 weeks before screening).
  • Subjects who have participated in another study of an investigational product or other medical research (a clinical study of pharmacotherapy, non-pharmacotherapy, or interventional device) within 30 days before screening, or are currently participating in a study.
  • Subjects who are concerned likely to have an increased risk for an underlying medical condition/neurological disease due to exposure of the product; subjects who have myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or a serious disease and use of a concomitant drug which may inhibit neuromuscular function.
  • Subjects with antihuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody positive.
  • Subjects who previously experienced allergic reactions or hypersensitivity due to botulinum toxin type A, an additive agent of sodium chloride, or human serum albumin.
  • Subjects who were previously suspected to have neutralizing antibody production by a investigator during an injection of botulinum toxin type A.
  • Subjects who have a skin disease such as infection at the site to be injected.
  • Subjects who suffer from serious and unstable disease, which could pose problems for the safety of subjects and study procedure compliance.
  • For enrolment in the study (Day 1 [prior to injection]): Subjects who have aspiration pneumonia, relapse of lower respiratory tract infection, uncontrollable asthma, uncontrollable COPD, and/or underlying or a history of serious respiratory dysfunction, which were clinically considered to be respiratory function impairment by a investigator within 12 months before Day 1 visit.
  • Subjects who have a history of aspiration, or an underlying and/or a history of the symptoms that suggests high risks for aspiration by a investigator within 12 months before Day 1 (serious salivation requiring changing in a type of diet, chronic dysphagia that is difficult to swallow).
  • Subjects who were treated with botulinum toxin for spasticity of upper limb less than 16 weeks before Day 1 visit.
  • Subjects who underwent surgical interventions, phenol block, ethanol block or muscle afferent block (MAB) within 12 months before Day 1 visit, or these interventions are planned during the study period in any one of the finger (upper limb), wrist, elbow or shoulder muscles, which will be involved in the study.
  • Subjects who placed a surgical cast or a dynamic splint within 3 months before Day 1 study visit, and/or these interventions are planned to be placed on the upper limb to be involved in the study.
  • Subjects who were injected corticosteroid or an anesthetic agent into the finger (upper limb), wrist, or shoulder flexors, which will be involved in the study within 3 months before Day 1 visit, or these injections are planned during the study.
  • Subjects who received constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) within 3 months before Day 1 visit or CIMT is planned during the blind phase.
  • Subjects who underwent ultrasound therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) , electrical stimulation therapy, or acupuncture therapy in the upper arm, which will be involved in the study within 1 month before Day 1 visit, or these therapies are planned during the study.

Sites / Locations

  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site
  • GSK Investigational Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Part 1: Subjects receiving 400 units of botulinum toxin A

Part 1: Subjects receiving 240 units of botulinum toxin A

Part 2,3,4: Subjects receiving 400 units of botulinum toxin A

Arm Description

Subjects will receive a total dose of 400 units of botulinum toxin A of which 240 units will be injected into the muscles that act on finger (including thumb flexors) and wrist flexors, and a total of 160 units will be injected into the muscles that act on the elbow flexors.

Subjects will receive 240 units of botulinum toxin A injected into the muscles that act on the finger (including thumb flexors) and wrist flexors. Placebo will be injected into the muscles that act on the elbow flexors.

Subjects will receive botulinum toxin A with a dose of 400 units injected in a divided doses.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Who Had Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Reduced at Least 1 From Baseline in the Elbow Flexors at Week 6
MAS was used to measure the level of spasticity. The test was performed in a sitting position throughout the study. The affected parts were extended as fast as possible to grade the flexor muscle tones. It was scored on a scale of 0 to 4 as: 0=No increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension, 1+= Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half of ROM, 2 =More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved, 3= Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult and 4= Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension. Higher scores= Worst outcome while lower scores= Better outcome.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants Who Had MAS Score Reduction in Elbow, Wrist, Finger and Thumb Flexors up to Week 12
MAS was used to measure the level of spasticity. The test was performed in a sitting position throughout the study. The affected parts were extended as fast as possible to grade the flexor muscle tones. It was scored on a scale of 0 to 4 as: 0=No increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM, 2=More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult and 4=Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension. Higher scores=worst outcome while lower scores=better outcome.
Change From Baseline in MAS Scores in Elbow, Wrist, Finger and Thumb Flexors up to Week 12 (Mixed Model Repeated Measures [MMRM])
The affected parts were extended as fast as possible to grade the flexor muscle tones. It was scored on a scale of 0 to 4 as: 0=No increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion/extension, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM, 2=More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult and 4=Affected part(s) rigid in flexion/extension. Higher scores=worst outcome while lower scores=better outcome. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-first dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Principal Therapeutic Target of Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) - MMRM up to Week 12
The investigator assessed 4 areas of disability namely hygiene, pain, dressing and limb posture and was graded using the 4-point DAS scale where (0=No functional disability, 1: Mild disability, 2: Moderate disability and 3=Severe disability). The investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected 1 functional disability item from the 4 areas of disability and assessed it as a principal therapeutic target. The maximum possible score was 3 where higher scores indicate severe disability and lowers scores indicate sound functional ability. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-first dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) After 84 Days of First Treatment
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment was categorized as SAE. Data for number of participants with any AE and any SAE is presented.
Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs-Overall Study Period
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment was categorized as SAE. Data for number of participants with any AE and any SAE is presented.
Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings After Physical Examinations
Physical examinations included assessment of lungs, cardiovascular system, and abdominal region (liver and spleen). This analysis was not planned and data was not collected and captured in the database.
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Hematology parameters along with their normal ranges included: basophils (0 to 2 percent), eosinophils (0 to 8 percent), hemoglobin (135 to 175 grams/liter), hematocrit (0.397 to 0.524 proportion of red blood cells in blood), lymphocytes (18 to 49 percent), monocytes (2 to 10 percent), total neutrophils (40 to 75 percent), platelet count (140 to 340 giga cells/liter), red blood cell count (4.3 to 5.7 trillion cells/liter), white blood cell count (3.3 to 9 giga cells/liter), mean corpuscular volume (85 to 102 femtoliters), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (28 to 34 picograms) and reticulocyte count (0.004 to 0.019 percent/ratio). Shift in values relative to normal range as high and low have been presented for categories having non-zero values.
Number of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Clinical chemistry parameters assessed were alkaline phosphatase (100 to 325 international units/liter), alanine amino transferase (5 to 45 international units/liter), aspartate amino transferase (10 to 40 international units/liter), direct bilirubin (0 to 3.42 micromoles/liter), total bilirubin (3.42 to 20.52 micromoles/liter), calcium (2.0958 - 2.5948 millimoles/liter), creatinine (53.924 - 91.936 micromoles/liter), potassium (3.5 - 5 millimoles/liter), sodium (137 - 147 millimoles/liter), total protein (67 - 83 grams/liter), urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN) [2.856 - 7.14 millimoles/liter]. Shift in values relative to normal range as high and low have been presented for categories having non-zero values.
Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis
Urinalysis parameters assessed were urine occult blood, urine protein . In this dipstick test, occult blood and protein in urine samples were recorded as negative trace, 1+, 2+, and 3+ (the plus sign increases with occult blood or proteins in the urine: 1+=slightly positive, 2+=positive, 3+=high positive etc). Number of participants with worst-case urinalysis results post-Baseline relative to Baseline by dipstick analysis have been presented.
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 12 and Week 48
Vital sign parameters SBP and DBP were measured in a semi-recumbent position after a 5-minute rest. If measurement in a semi-recumbent position was difficult, measurement in another position (e.g., sitting) was acceptable. The measurement was performed always in the same position during the study period. SBP and DBP were measured using an automated device. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameter Heart Rate at Week 12 and Week 48
Vital sign parameter heart rate was measured in a semi-recumbent position after a 5-minute rest. If measurement in a semi-recumbent position was difficult, measurement in another position (e.g., sitting) was acceptable. The measurement was performed always in the same position during the study period. Heart rate was measured using an automated device. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameter Temperature at Week 12 and Week 48
Vital sign parameter temperature was measured orally, intra-aurally, or axillary fossa, the participant was instructed to refrain from eating food or drinking beverage within 5 minutes before the measurement. The method for the measurement of body temperature was same throughout the study. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.

Full Information

First Posted
August 23, 2017
Last Updated
May 22, 2020
Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03261167
Brief Title
A Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK1358820 in Subjects With Post-stroke Upper Limb Spasticity
Official Title
A Phase III Study (a Placebo Controlled, Randomized, Double-blind Comparative Study and an Open-label, Uncontrolled Study) to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK1358820 in Patients With Post-stroke Upper Limb Spasticity
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
May 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 2, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 20, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 10, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
GlaxoSmithKline

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Botulinum toxin A (GSK1358820) is a sterile, purified type A botulinum neurotoxin complex. In Japan, 240 units of botulinum toxin A are approved as a maximum dose per administration for upper limb spasticity. This study is planned to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of 400 units of botulinum toxin A which can help to increase the maximum dose per administration to 400 units from 240 units as the treatment with 240 units is considered insufficient in subjects with post-stroke upper limb spasticity. Approximately 120 subjects will be randomized to receive either 400 or 240 units of botulinum toxin A in double blind phase followed by open-label phase in which 400 units of the study treatment will be injected in both the groups. The study period will be up to 52 weeks, consisting of a screening phase up to 4 weeks, minimum 12-week double blind phase (Part 1), maximum 36- week open-label phase (12 weeks per cycle with 3 treatment phases: Part 2, Part 3 and Part 4).

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Spasticity, Post-Stroke
Keywords
Botulinum toxin A, Safety, post-stroke upper limb spasticity, Efficacy, GSK1358820, double blind

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Subjects will receive either 400 units of botulinum toxin A injection or 240 units of botulinum toxin A injection plus placebo in double blind phase. Eligible subjects for open-label treatment period will receive 400 units of botulinum toxin A injection.
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Masking Description
This study will contain a double blind treatment period (Part 1) followed by open-label treatment period (Part 2/Part3/Part4).
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
124 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Part 1: Subjects receiving 400 units of botulinum toxin A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will receive a total dose of 400 units of botulinum toxin A of which 240 units will be injected into the muscles that act on finger (including thumb flexors) and wrist flexors, and a total of 160 units will be injected into the muscles that act on the elbow flexors.
Arm Title
Part 1: Subjects receiving 240 units of botulinum toxin A
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Subjects will receive 240 units of botulinum toxin A injected into the muscles that act on the finger (including thumb flexors) and wrist flexors. Placebo will be injected into the muscles that act on the elbow flexors.
Arm Title
Part 2,3,4: Subjects receiving 400 units of botulinum toxin A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Subjects will receive botulinum toxin A with a dose of 400 units injected in a divided doses.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Botulinum toxin A (GSK1358820)
Intervention Description
GSK1358820 is sterile, purified type A botulinum neurotoxin complex. GSK1358820 injection will contain botulinum toxin A (100 units), sodium chloride (0.9 milligrams [mg]), and human serum albumin (0.5 mg). It will be available with doses of 400 units and 240 units.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
Placebo injection will contain sodium chloride (0.9 mg).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Had Modified Ashworth Scale (MAS) Score Reduced at Least 1 From Baseline in the Elbow Flexors at Week 6
Description
MAS was used to measure the level of spasticity. The test was performed in a sitting position throughout the study. The affected parts were extended as fast as possible to grade the flexor muscle tones. It was scored on a scale of 0 to 4 as: 0=No increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension, 1+= Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half of ROM, 2 =More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved, 3= Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult and 4= Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension. Higher scores= Worst outcome while lower scores= Better outcome.
Time Frame
Week 6
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants Who Had MAS Score Reduction in Elbow, Wrist, Finger and Thumb Flexors up to Week 12
Description
MAS was used to measure the level of spasticity. The test was performed in a sitting position throughout the study. The affected parts were extended as fast as possible to grade the flexor muscle tones. It was scored on a scale of 0 to 4 as: 0=No increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion or extension, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM, 2=More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult and 4=Affected part(s) rigid in flexion or extension. Higher scores=worst outcome while lower scores=better outcome.
Time Frame
Week 2, Week 4, Week 6 and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in MAS Scores in Elbow, Wrist, Finger and Thumb Flexors up to Week 12 (Mixed Model Repeated Measures [MMRM])
Description
The affected parts were extended as fast as possible to grade the flexor muscle tones. It was scored on a scale of 0 to 4 as: 0=No increase in muscle tone, 1=Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch and release or by minimal resistance at the end of the range of motion (ROM) when the affected part(s) is moved in flexion/extension, 1+=Slight increase in muscle tone, manifested by a catch, followed by minimal resistance throughout the remainder (less than half) of the ROM, 2=More marked increase in muscle tone through most of the ROM, but affected part(s) easily moved, 3=Considerable increase in muscle tone, passive movement difficult and 4=Affected part(s) rigid in flexion/extension. Higher scores=worst outcome while lower scores=better outcome. Baseline was defined as the latest pre-first dose assessment with a non-missing value. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, Week 4, Week 6 and Week 12
Title
Change From Baseline in Principal Therapeutic Target of Disability Assessment Scale (DAS) - MMRM up to Week 12
Description
The investigator assessed 4 areas of disability namely hygiene, pain, dressing and limb posture and was graded using the 4-point DAS scale where (0=No functional disability, 1: Mild disability, 2: Moderate disability and 3=Severe disability). The investigator, in consultation with the participant, selected 1 functional disability item from the 4 areas of disability and assessed it as a principal therapeutic target. The maximum possible score was 3 where higher scores indicate severe disability and lowers scores indicate sound functional ability. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-first dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated as the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 2, Week 4, Week 6 and Week 12
Title
Number of Participants With Adverse Events (AEs) and Serious Adverse Events (SAEs) After 84 Days of First Treatment
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment was categorized as SAE. Data for number of participants with any AE and any SAE is presented.
Time Frame
Up to 84 days post first treatment
Title
Number of Participants With AEs and SAEs-Overall Study Period
Description
An AE is any untoward medical occurrence in a participant, temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product, whether or not considered related to the medicinal product. An AE can therefore be any unfavorable and unintended sign (including an abnormal laboratory finding), symptom, or disease (new or exacerbated) temporally associated with the use of a medicinal product. Any untoward event resulting in death, life threatening, requires hospitalization or prolongation of existing hospitalization, results in disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect or any other situation according to medical or scientific judgment was categorized as SAE. Data for number of participants with any AE and any SAE is presented.
Time Frame
Up to Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Abnormal Findings After Physical Examinations
Description
Physical examinations included assessment of lungs, cardiovascular system, and abdominal region (liver and spleen). This analysis was not planned and data was not collected and captured in the database.
Time Frame
Up to Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Worst Case Hematology Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Description
Hematology parameters along with their normal ranges included: basophils (0 to 2 percent), eosinophils (0 to 8 percent), hemoglobin (135 to 175 grams/liter), hematocrit (0.397 to 0.524 proportion of red blood cells in blood), lymphocytes (18 to 49 percent), monocytes (2 to 10 percent), total neutrophils (40 to 75 percent), platelet count (140 to 340 giga cells/liter), red blood cell count (4.3 to 5.7 trillion cells/liter), white blood cell count (3.3 to 9 giga cells/liter), mean corpuscular volume (85 to 102 femtoliters), mean corpuscular hemoglobin (28 to 34 picograms) and reticulocyte count (0.004 to 0.019 percent/ratio). Shift in values relative to normal range as high and low have been presented for categories having non-zero values.
Time Frame
Up to Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Worst Case Clinical Chemistry Results Relative to Normal Range Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline
Description
Clinical chemistry parameters assessed were alkaline phosphatase (100 to 325 international units/liter), alanine amino transferase (5 to 45 international units/liter), aspartate amino transferase (10 to 40 international units/liter), direct bilirubin (0 to 3.42 micromoles/liter), total bilirubin (3.42 to 20.52 micromoles/liter), calcium (2.0958 - 2.5948 millimoles/liter), creatinine (53.924 - 91.936 micromoles/liter), potassium (3.5 - 5 millimoles/liter), sodium (137 - 147 millimoles/liter), total protein (67 - 83 grams/liter), urea/blood urea nitrogen (BUN) [2.856 - 7.14 millimoles/liter]. Shift in values relative to normal range as high and low have been presented for categories having non-zero values.
Time Frame
Up to Week 48
Title
Number of Participants With Worst-case Urinalysis Results Post-Baseline Relative to Baseline by Dipstick Analysis
Description
Urinalysis parameters assessed were urine occult blood, urine protein . In this dipstick test, occult blood and protein in urine samples were recorded as negative trace, 1+, 2+, and 3+ (the plus sign increases with occult blood or proteins in the urine: 1+=slightly positive, 2+=positive, 3+=high positive etc). Number of participants with worst-case urinalysis results post-Baseline relative to Baseline by dipstick analysis have been presented.
Time Frame
Up to Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameters Systolic Blood Pressure (SBP) and Diastolic Blood Pressure (DBP) at Week 12 and Week 48
Description
Vital sign parameters SBP and DBP were measured in a semi-recumbent position after a 5-minute rest. If measurement in a semi-recumbent position was difficult, measurement in another position (e.g., sitting) was acceptable. The measurement was performed always in the same position during the study period. SBP and DBP were measured using an automated device. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameter Heart Rate at Week 12 and Week 48
Description
Vital sign parameter heart rate was measured in a semi-recumbent position after a 5-minute rest. If measurement in a semi-recumbent position was difficult, measurement in another position (e.g., sitting) was acceptable. The measurement was performed always in the same position during the study period. Heart rate was measured using an automated device. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 and Week 48
Title
Change From Baseline in Vital Sign Parameter Temperature at Week 12 and Week 48
Description
Vital sign parameter temperature was measured orally, intra-aurally, or axillary fossa, the participant was instructed to refrain from eating food or drinking beverage within 5 minutes before the measurement. The method for the measurement of body temperature was same throughout the study. Baseline value was defined as the latest pre-dose assessment with a non-missing value, including those from unscheduled visits. Change from Baseline was calculated by subtracting the post-dose visit value minus the Baseline value.
Time Frame
Baseline (Day 1), Week 12 and Week 48

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
20 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
80 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: For screening phase (Day -28 to Day -1): Between 20 and 80 years of age at the time of informed consent (ICF). Subjects with at least a 3-month history of upper limb spasticity after the most recent stroke. Subjects who have spastic symptoms in the finger (including the thumb), wrist, and elbow flexors whom the investigator considers the injections of 400 units of the product is necessary for the upper limb based on the muscle spasms and the symptoms of the subject. Subjects who have a previous treatment history of 240 units of the product for the upper limb at least 16 weeks before screening. Subjects who meet following criteria on MAS at screening (Test position : sitting): at least 3 in for the elbow flexors and at least 2 in the finger or wrist flexors. Subjects who have severe upper limb spasticity, which deserves to be treated with 400 units of the product in the divided dose and was previously injected 240 units of the product. Subjects whom the investigator considers that enrolment in the study poses no problems based on the laboratory data results at screening. Subjects who are free from a history of acute decreased lung function (hospitalization with aggravated asthma/ chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), pneumonia, or signs of pneumonia, or abnormal reactive airway diseases suggested on X-rays) within the last 3 months at screening and have stable pulmonary function (oxygen saturation [SpO2]value is >=95%). Body weight >=40 kilograms (kg) at screening. Male or female subjects will be included. Male subjects must content to use highly effective contraceptive methods and sperm donation must be avoided. Female subjects who are not pregnant or lactating are considered eligible if at least one of the following criteria is met; non-childbearing potential, women of childbearing potential who content to follow the guidance about contraception during the study period and at least for 3 months after the last dose of the product, no plan of pregnancy during the study period. Subjects who have ability to sign their name on the ICF. For enrolment in the study (Day 1 [prior to injection]):Subjects who meet the following criteria on MAS score: (Test position : sitting): At least 3 in the elbow flexors and at least 2 in the finger or wrist flexors. If centrally acting muscle relaxants, tetracycline antibiotics, anticholinergics, benzodiazepines, or benzamides are given, the dose and regimen must be stable at least for the last 2 months before Day 1; Subjects who can maintain the same dosage and regimens at least in the blind phase after initial injection (dose reductions and discontinuation of the drugs are acceptable in the open-label phase. However, second dose increase, resumption, and or new treatment will not be performed). If intrathecal baclofen is given, the dose and regimen must be stable at least for the last 1 month before Day 1; Subjects who can maintain the same dosage and regimens at least in the blind phase after initial injection (intravenous bolus is not acceptable, dose reductions and discontinuation of the drugs are acceptable. However, second dose increase, resumption, and or new treatment will not be performed). If antiepileptic agents are given, the dose and regimen must be stable at least for the 1 month before Day 1; Subjects who can maintain the same dose and regimens at least in the blind phase after initial injection (dose reductions and discontinuation of the drugs are acceptable in the open-label phase. However, second dose increase, resumption, and new treatment will not be performed). If a physical therapy, occupational therapy, or a static splint on the study involvement upper limbs is given, the frequency and treatment regimen must be stable at least for the last 3 weeks before Day 1; Subjects who can maintain the same dose and regimens at least in blind phase (In the open-label phase, the frequency and treatment regimen can be changed depending on the condition of spasticity). Exclusion Criteria: For screening phase (Day -28 to Day -1): Subjects present with spasticity requiring treatment in the non-paralytic side of the upper limb. Subjects who have fixed contracture in the finger (upper limb), wrist, elbow or shoulder muscle, which will be involved in the study. Subjects who have medically significant capsulitis or subluxation in any one of the fingers (upper limb), wrist, elbow and shoulder, which will be involved in the study, or whom a investigator considers the complicated local signs of pain may affect the efficacy evaluation. Subjects's upper limb spasticity is attributed to other than stroke (traumatic brain injury, spinal cord injury, multiple sclerosis, or cerebral palsy). Subjects who have a 2-fold higher alanine aminotransferase (ALT) level than the upper limit of normal (ULN). Subjects who have a 1.5-fold higher bilirubin than the ULN (If a bilirubin fractionation shows direct bilirubin < 35%, a 1.5-fold higher free bilirubin than the ULN is acceptable). Subjects whom the investigator considers presence of a current medical history of unstable liver diseases or biliary tract diseases (the condition will be defined by development of ascites, encephalopathy, coagulopathy, hypoalbuminemia, esophageal or gastric varices, persistent jaundice or hepatic cirrhosis). Subjects with corrected QT interval (QTc) > 450 milliseconds (msec) or QTc > 480 msec in subjects with bundle branch block. Subjects who use peripherally acting muscle relaxants (dantrolene sodium, suxamethonium chloride, pancuronium bromide, vecuronium bromide, rocuronium bromide, etc.) within 1 week of screening. Subjects who use antibiotic agents with neuromuscular junction inhibitory effects: Aminoglycoside antibiotic agents (streptomycin sulfate, kanamycin sulfate, gentamicin sulfate, neomycin sulfate, spectinomycin hydrochloride, etc.), polypeptides (polymyxin B sulfate), lincomycins (lincomycin hydrochloride, clindamycin), and enviomycin sulfate within 1 week of screening. Subjects who was diagnosed as having a malignant tumor, or have a history of a malignant tumor within the last 5 years (except completely resected basal cell carcinoma or planocellular carcinoma at least 12 weeks before screening). Subjects who have participated in another study of an investigational product or other medical research (a clinical study of pharmacotherapy, non-pharmacotherapy, or interventional device) within 30 days before screening, or are currently participating in a study. Subjects who are concerned likely to have an increased risk for an underlying medical condition/neurological disease due to exposure of the product; subjects who have myasthenia gravis, Eaton-Lambert syndrome, amyotrophic lateral sclerosis, or a serious disease and use of a concomitant drug which may inhibit neuromuscular function. Subjects with antihuman immunodeficiency virus (HIV) antibody positive. Subjects who previously experienced allergic reactions or hypersensitivity due to botulinum toxin type A, an additive agent of sodium chloride, or human serum albumin. Subjects who were previously suspected to have neutralizing antibody production by a investigator during an injection of botulinum toxin type A. Subjects who have a skin disease such as infection at the site to be injected. Subjects who suffer from serious and unstable disease, which could pose problems for the safety of subjects and study procedure compliance. For enrolment in the study (Day 1 [prior to injection]): Subjects who have aspiration pneumonia, relapse of lower respiratory tract infection, uncontrollable asthma, uncontrollable COPD, and/or underlying or a history of serious respiratory dysfunction, which were clinically considered to be respiratory function impairment by a investigator within 12 months before Day 1 visit. Subjects who have a history of aspiration, or an underlying and/or a history of the symptoms that suggests high risks for aspiration by a investigator within 12 months before Day 1 (serious salivation requiring changing in a type of diet, chronic dysphagia that is difficult to swallow). Subjects who were treated with botulinum toxin for spasticity of upper limb less than 16 weeks before Day 1 visit. Subjects who underwent surgical interventions, phenol block, ethanol block or muscle afferent block (MAB) within 12 months before Day 1 visit, or these interventions are planned during the study period in any one of the finger (upper limb), wrist, elbow or shoulder muscles, which will be involved in the study. Subjects who placed a surgical cast or a dynamic splint within 3 months before Day 1 study visit, and/or these interventions are planned to be placed on the upper limb to be involved in the study. Subjects who were injected corticosteroid or an anesthetic agent into the finger (upper limb), wrist, or shoulder flexors, which will be involved in the study within 3 months before Day 1 visit, or these injections are planned during the study. Subjects who received constraint-induced movement therapy (CIMT) within 3 months before Day 1 visit or CIMT is planned during the blind phase. Subjects who underwent ultrasound therapy, transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) , electrical stimulation therapy, or acupuncture therapy in the upper arm, which will be involved in the study within 1 month before Day 1 visit, or these therapies are planned during the study.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
GSK Clinical Trials
Organizational Affiliation
GlaxoSmithKline
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
465-8620
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Aichi
ZIP/Postal Code
490-1405
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chiba
ZIP/Postal Code
277-8567
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Chiba
ZIP/Postal Code
279-0021
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukui
ZIP/Postal Code
910-0067
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Fukuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
819-8551
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hiroshima
ZIP/Postal Code
720-0825
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hiroshima
ZIP/Postal Code
734-8530
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hokkaido
ZIP/Postal Code
005-0802
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Hyogo
ZIP/Postal Code
651-2181
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ibaraki
ZIP/Postal Code
300-0028
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Ibaraki
ZIP/Postal Code
312-0057
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kagoshima
ZIP/Postal Code
890-0067
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
227-8518
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
232-0024
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
245-8560
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kanagawa
ZIP/Postal Code
259-1143
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kochi
ZIP/Postal Code
780-0051
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Kumamoto
ZIP/Postal Code
862-0924
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Nagano
ZIP/Postal Code
399-6461
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Niigata
ZIP/Postal Code
945-8585
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Oita
ZIP/Postal Code
870-0862
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Okayama
ZIP/Postal Code
703-8265
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
538-0044
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
570-8507
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Osaka
ZIP/Postal Code
580-0032
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Saga
ZIP/Postal Code
849-8501
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Shizuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
417-0801
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Shizuoka
ZIP/Postal Code
433-8511
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokushima
ZIP/Postal Code
770-8503
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
102-8798
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
105-8471
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
123-0853
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
165-8906
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
192-0032
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Tokyo
ZIP/Postal Code
201-8601
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Wakayama
ZIP/Postal Code
641-8509
Country
Japan
Facility Name
GSK Investigational Site
City
Yamagata
ZIP/Postal Code
992-0057
Country
Japan

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Yes
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD for this study will be made available via the Clinical Study Data Request site.
IPD Sharing Time Frame
IPD is available via the Clinical Study Data Request site (click on the link provided below)
IPD Sharing Access Criteria
Access is provided after a research proposal is submitted and has received approval from the Independent Review Panel and after a Data Sharing Agreement is in place. Access is provided for an initial period of 12 months but an extension can be granted, when justified, for up to another 12 months.
IPD Sharing URL
https://clinicalstudydatarequest.com/Posting.aspx?ID=20343
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
32085529
Citation
Abo M, Shigematsu T, Hara H, Matsuda Y, Nimura A, Yamashita Y, Takahashi K. Efficacy and Safety of OnabotulinumtoxinA 400 Units in Patients with Post-Stroke Upper Limb Spasticity: Final Report of a Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial with an Open-Label Extension Phase. Toxins (Basel). 2020 Feb 18;12(2):127. doi: 10.3390/toxins12020127.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

A Phase III Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of GSK1358820 in Subjects With Post-stroke Upper Limb Spasticity

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs