search
Back to results

Prevention of Fascial Dehiscence With Prophylactic Onlay Mesh in Emergency Laparotomies

Primary Purpose

Surgical Wound Dehiscence

Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Brazil
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
prophylactic polypropilene mesh
Midline Fascial Closure
vacuum drainage system
Sponsored by
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional prevention trial for Surgical Wound Dehiscence focused on measuring laparotomy, emergency surgery, abdominal wound dehiscence, prophylactic mesh

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Emergency laparotomy by midline incision
  • High risk for abdominal wound dehiscence: Risk index** ≥ 4,0 or ≥ 2,2 in combination with at least one of the following: smoking, obesity, malnutrition or malignant neoplasia.

    • Risk index is the sum of values associated with high-risk characteristics, based in the risk score for abdominal wall dehiscence published by van Ramshorst et. al. in World Journal of Surgery, 2010 (Rotterdam risk model):

Age category (in years)

  • 40-49: 0.4
  • 50-59: 0.9
  • 60-69: 0.9
  • ≥70: 1.1

Male gender: 0.7

Chronic pulmonary disease: 0.7

Ascites: 1.5

Jaundice: 0.5

Anemia: 0.7

Emergency surgery: 0.6

Type of surgery:

  • Gallbladder/bile duct 0.7
  • Esophagus 1.5
  • Gastroduodenum 1.4
  • Small bowel 0.9
  • Large bowel 1.4
  • Vascular 1.3

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Non-midline incisions or midline laparotomy measuring less than 1/4 the distance between the xyphoid and the pubis, including laparoscopic surgery.
  • Diagnosis of incisional hernia or presence of previous mesh on site.
  • Midline laparotomy performed in less than 30 days.
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe trauma with hemodynamic instability
  • Need for open abdomen or relaxing incisions
  • Need for re-laparotomy during the first 30 postoperative days, except cases in which an abdominal wall dehiscence was diagnosed.
  • Death during the first 30 postoperative days, except cases in which an abdominal wall dehiscence was diagnosed before the event.

Sites / Locations

  • Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Suture group

Prophylactic mesh group

Arm Description

Patients randomized to this arm will undergo midline laparotomy closure using a PDS 0 continuous suture only, without mesh, aiming a suture length to wound length ratio higher than four. Randomization occurs after fascial closure.

Patients randomized to this arm will undergo midline laparotomy closure using a PDS 0 continuous suture aiming a suture length to wound length ratio higher than four AND further polypropilene onlay mesh. Randomization occurs after fascial closure.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Fascial dehiscence incidence

Secondary Outcome Measures

Surgical site occurence (SSO) incidence
Surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI) incidence
Operative time (minutes),
Hospital length of stay (days)
Intensive care unit length of stay (days)

Full Information

First Posted
September 20, 2017
Last Updated
April 15, 2019
Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03293862
Brief Title
Prevention of Fascial Dehiscence With Prophylactic Onlay Mesh in Emergency Laparotomies
Official Title
Prevention of Fascial Dehiscence With Prophylactic Onlay Mesh in Emergency Laparotomies: a Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2015 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 2017 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
February 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Facial dehiscence elicit high morbidity and mortality. This complication may arise in more than 8.5% of high-risk patients. Addressing risk factors and optimizing surgical technique are guarded as mainstay measures for prevention, but their efficacy is questionable. The aim of this study is to analyze the influence of using a polypropylene onlay prophylactic mesh on the incidence of fascial dehiscence in emergency surgery and associated complications.
Detailed Description
Fascial dehiscence is associated with high morbidity and mortality rates. It occurs in more than 8.5% of high-risk patients. Current preventive measures described are control of risk factors and optimization of surgical technique. Despite that, the incidence of such complication remained stable in the last decades, highlighting the low efficacy of such measures. Polypropilene onlay mesh has been used to avoid incisional hernias in selected elective patients, and could be useful in the prevention of fascial dehiscence. In emergency situations, especially in contaminated and infected surgical procedures, safety and efficacy of mesh is controversial. In this study the investigators aimed to evaluate the influence of polypropilene prophylactic onlay mesh on the incidence of fascial dehiscence in high-risk patients undergoing midline emergency laparotomy. As secondary outcome, the associated morbidity, including surgical site occurence, will be analyzed. The study design will be a randomized controlled trial.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Surgical Wound Dehiscence
Keywords
laparotomy, emergency surgery, abdominal wound dehiscence, prophylactic mesh

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Prevention
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Suture group and prophylactic mesh group
Masking
Care Provider
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
145 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Suture group
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Patients randomized to this arm will undergo midline laparotomy closure using a PDS 0 continuous suture only, without mesh, aiming a suture length to wound length ratio higher than four. Randomization occurs after fascial closure.
Arm Title
Prophylactic mesh group
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Patients randomized to this arm will undergo midline laparotomy closure using a PDS 0 continuous suture aiming a suture length to wound length ratio higher than four AND further polypropilene onlay mesh. Randomization occurs after fascial closure.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
prophylactic polypropilene mesh
Intervention Description
Placement of onlay polypropilene prophylactic mesh after midline fascial closure.
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
Midline Fascial Closure
Intervention Description
midline fascial closure using uninterrupted PDS 0 suture
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
vacuum drainage system
Intervention Description
Placement of a subcutaneous vacuum drainage system
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Fascial dehiscence incidence
Time Frame
30 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Surgical site occurence (SSO) incidence
Time Frame
30 days or during hospital stay
Title
Surgical site occurrence requiring procedural intervention (SSOPI) incidence
Time Frame
30 days or during hospital stay
Title
Operative time (minutes),
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Hospital length of stay (days)
Time Frame
30 days
Title
Intensive care unit length of stay (days)
Time Frame
30 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Emergency laparotomy by midline incision High risk for abdominal wound dehiscence: Risk index** ≥ 4,0 or ≥ 2,2 in combination with at least one of the following: smoking, obesity, malnutrition or malignant neoplasia. Risk index is the sum of values associated with high-risk characteristics, based in the risk score for abdominal wall dehiscence published by van Ramshorst et. al. in World Journal of Surgery, 2010 (Rotterdam risk model): Age category (in years) 40-49: 0.4 50-59: 0.9 60-69: 0.9 ≥70: 1.1 Male gender: 0.7 Chronic pulmonary disease: 0.7 Ascites: 1.5 Jaundice: 0.5 Anemia: 0.7 Emergency surgery: 0.6 Type of surgery: Gallbladder/bile duct 0.7 Esophagus 1.5 Gastroduodenum 1.4 Small bowel 0.9 Large bowel 1.4 Vascular 1.3 Exclusion Criteria: Non-midline incisions or midline laparotomy measuring less than 1/4 the distance between the xyphoid and the pubis, including laparoscopic surgery. Diagnosis of incisional hernia or presence of previous mesh on site. Midline laparotomy performed in less than 30 days. Pregnancy Severe trauma with hemodynamic instability Need for open abdomen or relaxing incisions Need for re-laparotomy during the first 30 postoperative days, except cases in which an abdominal wall dehiscence was diagnosed. Death during the first 30 postoperative days, except cases in which an abdominal wall dehiscence was diagnosed before the event.
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Hospital das Clínicas da Faculdade de Medicina da Universidade de São Paulo
City
São Paulo
State/Province
São
ZIP/Postal Code
05403000
Country
Brazil

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23648044
Citation
Gomez Diaz CJ, Rebasa Cladera P, Navarro Soto S, Hidalgo Rosas JM, Luna Aufroy A, Montmany Vioque S, Corredera Cantarin C. [Validation of abdominal wound dehiscence's risk model]. Cir Esp. 2014 Feb;92(2):114-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ciresp.2012.12.008. Epub 2013 May 3. Spanish.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19898894
Citation
van Ramshorst GH, Nieuwenhuizen J, Hop WC, Arends P, Boom J, Jeekel J, Lange JF. Abdominal wound dehiscence in adults: development and validation of a risk model. World J Surg. 2010 Jan;34(1):20-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-009-0277-y.
Results Reference
result
PubMed Identifier
31672681
Citation
Lima HVG, Rasslan R, Novo FCF, Lima TMA, Damous SHB, Bernini CO, Montero EFS, Utiyama EM. Prevention of Fascial Dehiscence with Onlay Prophylactic Mesh in Emergency Laparotomy: A Randomized Clinical Trial. J Am Coll Surg. 2020 Jan;230(1):76-87. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2019.09.010. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Prevention of Fascial Dehiscence With Prophylactic Onlay Mesh in Emergency Laparotomies

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs