search
Back to results

Comparing Efficacy and Safety of AryoGen Pharmed Biosimilar Denosumab 60 mg (Arylia) Versus Prolia® in Improvement of Bone Mineral Densitometry (BMD) Among Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women

Primary Purpose

Osteoporosis

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
Iran, Islamic Republic of
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Denosumab
calcium
vitamin D
Sponsored by
AryoGen Pharmed Co.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoporosis focused on measuring Osteoporosis, Denosumab

Eligibility Criteria

45 Years - 75 Years (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Postmenopausal women aged between 45 up to 75;
  • Bone mineral density T score at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck or total hip should be equal or less than -2.5 and equal or more than -4. (-4 ≤ T score ≤-2.5); or patients with high risk of fracture on the basis of FRAX criteria which according to osteoporosis treatment guidelines, need medicinal treatment.
  • Ability to comprehend and willingness to sign the Informed Consent Form for this study;
  • Signed informed consent with full knowledge and mental health.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Lack of consent for being in the trial and not complying with an 18-months follow-up;
  • Having hypersensitivity to denosumab or any component in the formulation (excipients include acetic acid, sorbitol, polysorbate 20, sodium hydroxide, water for injections);
  • Malabsorption syndrome;
  • History of thyroid surgery, parathyroid surgery or intestinal resection which has been caused malabsorption.
  • Patient with CKD stage 4 and 5 should be exclude (GFR <30cc/min)
  • Level of serum 25-(OH) vitamin D less than 20 ng/ml; (If vitamin deficiency has been corrected, and two tests show the level above 20 ng/ml within a month, the patient can be enrolled.)
  • Pre-existing hypocalcemia (Albumin-adjusted serum calcium level less than 8 mg/dl in fasting specimens) which is uncorrectable;
  • Untreated hypercalciuria (>250 mg/24h) and hypocalciuria (<100 mg/24h). If urine calcium level of patient is less than 100 mg per 24 hours and by vitamin D treatment the problem has been solved or if urine calcium level of patient is greater than 250 mg per 24 hours, but PTH is normal, the patient can be enrolled.
  • Presence of osteonecrosis of jaw (ONJ) risk factors including a diagnosis of cancer, poor oral hygiene, periodontal and/or dental diseases, having dentures; and comorbid disorders (anemia (hemoglobin level less than 11 g/dl, if it is corrected, patient can enter the study), history of diseases with coagulopathy, oral and dental infection);
  • Malignancy;
  • Having severe and active infections; (Severe infection is a difficult treated infection, like diabetic foot infection, but if the infection is treatable, after treatment, the patient can be enrolled.)
  • Being bed rest (for 2 weeks during the past 3 months)
  • A case in which the patient cannot take 1000 mg oral elemental calcium per day; (as supplement)
  • A case in which bone mineral density could not be accurately measured;
  • Conditions that influence bone metabolism, including hyperparathyroidism or hypoparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism, hypocalcemia, inflammatory rheumatologic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Paget's disease of bone, osteomalacia that is resistant to therapy (definition of resistant to therapy: not being responder to 1-month administration of vitamin D).
  • Patients will be excluded if they have one severe or more than 2 moderate vertebral fractures. (Severe fracture is defined as more than 50 percent vertebral height loss and moderate fracture is defined as 25-50 percent vertebral height loss).
  • Use of injectable bisphosphonates within the previous 12 months;
  • Use of oral bisphosphonates within the previous 3 months;
  • History of severe skeletal pain with bisphosphonates;
  • Use of parathyroid hormone or its derivatives, systemic hormone-replacement therapy, selective estrogen-receptor modulator, calcitonin, or calcitriol within 6 weeks before study enrollment.
  • Use of corticosteroids (>5 mg/prednisone daily or equivalent for ≥ 3months), in the past 3 months and more.
  • Use of heparin (more than 20,000 international units/day for 6 months and longer), in the past 6 months and more.
  • Patient that is possible to be administrated corticosteroids (>5 mg/prednisone daily or equivalent for ≥ 3months) or heparin (more than 20,000 international units/day for 6 months and longer) in the 18 month of the study, because of her chronic disease(s) such as allergy, asthma, coagulation disorders, should be excluded.

Sites / Locations

  • Rheumatology Center of Iran

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

AryoGen Pharmed Denosumab

Amgen Denosumab

Arm Description

Arylia (Denosumab Prefilled Syringe produced by AryoGen Pharmed) 60 mg/1 ml in a prefilled syringe. Denosumab 60 mg is subcutaneously administered to osteoporotic patients at baseline, month 6 and month 12. Along with, all women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided into two doses) and at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 months of the study.

Prolia® (Denosumab Prefilled Syringe produced by Amgen) 60 mg/1 ml in a prefilled syringe. Denosumab 60 mg is subcutaneously administered to osteoporotic patients at baseline, month 6 and month 12. Along with, all women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided into two doses) and at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 months of the study.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

BMD percentage change from baseline at lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck and total hip.
Percentage change from baseline in BMD at lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck and total hip by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to 18 months of the study, and compare between two groups.

Secondary Outcome Measures

The incidence of new vertebral fracture.
The incidence of new vertebral fracture assessed by Lateral spine X-ray radiography (T4-L4) at baseline then at 18 months, and compare between two groups.
Evolution of biochemical markers of bone metabolism.
Evolution of biochemical markers of bone metabolism at baseline, first month and afterwards every 3 months from baseline, and compare between two groups.
Comparing adverse events between two products.
Evaluation of the following parameters at each visit including 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months, and compare between two groups. Adverse events (AEs), Adverse drug reactions (ADR) Changes in physical examination findings Changes in vital signs Clinical laboratory testing for systemic safety, including liver function, renal function, complete blood count, and clinical chemistries.
Comparing immunogenicity between two products.
Evaluation of immunogenicity at visit 0, 6, 12 and 18 months for both arms, and compare between two groups.

Full Information

First Posted
September 19, 2017
Last Updated
July 8, 2020
Sponsor
AryoGen Pharmed Co.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03293108
Brief Title
Comparing Efficacy and Safety of AryoGen Pharmed Biosimilar Denosumab 60 mg (Arylia) Versus Prolia® in Improvement of Bone Mineral Densitometry (BMD) Among Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women
Official Title
A Phase III, Randomized, Two-armed, Parallel, Double-blind, Active-controlled, Non-inferiority Clinical Trial to Determine the Non-inferior Therapeutic Efficacy and Safety Between Arylia (60 mg, Denosumab, Produced by AryoGen Pharmed) Compared With Prolia® (60 mg, Denosumab, the Reference Drug, Produced by Amgen Company) in the Improvement of Bone Mineral Densitometry (BMD) Among Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
April 29, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 30, 2020 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
September 30, 2020 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
AryoGen Pharmed Co.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Denosumab 60 mg produced by AryoGen Pharmed and Amgen Denosumab 60 mg among osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women diagnosed with osteoporosis according to their Bone mineral density result (BMD), aged between 45 to 75 are included in this trial. This is a Phase III, randomized, two armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled,non-inferiority clinical trial. The eligible patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive Arylia or Prolia® subcutaneous injections, at the beginning of the trial and every 6 months at month 6 and 12, in an 18-month study period. Along with, all women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided into two doses) and at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 months of the study. The primary objective of this study is to assess non-inferiority of test- Denosumab 60 mg (Arylia) to the reference Denosumab 60 mg (Prolia®) in terms of efficacy among osteoporotic postmenopausal women. The secondary objectives of this study are: To further compare efficacy of test- Denosumab 60 mg to reference Denosumab 60 mg; To assess the safety of test- Denosumab 60 mg compared to reference Denosumab 60 mg.
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy and safety of Denosumab 60 mg produced by AryoGen Pharmed and Amgen Denosumab 60 mg among osteoporotic postmenopausal women. Postmenopausal women diagnosed with osteoporosis according to their Bone mineral density result (BMD) and aged between 45 to 75 are included in this trial. This is a Phase III, randomized, two armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled,non-inferiority clinical trial. Visits are going to be conducted at screening, 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months. After signing the written informed consent, patients are randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive Arylia or Prolia® subcutaneous injections, at the beginning of the trial and every 6 months at month 6 and 12, in an 18-month study period. Along with, all women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided into two doses) and at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 months of the study. The primary objective of this study is to assess percentage change from baseline in BMD at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck and total hip by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to 18 months of the study, and compare it between two treatment groups. The second objectives of this study are to assess the followings between treatment groups: The incidence of new vertebral fracture; Evolution of biochemical markers of bone metabolism at baseline, first month and afterward every 3 months from baseline. Comparing adverse events; Comparing immunogenicity of two products. Before initiation, the trial is reviewed by food and drug administration of Iran. The protocol, electronic case report form (eCRF), information for patients and informed consent forms are submitted to the ethics committees responsible for review and approval purposes, according to national regulatory guidelines. Sample size: 172 patients will be equally (1:1) divided into intervention arms for achieving 80% power in order to determine non-inferiority using a one-sided, independent sample t-test. Efficacy of Prolia® in comparison with placebo for lumbar spine BMD improvement in previous studies is reported 7.1%. The margin of non-inferiority is 1.78. The true difference between the means is assumed to be 0.000. The significance level (alpha) of the test is 0.025. The data are drawn from populations with standard deviations of 4.116 and 4.116. However, we have calculated that 190 patients should enter the study, by considering that there might be 10% drop-outs of participants during the trial. Blinding: To prevent the influence of knowing intervention group on study conclusion, the subjects and those who assess the study outcomes will be unaware of the state of the patient with regard to receiving the test drug or reference drug. For this purpose, subjects and administrator of the drug will be blinded by using a similar masked prefilled syringes. All drugs packages will be identified by unique numbers.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoporosis
Keywords
Osteoporosis, Denosumab

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigator
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
190 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
AryoGen Pharmed Denosumab
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Arylia (Denosumab Prefilled Syringe produced by AryoGen Pharmed) 60 mg/1 ml in a prefilled syringe. Denosumab 60 mg is subcutaneously administered to osteoporotic patients at baseline, month 6 and month 12. Along with, all women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided into two doses) and at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 months of the study.
Arm Title
Amgen Denosumab
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Prolia® (Denosumab Prefilled Syringe produced by Amgen) 60 mg/1 ml in a prefilled syringe. Denosumab 60 mg is subcutaneously administered to osteoporotic patients at baseline, month 6 and month 12. Along with, all women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided into two doses) and at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 months of the study.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Denosumab
Intervention Description
Denosumab 60 mg is subcutaneously administered to osteoporotic patients at baseline, month 6 and month 12.
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
calcium
Intervention Description
All women will receive daily supplements containing at least 1000 mg of elemental calcium (divided in two doses), during 18 month of the study.
Intervention Type
Dietary Supplement
Intervention Name(s)
vitamin D
Intervention Description
All women will receive daily supplements containing at least 400 IU vitamin D daily during 18 month of the study.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
BMD percentage change from baseline at lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck and total hip.
Description
Percentage change from baseline in BMD at lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck and total hip by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry to 18 months of the study, and compare between two groups.
Time Frame
Baseline and at 18 months.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The incidence of new vertebral fracture.
Description
The incidence of new vertebral fracture assessed by Lateral spine X-ray radiography (T4-L4) at baseline then at 18 months, and compare between two groups.
Time Frame
Baseline and at 18 months
Title
Evolution of biochemical markers of bone metabolism.
Description
Evolution of biochemical markers of bone metabolism at baseline, first month and afterwards every 3 months from baseline, and compare between two groups.
Time Frame
Baseline,at month 1,at month 3,at month 6,at month 9, at month 12, at month 15 and at month 18.
Title
Comparing adverse events between two products.
Description
Evaluation of the following parameters at each visit including 0, 1, 3, 6, 9, 12, 15 and 18 months, and compare between two groups. Adverse events (AEs), Adverse drug reactions (ADR) Changes in physical examination findings Changes in vital signs Clinical laboratory testing for systemic safety, including liver function, renal function, complete blood count, and clinical chemistries.
Time Frame
baseline,at month 1,at month 3,at month 6,at month 9,at month 12, at month 15 and at month 18.
Title
Comparing immunogenicity between two products.
Description
Evaluation of immunogenicity at visit 0, 6, 12 and 18 months for both arms, and compare between two groups.
Time Frame
Baseline,at month 6,at month 12 and at month 18.

10. Eligibility

Sex
Female
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
45 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
75 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Postmenopausal women aged between 45 up to 75; Bone mineral density T score at the lumbar spine (L1-L4), femoral neck or total hip should be equal or less than -2.5 and equal or more than -4. (-4 ≤ T score ≤-2.5); or patients with high risk of fracture on the basis of FRAX criteria which according to osteoporosis treatment guidelines, need medicinal treatment. Ability to comprehend and willingness to sign the Informed Consent Form for this study; Signed informed consent with full knowledge and mental health. Exclusion Criteria: Lack of consent for being in the trial and not complying with an 18-months follow-up; Having hypersensitivity to denosumab or any component in the formulation (excipients include acetic acid, sorbitol, polysorbate 20, sodium hydroxide, water for injections); Malabsorption syndrome; History of thyroid surgery, parathyroid surgery or intestinal resection which has been caused malabsorption. Patient with CKD stage 4 and 5 should be exclude (GFR <30cc/min) Level of serum 25-(OH) vitamin D less than 20 ng/ml; (If vitamin deficiency has been corrected, and two tests show the level above 20 ng/ml within a month, the patient can be enrolled.) Pre-existing hypocalcemia (Albumin-adjusted serum calcium level less than 8 mg/dl in fasting specimens) which is uncorrectable; Untreated hypercalciuria (>250 mg/24h) and hypocalciuria (<100 mg/24h). If urine calcium level of patient is less than 100 mg per 24 hours and by vitamin D treatment the problem has been solved or if urine calcium level of patient is greater than 250 mg per 24 hours, but PTH is normal, the patient can be enrolled. Presence of osteonecrosis of jaw (ONJ) risk factors including a diagnosis of cancer, poor oral hygiene, periodontal and/or dental diseases, having dentures; and comorbid disorders (anemia (hemoglobin level less than 11 g/dl, if it is corrected, patient can enter the study), history of diseases with coagulopathy, oral and dental infection); Malignancy; Having severe and active infections; (Severe infection is a difficult treated infection, like diabetic foot infection, but if the infection is treatable, after treatment, the patient can be enrolled.) Being bed rest (for 2 weeks during the past 3 months) A case in which the patient cannot take 1000 mg oral elemental calcium per day; (as supplement) A case in which bone mineral density could not be accurately measured; Conditions that influence bone metabolism, including hyperparathyroidism or hypoparathyroidism, hyperthyroidism or hypothyroidism, hypocalcemia, inflammatory rheumatologic diseases such as rheumatoid arthritis, Paget's disease of bone, osteomalacia that is resistant to therapy (definition of resistant to therapy: not being responder to 1-month administration of vitamin D). Patients will be excluded if they have one severe or more than 2 moderate vertebral fractures. (Severe fracture is defined as more than 50 percent vertebral height loss and moderate fracture is defined as 25-50 percent vertebral height loss). Use of injectable bisphosphonates within the previous 12 months; Use of oral bisphosphonates within the previous 3 months; History of severe skeletal pain with bisphosphonates; Use of parathyroid hormone or its derivatives, systemic hormone-replacement therapy, selective estrogen-receptor modulator, calcitonin, or calcitriol within 6 weeks before study enrollment. Use of corticosteroids (>5 mg/prednisone daily or equivalent for ≥ 3months), in the past 3 months and more. Use of heparin (more than 20,000 international units/day for 6 months and longer), in the past 6 months and more. Patient that is possible to be administrated corticosteroids (>5 mg/prednisone daily or equivalent for ≥ 3months) or heparin (more than 20,000 international units/day for 6 months and longer) in the 18 month of the study, because of her chronic disease(s) such as allergy, asthma, coagulation disorders, should be excluded.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rheumatology Center of Iran
City
Tehran
ZIP/Postal Code
021
Country
Iran, Islamic Republic of

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
25760281
Citation
Lim SY, Bolster MB. Current approaches to osteoporosis treatment. Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015 May;27(3):216-24. doi: 10.1097/BOR.0000000000000169.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26163201
Citation
Drake MT, Clarke BL, Lewiecki EM. The Pathophysiology and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Clin Ther. 2015 Aug;37(8):1837-50. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.06.006. Epub 2015 Jul 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25182228
Citation
Cosman F, de Beur SJ, LeBoff MS, Lewiecki EM, Tanner B, Randall S, Lindsay R; National Osteoporosis Foundation. Clinician's Guide to Prevention and Treatment of Osteoporosis. Osteoporos Int. 2014 Oct;25(10):2359-81. doi: 10.1007/s00198-014-2794-2. Epub 2014 Aug 15. Erratum In: Osteoporos Int. 2015 Jul;26(7):2045-7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26508890
Citation
Cairoli E, Eller-Vainicher C, Chiodini I. Update on denosumab in the management of postmenopausal osteoporosis: patient preference and adherence. Int J Womens Health. 2015 Oct 13;7:833-9. doi: 10.2147/IJWH.S75681. eCollection 2015.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26639186
Citation
Diedhiou D, Cuny T, Sarr A, Norou Diop S, Klein M, Weryha G. Efficacy and safety of denosumab for the treatment of osteoporosis: A systematic review. Ann Endocrinol (Paris). 2015 Dec;76(6):650-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ando.2015.10.009. Epub 2015 Nov 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26923729
Citation
Herrero S, Pico Y. Treatments for post-menopausal osteoporotic women, what's new? How can we manage long-term treatment? Eur J Pharmacol. 2016 May 15;779:8-21. doi: 10.1016/j.ejphar.2016.02.053. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26789873
Citation
Black DM, Rosen CJ. Clinical Practice. Postmenopausal Osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 21;374(3):254-62. doi: 10.1056/NEJMcp1513724. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. ;374(18):1797.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19671655
Citation
Cummings SR, San Martin J, McClung MR, Siris ES, Eastell R, Reid IR, Delmas P, Zoog HB, Austin M, Wang A, Kutilek S, Adami S, Zanchetta J, Libanati C, Siddhanti S, Christiansen C; FREEDOM Trial. Denosumab for prevention of fractures in postmenopausal women with osteoporosis. N Engl J Med. 2009 Aug 20;361(8):756-65. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa0809493. Epub 2009 Aug 11. Erratum In: N Engl J Med. 2009 Nov 5;361(19):1914.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16495394
Citation
McClung MR, Lewiecki EM, Cohen SB, Bolognese MA, Woodson GC, Moffett AH, Peacock M, Miller PD, Lederman SN, Chesnut CH, Lain D, Kivitz AJ, Holloway DL, Zhang C, Peterson MC, Bekker PJ; AMG 162 Bone Loss Study Group. Denosumab in postmenopausal women with low bone mineral density. N Engl J Med. 2006 Feb 23;354(8):821-31. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa044459.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18767928
Citation
Brown JP, Prince RL, Deal C, Recker RR, Kiel DP, de Gregorio LH, Hadji P, Hofbauer LC, Alvaro-Gracia JM, Wang H, Austin M, Wagman RB, Newmark R, Libanati C, San Martin J, Bone HG. Comparison of the effect of denosumab and alendronate on BMD and biochemical markers of bone turnover in postmenopausal women with low bone mass: a randomized, blinded, phase 3 trial. J Bone Miner Res. 2009 Jan;24(1):153-61. doi: 10.1359/jbmr.0809010.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26554766
Citation
Gu HF, Gu LJ, Wu Y, Zhao XH, Zhang Q, Xu ZR, Yang YM. Efficacy and Safety of Denosumab in Postmenopausal Women With Osteoporosis: A Meta-Analysis. Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Nov;94(44):e1674. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000001674.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18381571
Citation
Bone HG, Bolognese MA, Yuen CK, Kendler DL, Wang H, Liu Y, San Martin J. Effects of denosumab on bone mineral density and bone turnover in postmenopausal women. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008 Jun;93(6):2149-57. doi: 10.1210/jc.2007-2814. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
35773713
Citation
Jamshidi A, Vojdanian M, Soroush M, Akbarian M, Aghaei M, Hajiabbasi A, Mirfeizi Z, Khabbazi A, Alishiri G, Haghighi A, Salimzadeh A, Karimzadeh H, Shirani F, Fard MRH, Nazarinia M, Soroosh S, Anjidani N, Gharibdoost F. Efficacy and safety of the biosimilar denosumab candidate (Arylia) compared to the reference product (Prolia(R)) in postmenopausal osteoporosis: a phase III, randomized, two-armed, double-blind, parallel, active-controlled, and noninferiority clinical trial. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Jun 30;24(1):161. doi: 10.1186/s13075-022-02840-8.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Comparing Efficacy and Safety of AryoGen Pharmed Biosimilar Denosumab 60 mg (Arylia) Versus Prolia® in Improvement of Bone Mineral Densitometry (BMD) Among Osteoporotic Postmenopausal Women

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs