Spinal Infection Management With Structural Allograft

Background. Bone infections can involve the vertebral column, intervertebral disc space, spinal canal and soft tissues, can generate neurological deficit in addition to the destruction of the bone that causes functional disability. Vertebral osteomyelitis is the most frequent, affecting 2 to 7 patients per 100,000 habitants. Management is bone debridement and bone reconstruction. Objective. Demonstrate that the use of bone allograft is a functional method to stabilize the spine after a bone spinal infection Material and methods. Patients with vertebral bone destruction are included in two groups. Bone allograft group will receive bone structural allograft; Auto and allograft group will receive bone structural allograft plus autograft. The bone reconstruction will be performed in a one-time surgical procedure. Bone consolidation, pain, functionality, and spine deformity will be evaluated.

Spinal bone infections can involve the bone vertebra, intervertebral disc space, spinal canal and soft tissues. It generate neurological deficit in addition to the destruction of the bone that causes functional disability and significant pain (Colmenero 1997). Spinal infections include discitis, osteomyelitis, epidural abscesses, meningitis, subdural empyema, and abscesses of the spinal cord (An, 2006). Only discitis and osteomyelitis can occur together (Skaf, 2010). Vertebral osteomyelitis is the most frequent, affecting 2 to 7 patients per 100,000 habitants (Bhavan, 2010; Grammatico 2003). Pathogenic organisms reach the column by hematogenous pathway, arterial pathways (Batson's plexus) or by direct inoculation, due to a diagnostic or therapeutic intervention (Skaf, 2010). The natural history of pyogenic vertebral infections involves an infectious source or an incident followed by a period of intense pain, with or without generalized significant sepsis. Neurological deficit is caused by: [1] direct extension of the infection in the form of an abscess or bacterial communication with the spinal canal to the neural elements or [2] secondary compression of a pathological fracture as a result of bone softening. (Campbell´s, 2013). Early diagnosis and treatment are essential for optimal outcomes (Weisz, 2000). The treatment goals may include eradicating the infection, relieving pain, preserving or restoring neurologic function, improving nutrition, and maintaining spinal stability (Tay, 2002). The aim of this study is to demonstrate that the use of bone allograft is a functional method to stabilize the spine after a bone spinal infection. METHODS This study was approved by our Institutional Ethics and Research Committee. Patients with vertebral bone destruction are randomized included in two groups. Inclusion criteria: patients older than 18 years, any gender, pyogenic spinal infection with bone destruction and kyphotic deformity, without previous treatment of any kind, and Informed Consent signature. Exclusion criteria: patients with immunodeficiency, psychiatric disorders, patients with severe malnutrition, morbid obesity. Elimination criteria: failure to comply with follow-up time, patient's express request to leave the study. The bone reconstruction will be performed in a one-step surgical procedure. All participants will undergo the same surgical procedure consisting of open surgery, more debridement of infected and devitalized tissue, as well as corresponding bone resection. For the identification of the microorganism, biopsies will be performed guided by computed tomography (CT scan) and/or by fluoroscopy. A culture and antibiogram will be performed in case of not obtaining enough material for this, at the time of the surgery samples will be sent to perform the same procedure. The investigators will use the appropriate antibiotics, according to infecting microorganism and result of antibiogram, and patients with infections with gram positive and negative microorganisms only will be included. Bone consolidation, pain, functionality, and spinal deformity will be evaluated. The investigators will perform evaluations at 8, 12, 16, 20 and 24 weeks, and a CT scan will be realized, to evaluated the bone consolidation, defined as the presence of continuous trabeculae between the bone graft and the vertebra, according to the next classification system. Type 1 definitive fusion; Type 2 uncertain fusion; Type 3 definitive pseudoarthrosis. Statistical analysis. The results will be reported in contingency tables, frequencies, percentages, measures of central tendency and dispersion. Qualitative variables will be analyzed with the chi-square statistic and quantitative variables with t-test for independent samples with a significance level of 95% with their respective confidence intervals, or with non-parametric statistics if necessary. Using a formula for hypothesis testing and difference of two proportions or with the proportion of a reference value, with a value zα of 1.94 with a level of significance of 95% for a queue, and a value zβ of 1.20 with a power of 80 %, With a proportion for group 1 of 0.38 and for group 2 of 0.83 (Zdeblick, Ducker) a sample of 19 participants was obtained per group. Statistical analysis will be performed with IBM SPSS version 20 (SPSS, Inc., Armon, NY).

Bone Diseases, Infectious, Disease of Bone, Syndrome, Spine Infection, Allografts, Bone Graft; Complications, Fracture

Bone allograft group will receive bone structural allograft; Auto and allograft group will receive bone structural allograft plus spongy autograft.

This participants will receive bone structural allograft management for vertebral reconstruction. All patients undergo surgical procedure to realize debridement of the lesion, and the application of allograft without autograft.

This participants will receive bone structural allograft plus spongy autograft management for vertebral reconstruction. All patients undergo surgical procedure.

All patients will undergo the same surgical procedure consisting of open surgery, more debridement of infected and devitalized tissue, as well as corresponding bone resection. For the identification of the microorganism, biopsies will be performed by puncture guided by CAT and / or fluoroscopy, and culture and antibiogram will be performed in case of not obtaining enough material for this, at the time of the surgery samples will be sent to perform the same procedure. We will use the appropriate antibiotics, according to infecting microorganism and result of antibiogram. We will include patients with infections with gram positive and negative microorganisms only. This patients will go stabilized with bone allograft only.

All patients will undergo the same surgical procedure consisting of open surgery, more debridement of infected and devitalized tissue, as well as corresponding bone resection. For the identification of the microorganism, biopsies will be performed by puncture guided by CAT and / or fluoroscopy, and culture and antibiogram will be performed in case of not obtaining enough material for this, at the time of the surgery samples will be sent to perform the same procedure. We will use the appropriate antibiotics, according to infecting microorganism and result of antibiogram. We will include patients with infections with gram positive and negative microorganisms only. This patients will go stabilized with bone autograft plus bone allograft

Inclusion Criteria: pyogenic spinal infection with bone destruction and spinal deformity, without previous treatment of any kind and Informed Consent signature Exclusion Criteria: immunodeficiency, psychiatric disorders, patients with severe malnutrition, morbid obesity

Colmenero JD, Jimenez-Mejias ME, Sanchez-Lora FJ, Reguera JM, Palomino-Nicas J, Martos F, Garcia de las Heras J, Pachon J. Pyogenic, tuberculous, and brucellar vertebral osteomyelitis: a descriptive and comparative study of 219 cases. Ann Rheum Dis. 1997 Dec;56(12):709-15. doi: 10.1136/ard.56.12.709.

An HS, Seldomridge JA. Spinal infections: diagnostic tests and imaging studies. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2006 Mar;444:27-33. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000203452.36522.97.

Skaf GS, Domloj NT, Fehlings MG, Bouclaous CH, Sabbagh AS, Kanafani ZA, Kanj SS. Pyogenic spondylodiscitis: an overview. J Infect Public Health. 2010;3(1):5-16. doi: 10.1016/j.jiph.2010.01.001. Epub 2010 Feb 19.

Bhavan KP, Marschall J, Olsen MA, Fraser VJ, Wright NM, Warren DK. The epidemiology of hematogenous vertebral osteomyelitis: a cohort study in a tertiary care hospital. BMC Infect Dis. 2010 Jun 7;10:158. doi: 10.1186/1471-2334-10-158.

Grammatico L, Baron S, Rusch E, Lepage B, Surer N, Desenclos JC, Besnier JM. Epidemiology of vertebral osteomyelitis (VO) in France: analysis of hospital-discharge data 2002-2003. Epidemiol Infect. 2008 May;136(5):653-60. doi: 10.1017/S0950268807008850. Epub 2007 Jun 14.

Govender S. Spinal infections. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2005 Nov;87(11):1454-8. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.87B11.16294. No abstract available.

Reihsaus E, Waldbaur H, Seeling W. Spinal epidural abscess: a meta-analysis of 915 patients. Neurosurg Rev. 2000 Dec;23(4):175-204; discussion 205. doi: 10.1007/pl00011954.

Tay BK, Deckey J, Hu SS. Spinal infections. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2002 May-Jun;10(3):188-97. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200205000-00005.

Mann S, Schutze M, Sola S, Piek J. Nonspecific pyogenic spondylodiscitis: clinical manifestations, surgical treatment, and outcome in 24 patients. Neurosurg Focus. 2004 Dec 15;17(6):E3. doi: 10.3171/foc.2004.17.6.3.

Martinez-Gutierrez O, Pena-Martinez V, Camacho-Ortiz A, Vilchez-Cavazos F, Simental-Mendia M, Tamez-Mata Y, Acosta-Olivo C. Spondylodiscitis treated with freeze-dried bone allograft alone or combined with autograft: A randomized and blinded trial. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong). 2021 May-Aug;29(2):23094990211019101. doi: 10.1177/23094990211019101.