search
Back to results

Remediation of Age-related Cognitive Decline: Vortioxetine and Cognitive Training (BBS)

Primary Purpose

Age-related Cognitive Decline

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 4
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Vortioxetine 10 mg
Cognitive training program
Sponsored by
Washington University School of Medicine
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Age-related Cognitive Decline focused on measuring Vortioxetine, Elderly, Online cognitive training

Eligibility Criteria

65 Years - undefined (Older Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Community-living men and women age 65 and older
  • Age-related cognitive decline as defined by (a) self-reported cognitive dysfunction that is attributed to the aging process (in response to screening questions to the participant); (b) ability to complete cognitive battery, but still scoring less than 1 standard deviation above age-matched norms at both baseline and after the two-week cognitive training lead-in.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known dementia or other clinical neurodegenerative illness (e.g., Parkinson's disease, cerebrovascular disease) per self-report, informant report, medical records, or neuropsychological testing
  • Any current psychiatric disorder
  • Medical conditions that suggest shortened lifespan, such as metastatic cancer; or would prohibit safe participation in the interventions, including cardiovascular disease or musculoskeletal conditions; or with the assessments.
  • Sensory impairment that would prevent participation
  • IQ < 70 as estimated by the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading
  • Alcohol or substance abuse within 6 months
  • Concurrent cognitive training, such as brain-training software, or other interventions expected to affect neuroplasticity
  • Psychotropic medications or those with likely CNS effects (none within 4 weeks prior to study entry)

Sites / Locations

  • Washington University School of Medicine

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

Vortioxetine plus cognitive training

Placebo plus cognitive training

Arm Description

Vortioxetine (10 mg) plus cognitive training 5 times weekly for 30 minutes a day

Placebo plus cognitive training 5 times weekly for 30 minutes a day

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change in Total Fluid Cognitive Score
Total fluid cognitive score from the NIH Toolbox as well as the speed of cognitive improvement The study utilized five cognitive tests from the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery that measured "fluid" cognition-the capacity for new learning and information processing. A higher score indicates indicates better performance on these tests. A total fluid cognitive score at or near 100 indicates ability that is average compared with others nationally. Scores around 115 suggest above-average fluid cognitive ability, while scores around 130 suggest superior ability. Conversely, a score around 85 suggests below-average fluid cognitive ability, and a score in the range of 70 or below suggests significant impairment.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Change in Total Fluid Cognitive Score
Total fluid cognitive score from the NIH Toolbox as well as the speed of cognitive improvement The study utilized five cognitive tests from the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery that measured "fluid" cognition-the capacity for new learning and information processing. A higher score indicates indicates better performance on these tests. A total fluid cognitive score at or near 100 indicates ability that is average compared with others nationally. Scores around 115 suggest above-average fluid cognitive ability, while scores around 130 suggest superior ability. Conversely, a score around 85 suggests below-average fluid cognitive ability, and a score in the range of 70 or below suggests significant impairment.
Participant Function
Participant function assessed using the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA). A validated test that required participants to demonstrate their competence to perform everyday functioning tasks in domains such as comprehension, planning, finances, transportation and communication. A higher scores indicates a better outcome. Scores can range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100.

Full Information

First Posted
September 1, 2017
Last Updated
December 27, 2019
Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Collaborators
Queen's University, Takeda
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03272711
Brief Title
Remediation of Age-related Cognitive Decline: Vortioxetine and Cognitive Training
Acronym
BBS
Official Title
Remediation of Age-related Cognitive Decline: Vortioxetine and Cognitive Training
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
December 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
August 31, 2016 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 24, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 24, 2019 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Washington University School of Medicine
Collaborators
Queen's University, Takeda

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this research study is to examine the potential benefits of vortioxetine in combination with at-home computerized cognitive training program to improve cognition, such as memory, attention, and concentration. This study will compare the effectiveness of vortioxetine plus cognitive training versus placebo plus cognitive training.
Detailed Description
The purpose of this research study is to examine the potential benefits of vortioxetine in combination with at-home computerized cognitive training program to improve cognition, such as memory, attention, and concentration. This study will compare the effectiveness of vortioxetine plus cognitive training versus placebo plus cognitive training. Vortioxetine is considered investigational when used as a treatment for age-related cognitive decline, which means that it has not been approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for this purpose. Vortioxetine is approved by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration as a treatment for depression, and also goes by the name Trintellix (formerly known as Brintellix). That means that, while the drug itself is approved by the FDA, it is not approved for the reasons the investigators are using it in this study. Participation in this study entails an estimated 6 study visits over the course of approximately six months. Participants will complete various assessments at our lab at the Washington University School of Medicine along with check-in visits in-person or over the phone. Additionally, they will participate in at home computerized cognitive training for approximately six months, supplemented with either vortioxetine or placebo. The investigators will assess memory and problem-solving abilities using paper and pencil, computerized measures, and self-assessments of how participants feel. These tests could include numbers, letters, symbols, words, or sentences. These tests will be repeated throughout the study. If eligible to do so, participants will complete a baseline MRI scan. A subset of participants who completed a baseline MRI scan will complete another MRI scan after approximately 26 weeks of vortioxetine or placebo and at home computerized cognitive training.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Age-related Cognitive Decline
Keywords
Vortioxetine, Elderly, Online cognitive training

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 4
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
129 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Vortioxetine plus cognitive training
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Vortioxetine (10 mg) plus cognitive training 5 times weekly for 30 minutes a day
Arm Title
Placebo plus cognitive training
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebo plus cognitive training 5 times weekly for 30 minutes a day
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Vortioxetine 10 mg
Other Intervention Name(s)
Trintellix
Intervention Type
Behavioral
Intervention Name(s)
Cognitive training program
Intervention Description
Online training program, 30 minutes a day, 5 times a week
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Total Fluid Cognitive Score
Description
Total fluid cognitive score from the NIH Toolbox as well as the speed of cognitive improvement The study utilized five cognitive tests from the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery that measured "fluid" cognition-the capacity for new learning and information processing. A higher score indicates indicates better performance on these tests. A total fluid cognitive score at or near 100 indicates ability that is average compared with others nationally. Scores around 115 suggest above-average fluid cognitive ability, while scores around 130 suggest superior ability. Conversely, a score around 85 suggests below-average fluid cognitive ability, and a score in the range of 70 or below suggests significant impairment.
Time Frame
Randomization (0 weeks), 4 weeks
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Total Fluid Cognitive Score
Description
Total fluid cognitive score from the NIH Toolbox as well as the speed of cognitive improvement The study utilized five cognitive tests from the NIH Toolbox Cognitive Battery that measured "fluid" cognition-the capacity for new learning and information processing. A higher score indicates indicates better performance on these tests. A total fluid cognitive score at or near 100 indicates ability that is average compared with others nationally. Scores around 115 suggest above-average fluid cognitive ability, while scores around 130 suggest superior ability. Conversely, a score around 85 suggests below-average fluid cognitive ability, and a score in the range of 70 or below suggests significant impairment.
Time Frame
Randomization (0 weeks), 4 week, 12 week, 26 week
Title
Participant Function
Description
Participant function assessed using the UCSD Performance-Based Skills Assessment (UPSA). A validated test that required participants to demonstrate their competence to perform everyday functioning tasks in domains such as comprehension, planning, finances, transportation and communication. A higher scores indicates a better outcome. Scores can range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 100.
Time Frame
Randomization (0 weeks), 26 weeks

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Community-living men and women age 65 and older Age-related cognitive decline as defined by (a) self-reported cognitive dysfunction that is attributed to the aging process (in response to screening questions to the participant); (b) ability to complete cognitive battery, but still scoring less than 1 standard deviation above age-matched norms at both baseline and after the two-week cognitive training lead-in. Exclusion Criteria: Known dementia or other clinical neurodegenerative illness (e.g., Parkinson's disease, cerebrovascular disease) per self-report, informant report, medical records, or neuropsychological testing Any current psychiatric disorder Medical conditions that suggest shortened lifespan, such as metastatic cancer; or would prohibit safe participation in the interventions, including cardiovascular disease or musculoskeletal conditions; or with the assessments. Sensory impairment that would prevent participation IQ < 70 as estimated by the Wechsler Test of Adult Reading Alcohol or substance abuse within 6 months Concurrent cognitive training, such as brain-training software, or other interventions expected to affect neuroplasticity Psychotropic medications or those with likely CNS effects (none within 4 weeks prior to study entry)
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Eric Lenze, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Washington University School of Medicine
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Washington University School of Medicine
City
Saint Louis
State/Province
Missouri
ZIP/Postal Code
63110
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
12425704
Citation
Ball K, Berch DB, Helmers KF, Jobe JB, Leveck MD, Marsiske M, Morris JN, Rebok GW, Smith DM, Tennstedt SL, Unverzagt FW, Willis SL; Advanced Cognitive Training for Independent and Vital Elderly Study Group. Effects of cognitive training interventions with older adults: a randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2002 Nov 13;288(18):2271-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.288.18.2271.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23896849
Citation
Bowie CR, Gupta M, Holshausen K, Jokic R, Best M, Milev R. Cognitive remediation for treatment-resistant depression: effects on cognition and functioning and the role of online homework. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2013 Aug;201(8):680-5. doi: 10.1097/NMD.0b013e31829c5030.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23484795
Citation
Kozauer N, Katz R. Regulatory innovation and drug development for early-stage Alzheimer's disease. N Engl J Med. 2013 Mar 28;368(13):1169-71. doi: 10.1056/NEJMp1302513. Epub 2013 Mar 13. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25405755
Citation
Lampit A, Hallock H, Valenzuela M. Computerized cognitive training in cognitively healthy older adults: a systematic review and meta-analysis of effect modifiers. PLoS Med. 2014 Nov 18;11(11):e1001756. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1001756. eCollection 2014 Nov.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
32212856
Citation
Lenze EJ, Stevens A, Waring JD, Pham VT, Haddad R, Shimony J, Miller JP, Bowie CR. Augmenting Computerized Cognitive Training With Vortioxetine for Age-Related Cognitive Decline: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;177(6):548-555. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19050561. Epub 2020 Mar 26. Erratum In: Am J Psychiatry. 2020 Jun 1;177(6):556.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Remediation of Age-related Cognitive Decline: Vortioxetine and Cognitive Training

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs