Comparison of Positive End Expiratory Pressure Titration Methods in ARDS Patients (ELSE)
Primary Purpose
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
France
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Strategy 1
Strategy 2
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional other trial for Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome focused on measuring ARDS, Esophageal pressure, Mechanical ventilation
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Age> 18 years
- Moderate or severe ARDS
- Consent to participation obtained from a relative
Exclusion Criteria:
- Protect adult
- Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
- No-affiliation to the social security scheme
- Contra-indication to the placement of an esophageal pressure measuring catheter
- Pneumothorax
- Hemodynamic and / or respiratory instability
- Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation
Sites / Locations
- University HospitalRecruiting
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Experimental
Arm Label
Arms A
Arms B
Arm Description
Strategy 1 - Washout period - Strategy 2
Strategy 2 - Washout period - Strategy 1
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Short-term effects of 2 PEEP titration strategies on gas exchange
Secondary Outcome Measures
Short-term effects of 2 PEEP titration strategies on respiratory mechanics
Short-term effects of 2 PEEP titration strategies on hemodynamics
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03281473
First Posted
July 11, 2017
Last Updated
March 19, 2019
Sponsor
University Hospital, Angers
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03281473
Brief Title
Comparison of Positive End Expiratory Pressure Titration Methods in ARDS Patients
Acronym
ELSE
Official Title
Comparison of Positive End Expiratory Pressure Titration Methods in Patients With Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome: a Physiological Study
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
March 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 2, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 2019 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
December 2019 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University Hospital, Angers
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
This study aims at assessing the short-term physiological effects of 2 positive end expiratory pressure titration strategies in patients with ARDS.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome
Keywords
ARDS, Esophageal pressure, Mechanical ventilation
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Other
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Crossover Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
20 (Anticipated)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Arms A
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Strategy 1 - Washout period - Strategy 2
Arm Title
Arms B
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Strategy 2 - Washout period - Strategy 1
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Strategy 1
Intervention Description
PEEP titration according to transpulmonary-end-expiratory pressure
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Strategy 2
Intervention Description
PEEP titration according to chest wall elastance measurement
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Short-term effects of 2 PEEP titration strategies on gas exchange
Time Frame
2 hours 15 minutes
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Short-term effects of 2 PEEP titration strategies on respiratory mechanics
Time Frame
2 hours 15 min
Title
Short-term effects of 2 PEEP titration strategies on hemodynamics
Time Frame
2 hours 15 min
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Age> 18 years
Moderate or severe ARDS
Consent to participation obtained from a relative
Exclusion Criteria:
Protect adult
Pregnant or breastfeeding woman
No-affiliation to the social security scheme
Contra-indication to the placement of an esophageal pressure measuring catheter
Pneumothorax
Hemodynamic and / or respiratory instability
Extra-corporeal membrane oxygenation
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Study Official is required by the WHO and BELONCLE, Ass.Pr
Phone
0241353845
Email
Francois.Beloncle@chu-angers.fr
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Study Official is required by the WHO and BELONCLE, Ass.Pr
Organizational Affiliation
Angers teatching hospital
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University Hospital
City
Angers
Country
France
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
François BELONCLE, Ass.Pr
Phone
0241353845
Email
Francois.Beloncle@chu-angers.fr
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Learn more about this trial
Comparison of Positive End Expiratory Pressure Titration Methods in ARDS Patients
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs