search
Back to results

Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Performances of 4 Dialyzers in Different Mode Treatments (BIOMODAL)

Primary Purpose

End Stage Renal Disease, Inflammation

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
VIE A Hemodialyzer
Rexsys 27H hemodialyzer
Leoceed 21HX hemodialyzer
Polypure 22S+ hemodialyzer
Sponsored by
Hemotech
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for End Stage Renal Disease

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Adult patient with chronic kidney disease dialyzed for at least one month and treated with the treatment mode that we will test
  • Patient using post-dilution HDF mode have to use EuDIAL volume guidelines (20-22L minimum)
  • Patient treated before with high permeability membrane
  • Patient with vascular access allowing a blood flow rate with a minimum of 300 mL/min
  • Patient treated with a high surface area dialyzer ≥ 1,8 m²
  • Patient covered by the social French health organism
  • Patient informed of the study goals and having signed the informed consent

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Patient with a vascular access not allowing a blood flow rate minimum of 300 mL/min
  • Patient with a fast progressive chronic disease
  • Patient with an uncontrolled anemia
  • Patient refusing to sign the informed consent
  • Pregnant or nursing patient
  • Pediatric patient
  • Patient under tutorship

Sites / Locations

  • AIDER-Lapeyronie

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Hemodialysis

Hemodiafiltration post dilution

Arm Description

patients treated by conventionnal hemodialysis

patients treated by HDF post-dilution

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Evaluation of middle molecules extraction
Measurements of β 2 microglobulin (11,8kDa), myoglobin (17kDa), Beta Trace (21kDa), Free immunoglobulin light chains Kappa (23kDa), myostatin (40kDa), glycoprotein orosomucoïd (44kDa)

Secondary Outcome Measures

Extraction of uremic toxins
Urea Creatinin inorganic phosphates
Biocompatibility assessment
Anaphylatoxins (C3a, C5a) during the session (T0, T15, Tend) TNF-α and IL-6 (T0 et Tend)
Monitoring of Nutrition status
Quantification of the albumin loss in the used dialysate (1 center) during the middle session of the week for each dialyzer tested per patient, i.e 4 times/patient. 2 analysis modalities will be used: " pull and push " syringe Plastipak BD 50mL or collection of the whole dialysate in a 200 L tank Dosage Albumin et pre-albumin before dialysis session
Handling of the devices
- Evaluation of the priming and recovery for each dialysis session
Dialysis adequacy evaluation
Calculation of KT/V
Session tolerance
All secondary troubles will be noted: cramps, nauseas, hypotension…
Parameters inflammation
CRP (mg/l)
Parameters inflammation
- Calcul of PINI = [CRP(mg/l) x Orosomucoïd (mg/l)] / [Albumin(g/l) x Pre-albumin(mg/l)]

Full Information

First Posted
July 12, 2017
Last Updated
February 20, 2019
Sponsor
Hemotech
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03262272
Brief Title
Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Performances of 4 Dialyzers in Different Mode Treatments
Acronym
BIOMODAL
Official Title
Evaluation of Dialyzers' Biocompatibility and Performances Compared in Different Dialysis Treatments : Conventional Hemodialysis and Post-dilution Hemodialfiltration
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
November 21, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
July 31, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
October 31, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Hemotech

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Prospective multicenter randomized cross-over study Number of patients : 32 (8 patients per group) Obtain objectives data to advise each hemodialyzer according to dialysis treatment and patient profile. To evaluate the different hemodialyzers and judge their extraction performances in HD and post HDF. Evaluation of the biocompatibility of the hemodialyzers and the patients' inflammatory status.
Detailed Description
Medical devices studied : Leoceed 21HX, hemodialyzer, High permeability PS membrane 2,1 m² , made by Nx Stage in Germany Polypure 22S, hemodialyzer, High permeability PS membrane 2,2 m² , made by Allmed in Germany VIE 21A hemodialyzer, High permeability PS membrane 2,1 m² coated in vitamin E, made by Asahi Kasei Medical in Japan Rexsys 27H, hemodialyzer , High permeability PES membrane 2,7 m² , made by Medica in Italia These hemodialyzers are EC marked and are used in their own indications. Schema Details of the cross-over plan : 8 patients will be treated successively with the 4 hemodialyzers. Patients will be treated with the dialyzer "test" for the two first sessions of the week. During the last dialysis session of each week, only their usual dialyzer will be used as wash-out. A randomization will define the order of use of the dialyzers in the 4 centers. This order will be identical in a center. Number of patients : 32 (8 patients per center (4 centers)) Duration : One week per dialyzer

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
End Stage Renal Disease, Inflammation

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Model Description
Prospective randomized cross-over study
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
32 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Hemodialysis
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
patients treated by conventionnal hemodialysis
Arm Title
Hemodiafiltration post dilution
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
patients treated by HDF post-dilution
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
VIE A Hemodialyzer
Intervention Description
polysulfon membrane coated with vitamin E
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Rexsys 27H hemodialyzer
Intervention Description
polyethersulfon membrane with large surface area : 2,7m²
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Leoceed 21HX hemodialyzer
Intervention Description
polyslfon membrane with gamma sterilization
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Polypure 22S+ hemodialyzer
Intervention Description
polysulfon membrane with steam sterilization
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Evaluation of middle molecules extraction
Description
Measurements of β 2 microglobulin (11,8kDa), myoglobin (17kDa), Beta Trace (21kDa), Free immunoglobulin light chains Kappa (23kDa), myostatin (40kDa), glycoprotein orosomucoïd (44kDa)
Time Frame
one week per dialyzer per patient
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Extraction of uremic toxins
Description
Urea Creatinin inorganic phosphates
Time Frame
one week per dialyzer per patient
Title
Biocompatibility assessment
Description
Anaphylatoxins (C3a, C5a) during the session (T0, T15, Tend) TNF-α and IL-6 (T0 et Tend)
Time Frame
one week per dialyzer per patient
Title
Monitoring of Nutrition status
Description
Quantification of the albumin loss in the used dialysate (1 center) during the middle session of the week for each dialyzer tested per patient, i.e 4 times/patient. 2 analysis modalities will be used: " pull and push " syringe Plastipak BD 50mL or collection of the whole dialysate in a 200 L tank Dosage Albumin et pre-albumin before dialysis session
Time Frame
one week per dialyzer per patient
Title
Handling of the devices
Description
- Evaluation of the priming and recovery for each dialysis session
Time Frame
one week per dialyzer per patient
Title
Dialysis adequacy evaluation
Description
Calculation of KT/V
Time Frame
one week per dialyzer per patient
Title
Session tolerance
Description
All secondary troubles will be noted: cramps, nauseas, hypotension…
Time Frame
one week per dialyzer per patient
Title
Parameters inflammation
Description
CRP (mg/l)
Time Frame
one week per dialyzer per patient
Title
Parameters inflammation
Description
- Calcul of PINI = [CRP(mg/l) x Orosomucoïd (mg/l)] / [Albumin(g/l) x Pre-albumin(mg/l)]
Time Frame
one week per dialyzer per patient

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Adult patient with chronic kidney disease dialyzed for at least one month and treated with the treatment mode that we will test Patient using post-dilution HDF mode have to use EuDIAL volume guidelines (20-22L minimum) Patient treated before with high permeability membrane Patient with vascular access allowing a blood flow rate with a minimum of 300 mL/min Patient treated with a high surface area dialyzer ≥ 1,8 m² Patient covered by the social French health organism Patient informed of the study goals and having signed the informed consent Exclusion Criteria: Patient with a vascular access not allowing a blood flow rate minimum of 300 mL/min Patient with a fast progressive chronic disease Patient with an uncontrolled anemia Patient refusing to sign the informed consent Pregnant or nursing patient Pediatric patient Patient under tutorship
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jean Paul CRISTOL, Professor
Organizational Affiliation
University Hospital, Montpellier
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
AIDER-Lapeyronie
City
Montpellier
ZIP/Postal Code
34295
Country
France

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
26656534
Citation
Kokubo K, Kurihara Y, Kobayashi K, Tsukao H, Kobayashi H. Evaluation of the Biocompatibility of Dialysis Membranes. Blood Purif. 2015;40(4):293-7. doi: 10.1159/000441576. Epub 2015 Nov 17.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26672890
Citation
Maduell F, Moreso F, Mora-Macia J, Pons M, Ramos R, Carreras J, Soler J, Torres F; study group ESHOL. ESHOL study reanalysis: All-cause mortality considered by competing risks and time-dependent covariates for renal transplantation. Nefrologia. 2016;36(2):156-63. doi: 10.1016/j.nefro.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Dec 8. English, Spanish.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Evaluation of Biocompatibility and Performances of 4 Dialyzers in Different Mode Treatments

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs