Cervical Spine Thrust Joint Manipulation for Temporomandibular Disorder
Primary Purpose
Temporomandibular Disorder
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Cervical Spine Thrust Joint Manipulation
Cervical Spine Sham Manipulation
Home Program
Suboccipital Release
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional treatment trial for Temporomandibular Disorder focused on measuring Temporomandibular joint, Physical Therapy, Cervical spine thrust joint manipulation, therapy, exercise, Temporomandibular Disorders
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- 18-65 y/o
- primary complaint of TMD pain
- positive TMD screen
- proficiency in English language
- availability to attend 4 sessions
- minimum level of disability (NPRS 2 or greater)
- minimum level of disability (pain free mouth opening 50 mm or less).
Exclusion Criteria:
- traumatic onset of symptoms
- whiplash in the last 6 weeks
- prior neck surgery
- medical red flags suggestive on on-musculoskeletal origin of pain, systemic disease, or neurological disease
- contraindications to thrust joint manipulation (TJM),
- previous TJM in the last 3 months
- Worker's compensation
- pending litigation regarding pain or injury.
Sites / Locations
- Rock Valley Physical Therapy
- Rock Valley Physical Therapy
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Sham Comparator
Arm Label
Cervical Spine Thrust Joint Manipulation
Cervical Spine Sham Manipulation
Arm Description
Thrust Manipulation delivered to C0/1 and C2/3 on both the right and left side
Sham Manipulation delivered to C0/1 and C2/3 on both the right and left side
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
Change in Maximal Mouth Opening Range of Motion (mm)
Jaw ROM, mouth opening
Change in Pain with Numeric Pain Rating Scale
NPRS, self-reported intensity of pain on 0-10 pain rating scale
Change in Function with Jaw Functional Limitation Scale
JFLS, self report jaw functions rated 0-10 based on difficulty
Change in Fear with Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-TMD version
self report scale to assess level of fear rating 12 items on a 1-4 scale
Global Rating of Change
perception of overall change in a self report scale from -7 to +7
Secondary Outcome Measures
Change in Function with Neck Disability Index
10 item self report assessment of neck disability
Change in Function with TMD Disability Index
10 item self report assessment of jaw dysfunction
Patient Acceptable Symptom State
Self report acceptable nature of current state
Change in Cervical Spine range of motion
bubble inclinometer measurement of neck motion
Change in Pain pressure threshold
digital algometer assessment of threshold
PHQ-2 Depression Screen
2 question screen
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03300297
First Posted
September 28, 2017
Last Updated
February 14, 2019
Sponsor
Bradley University
Collaborators
Nova Southeastern University, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03300297
Brief Title
Cervical Spine Thrust Joint Manipulation for Temporomandibular Disorder
Official Title
Thrust Joint Manipulation to the Cervical Spine in Participants With a Primary Complaint of Temporomandibular Disorder (TMD): A Randomized Clinical Trial
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
February 2019
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 18, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
October 2, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
December 6, 2018 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Bradley University
Collaborators
Nova Southeastern University, University of Nevada, Las Vegas
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
Background: Temporomandibular disorder (TMD) is a common and costly problem that often leads to chronic pain or dysfunction. There is moderate evidence to support physical therapy (PT) interventions for individuals with TMD, yet they continue to be an underserved population. A known relationship between TMD and the cervical spine exists with some evidence to support the use of cervical interventions for TMD. Cervical spine thrust joint manipulation (TJM) is an effective PT intervention that has been explored in a limited fashion for this population.
The purpose of this trial is to determine the immediate and short term (1 and 4 week) effects of cervical TJM delivered by a physical therapist on pain, dysfunction, and perception of change in persons with a primary complaint of TMD. The hypothesis is that all participants will improve, and those in the cervical TJM group may have a greater degree of improvement.
Design: Participants will be randomized to one of two groups and all will receive physical therapy. Forty-two willing participants, age 18-65 with TMD will complete the informed consent process and screening for eligibility before being admitted. Participants will receive a combined treatment of 1) behavioral education, a home exercise program, soft tissue mobilization, and cervical spine TJM or 2) behavioral education, a home exercise program, soft tissue mobilization, and sham manipulation. Participants will receive 4 treatments over a period of 4 weeks.
Significance: The results of this clinical trial will provide evidence relative to the impact of cervical spine TJM in the treatment of persons with TMD. Determining the effectiveness of cervical spine TJM included with a combined treatment approach has clinical implication for physical therapists and the patients they serve.
Detailed Description
Methods: Research design following CONSORT guidelines. A blinded assessor will measure ROM and PPT. Treating therapists will know group allocation and will receive training to standardize assessments and treatments. Self-report and objective measurements will be taken at baseline, immediately after treatment one, and at one and four week follow-ups.
Data Analysis (primary): Sample size estimations were completed using G-Power, a free online downloadable program. An F-test family with ANOVA: Repeated measures, within-between interaction protocol was selected. While it is optimal to power sample size estimations around a functional outcome measure, the limited use of functional measures in this population created an obstacle. The sample size estimation for this project was powered around maximal mouth opening (MMO) as this most closely relates to function in the TMD population. In order to account for 15% attrition, and maintain equal participants in each arm of this study, the desired sample size is 42 participants.
A 2 x 4 mixed model analysis of variance (ANOVA) will be used with treatment group as the between-subjects factor and time as the within-subjects factor. Separate ANOVAs will be performed for dependent variables and the hypothesis of interest will be group by time interaction for each ANOVA.
To determine if missing data points associated with dropouts were missing at random or missing for systematic reasons, we will perform Little's Missing Completely at Random (MCAR) Test. Intention to treat analysis will be performed by using expectation maximization whereby missing data are computed using regression equations. Planned pair-wise comparisons will examine the difference between baseline and follow-up periods using the Bonferroni equality at an alpha level of 0.05.
Success will be dichotomized using the GROC scale. A cut-off score of +5 or higher on the GROC will be used as a measure of success. Correlations between outcome measures (change scores) and success will be analyzed using an independent t-test to determine if differences between groups exist. Number needed to treat (NNT) will be calculated. Correlations among dependent variables will be analyzed with Pearson/Spearman correlations. Examples include the following: correlation between NDI and jaw functional measures, correlation among PPT at various areas tested, and correlation between change in ROM and change in functional scores. Data analysis will include 95% confidence intervals, and tables, charts, or other figures will be utilized to display findings to enhance reader understanding. Effect size of primary outcome measures including jaw ROM, JFLS, and TMD Disability Index will be calculated and reported. If there is no significant difference between groups noted, a post-hoc power analysis will be performed to determine the risk of Type II error.
Data Safety Plan/Subject Confidentiality: The PI will be responsible for educating all clinicians, research assistants, and front office staff with RVPT, Bradley University, and UNLV in confidentiality measures and data safety plans. This information will be part of the live training and included in the Manuals of Standard Operating Procedures. The PI will also periodically check in with each participating clinician, blinded assessor, and clinic office staff member to review procedures and monitor recruitment and retention. This check will occur once per month over the phone.
Standard Operating Procedures: Manual developed and used in training.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Temporomandibular Disorder
Keywords
Temporomandibular joint, Physical Therapy, Cervical spine thrust joint manipulation, therapy, exercise, Temporomandibular Disorders
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Participants will be randomly assigned to one of two intervention groups. Both will receive intervention and one group will receive cervical spine thrust joint manipulation while the other receives sham manipulation.
Masking
ParticipantOutcomes Assessor
Masking Description
Participants will be blinded to group allocation. Blind assessors will be utilized to measure objective change in range of motion and pain pressure threshold.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Cervical Spine Thrust Joint Manipulation
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Thrust Manipulation delivered to C0/1 and C2/3 on both the right and left side
Arm Title
Cervical Spine Sham Manipulation
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
Sham Manipulation delivered to C0/1 and C2/3 on both the right and left side
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Cervical Spine Thrust Joint Manipulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Grade V manipulation
Intervention Description
High velocity, short amplitude thrust to the cervical spine
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Cervical Spine Sham Manipulation
Intervention Description
Manipulative hold position shy of end range without a thrust
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Home Program
Intervention Description
therapeutic exercise program and education
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Suboccipital Release
Other Intervention Name(s)
soft tissue mobilization
Intervention Description
suboccipital soft tissue mobilization
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Maximal Mouth Opening Range of Motion (mm)
Description
Jaw ROM, mouth opening
Time Frame
baseline, immediate, 1 week, 4 week
Title
Change in Pain with Numeric Pain Rating Scale
Description
NPRS, self-reported intensity of pain on 0-10 pain rating scale
Time Frame
baseline, immediate, 1 week, 4 week
Title
Change in Function with Jaw Functional Limitation Scale
Description
JFLS, self report jaw functions rated 0-10 based on difficulty
Time Frame
baseline, 1 week, 4 week, 3 month, 6 month
Title
Change in Fear with Tampa Scale of Kinesiophobia-TMD version
Description
self report scale to assess level of fear rating 12 items on a 1-4 scale
Time Frame
baseline, 1 week, 4 week, 3 month, 6 month
Title
Global Rating of Change
Description
perception of overall change in a self report scale from -7 to +7
Time Frame
immediate, 1 week, 4 week
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change in Function with Neck Disability Index
Description
10 item self report assessment of neck disability
Time Frame
baseline, 1 week, 4 week, 3 month, 6 month
Title
Change in Function with TMD Disability Index
Description
10 item self report assessment of jaw dysfunction
Time Frame
baseline, 1 week, 4 week, 3 month, 6 month
Title
Patient Acceptable Symptom State
Description
Self report acceptable nature of current state
Time Frame
4 week, 3 month, 6 month
Title
Change in Cervical Spine range of motion
Description
bubble inclinometer measurement of neck motion
Time Frame
baseline, immediate, 1 week, 4 week
Title
Change in Pain pressure threshold
Description
digital algometer assessment of threshold
Time Frame
baseline, immediate, 1 week, 4 week
Title
PHQ-2 Depression Screen
Description
2 question screen
Time Frame
baseline
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
18-65 y/o
primary complaint of TMD pain
positive TMD screen
proficiency in English language
availability to attend 4 sessions
minimum level of disability (NPRS 2 or greater)
minimum level of disability (pain free mouth opening 50 mm or less).
Exclusion Criteria:
traumatic onset of symptoms
whiplash in the last 6 weeks
prior neck surgery
medical red flags suggestive on on-musculoskeletal origin of pain, systemic disease, or neurological disease
contraindications to thrust joint manipulation (TJM),
previous TJM in the last 3 months
Worker's compensation
pending litigation regarding pain or injury.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Breanna C Reynolds, DPT
Organizational Affiliation
Bradley University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Rock Valley Physical Therapy
City
Peoria
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61614
Country
United States
Facility Name
Rock Valley Physical Therapy
City
Washington
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
61571
Country
United States
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
22036893
Citation
Moher D, Hopewell S, Schulz KF, Montori V, Gotzsche PC, Devereaux PJ, Elbourne D, Egger M, Altman DG; CONSORT. CONSORT 2010 explanation and elaboration: updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. Int J Surg. 2012;10(1):28-55. doi: 10.1016/j.ijsu.2011.10.001. Epub 2011 Oct 12.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24579796
Citation
Harrison AL, Thorp JN, Ritzline PD. A proposed diagnostic classification of patients with temporomandibular disorders: implications for physical therapists. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2014 Mar;44(3):182-97. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2014.4847.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25240990
Citation
Kraus SL. Characteristics of 511 patients with temporomandibular disorders referred for physical therapy. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol. 2014 Oct;118(4):432-9. doi: 10.1016/j.oooo.2014.06.005. Epub 2014 Jul 2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26144684
Citation
Martins WR, Blasczyk JC, Aparecida Furlan de Oliveira M, Lagoa Goncalves KF, Bonini-Rocha AC, Dugailly PM, de Oliveira RJ. Efficacy of musculoskeletal manual approach in the treatment of temporomandibular joint disorder: A systematic review with meta-analysis. Man Ther. 2016 Feb;21:10-7. doi: 10.1016/j.math.2015.06.009. Epub 2015 Jun 25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26294683
Citation
Armijo-Olivo S, Pitance L, Singh V, Neto F, Thie N, Michelotti A. Effectiveness of Manual Therapy and Therapeutic Exercise for Temporomandibular Disorders: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. Phys Ther. 2016 Jan;96(1):9-25. doi: 10.2522/ptj.20140548. Epub 2015 Aug 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16649894
Citation
McNeely ML, Armijo Olivo S, Magee DJ. A systematic review of the effectiveness of physical therapy interventions for temporomandibular disorders. Phys Ther. 2006 May;86(5):710-25.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27472523
Citation
Paco M, Peleteiro B, Duarte J, Pinho T. The Effectiveness of Physiotherapy in the Management of Temporomandibular Disorders: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. J Oral Facial Pain Headache. 2016 Summer;30(3):210-20. doi: 10.11607/ofph.1661.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25883963
Citation
Silveira A, Gadotti IC, Armijo-Olivo S, Biasotto-Gonzalez DA, Magee D. Jaw dysfunction is associated with neck disability and muscle tenderness in subjects with and without chronic temporomandibular disorders. Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:512792. doi: 10.1155/2015/512792. Epub 2015 Mar 26.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20524969
Citation
Olivo SA, Fuentes J, Major PW, Warren S, Thie NM, Magee DJ. The association between neck disability and jaw disability. J Oral Rehabil. 2010 Sep;37(9):670-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2010.02098.x. Epub 2010 May 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19627454
Citation
La Touche R, Fernandez-de-las-Penas C, Fernandez-Carnero J, Escalante K, Angulo-Diaz-Parreno S, Paris-Alemany A, Cleland JA. The effects of manual therapy and exercise directed at the cervical spine on pain and pressure pain sensitivity in patients with myofascial temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Rehabil. 2009 Sep;36(9):644-52. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2842.2009.01980.x. Epub 2009 Jul 14.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
22874091
Citation
La Touche R, Paris-Alemany A, Mannheimer JS, Angulo-Diaz-Parreno S, Bishop MD, Lopez-Valverde-Centeno A, von Piekartz H, Fernandez-Carnero J. Does mobilization of the upper cervical spine affect pain sensitivity and autonomic nervous system function in patients with cervico-craniofacial pain?: A randomized-controlled trial. Clin J Pain. 2013 Mar;29(3):205-15. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318250f3cd.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21965492
Citation
Gonzalez YM, Schiffman E, Gordon SM, Seago B, Truelove EL, Slade G, Ohrbach R. Development of a brief and effective temporomandibular disorder pain screening questionnaire: reliability and validity. J Am Dent Assoc. 2011 Oct;142(10):1183-91. doi: 10.14219/jada.archive.2011.0088.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17185065
Citation
Kraus S. Temporomandibular disorders, head and orofacial pain: cervical spine considerations. Dent Clin North Am. 2007 Jan;51(1):161-93, vii. doi: 10.1016/j.cden.2006.10.001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16813476
Citation
Medlicott MS, Harris SR. A systematic review of the effectiveness of exercise, manual therapy, electrotherapy, relaxation training, and biofeedback in the management of temporomandibular disorder. Phys Ther. 2006 Jul;86(7):955-73.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26059857
Citation
Calixtre LB, Moreira RF, Franchini GH, Alburquerque-Sendin F, Oliveira AB. Manual therapy for the management of pain and limited range of motion in subjects with signs and symptoms of temporomandibular disorder: a systematic review of randomised controlled trials. J Oral Rehabil. 2015 Nov;42(11):847-61. doi: 10.1111/joor.12321. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19243721
Citation
Mansilla-Ferragut P, Fernandez-de-Las Penas C, Alburquerque-Sendin F, Cleland JA, Bosca-Gandia JJ. Immediate effects of atlanto-occipital joint manipulation on active mouth opening and pressure pain sensitivity in women with mechanical neck pain. J Manipulative Physiol Ther. 2009 Feb;32(2):101-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jmpt.2008.12.003.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20436241
Citation
Oliveira-Campelo NM, Rubens-Rebelatto J, Marti N-Vallejo FJ, Alburquerque-Sendi N F, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C. The immediate effects of atlanto-occipital joint manipulation and suboccipital muscle inhibition technique on active mouth opening and pressure pain sensitivity over latent myofascial trigger points in the masticatory muscles. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther. 2010 May;40(5):310-7. doi: 10.2519/jospt.2010.3257.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
18018993
Citation
Mulet M, Decker KL, Look JO, Lenton PA, Schiffman EL. A randomized clinical trial assessing the efficacy of adding 6 x 6 exercises to self-care for the treatment of masticatory myofascial pain. J Orofac Pain. 2007 Fall;21(4):318-28.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24422022
Citation
Armijo-Olivo S, Magee D. Cervical musculoskeletal impairments and temporomandibular disorders. J Oral Maxillofac Res. 2013 Jan 1;3(4):e4. doi: 10.5037/jomr.2012.3404. eCollection 2013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19945351
Citation
La Touche R, Fernandez-de-Las-Penas C, Fernandez-Carnero J, Diaz-Parreno S, Paris-Alemany A, Arendt-Nielsen L. Bilateral mechanical-pain sensitivity over the trigeminal region in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain. J Pain. 2010 Mar;11(3):256-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.07.003. Epub 2009 Nov 27.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27383698
Citation
Calixtre LB, Gruninger BL, Haik MN, Alburquerque-Sendin F, Oliveira AB. Effects of cervical mobilization and exercise on pain, movement and function in subjects with temporomandibular disorders: a single group pre-post test. J Appl Oral Sci. 2016 May-Jun;24(3):188-97. doi: 10.1590/1678-775720150240.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20226365
Citation
Cuccia AM, Caradonna C, Annunziata V, Caradonna D. Osteopathic manual therapy versus conventional conservative therapy in the treatment of temporomandibular disorders: a randomized controlled trial. J Bodyw Mov Ther. 2010 Apr;14(2):179-84. doi: 10.1016/j.jbmt.2009.08.002. Epub 2009 Sep 20.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20598804
Citation
Visscher CM, Ohrbach R, van Wijk AJ, Wilkosz M, Naeije M. The Tampa Scale for Kinesiophobia for Temporomandibular Disorders (TSK-TMD). Pain. 2010 Sep;150(3):492-500. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2010.06.002. Epub 2010 Jul 3.
Results Reference
background
Learn more about this trial
Cervical Spine Thrust Joint Manipulation for Temporomandibular Disorder
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs