search
Back to results

Nurse Navigation Versus Current Care Coordination During Colorectal Cancer Trajectories (NaviCan)

Primary Purpose

Self Efficacy, Continuity of Care, Quality of Life

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Nurse navigation
Current care coordination
Sponsored by
Odense University Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional supportive care trial for Self Efficacy focused on measuring Nurse navigation, Family, Self Efficacy, Needs assessment, Quality of Life, Colorectal Neoplasms, Case Management

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Lesions suspected for cancer in the colon or rectum recognized through colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy found at scopy centres in Odense, Nyborg, Svendborg or Slagelse, all in Denmark
  • Can speak and understand Danish.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Life-threatening disease: score 4 in the American Society of Anaesthesiologists status classification system.
  • Dementia ( Diagnosed or in a diagnostic phase).
  • Severe psychiatric disease ( Diagnosed or in a diagnostic phase).
  • Mentally retarded ( Diagnosed or in a diagnostic phase).

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Active Comparator

    Arm Label

    Nurse navigation

    Current care coordination

    Arm Description

    Coherent navigation and support from a family-centred viewpoint throughout the cancer trajectory, despite the individual patient's affiliation to any department.

    Department-specific coordination and answers to questions from a patient-centred viewpoint.

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Self evaluated Self Efficacy for Cancer
    Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Self evaluated Self Efficacy for Cancer
    Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief
    Self evaluated Self Efficacy for Cancer
    Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief
    Self evaluated Self Efficacy for Cancer
    Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief
    Self evaluated Self Efficacy for Cancer
    Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief
    Self evaluated Self Efficacy for Cancer
    Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief
    Continuity of care
    Qualitatively validated questions answered by participants
    Continuity of care
    Qualitatively validated questions answered by participants
    Continuity of care
    Qualitatively validated questions answered by participants
    Continuity of care
    Qualitatively validated questions answered by participants
    Continuity of care
    Qualitatively validated questions answered by participants
    Continuity of care
    Qualitatively validated questions
    Unmet needs
    Patients experienced needs and degree of fulfilled support
    Unmet needs
    Patients experienced needs and degree of fulfilled support
    Unmet needs
    Patients experienced needs and degree of fulfilled support
    Health-related Quality of Life
    European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life questionnaire with 30 questions (EORCT QLQ-c30).

    Full Information

    First Posted
    September 11, 2017
    Last Updated
    April 2, 2019
    Sponsor
    Odense University Hospital
    Collaborators
    University of Southern Denmark, Laval University, Slagelse Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark, Region Zealand, Danish Cancer Society, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03281447
    Brief Title
    Nurse Navigation Versus Current Care Coordination During Colorectal Cancer Trajectories
    Acronym
    NaviCan
    Official Title
    NaviCan. Navigation and Support to Cancer Patients - A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    April 2019
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Completed
    Study Start Date
    February 26, 2016 (Actual)
    Primary Completion Date
    October 23, 2017 (Actual)
    Study Completion Date
    December 31, 2018 (Actual)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Principal Investigator
    Name of the Sponsor
    Odense University Hospital
    Collaborators
    University of Southern Denmark, Laval University, Slagelse Hospital, Region of Southern Denmark, Region Zealand, Danish Cancer Society, Odense Patient Data Explorative Network

    4. Oversight

    Data Monitoring Committee
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    In western countries, the number of cancer survivors increases, and current cancer care seems insufficient with both patients' experiences of lack of help in transitions and up to 60 % of the patients having psychological problems after treatment. Further, Denmark shall have new hospitals, where researchers and healthcare professionals are expected to merge tasks and reach a higher patient experienced quality of care, without additional costs, so a better way to provide cancer care, which benefits the patients and supports the ideas within the new hospitals in Denmark, is needed. In a randomized controlled trial, the organizational structure of the healthcare system is challenged and the impact of a coherent nurse navigation practice compared to the currently existing department-specific care coordination is tested. The primary data are changes in patients' self-reported cancer-related self-efficacy from inclusion till one week after receipt of the information that they have reached the end of treatment, or in case of prolonged treatment, till not later than one year after inclusion. Patients can participate if they are 18 years of age or older, speak and understand Danish, and have a proven lesion suspected of cancer in the colon or rectum after colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy at the Danish endoscopy centers at Odense University Hospital (the cities: Nyborg, Svendborg and Odense) or at Slagelse Hospital. Furthermore, participants must not be mentally retarded, they must not suffer from a constant life-threatening disease, and they must not suffer from, or be in the diagnostic phase of, dementia or severe psychiatric disease. Participants are allocated to support from nurse navigation or to current care coordination, and fill in four questionnaires during their cancer trajectory: 1) At inclusion, 2) Three days before treatment start, 3) One week after receipt of information about treatment end or not later than one year after inclusion, and 4) Six weeks after measure point 3. Data is analyzed using suitable statistical models. With positive results, participants in nurse navigation are better helped during their cancer trajectory and have a better psychological start on the rest of their lives after cancer treatment. Focus will be on colon and rectum cancer care, but the results will be transferable to similar settings. Furthermore, positive results will support changes in the onset of rehabilitation initiatives.
    Detailed Description
    The primary hypothesis in this study is: Nurse navigation, as a specific, defined concept of coherent help through cancer trajectories, will prove superior to current care coordination with regard to patients' self-evaluated self-efficacy for cancer from inclusion to one week after receipt of information about treatment end or not later than one year after inclusion. Allocation The randomization will be stratified by age and gender. The rational is that age and gender is differently associated with benefit by a given care. Data collection Participants fill in questionnaires at four measurements, and supplements to sociodemographic information as well as information for an economic evaluation is collected from provider side. The questionnaires for participants are available in paper and electronically, and participants are allowed to discuss the individual questions with a person whom they trust before filling in their answers. If a participant is blind or dyslexic and has no one to help them fill in the questionnaires, a trained study nurse will read out loud the questions and fill in the participant's answers, and eventually in this process, listen to the participant's pros and cons, acknowledge that they are heard, ask for an answer and read out loud the question again. All data are stored in Research Electronic Data Capture (RedCap). Blinding The trial is not blinded but all participants are told, there is no favorite group. The statistician is blinded to randomization group and this blinding will be unveiled after the data is analyzed. Statistics Data are analyzed following the modified intention-to-treat principle, which is carried out by a senior statistician in close collaboration with the research group. Usual descriptive statistics will be used to summarize baseline and subject characteristics. The analyses of the primary endpoint, i.e. change in self-evaluated self-efficacy for cancer from inclusion (measurement 1) to end of treatment (measurement 3), and the secondary outcomes are done using analysis of covariance of the measure at measurement 3 with randomization group as a factor and measure at measurement 1 as covariate. In secondary analyses for all endpoints (measurement 1-4), the change over time will be investigated by mixed effects repeated measures analysis with randomization group as factor and random effects for subjects. These analyses are repeated within the subgroup of all cancer patients and the subgroup of cancer patients treated with curative aim. In the subgroup analyses, the influence of relevant subject-level confounders such as age, disease-stage, treatment, etc. will be explored, and appropriate adjustment will be performed. An economic evaluation will be performed for each randomized group and compared.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Self Efficacy, Continuity of Care, Quality of Life, Colorectal Neoplasms, Case Management
    Keywords
    Nurse navigation, Family, Self Efficacy, Needs assessment, Quality of Life, Colorectal Neoplasms, Case Management

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Supportive Care
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Randomized
    Enrollment
    280 (Actual)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Nurse navigation
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Coherent navigation and support from a family-centred viewpoint throughout the cancer trajectory, despite the individual patient's affiliation to any department.
    Arm Title
    Current care coordination
    Arm Type
    Active Comparator
    Arm Description
    Department-specific coordination and answers to questions from a patient-centred viewpoint.
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Nurse navigation
    Intervention Type
    Other
    Intervention Name(s)
    Current care coordination
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Self evaluated Self Efficacy for Cancer
    Description
    Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief
    Time Frame
    Change in "Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief" from inclusion to measurement 3: one week after receipt of information about treatment end or not later than one year after inclusion.
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Self evaluated Self Efficacy for Cancer
    Description
    Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief
    Time Frame
    Change in "Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief" from inclusion to three days before treatment start.
    Title
    Self evaluated Self Efficacy for Cancer
    Description
    Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief
    Time Frame
    Change in "Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief" from inclusion to six weeks after measurement 3.
    Title
    Self evaluated Self Efficacy for Cancer
    Description
    Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief
    Time Frame
    Change in "Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief" from three days before treatment start to measurement 3: one week after receipt of information about treatment end or not later than one year after inclusion.
    Title
    Self evaluated Self Efficacy for Cancer
    Description
    Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief
    Time Frame
    Change in "Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief" from three days before treatment start to six weeks after measurement 3.
    Title
    Self evaluated Self Efficacy for Cancer
    Description
    Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief
    Time Frame
    Change in "Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief" from one week after measurement 3: one week after receipt of information about treatment end or not later than one year after inclusion to six weeks after measure point 3.
    Title
    Continuity of care
    Description
    Qualitatively validated questions answered by participants
    Time Frame
    Change in "Continuity of care" from inclusion to measurement 3: one week after receipt of information about treatment end or not later than one year after inclusion.
    Title
    Continuity of care
    Description
    Qualitatively validated questions answered by participants
    Time Frame
    Change in "Continuity of care" from inclusion to three days before treatment start.
    Title
    Continuity of care
    Description
    Qualitatively validated questions answered by participants
    Time Frame
    Change in "Continuity of care" from inclusion to six weeks after measurement 3.
    Title
    Continuity of care
    Description
    Qualitatively validated questions answered by participants
    Time Frame
    Change in "Continuity of care" from three days before treatment start to measurement 3: one week after receipt of information about treatment end or not later than one year after inclusion.
    Title
    Continuity of care
    Description
    Qualitatively validated questions answered by participants
    Time Frame
    Change in "Continuity of care" from three days before treatment start to six weeks after measurement 3.
    Title
    Continuity of care
    Description
    Qualitatively validated questions
    Time Frame
    Change in "Continuity of care" from one week after measurement 3: one week after receipt of information about treatment end or not later than one year after inclusion to six weeks after measure point 3.
    Title
    Unmet needs
    Description
    Patients experienced needs and degree of fulfilled support
    Time Frame
    Change in "Unmet needs" from three days before treatment start to measurement 3: one week after receipt of information about treatment end or not later than one year after inclusion.
    Title
    Unmet needs
    Description
    Patients experienced needs and degree of fulfilled support
    Time Frame
    Change in "Unmet needs" from three days before treatment start to six weeks after measurement 3.
    Title
    Unmet needs
    Description
    Patients experienced needs and degree of fulfilled support
    Time Frame
    Change in "Cancer Behaviour Inventory - Brief" from one week after measurement 3: one week after receipt of information about treatment end or not later than one year after inclusion to six weeks after measure point 3.
    Title
    Health-related Quality of Life
    Description
    European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of life questionnaire with 30 questions (EORCT QLQ-c30).
    Time Frame
    Change in "Health-related Quality of Life" from three days before treatment start to six weeks after measurement 3.

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    All
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Lesions suspected for cancer in the colon or rectum recognized through colonoscopy or sigmoidoscopy found at scopy centres in Odense, Nyborg, Svendborg or Slagelse, all in Denmark Can speak and understand Danish. Exclusion Criteria: Life-threatening disease: score 4 in the American Society of Anaesthesiologists status classification system. Dementia ( Diagnosed or in a diagnostic phase). Severe psychiatric disease ( Diagnosed or in a diagnostic phase). Mentally retarded ( Diagnosed or in a diagnostic phase).
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Lise Fillion, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Nursing Faculty, Laval University
    Official's Role
    Study Chair
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Jens Søndergaard, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Research Unit of General Practice, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark
    Official's Role
    Study Chair
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Marianne K Thygesen, PhD
    Organizational Affiliation
    Surgery department A, Clinical Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark and OPEN at Region of Southern Denmark
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Niels Qvist, DMSc
    Organizational Affiliation
    Surgery department A, Clinical Institute, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Southern Denmark
    Official's Role
    Study Director

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No

    Learn more about this trial

    Nurse Navigation Versus Current Care Coordination During Colorectal Cancer Trajectories

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs