search
Back to results

Adjuvant Low-dose Ketamine in Pediatric Sickle Cell Vaso-occlusive Crisis (AKTSS)

Primary Purpose

Sickle Cell Disease, Vaso-Occlusive Crisis

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Ketamine
Sponsored by
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Sickle Cell Disease focused on measuring Ketamine, Sickle Cell Disease, Vaso-Occlusive Episode

Eligibility Criteria

10 Years - 25 Years (Child, Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • All English-speaking, sickle cell patients who receive their care at UCSFBCHO in the Department of Hematology who are 8-to-25-years-old presenting to the emergency department for VOC were asked to enroll.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Prior adverse reaction to ketamine
  • Patients were asked during the consent process if they have ever received ketamine, and if so, if they had any serious adverse reaction, such as difficulty breathing, dysphoria, hallucinations, or allergic reaction. If they have, ketamine was not given to these patients.
  • Patients who have received ketamine and experienced nausea or vomiting will be asked if they wish to receive the medication. If they do not, they did not receive ketamine.

Sites / Locations

  • UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital and Research Center Oakland

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

No Intervention

Arm Label

Intervention

Historical Control

Arm Description

Prior to the second dose of IV opiates, the experiment was to give patients a single IV bolus of ketamine at the dose of 0.2 mg/kg. Pain scores were collected using the FACES scale currently in place. In consenting patients, chart review was performed with the following data collected: mg/kg/hour of morphine equivalents, pain scores on admission, during the encounter, and at discharge, the time to 50% pain reduction, and whether or not the patient was discharged. In addition, a survey, which is attached, was given to patients/families at the time of drug administration to determine if they experienced a subjective improvement in their pain and if they suffered any undue side effects due to drug administration.

Patient data from at least one but up three patient encounters within the prior year were compared to their visit in which they were given adjuvant ketamine, using the outcome measures in the "Intervention" arm. Since this a historical control study, patients acted as their own controls in the above manner. Patients were allowed to re-enroll 4 weeks after presentation, which is typically considered a separate vaso-occlusive episode in the literature.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
The number of serious and minor adverse events was measured via patient-completed survey as well as by nurse and medical providers on presentation to the emergency department (ED). Serious adverse events are defined as cardiorespiratory events requiring intervention. Minor adverse events are defined as nausea/vomiting, emergence reaction (dysphoria; hallucinations; frightening dreams), and a sense of de-realization or "dreamy" sensation. Both study providers and patients themselves, via a survey that the parent and/or patient (based on age) fills out post receipt of ketamine, reported serious and minor adverse events.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Effect of Low-dose Ketamine (LDK) on Opioid Usage in the ED
Opioid usage for at least one but up to three prior patient visits in the last one year for each patient enrolled in the study was summarized, expressed as morphine equivalents in mg/kg/h, to account for different types of opioids used per patient preference, and then this was compared to the intervention group that received LDK. Percent change in opioid usage (expressed as morphine equivalents in mg/kg/h) is reported).
Effect of Low-dose Ketamine on Pain Scores on Presentation to the ED
Patient pain scores at presentation for the enrolled encounters and for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed. At least one but up to three prior visits were averaged and compared to the intervention visit. Pain was assessed using the faces pain scale which consists of a series of line diagrams of faces with expressions of increasing distress. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain).
Effect of Low-dose Ketamine on Discharge Rates From the ED
Percent discharge from the ED for intervention group and for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed. Participants were assigned a "0" if discharged or "1" if not discharged.
Subjective Effect of Low Dose Ketamine on Pain Relief Assessed Via a Patient Survey
After receipt of LDK, patients and/or their parents, based on age, filled out a survey based on a Likert scale regarding their agreement (Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree) with the following statements: Achieved faster pain relief with LDK, Achieved more complete pain relief with LDK, and Desire to receive LDK in a future vaso-occlusive crisis. There is also an area where patients could provide general comments regarding their experience in receiving LDK. Count of Participants who agree or strongly agree for each question are reported.
Effect of Low-dose Ketamine on Patient Pain Scores on Discharge From the ED/Admission to the Hospital
Patient pain scores at time of discharge from the ED/admission to the hospital for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed. At least one but up to three prior visits were averaged and compared to the intervention visit. Pain scores post receipt of ketamine are presented for the intervention group. Pain was assessed using the faces pain scale which consists of a series of line diagrams of faces with expressions of increasing distress. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain).
Effect of Low-dose Ketamine on Percent Difference of Length of Stay (LOS) in the ED
Length of stay (LOS) in minutes in the ED for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed.
Effect of Low-dose Ketamine on Time to 50% Pain Reduction
Time to 50% pain reduction (pain reported 50% less than baseline) in minutes for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed as historical controls. Pain was assessed using the faces pain scale which consists of a series of line diagrams of faces with expressions of increasing distress. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain).

Full Information

First Posted
January 9, 2017
Last Updated
March 25, 2021
Sponsor
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03296345
Brief Title
Adjuvant Low-dose Ketamine in Pediatric Sickle Cell Vaso-occlusive Crisis
Acronym
AKTSS
Official Title
Adjuvant Low-dose Ketamine in Pediatric Sickle Cell Vaso-occlusive Crisis (AKTSS)
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
June 2016 (undefined)
Primary Completion Date
April 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
April 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland

4. Oversight

Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Acute vaso-occlusive episodes (VOEs) in sickle cell disease (SCD) are primarily managed with opioids. Tolerance and hyperalgesia to opioids develops due to N-methyl-D-aspartate (NMDA)-receptor mediated activation of the nociceptive system, and as a receptor antagonist, ketamine mitigates this. Intravenous (IV) ketamine has demonstrated efficacy in reducing post-operative, chronic, and cancer-related pain in pediatrics, as well as in reducing time to pain control in the emergency department (ED) in adults. Limited studies suggest efficacy in adult opioid-refractory SCD patients. This study is investigating the safety and tolerability of adjuvant low-dose IV ketamine bolus for pediatric SCD VOE in the ED, as well as its efficacy in improving pain control and reducing hospitalization.
Detailed Description
In this cohort study, all consenting pediatric sickle-cell patients between 10 and 25 years old who were cared for at UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital Oakland (UCSFBCHO) presenting to the emergency department for VOC were enrolled in the study. Patients were compared to themselves in a time series, pre and post exposure to the study intervention (low-dose ketamine bolus at 0.2 mg/kg x 1 prior to second dose of IV opiate). The pediatric FACES pain scale was used to measure pain scales at pre-designated time points in the ED per standard nursing protocol (FACES for younger kids, visual analog scale in adolescents/young adults). Opiate usage was summed in the ED, converted to mg/kg/hour of morphine equivalents (since different opioids agents were given to different patients based on individual historical efficacy, and since length of stay in the emergency room could affect total morphine equivalents received), and compared between the pre and post-intervention groups. In addition, length of stay, time to 50% pain control, presentation and discharge pain scores, and likelihood of discharge from the ED were compared. Data was be collected via chart review in the UCSFBCHO system by study investigators. Pre-intervention data from the past three patient encounters (e.g., the mean of the mg/kg/hour of morphine equivalents used in the last three patient encounters prior to receipt of ketamine) was compared to the post intervention data. In addition, a survey, which is attached, was given to patients/families at the time of the drug administration to attempt to discern if patients subjectively experienced improvement in their pain and if they experienced any negative side effects due to the drug administration. Monitoring for adverse events was recorded for each patient encounter.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Sickle Cell Disease, Vaso-Occlusive Crisis
Keywords
Ketamine, Sickle Cell Disease, Vaso-Occlusive Episode

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Single Group Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Non-Randomized
Enrollment
62 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Prior to the second dose of IV opiates, the experiment was to give patients a single IV bolus of ketamine at the dose of 0.2 mg/kg. Pain scores were collected using the FACES scale currently in place. In consenting patients, chart review was performed with the following data collected: mg/kg/hour of morphine equivalents, pain scores on admission, during the encounter, and at discharge, the time to 50% pain reduction, and whether or not the patient was discharged. In addition, a survey, which is attached, was given to patients/families at the time of drug administration to determine if they experienced a subjective improvement in their pain and if they suffered any undue side effects due to drug administration.
Arm Title
Historical Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Patient data from at least one but up three patient encounters within the prior year were compared to their visit in which they were given adjuvant ketamine, using the outcome measures in the "Intervention" arm. Since this a historical control study, patients acted as their own controls in the above manner. Patients were allowed to re-enroll 4 weeks after presentation, which is typically considered a separate vaso-occlusive episode in the literature.
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ketamine
Other Intervention Name(s)
Ketalar
Intervention Description
The intervention is IV low-dose bolus ketamine as an adjuvant to standard therapy (IV opiates and NSAIDs).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment-Emergent Adverse Events [Safety and Tolerability]
Description
The number of serious and minor adverse events was measured via patient-completed survey as well as by nurse and medical providers on presentation to the emergency department (ED). Serious adverse events are defined as cardiorespiratory events requiring intervention. Minor adverse events are defined as nausea/vomiting, emergence reaction (dysphoria; hallucinations; frightening dreams), and a sense of de-realization or "dreamy" sensation. Both study providers and patients themselves, via a survey that the parent and/or patient (based on age) fills out post receipt of ketamine, reported serious and minor adverse events.
Time Frame
18 months
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Effect of Low-dose Ketamine (LDK) on Opioid Usage in the ED
Description
Opioid usage for at least one but up to three prior patient visits in the last one year for each patient enrolled in the study was summarized, expressed as morphine equivalents in mg/kg/h, to account for different types of opioids used per patient preference, and then this was compared to the intervention group that received LDK. Percent change in opioid usage (expressed as morphine equivalents in mg/kg/h) is reported).
Time Frame
Up to one year prior and after LDK administration on day 1 of the study in the ED
Title
Effect of Low-dose Ketamine on Pain Scores on Presentation to the ED
Description
Patient pain scores at presentation for the enrolled encounters and for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed. At least one but up to three prior visits were averaged and compared to the intervention visit. Pain was assessed using the faces pain scale which consists of a series of line diagrams of faces with expressions of increasing distress. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain).
Time Frame
Up to one year prior and on presentation to the ED after LDK administration
Title
Effect of Low-dose Ketamine on Discharge Rates From the ED
Description
Percent discharge from the ED for intervention group and for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed. Participants were assigned a "0" if discharged or "1" if not discharged.
Time Frame
Up to one year prior to receipt of ketamine for the historical control arm/group and up to 18 months for the intervention arm/group
Title
Subjective Effect of Low Dose Ketamine on Pain Relief Assessed Via a Patient Survey
Description
After receipt of LDK, patients and/or their parents, based on age, filled out a survey based on a Likert scale regarding their agreement (Strongly Disagree to Strongly Agree) with the following statements: Achieved faster pain relief with LDK, Achieved more complete pain relief with LDK, and Desire to receive LDK in a future vaso-occlusive crisis. There is also an area where patients could provide general comments regarding their experience in receiving LDK. Count of Participants who agree or strongly agree for each question are reported.
Time Frame
after LDK administration on day 1 of the study in the ED
Title
Effect of Low-dose Ketamine on Patient Pain Scores on Discharge From the ED/Admission to the Hospital
Description
Patient pain scores at time of discharge from the ED/admission to the hospital for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed. At least one but up to three prior visits were averaged and compared to the intervention visit. Pain scores post receipt of ketamine are presented for the intervention group. Pain was assessed using the faces pain scale which consists of a series of line diagrams of faces with expressions of increasing distress. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain).
Time Frame
At time of discharge from the ED/admission to the hospital (up to one year prior and after LDK administration)
Title
Effect of Low-dose Ketamine on Percent Difference of Length of Stay (LOS) in the ED
Description
Length of stay (LOS) in minutes in the ED for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed.
Time Frame
Up to one year prior to and after LDK administration on day 1 of the study in the ED
Title
Effect of Low-dose Ketamine on Time to 50% Pain Reduction
Description
Time to 50% pain reduction (pain reported 50% less than baseline) in minutes for at least one but up to three visits prior to receipt of ketamine in the last one year, were assessed as historical controls. Pain was assessed using the faces pain scale which consists of a series of line diagrams of faces with expressions of increasing distress. The score ranges from 0 (no pain) to 10 (the worst pain).
Time Frame
Up to one year prior to and after LDK administration on day 1 of the study in the ED

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
10 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
25 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: All English-speaking, sickle cell patients who receive their care at UCSFBCHO in the Department of Hematology who are 8-to-25-years-old presenting to the emergency department for VOC were asked to enroll. Exclusion Criteria: Prior adverse reaction to ketamine Patients were asked during the consent process if they have ever received ketamine, and if so, if they had any serious adverse reaction, such as difficulty breathing, dysphoria, hallucinations, or allergic reaction. If they have, ketamine was not given to these patients. Patients who have received ketamine and experienced nausea or vomiting will be asked if they wish to receive the medication. If they do not, they did not receive ketamine.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Jonathan B Cooper-Sood, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Children's Hospital and Research Center of Oakland
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
UCSF Benioff Children's Hospital and Research Center Oakland
City
Oakland
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94609
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
23565738
Citation
Neri CM, Pestieau SR, Darbari DS. Low-dose ketamine as a potential adjuvant therapy for painful vaso-occlusive crises in sickle cell disease. Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Aug;23(8):684-9. doi: 10.1111/pan.12172. Epub 2013 Apr 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24088202
Citation
Tawfic QA, Faris AS, Eipe N. Sickle cell pain management: are we missing the role of pronociception and neuropathic pain? Paediatr Anaesth. 2013 Nov;23(11):1104-5. doi: 10.1111/pan.12269. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23692261
Citation
Jennings CA, Bobb BT, Noreika DM, Coyne PJ. Oral ketamine for sickle cell crisis pain refractory to opioids. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2013 Jun;27(2):150-4. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2013.788599. Epub 2013 May 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20090444
Citation
Zempsky WT, Loiselle KA, Corsi JM, Hagstrom JN. Use of low-dose ketamine infusion for pediatric patients with sickle cell disease-related pain: a case series. Clin J Pain. 2010 Feb;26(2):163-7. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181b511ab.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25865160
Citation
Riha H, Aaronson P, Schmidt A. Evaluation of analgesic effects of ketamine through sub-dissociative dosing in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Jun;33(6):847-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2015.03.045. Epub 2015 Mar 25. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25377395
Citation
Beaudoin FL, Lin C, Guan W, Merchant RC. Low-dose ketamine improves pain relief in patients receiving intravenous opioids for acute pain in the emergency department: results of a randomized, double-blind, clinical trial. Acad Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;21(11):1193-202. doi: 10.1111/acem.12510.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26130219
Citation
Drake AB, Milne WK, Carpenter CR. Hot Off the Press: Subdissociative-dose Ketamine for Acute Pain in the Emergency Department. Acad Emerg Med. 2015 Jul;22(7):887-9. doi: 10.1111/acem.12705. Epub 2015 Jun 30. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25624076
Citation
Miller JP, Schauer SG, Ganem VJ, Bebarta VS. Low-dose ketamine vs morphine for acute pain in the ED: a randomized controlled trial. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Mar;33(3):402-8. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.12.058. Epub 2015 Jan 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24232306
Citation
Uprety D, Baber A, Foy M. Ketamine infusion for sickle cell pain crisis refractory to opioids: a case report and review of literature. Ann Hematol. 2014 May;93(5):769-71. doi: 10.1007/s00277-013-1954-3. Epub 2013 Nov 15.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23856095
Citation
Tawfic QA, Faris AS, Kausalya R. The role of a low-dose ketamine-midazolam regimen in the management of severe painful crisis in patients with sickle cell disease. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Feb;47(2):334-40. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.012. Epub 2013 Jul 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25488336
Citation
Ahern TL, Herring AA, Anderson ES, Madia VA, Fahimi J, Frazee BW. The first 500: initial experience with widespread use of low-dose ketamine for acute pain management in the ED. Am J Emerg Med. 2015 Feb;33(2):197-201. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2014.11.010. Epub 2014 Nov 15.
Results Reference
background

Learn more about this trial

Adjuvant Low-dose Ketamine in Pediatric Sickle Cell Vaso-occlusive Crisis

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs