search
Back to results

London Investigation Into diElectric Scanning of Lesions (LIESL)

Primary Purpose

Breast Cancer

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
MARIA scan
Sponsored by
Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Breast Cancer

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)FemaleDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Attending a symptomatic breast care clinic OR Patients who have a diagnosed or suspected breast cancer (P5/M5/U5/B5).
  • Female sex
  • 18 years or older.
  • Able to provide informed consent.
  • Not in any identified, vulnerable group.

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Unable to mount MARIA™ patient bed using provided 2-step
  • Unable to lie in the prone position
  • Patients who have undergone biopsy less than 5 days before the MARIA™ scan
  • Patients with implanted electronics.
  • Patients with breast implants.
  • Patients with nipple piercings (unless they are removed prior to the MARIA™ scan)
  • Breast sizes smaller than 197ml or greater than 1L in volume

Sites / Locations

    Arms of the Study

    Arm 1

    Arm 2

    Arm 3

    Arm Type

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Experimental

    Arm Label

    Breast cancer accuracy

    Imaging characteristics and performance

    Tumour response in neoadjuvant treatment

    Arm Description

    Patients with a known or suspected (and subsequently proven) breast cancer

    Patients attending the symptomatic clinic

    Patients who are being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine treatment

    Outcomes

    Primary Outcome Measures

    Proportion of patients with breast cancer in whom breast cancer is correctly identified by MARIA
    Comparison to histopathology result
    Sensitivity and specificity of MARIA for a range of findings to include, simple cysts, fibroadenomata, and malignant lesions. As judged against the final diagnosis at discharge, which may be based on clinical findings, imaging and pathology data.
    Comparison with clinical, radiology and pathology findings
    Proportion of post-operative patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, correctly identified by MARIA with complete response or residual disease, as compared to surgical histology.
    Comparison of response to surgical histology

    Secondary Outcome Measures

    Compare the detection of breast cancer from MARIA with the detection from mammography by the sub-group of histology type.
    Comparison to Mammography and Pathology result
    Compare the detection of breast cancer from MARIA with the detection from mammography by sub-group of mammographic density.
    Comparison to Mammography and Pathology result
    Compare the detection of breast cancer from MARIA with the detection from mammography in the overall patient group.
    Comparison to Mammography and Pathology result
    Assessment of data repeatability (test re-test) of MARIA assessment results on patients with diagnostic follow-up imaging.
    Comparison with prior MARIA scan when returning for further imaging
    Investigate the performance of MARIA in the estimation of residual tumour size compared to the final surgical histology results in the case of patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy.
    The correlation between the pathological features of the lesion and the imaging features as determined from MARIA including presence of features, shape and size.
    Patient tolerance of MARIA (a non-compressing, non-ionising modality)
    Questionnaire measurement, Quantitative answers.

    Full Information

    First Posted
    September 21, 2017
    Last Updated
    October 4, 2017
    Sponsor
    Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
    Collaborators
    Micrima, Ltd.
    search

    1. Study Identification

    Unique Protocol Identification Number
    NCT03302819
    Brief Title
    London Investigation Into diElectric Scanning of Lesions
    Acronym
    LIESL
    Official Title
    Performance Evaluation of the MARIA (Multi Static Array Processing of Radiowave Image Acquisition) Radar Breast Imaging System in Patients With Breast Cancer and in Patients Assessed in the Symptomatic Breast Clinic.
    Study Type
    Interventional

    2. Study Status

    Record Verification Date
    September 2017
    Overall Recruitment Status
    Unknown status
    Study Start Date
    November 1, 2017 (Anticipated)
    Primary Completion Date
    November 1, 2018 (Anticipated)
    Study Completion Date
    December 1, 2018 (Anticipated)

    3. Sponsor/Collaborators

    Responsible Party, by Official Title
    Sponsor
    Name of the Sponsor
    Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
    Collaborators
    Micrima, Ltd.

    4. Oversight

    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
    No
    Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
    No

    5. Study Description

    Brief Summary
    The MARIA breast imaging system is a novel CE-marked radio-frequency (RF) medical imaging device. The system employs an electromagnetic imaging technique that exploits the dielectric contrast between normal and cancerous tissues. The performance and imaging characteristics of MARIA are not yet well demonstrated. The investigators aim to evaluate some aspects of this potentially important new technology.
    Detailed Description
    The early diagnosis of breast cancer is of paramount importance, with a 5-year survival rate of 97% if the cancer is caught "locally", deteriorating to 79% if it has progressed to the "axillary" lymph nodes, and 23% if it has spread to the rest of the body, known as "metastasised." Diagnosis is currently achieved through clinical examination, imaging with mammography (MMG) and/or ultrasound (US) and needle biopsy. Mammography is dependent upon adequate breast compression to allow greater contrast differentiation between tissue structures, this is not only uncomfortable, but in younger women with 'dense' breast tissue the contrast difference between normal tissue and tumour is minimal despite compression. Furthermore mammography uses ionising radiation, which means that a risk/benefit calculation is weighted against repeated or frequent use. Frequently it is necessary to use additional imaging such as ultrasound or MRI for diagnostic support. Breast tumours have an additional property that can distinguish them from normal and this is defined by the dielectric value. This has two components - the dielectric constant, which affects the velocity of propagation of radio waves and therefore their wavelength, and the conductivity, which affects the rate of attenuation. Typically a tumour has a dielectric constant of 45-50 and a conductivity of 2S/m, whereas breast fat is 5-15 and 0.2-1S/m respectively but with considerable range. Normal glandular tissue is intermediate. These differences in dielectric constant enable a consideration of the value of this data in breast cancer diagnosis. Several attempts to exploit this property for imaging have been made. The outcomes have been similar in that the presence of a tumour is detectable, however limitations in depth for detection and mode of the technology were identified. Due to updated technology in the MARIA device, previous limitations from similar studies are not reported to be a problem. This study aims to determine the proportion of patients with breast cancer who are correctly diagnosed by MARIA, and to stratify this by breast density and histological type. In addition a pilot study will be performed to investigate the imaging characteristics and performance of MARIA in the assessment of benign and malignant lesions in patients attending the symptomatic breast clinic. The MARIA scan will be in addition to any standard diagnostic procedures, including imaging, that comprise the standard of care. The scan will require them to lie prone for less than 10 minutes with their breast pendant in an ergonomically-fitted bowl with a thin layer of a coupling fluid (similar to hand moisture in consistency) applied to the surface of the breast. While there is no direct benefit nor detrimental effect from this study to the patients participating, the study has large implications for many women. This study will allow the investigators to test the feasibility of this highly innovating approach to breast cancer, with minimal negative effects or possible complications. This diagnostic modality could prove to be a major step forwards in cancer detection, initially as a complementary source of information that can increase confidence in results obtained from established technologies that are routinely deployed in the clinic.

    6. Conditions and Keywords

    Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
    Breast Cancer

    7. Study Design

    Primary Purpose
    Diagnostic
    Study Phase
    Not Applicable
    Interventional Study Model
    Parallel Assignment
    Masking
    None (Open Label)
    Allocation
    Non-Randomized
    Enrollment
    994 (Anticipated)

    8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

    Arm Title
    Breast cancer accuracy
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Patients with a known or suspected (and subsequently proven) breast cancer
    Arm Title
    Imaging characteristics and performance
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Patients attending the symptomatic clinic
    Arm Title
    Tumour response in neoadjuvant treatment
    Arm Type
    Experimental
    Arm Description
    Patients who are being treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine treatment
    Intervention Type
    Diagnostic Test
    Intervention Name(s)
    MARIA scan
    Intervention Description
    The patient will have an additional MARIA scan along with conventional imaging, pathology and surgical procedures.
    Primary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Proportion of patients with breast cancer in whom breast cancer is correctly identified by MARIA
    Description
    Comparison to histopathology result
    Time Frame
    1 week (after histopathology result)
    Title
    Sensitivity and specificity of MARIA for a range of findings to include, simple cysts, fibroadenomata, and malignant lesions. As judged against the final diagnosis at discharge, which may be based on clinical findings, imaging and pathology data.
    Description
    Comparison with clinical, radiology and pathology findings
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, an average of 1 year
    Title
    Proportion of post-operative patients treated with neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy, correctly identified by MARIA with complete response or residual disease, as compared to surgical histology.
    Description
    Comparison of response to surgical histology
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, an average of 1 year
    Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
    Title
    Compare the detection of breast cancer from MARIA with the detection from mammography by the sub-group of histology type.
    Description
    Comparison to Mammography and Pathology result
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, an average of 1 year
    Title
    Compare the detection of breast cancer from MARIA with the detection from mammography by sub-group of mammographic density.
    Description
    Comparison to Mammography and Pathology result
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, an average of 1 year
    Title
    Compare the detection of breast cancer from MARIA with the detection from mammography in the overall patient group.
    Description
    Comparison to Mammography and Pathology result
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, an average of 1 year
    Title
    Assessment of data repeatability (test re-test) of MARIA assessment results on patients with diagnostic follow-up imaging.
    Description
    Comparison with prior MARIA scan when returning for further imaging
    Time Frame
    After attendance for further imaging, at 1-2 weeks.
    Title
    Investigate the performance of MARIA in the estimation of residual tumour size compared to the final surgical histology results in the case of patients receiving neo-adjuvant chemotherapy or endocrine therapy.
    Description
    The correlation between the pathological features of the lesion and the imaging features as determined from MARIA including presence of features, shape and size.
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, an average of 1 year
    Title
    Patient tolerance of MARIA (a non-compressing, non-ionising modality)
    Description
    Questionnaire measurement, Quantitative answers.
    Time Frame
    Through study completion, an average of 1 year

    10. Eligibility

    Sex
    Female
    Minimum Age & Unit of Time
    18 Years
    Accepts Healthy Volunteers
    No
    Eligibility Criteria
    Inclusion Criteria: Attending a symptomatic breast care clinic OR Patients who have a diagnosed or suspected breast cancer (P5/M5/U5/B5). Female sex 18 years or older. Able to provide informed consent. Not in any identified, vulnerable group. Exclusion Criteria: Unable to mount MARIA™ patient bed using provided 2-step Unable to lie in the prone position Patients who have undergone biopsy less than 5 days before the MARIA™ scan Patients with implanted electronics. Patients with breast implants. Patients with nipple piercings (unless they are removed prior to the MARIA™ scan) Breast sizes smaller than 197ml or greater than 1L in volume
    Central Contact Person:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
    Richard Sidebottom
    Phone
    02073528171
    Ext
    1407
    Email
    richardsidebottom@nhs.net
    Overall Study Officials:
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Steven Allen
    Organizational Affiliation
    Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
    Official's Role
    Study Chair
    First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
    Richard Sidebottom
    Organizational Affiliation
    Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust
    Official's Role
    Principal Investigator

    12. IPD Sharing Statement

    Plan to Share IPD
    No
    Citations:
    PubMed Identifier
    27446970
    Citation
    Preece AW, Craddock I, Shere M, Jones L, Winton HL. MARIA M4: clinical evaluation of a prototype ultrawideband radar scanner for breast cancer detection. J Med Imaging (Bellingham). 2016 Jul;3(3):033502. doi: 10.1117/1.JMI.3.3.033502. Epub 2016 Jul 20.
    Results Reference
    background
    PubMed Identifier
    26442924
    Citation
    Saadatmand S, Bretveld R, Siesling S, Tilanus-Linthorst MM. Influence of tumour stage at breast cancer detection on survival in modern times: population based study in 173,797 patients. BMJ. 2015 Oct 6;351:h4901. doi: 10.1136/bmj.h4901.
    Results Reference
    background

    Learn more about this trial

    London Investigation Into diElectric Scanning of Lesions

    We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs