search
Back to results

Unilateral Wrist Extension Training After Stroke

Primary Purpose

Stroke

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Unilateral wrist extension training
Sponsored by
University of Victoria
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Stroke focused on measuring stroke, strength training, rehabilitation

Eligibility Criteria

undefined - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Over 6 months post-stroke;
  • One side of arm shows muscle weakness
  • Pass the screening test of Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire
  • Pass the screening test for dementia
  • Free from dementia (score < 24 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and any other contradiction for TMS test

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Had medication affecting muscle tone within the past 3 months
  • Wear a pacemaker

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Wrist extension training

    Arm Description

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Changes in wrist extension force
    To test if training could improve wrist extension strength, maximal wrist extension force were measured in both arms during the 3 baseline pretests, 1 post-test. There was a week in between each baseline tests, post-test will be performed within one week after the training finished. To test if the force changes maintained after training, follow-up test was performed 5 weeks after training finished.

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Changes in the modulation of spinal-mediated muscle reflexes
    To test if training could induce neural adaptation at spinal level, spinal-mediated muscle reflexes include reciprocal inhibition and cutaneous reflexes in the wrist extensor muscle were measured. Muscle reflex amplitudes were compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement
    Neural adaptation in the corticospinal pathway
    To test if training could induced neural adaptation at corticospinal level, cortical silent period, short-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation and transcallosal from transcranial magnetic stimulation were measured in wrist extensor muscle. Changes in the muscle reflex amplitudes and cortical silent period duration were compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement.
    Upper limb impairment assessments
    Fugl-Meyer test score were assessed by licensed physiotherapists. Scores were compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement.
    Upper limb function assessments
    Wolf Motor Function Test were assessed by licensed physiotherapists. Scores were compared before and after training.
    Ten-meter walking test
    Walking speed was compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement
    Six-minute walking test
    Walking distance was compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement
    Timed up and go
    Walking speed was compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    August 24, 2017
    Last Updated
    August 29, 2017
    Sponsor
    University of Victoria
    Collaborators
    University of British Columbia
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03268798
    Brief Title
    Unilateral Wrist Extension Training After Stroke
    Official Title
    Unilateral Wrist Extension Training After Stroke
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    August 2017
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    March 2015 (undefined)
    Primary Completion Date
    July 1, 2017 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    July 1, 2017 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    University of Victoria
    Collaborators
    University of British Columbia

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    Following stroke, muscle weakness and impaired motor function are expressed in both the more (MA; paretic) and less affected (LA; non-paretic) sides. Although the efficacy of resistance training is well recognized, training the MA limb directly may be initially difficult due to muscular weakness. "Cross-education" is training one side of the body increases strength in the untrained and opposite side. This concept can be applied in strength training when training the more affected sides cannot be initiated. Recently, our lab found six weeks of dorsiflexion resistance training in the LA leg improved the strength of both trained and untrained legs of chronic stroke participants. The current project explored if cross-education exists in the upper limb in chronic stroke participants and if there are related changes in cortical and spinal cord plasticity. We hypothesized that unilateral strength in the less affected arm could enhance wrist extension strength bilaterally with related neural adoption and improved clinical function.
    Detailed Description
    Stroke produces muscle weakness seen on both more (paretic, MA) and less affected (non-paretic, LA) sides. "Cross-education" is training one side of the body increases strength or motor skill in the same muscles on the untrained side. This can be applied to enhance muscle strength in the MA side and we found that 6 weeks of dorsiflexion resistance training with the LA leg improved strength bilaterally in chronic stroke. To explore if cross-education occurs also in the upper limb after stroke, participants will complete a 5-week unilateral wrist extension training. Twenty four participants will be recruited, 12 from Rehabilitation Neuroscience laboratory at University of Victoria, 12 from Brain Behaviour Laboratory at University of British Columbia. Before and after training, maximal voluntary contraction wrist extension force was measured with a 6-axis load cell using Cartesian coordinates (Fz = extension). Electromyography of extensor and flexor carpi radialis, biceps and triceps brachii were recorded. Fugl-Meyer and partial Wolf Motor Function Test were performed by the same physical therapist at each location. Reciprocal inhibition from wrist flexors to extensors, cutaneous reflexes evoked by median and superficial radial nerve stimulation were assessed in those at UVIC. Cortical silent period, short-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation and transcallosal inhibition from transcranial magnetic stimulation were measured in participants at UBC.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Stroke
    Keywords
    stroke, strength training, rehabilitation

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Treatment
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Single Group Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    N/A
    Enrollment
    24 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Wrist extension training
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Intervention Type
    Device
    Intervention Name(s)
    Unilateral wrist extension training
    Intervention Description
    Participants will join a five-week training protocol with 3 sessions per week. During each session, 5 sets 5 maximal wrist extension training will be performed on participants less affected side.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Changes in wrist extension force
    Description
    To test if training could improve wrist extension strength, maximal wrist extension force were measured in both arms during the 3 baseline pretests, 1 post-test. There was a week in between each baseline tests, post-test will be performed within one week after the training finished. To test if the force changes maintained after training, follow-up test was performed 5 weeks after training finished.
    Time Frame
    Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training(no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test; Week 13: follow-up test
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Changes in the modulation of spinal-mediated muscle reflexes
    Description
    To test if training could induce neural adaptation at spinal level, spinal-mediated muscle reflexes include reciprocal inhibition and cutaneous reflexes in the wrist extensor muscle were measured. Muscle reflex amplitudes were compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement
    Time Frame
    Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training(no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test;
    Title
    Neural adaptation in the corticospinal pathway
    Description
    To test if training could induced neural adaptation at corticospinal level, cortical silent period, short-interval intracortical inhibition, intracortical facilitation and transcallosal from transcranial magnetic stimulation were measured in wrist extensor muscle. Changes in the muscle reflex amplitudes and cortical silent period duration were compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement.
    Time Frame
    Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training(no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test;
    Title
    Upper limb impairment assessments
    Description
    Fugl-Meyer test score were assessed by licensed physiotherapists. Scores were compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement.
    Time Frame
    Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training(no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test;
    Title
    Upper limb function assessments
    Description
    Wolf Motor Function Test were assessed by licensed physiotherapists. Scores were compared before and after training.
    Time Frame
    Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training (no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test; Week 13: follow-up test
    Title
    Ten-meter walking test
    Description
    Walking speed was compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement
    Time Frame
    Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training (no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test;
    Title
    Six-minute walking test
    Description
    Walking distance was compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement
    Time Frame
    Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training(no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test;
    Title
    Timed up and go
    Description
    Walking speed was compared before and after training. There was no follow-up test for this measurement.
    Time Frame
    Week1-3: baselines were measured once per week for three times; Week 4-8: training(no measurement was taken); Week 9: post-test;

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Over 6 months post-stroke; One side of arm shows muscle weakness Pass the screening test of Physical Activity Readiness Questionnaire Pass the screening test for dementia Free from dementia (score < 24 on the Montreal Cognitive Assessment) and any other contradiction for TMS test Exclusion Criteria: Had medication affecting muscle tone within the past 3 months Wear a pacemaker
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    E.Paul Zehr
    Organizational Affiliation
    Rehabilitation Neuroscience Laboratory, University of Victoria
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Learn more about this trial

    Unilateral Wrist Extension Training After Stroke

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs