search
Back to results

Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HIMALAYA)

Primary Purpose

Hepatocellular Carcinoma

Status
Active
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Durvalumab
Tremelimumab (Regimen 1)
Tremelimumab (Regimen 2)
Sorafenib
Durvalumab (Regimen 1)
Durvalumab (Regimen 2)
Sponsored by
AstraZeneca
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hepatocellular Carcinoma focused on measuring Hepatocellular Carcinoma Non-Resectable

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 100 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion criteria

  • HCC based on histopathological confirmation
  • No prior systemic therapy for HCC
  • Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B (that is not eligible for locoregional therapy) or stage C
  • Child-Pugh Score class A
  • ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 at enrollment

Exclusion criteria

  • Hepatic encephalopathy within past 12 months or requirement for medication to prevent or control encephalopathy
  • Clinically meaningful ascites
  • Main portal vein tumor thrombosis
  • Active or prior documented GI bleeding (eg, esophageal varices or ulcer bleeding) within 12 months
  • HBV and HVC co-infection, or HBV and Hep D co-infection

Sites / Locations

  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site
  • Research Site

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Description

Durvalumab

Durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab (Regimen 1)

Durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab (Regimen 2)

Sorafenib

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Overall Survival (OS) - Treme 300 mg x1 Dose + Durva 1500 mg vs Sora 400 mg
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause, regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy. Any participant not known to have died at the DCO date was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. If the last known date alive or if the date of death was after the DCO date, participants were censored at the DCO date. This primary outcome measure presents OS analysis of Treme 300mg x1 dose + Durva 1500 mg vs Sora 400 mg at the time of the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021).

Secondary Outcome Measures

Overall Survival (OS) - Durva 1500 mg vs Sora 400 mg
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause, regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy. Any participant not known to have died at the DCO date was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. If the last known date alive or if the date of death was after the DCO date, participants were censored at the DCO date. This secondary outcome measure presents OS analysis of Durva 1500 mg vs Sora 400 mg at the time of the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021).
Overall Survival (OS) at 18, 24, and 36 Months After Randomization
Percentage of participants who were alive at fixed time points (18, 24, and 36 months) after randomization. The estimated percentage of survival along with the 95% confidence interval were calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique on the full analysis set.
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
PFS (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 [RECIST 1.1] using Investigator assessments) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death by any cause in the absence of progression, regardless of whether the patient withdrew from study treatment or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. Progression (i.e., PD) was defined as a at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir) - this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir.
Time To Progression (TTP)
TTP was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression in the absence of death. If participants died without tumor progression, they were censored at the time of death.
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
ORR (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator) was defined as the number (%) of participants with at least 1 confirmed visit response of CR or PR until progression, or the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression. Participants who go off treatment without progression, receive a subsequent therapy, and then respond will not be included as responders in the ORR. Complete response (ie., CR) was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to <10 mm. Partial response (ie., PR) was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameter of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Number (%) of participants with a Best Objective Response (BoR) of CR, PR, or SD. Complete response (ie., CR) was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to <10 mm. Partial response (ie., PR) was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameter of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Stable disease (ie., SD) was defined as neither sufficient decrease in sum of diameters to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progression.
Duration of Objective Response (DoR)
Time from the date of first documented confirmed response (complete or partial response) until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression. Complete response (ie., CR) was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to <10 mm. Partial response (ie., PR) was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameter of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1
Overall survival by baseline PD-L1 expression levels (positive vs. negative). PD-L1 expression level is based on the Tumor and Immune Cell Positivity (TIP) score method as: PD-L1 Positive (TIP ≥ 1%) or PD-L1 Negative (TIP < 1%).
EORTC QLQ-C30 Time to Global Health Status/QoL Deterioration
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-item core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30), which consists of 30 questions combined to produce a global health status/QoL scale. Higher scores indicate better health. A clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as a decrease in the score from baseline of ≥10. Time to deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that is confirmed at a subsequent visit or death by any cause in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether the patient discontinues study drug(s) or receives another anticancer therapy.
EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Time to Symptom (Abdominal Pain) Deterioration
EORTC 18-item hepatocellular cancer health-related quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-HCC18) is an 18-item questionnaire design used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30, which includes 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, jaundice, body image, nutrition, pain, fever, sex life and abdominal swelling. A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. A clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as an increase in the score from baseline of ≥10. Time to deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that is confirmed at a subsequent visit or death by any cause in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether the patient discontinues study drug(s) or receives another anticancer therapy.
EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Time to Symptom (Shoulder Pain) Deterioration
EORTC 18-item hepatocellular cancer health-related quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-HCC18) is an 18-item questionnaire design used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30, which includes 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, jaundice, body image, nutrition, pain, fever, sex life and abdominal swelling. A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. A clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as an increase in the score from baseline of ≥10. Time to deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that is confirmed at a subsequent visit or death by any cause in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether the patient discontinues study drug(s) or receives another anticancer therapy.
EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Time to Symptom (Abdominal Swelling) Deterioration
EORTC 18-item hepatocellular cancer health-related quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-HCC18) is an 18-item questionnaire design used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30, which includes 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, jaundice, body image, nutrition, pain, fever, sex life and abdominal swelling. A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. A clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as an increase in the score from baseline of ≥10. Time to deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that is confirmed at a subsequent visit or death by any cause in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether the patient discontinues study drug(s) or receives another anticancer therapy.
Presence of ADA for Durvalumab
Number of participants with Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) response to Durvalumab. ADA positive post-baseline only was also referred to as treatment-induced ADA. Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as the sum of treatment-induced ADA and treatment-boosted ADA. Results are reported as number of participants with ADA responses to Durvalumab for each indicated category.
Presence of ADA for Tremelimumab
Number of participants with Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) response to Tremelimumab. ADA positive post-baseline only was also referred to as treatment-induced ADA. Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as the sum of treatment-induced ADA and treatment-boosted ADA. Results are reported as number of participants with ADA responses to Tremelimumab for each indicated category.
Summary of Durvalumab Concentration Over Time
Blood sample were collected at pre-specified timepoints and Durvalumab concentrations in serum (ug/mL) were reported over time.
Summary of Tremelimumab Concentration Over Time
Blood sample were collected at pre-specified timepoints and Tremelimumab concentrations in serum (ug/mL) were reported over time.

Full Information

First Posted
September 19, 2017
Last Updated
October 2, 2023
Sponsor
AstraZeneca
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03298451
Brief Title
Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Acronym
HIMALAYA
Official Title
A Randomized, Open-label, Multi-center Phase III Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
October 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Active, not recruiting
Study Start Date
October 11, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
August 27, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
August 27, 2024 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
AstraZeneca

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a randomized, open-label, multi-center, global, Phase III study to assess the efficacy and safety of durvalumab plus tremelimumab combination therapy and durvalumab monotherapy versus sorafenib in the treatment of patients with no prior systemic therapy for unresectable HCC. The patients cannot be eligible for locoregional therapy
Detailed Description
The study population includes patients 18 years of age or older with advanced HCC, Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage B not eligible for locoregional therapy or stage C, and Child-Pugh A classification liver disease. Patients must not have received any prior systemic therapy for unresectable HCC. Patients in all treatment arms may continue receiving their originally assigned treatment, at the Investigator's discretion, until progression Patients in all arms with confirmed PD who, in the Investigator's opinion, continue to receive benefit from their assigned treatment and meet the criteria for treatment in the setting of PD may continue to receive their assigned treatment. If a patient discontinues study drug(s) due to disease progression, the patient will enter survival follow-up. Patients who have discontinued treatment due to toxicity or symptomatic deterioration or who have commenced subsequent anticancer therapy, will have tumor assessments until confirmed PD and will be followed for survival

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Keywords
Hepatocellular Carcinoma Non-Resectable

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1324 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Arm 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Durvalumab
Arm Title
Arm 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab (Regimen 1)
Arm Title
Arm 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Durvalumab in combination with tremelimumab (Regimen 2)
Arm Title
Arm 4
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Sorafenib
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Durvalumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
MEDI4736
Intervention Description
Durvalumab IV (intravenous infusion).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tremelimumab (Regimen 1)
Intervention Description
Tremelimumab IV (intravenous infusion).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Tremelimumab (Regimen 2)
Intervention Description
Tremelimumab IV (intravenous infusion).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Sorafenib
Intervention Description
Sorafenib, as per standard of care
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Durvalumab (Regimen 1)
Intervention Description
Durvalumab IV (intravenous infusion).
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Durvalumab (Regimen 2)
Intervention Description
Durvalumab IV (intravenous infusion).
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival (OS) - Treme 300 mg x1 Dose + Durva 1500 mg vs Sora 400 mg
Description
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause, regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy. Any participant not known to have died at the DCO date was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. If the last known date alive or if the date of death was after the DCO date, participants were censored at the DCO date. This primary outcome measure presents OS analysis of Treme 300mg x1 dose + Durva 1500 mg vs Sora 400 mg at the time of the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021).
Time Frame
From the date of randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Overall Survival (OS) - Durva 1500 mg vs Sora 400 mg
Description
OS was defined as the time from the date of randomization until death due to any cause, regardless of whether the participant withdrew from randomized therapy or received another anticancer therapy. Any participant not known to have died at the DCO date was censored based on the last recorded date on which the participant was known to be alive. If the last known date alive or if the date of death was after the DCO date, participants were censored at the DCO date. This secondary outcome measure presents OS analysis of Durva 1500 mg vs Sora 400 mg at the time of the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021).
Time Frame
From the date of randomization until death due to any cause, assessed up to the data cut-off date (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).
Title
Overall Survival (OS) at 18, 24, and 36 Months After Randomization
Description
Percentage of participants who were alive at fixed time points (18, 24, and 36 months) after randomization. The estimated percentage of survival along with the 95% confidence interval were calculated using Kaplan-Meier technique on the full analysis set.
Time Frame
At 18, 24, and 36 months post-randomization. Assessed at the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021).
Title
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Description
PFS (per Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors, version 1.1 [RECIST 1.1] using Investigator assessments) was defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of objective disease progression or death by any cause in the absence of progression, regardless of whether the patient withdrew from study treatment or received another anticancer therapy prior to progression. Progression (i.e., PD) was defined as a at least 20% increase in the sum of diameters of TLs, taking as reference the smallest previous sum of diameters (nadir) - this includes the baseline sum if that is the smallest on study. In addition to the relative increase of 20%, the sum must also demonstrate an absolute increase of at least 5 mm from nadir.
Time Frame
Tumor scans performed at baseline, every 8 weeks for the first 48 weeks following randomization, and every 12 weeks thereafter until RECIST 1.1-defined progression. Assessed up to DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months)
Title
Time To Progression (TTP)
Description
TTP was defined as the time from randomization until objective tumor progression in the absence of death. If participants died without tumor progression, they were censored at the time of death.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization until objective tumor progression, assessed until the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).
Title
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
Description
ORR (per RECIST 1.1 as assessed by the Investigator) was defined as the number (%) of participants with at least 1 confirmed visit response of CR or PR until progression, or the last evaluable assessment in the absence of progression. Participants who go off treatment without progression, receive a subsequent therapy, and then respond will not be included as responders in the ORR. Complete response (ie., CR) was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to <10 mm. Partial response (ie., PR) was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameter of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization until objective tumor progression, assessed until the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).
Title
Disease Control Rate (DCR)
Description
Number (%) of participants with a Best Objective Response (BoR) of CR, PR, or SD. Complete response (ie., CR) was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to <10 mm. Partial response (ie., PR) was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameter of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters. Stable disease (ie., SD) was defined as neither sufficient decrease in sum of diameters to qualify for PR nor sufficient increase to qualify for progression.
Time Frame
From the date of randomization until objective tumor progression or date of death, assessed until the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).
Title
Duration of Objective Response (DoR)
Description
Time from the date of first documented confirmed response (complete or partial response) until the first date of documented progression or death in the absence of disease progression. Complete response (ie., CR) was defined as disappearance of all target lesions (TLs) since baseline. Any pathological lymph nodes selected as TLs must have a reduction in short axis diameter to <10 mm. Partial response (ie., PR) was defined as at least a 30% decrease in the sum of the diameter of TL, taking as reference the baseline sum of diameters.
Time Frame
From the date of first documented response until the first date of documented progression or death, assessed until the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).
Title
Overall Survival (OS) by PD-L1
Description
Overall survival by baseline PD-L1 expression levels (positive vs. negative). PD-L1 expression level is based on the Tumor and Immune Cell Positivity (TIP) score method as: PD-L1 Positive (TIP ≥ 1%) or PD-L1 Negative (TIP < 1%).
Time Frame
From the date of randomization until death due to any cause, assessed until the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).
Title
EORTC QLQ-C30 Time to Global Health Status/QoL Deterioration
Description
European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) 30-item core quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-C30), which consists of 30 questions combined to produce a global health status/QoL scale. Higher scores indicate better health. A clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as a decrease in the score from baseline of ≥10. Time to deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that is confirmed at a subsequent visit or death by any cause in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether the patient discontinues study drug(s) or receives another anticancer therapy.
Time Frame
At baseline and every 8 weeks for the first 48 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter until death or the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021), assessed up to approximately 46 months.
Title
EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Time to Symptom (Abdominal Pain) Deterioration
Description
EORTC 18-item hepatocellular cancer health-related quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-HCC18) is an 18-item questionnaire design used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30, which includes 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, jaundice, body image, nutrition, pain, fever, sex life and abdominal swelling. A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. A clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as an increase in the score from baseline of ≥10. Time to deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that is confirmed at a subsequent visit or death by any cause in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether the patient discontinues study drug(s) or receives another anticancer therapy.
Time Frame
At baseline and every 8 weeks for the first 48 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter until death or the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021), assessed up to approximately 46 months.
Title
EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Time to Symptom (Shoulder Pain) Deterioration
Description
EORTC 18-item hepatocellular cancer health-related quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-HCC18) is an 18-item questionnaire design used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30, which includes 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, jaundice, body image, nutrition, pain, fever, sex life and abdominal swelling. A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. A clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as an increase in the score from baseline of ≥10. Time to deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that is confirmed at a subsequent visit or death by any cause in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether the patient discontinues study drug(s) or receives another anticancer therapy.
Time Frame
At baseline and every 8 weeks for the first 48 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter until death or the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021), assessed up to approximately 46 months.
Title
EORTC QLQ-HCC18 Time to Symptom (Abdominal Swelling) Deterioration
Description
EORTC 18-item hepatocellular cancer health-related quality of life questionnaire (QLQ-HCC18) is an 18-item questionnaire design used along with the 30-item EORTC QLQ-C30, which includes 8 symptom scales such as fatigue, jaundice, body image, nutrition, pain, fever, sex life and abdominal swelling. A high score for a symptom scale/item represents a high level of symptomatology/problem. A clinically meaningful deterioration is defined as an increase in the score from baseline of ≥10. Time to deterioration is defined as the time from the date of randomization until the date of the first clinically meaningful deterioration that is confirmed at a subsequent visit or death by any cause in the absence of a clinically meaningful deterioration, regardless of whether the patient discontinues study drug(s) or receives another anticancer therapy.
Time Frame
At baseline and every 8 weeks for the first 48 weeks and then every 12 weeks thereafter until death or the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021), assessed up to approximately 46 months.
Title
Presence of ADA for Durvalumab
Description
Number of participants with Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) response to Durvalumab. ADA positive post-baseline only was also referred to as treatment-induced ADA. Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as the sum of treatment-induced ADA and treatment-boosted ADA. Results are reported as number of participants with ADA responses to Durvalumab for each indicated category.
Time Frame
Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 12 and at 3 months after the last dose of durvalumab. Assessed until the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021, to a maximum of approximately 46 months).
Title
Presence of ADA for Tremelimumab
Description
Number of participants with Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) response to Tremelimumab. ADA positive post-baseline only was also referred to as treatment-induced ADA. Treatment-emergent ADA was defined as the sum of treatment-induced ADA and treatment-boosted ADA. Results are reported as number of participants with ADA responses to Tremelimumab for each indicated category.
Time Frame
Samples were collected on Day 1 (Week 0), Week 12 and at 3 months after the last dose of tremelimumab. Assessed up to approximately 46 months after the first randomization.
Title
Summary of Durvalumab Concentration Over Time
Description
Blood sample were collected at pre-specified timepoints and Durvalumab concentrations in serum (ug/mL) were reported over time.
Time Frame
To evaluate the PK of Durvalumab, samples were collected pre-dose at week 4 and week 12 and post-dose at week 12. Assessed at the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021).
Title
Summary of Tremelimumab Concentration Over Time
Description
Blood sample were collected at pre-specified timepoints and Tremelimumab concentrations in serum (ug/mL) were reported over time.
Time Frame
To evaluate the PK of Tremelimumab, samples were collected at week 0 (post-dose), week 4, and week 12. Assessed at the final analysis DCO (27Aug2021).

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
100 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion criteria HCC based on histopathological confirmation No prior systemic therapy for HCC Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) stage B (that is not eligible for locoregional therapy) or stage C Child-Pugh Score class A ECOG performance status of 0 or 1 at enrollment Exclusion criteria Hepatic encephalopathy within past 12 months or requirement for medication to prevent or control encephalopathy Clinically meaningful ascites Main portal vein tumor thrombosis Active or prior documented GI bleeding (eg, esophageal varices or ulcer bleeding) within 12 months HBV and HVC co-infection, or HBV and Hep D co-infection
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90048
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Orange
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92868
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94158
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Washington
State/Province
District of Columbia
ZIP/Postal Code
20007
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Fort Myers
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33916
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Westwood
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66205
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Baltimore
State/Province
Maryland
ZIP/Postal Code
21231
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ann Arbor
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48109
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Rochester
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
New York
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10065
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Charlotte
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28262
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Portland
State/Province
Oregon
ZIP/Postal Code
97213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pittsburgh
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15237
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
74235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75216
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dallas
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75235
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77030
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Houston
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
77090
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Murray
State/Province
Utah
ZIP/Postal Code
84107
Country
United States
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Barretos
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Curitiba
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Florianopolis
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Porto Alegre
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Rio de Janeiro
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sao Paulo
Country
Brazil
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Calgary
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T2N 4N2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Edmonton
State/Province
Alberta
ZIP/Postal Code
T6G 1Z2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hamilton
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
L8V 5C2
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kingston
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
K7L 2V7
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
London
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
N6A 4L6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Toronto
State/Province
Ontario
ZIP/Postal Code
M4N 3M5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Montreal
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
H2X 0A9
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Quebec City
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
G1R 2J6
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sherbrooke
State/Province
Quebec
ZIP/Postal Code
J1H 5N4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Beijing
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Changchun
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Changsha
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chengdu
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dalian
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Fuzhou
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Guangzhou
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hangzhou
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Harbin
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hefei
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nanchang
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nanjing
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nanning
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Shanghai
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Suzhou
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Wuhan
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Xian
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Zhengzhou
Country
China
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Clichy
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lile
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Marseille
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Montpellier
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nancy
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nantes
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nice
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pessac
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Poitiers
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Reims
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Rouen
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Saint-Etienne
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Toulouse
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Villejuif
Country
France
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Aachen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Essen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hannover
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Heidelberg
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Koeln
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Leipzig
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mainz
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Muenchen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tuebingen
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ulm
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hong Kong
Country
Hong Kong
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bangalore
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bhubneshwar
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chennai
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hubli
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hyderabad
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Karmsad
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mumbai
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nashik
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
New Delhi
Country
India
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Benevento
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Meldola
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Milano
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Napoli
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Perugia
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pisa
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Roma
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Rozzano
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bunkyoku
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chiba
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Fukuoka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hiroshima
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Iizuka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kanazawa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kotoku
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kumamoto
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kurume
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Matsuyama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Mitakashi
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Musashino
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nagoya
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ogaki
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Okayama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Osaka Sayama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Osaka
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Saga
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Sapporo
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Shiwa
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Suntogun
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tsu
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Yokohama
Country
Japan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ilsan
State/Province
Gyeonggi-do
ZIP/Postal Code
10408
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seongnam-si
State/Province
Gyeonggi-do
ZIP/Postal Code
13620
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Busan
ZIP/Postal Code
49241
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Daegu
ZIP/Postal Code
41944
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
3080
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
3722
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
5505
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Seoul
ZIP/Postal Code
6351
Country
Korea, Republic of
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Moscow
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Murmansk
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Nizhniy Novgorod
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Novosibirsk
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Obninsk
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Omsk
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Saint Petersburg
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Ufa
Country
Russian Federation
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Barcelona
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Oviedo
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Pamplona Madrid
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Santander
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chiayi
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kaohsiung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Taichung
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Tainan
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Taipei
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Taoyuan
Country
Taiwan
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Bangkok
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Chang Mai
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Khon Kaen
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Phitsanulok
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Songkhla
Country
Thailand
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Dnipro
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
IvanoFrankivsk
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kharkiv
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kropyvnitskyi
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Kyiv
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Lviv
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Odesa
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Uzhgorod
Country
Ukraine
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hanoi
Country
Vietnam
Facility Name
Research Site
City
Hochiminh
Country
Vietnam

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Links:
URL
https://filehosting-v2.pharmacm.com/api/Attachment/Download?tenantId=80217111&amp;parentIdentifier=D419CC00002&amp;attachmentIdentifier=5492a658-0cae-4a53-9c5f-2c7d7dd2f180&amp;fileName=419CC00002CSP_redacted.pdf&amp;versionIdentifier=
Description
CSP_redacted
URL
https://filehosting-v2.pharmacm.com/api/Attachment/Download?tenantId=80217111&amp;parentIdentifier=D419CC00002&amp;attachmentIdentifier=dfa10daf-41b0-454d-ab99-f62959a00fdc&amp;fileName=D419CC00002_SAP_redacted.pdf&amp;versionIdentifier=
Description
SAP_redacted
URL
https://filehosting-v2.pharmacm.com/api/Attachment/Download?tenantId=80217111&amp;parentIdentifier=D419CC00002&amp;attachmentIdentifier=7f90991f-10dd-4176-8b36-c5535f3ba6d6&amp;fileName=D419CC00002_CSR__synopsis_redacted.pdf&amp;versionIdentifier=
Description
CSR_synopsis

Learn more about this trial

Study of Durvalumab and Tremelimumab as First-line Treatment in Patients With Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs