Improving Sternal Healing After Cardiac Surgery: Sternal Wire vs ZIPFIX (Closure)
Primary Purpose
Sternal Injury, Cardiac Surgery, Heart Diseases
Status
Withdrawn
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Canada
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Steel Wires
ZipFix Sternal Closure System
Sponsored by

About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Sternal Injury
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Patient age ≥ 18 years
- Scheduled cardiac surgery including coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement/repair, or ascending aorta replacement.
- Patient undergoing elective or urgent surgery
- Ability to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
- Patients undergoing emergent cardiac surgery
- Severe congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV) at enrollment
- Prior cardiac surgery
- Patients undergoing ventricular assist device insertion or heart transplantation
- Patients with a known metal allergy or allergy to ZIPFIX implant
- Patients who refuses consent
- Patients who are unable to follow post-operative instructions
- Prior history of significant bleeding that might be expected to recur with cardiac surgery
- Dementia with a mini mental status examination (MMSE) score of < 20
- Extra cardiac illness that is expected to limit survival to less than 5 years
- Suspected pregnancy. A pregnancy test (urine or serum) will be administered to all women not clearly menopausal
- Concurrent enrollment in another clinical trial
- Geographic inaccessibility for follow-up visits required by the protocol
- Prisoners or institutionalized individuals
Sites / Locations
- Division of Cardiac Surgery
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Experimental
Arm Label
Steel Wires
ZipFix Sternal Closure System (Plastic Cables)
Arm Description
In this arm, patients will have their sternum closed with steel wires.
In this arm, patients will have their sternum closed with the ZipFix system.
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Sternal bone healing
Assessment of how the sternum is healing, assessed via a CT scan and classified using a 6-point scale.
Secondary Outcome Measures
Post-operative pain
A patient's subjective assessment of their pain after surgery.
Use of narcotics
A patient's use of narcotic pain medication. To assess this measure, the proportion of patients in each group using narcotic pain medication will be compared.
Sternal instability
Clinical assessment of patient's sternum stability after surgery
Sternal wound infection
The presence of sternal wound infection after surgery, confirmed by wound cultures
Cost
An approximation of the comparative cost of the ZipFix system versus sternal wires, which will be approximated by comparing the duration of hospital stay between groups; the use of narcotic pain medication between groups; and the rate of sternal wound infection between groups.
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03289104
First Posted
January 31, 2017
Last Updated
December 13, 2018
Sponsor
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03289104
Brief Title
Improving Sternal Healing After Cardiac Surgery: Sternal Wire vs ZIPFIX
Acronym
Closure
Official Title
Improving Sternal Healing After Cardiac Surgery: Sternal Wire vs ZIPFIX
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
December 2018
Overall Recruitment Status
Withdrawn
Why Stopped
Study terminated due to inadequate funding.
Study Start Date
September 2018 (Anticipated)
Primary Completion Date
September 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 2020 (Anticipated)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to determine whether sternal reconstruction using the ZIPFIX system compared to standard wire cerclage could improve bone healing, patient function, and decreased postoperative pain.
Detailed Description
Despite a longer time for bone healing and functional recovery, median sternotomy is still the most common approach in cardiac surgery. Sternal closure has traditionally been wire cerclage using stainless steel wires, however, new sternal fixation devices have been developed to improve sternal union. Rigid sternal fixation, although very costly, has demonstrated to be superior to standard wire cerclage both in clinical and biomechanical studies. Although improved sternal healing was observed with rigid plate fixation in a randomized controlled trial in high risk patients, the wound complication rate with plate fixation was almost double that of wire cerclage albeit not statistically significant.
A novel sternal closure system denoted the sternal ZIPFIX system (DePuySynthes, Companies of Johnson and Johnson, West Over, PA, US) is biocompatible Poly-Ether-Ether-Ketone implant that was developed for fast and reliable sternal fixation following median sternotomy. First published case series utilized the sternal ZIPFIX System demonstrating effective sternal stability at 30 days. Another study has demonstrated no significant difference in the incidence of sternal wound infection following the ZIPFIX system compared to standard wire cerclage while Stelly et al., 2015 demonstrated reduced risk of deep sternal wound infection for patients using ZIPFIX. The ZIPFIX system demonstrates a higher resistance of fatigue failure and has a larger implant-to-bone contact area compared to stainless steel wires thereby reducing the risk of bone cut through. Placement of the cable ties are done similar to wire cerclage thereby not affecting time for sternal closure and training.
The objective of this study is to determine whether sternal reconstruction using the ZIPFIX system compared to standard wire cerclage would improve bone healing, patient function, and decrease postoperative pain.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sternal Injury, Cardiac Surgery, Heart Diseases
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
Participant
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
0 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Steel Wires
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
In this arm, patients will have their sternum closed with steel wires.
Arm Title
ZipFix Sternal Closure System (Plastic Cables)
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
In this arm, patients will have their sternum closed with the ZipFix system.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Steel Wires
Intervention Description
Control: Steel wires (device) are selected for sternal closure after surgery. Currently, most patients who have a sternotomy during cardiac surgery have their sternum closed with steel wires.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
ZipFix Sternal Closure System
Intervention Description
Treatment: ZipFix system (device) are selected for sternal closure after surgery. These plastic cables can also be used to close the sternum during bypass surgery.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Sternal bone healing
Description
Assessment of how the sternum is healing, assessed via a CT scan and classified using a 6-point scale.
Time Frame
3 months after surgery
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Post-operative pain
Description
A patient's subjective assessment of their pain after surgery.
Time Frame
Within 1 week of surgery
Title
Use of narcotics
Description
A patient's use of narcotic pain medication. To assess this measure, the proportion of patients in each group using narcotic pain medication will be compared.
Time Frame
In the first 6 months after surgery
Title
Sternal instability
Description
Clinical assessment of patient's sternum stability after surgery
Time Frame
In the first 6 months after surgery
Title
Sternal wound infection
Description
The presence of sternal wound infection after surgery, confirmed by wound cultures
Time Frame
In the first 6 months after surgery
Title
Cost
Description
An approximation of the comparative cost of the ZipFix system versus sternal wires, which will be approximated by comparing the duration of hospital stay between groups; the use of narcotic pain medication between groups; and the rate of sternal wound infection between groups.
Time Frame
In the first 6 months after surgery.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Patient age ≥ 18 years
Scheduled cardiac surgery including coronary artery bypass grafting, aortic valve replacement, mitral valve replacement/repair, or ascending aorta replacement.
Patient undergoing elective or urgent surgery
Ability to understand study procedures and to comply with them for the entire length of the study.
Exclusion Criteria:
Patients undergoing emergent cardiac surgery
Severe congestive heart failure (NYHA class III or IV) at enrollment
Prior cardiac surgery
Patients undergoing ventricular assist device insertion or heart transplantation
Patients with a known metal allergy or allergy to ZIPFIX implant
Patients who refuses consent
Patients who are unable to follow post-operative instructions
Prior history of significant bleeding that might be expected to recur with cardiac surgery
Dementia with a mini mental status examination (MMSE) score of < 20
Extra cardiac illness that is expected to limit survival to less than 5 years
Suspected pregnancy. A pregnancy test (urine or serum) will be administered to all women not clearly menopausal
Concurrent enrollment in another clinical trial
Geographic inaccessibility for follow-up visits required by the protocol
Prisoners or institutionalized individuals
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Marc Ruel, MD, MPH
Organizational Affiliation
Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Division of Cardiac Surgery
City
Ottawa
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K1Y4W7
Country
Canada
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25069686
Citation
Karamlou T, Jacobs ML, Pasquali S, He X, Hill K, O'Brien S, McMullan DM, Jacobs JP. Surgeon and center volume influence on outcomes after arterial switch operation: analysis of the STS Congenital Heart Surgery Database. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Sep;98(3):904-11. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2014.04.093. Epub 2014 Jul 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20732512
Citation
Kozower BD, Sheng S, O'Brien SM, Liptay MJ, Lau CL, Jones DR, Shahian DM, Wright CD. STS database risk models: predictors of mortality and major morbidity for lung cancer resection. Ann Thorac Surg. 2010 Sep;90(3):875-81; discussion 881-3. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2010.03.115.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17670585
Citation
Raman J, Song DH, Bolotin G, Jeevanandam V. Sternal closure with titanium plate fixation--a paradigm shift in preventing mediastinitis. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2006 Aug;5(4):336-9. doi: 10.1510/icvts.2005.121863. Epub 2006 Apr 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16122464
Citation
Pai S, Gunja NJ, Dupak EL, McMahon NL, Roth TP, Lalikos JF, Dunn RM, Francalancia N, Pins GD, Billiar KL. In vitro comparison of wire and plate fixation for midline sternotomies. Ann Thorac Surg. 2005 Sep;80(3):962-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2005.03.089.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17888985
Citation
Losanoff JE, Basson MD, Gruber SA, Huff H, Hsieh FH. Single wire versus double wire loops for median sternotomy closure: experimental biomechanical study using a human cadaveric model. Ann Thorac Surg. 2007 Oct;84(4):1288-93. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2007.05.023.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
14726062
Citation
Losanoff JE, Collier AD, Wagner-Mann CC, Richman BW, Huff H, Hsieh Fh, Diaz-Arias A, Jones JW. Biomechanical comparison of median sternotomy closures. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Jan;77(1):203-9. doi: 10.1016/s0003-4975(03)01468-1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15296898
Citation
Song DH, Lohman RF, Renucci JD, Jeevanandam V, Raman J. Primary sternal plating in high-risk patients prevents mediastinitis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2004 Aug;26(2):367-72. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2004.04.038.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22731778
Citation
Grapow MT, Melly LF, Eckstein FS, Reuthebuch OT. A new cable-tie based sternal closure system: description of the device, technique of implantation and first clinical evaluation. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2012 Jun 25;7:59. doi: 10.1186/1749-8090-7-59.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23624983
Citation
Melly L, Gahl B, Meinke R, Rueter F, Matt P, Reuthebuch O, Eckstein FS, Grapow MT. A new cable-tie-based sternal closure device: infectious considerations. Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg. 2013 Aug;17(2):219-23; discussion 223-4. doi: 10.1093/icvts/ivt183. Epub 2013 Apr 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26577944
Citation
Stelly MM, Rodning CB, Stelly TC. Reduction in deep sternal wound infection with use of a peristernal cable-tie closure system: a retrospective case series. J Cardiothorac Surg. 2015 Nov 14;10:166. doi: 10.1186/s13019-015-0378-7.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Improving Sternal Healing After Cardiac Surgery: Sternal Wire vs ZIPFIX
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs