search
Back to results

Study to Determine the Safety and the Efficacy of Fasinumab Compared to Placebo and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) for Treatment of Adults With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip (FACT OA2)

Primary Purpose

Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Fasinumab
Diclofenac
Celecoxib
Matching placebo
Sponsored by
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Osteoarthritis, Knee

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Key Inclusion Criteria (additional criteria may apply at screening):

  1. A clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria with radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2 for the index joint) at the screening visit.
  2. Willing to discontinue current pain medications and to adhere to study requirements for rescue treatments (acetaminophen/paracetamol to be taken as needed with a maximum daily dose of 2500 mg [countries where 500 mg strength tablets/capsules are available] or 2600 mg [countries where 325 mg strength tablets/capsules are available])
  3. A history of at least 12 weeks of inadequate pain relief or intolerance to analgesics used for pain due to OA of the knee or hip
  4. Currently using a stable dose of NSAID
  5. Willing to discontinue glucosamine sulfate and chondroitin sulfate treatments during the 24 weeks of treatment

Key Exclusion Criteria (additional criteria may apply at screening):

  1. Non-compliance with the numeric rating scale (NRS) recording during the pre-randomization period
  2. History or presence at the screening visit of non-OA inflammatory joint disease, Paget's disease of the spine, pelvis or femur, neuropathic disorders, multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia, tumors or infections of the spinal cord, or renal osteodystrophy
  3. History or presence on imaging of arthropathy, hip or knee dislocation, extensive subchondral cysts, evidence of severe structural damage, bone collapse, or primary metastatic tumor with the exception of chondromas or pathologic fractures
  4. Trauma to the index joint within 3 months prior to the screening visit
  5. Signs or symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome within 6 months of screening
  6. Patient is not a candidate for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)
  7. Is scheduled for a JR surgery to be performed during the study period or who would be unwilling or unable to undergo JR surgery if needed
  8. History or presence at the screening visit of autonomic or diabetic neuropathy, or other peripheral neuropathy, including reflex sympathetic dystrophy
  9. Evidence of autonomic neuropathy as defined in the schedule of assessments (SoAs)
  10. History or diagnosis of chronic autonomic failure syndrome including pure autonomic failure, multiple system atrophy
  11. Use of systemic corticosteroids within 30 days prior to the screening visit. Intra-articular corticosteroids in the index joint within 12 weeks prior to the screening visit, or to any other joint within 30 days prior to the screening visit
  12. Exposure to an anti-NGF antibody prior to the screening visit or known sensitivity or intolerance to anti-NGF antibodies
  13. Women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to practice highly effective contraception prior to the start of the first treatment, during the study, and for at least 20 weeks after the last dose

Sites / Locations

  • Pinnacle Research Group, Llc
  • Horizon Research Partners
  • Clinical Research Advantage, Inc./Warner Family Practice, PC
  • Synexus Central Phoenix Medical Clinic
  • Clinical Research Consortium Arizona
  • Advance Research Center
  • TriWest Research Associates, LLC
  • Paragon Rx Clinical Research, Inc.
  • Catalina Research Institute, LLC
  • Sierra Clinical Research
  • UC Davis Center for Musculoskeletal Health
  • Advanced Research Center, Inc
  • California Research Foundation
  • Paragon Rx Clinical Research, Inc
  • Encompass Clinical Research
  • Westlake Medical Research
  • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.
  • Mountain View Clinical Research
  • New England Research Associates, LLC
  • CRM of Greater New Haven, LLC
  • Stamford Therapeutics Consortium
  • Avail Clinical Research, LLC
  • Lakes Research, LLC
  • AMB Research Center, Inc
  • Allied Biomedical Research Institute
  • Bioclinica Research
  • Gulf Region Clinical Research institute
  • Integral Rheumatology & Immunology Specialists (IRIS)
  • Progressive Medical Research
  • Drug Studies America
  • Georgia Institute For Clinical Research LLC
  • North Georgia Clinical Research
  • Chicago Clinical Research Institute, Inc
  • Affinity Clinical Research Institute
  • Clinical Research Advantage, Inc.
  • MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC
  • L-MARC Research Center
  • Tandem Clinical Research
  • Tufts Medical Center, Inc.
  • Great Lakes Research Group, Inc.
  • Onyx Clinical Research
  • Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.
  • Skyline Medical Center /Radiant Research, Inc.
  • Meridian Clinical Research Associates, LLC
  • Robert Kaplan, D.O.
  • Amici Clinical Research, LLC
  • Albuquerque Clinical Trials, Inc.
  • Drug Trial Brooklyn
  • Northwell Health
  • Drug Trials America
  • Upstate Clinical Research Associates, LLC
  • Carolina Research Center
  • PMG Research of Wilmington LLC
  • The Center For Clinical Research
  • New Horizons Clinical Research
  • Aventiv Research Inc
  • DOC Clinical Research
  • Center for Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
  • Radiant Research, Inc.
  • Piedmont Comprehensive Pain Management Group
  • Radiant Research, Inc.
  • Piedmont Research Partners, LLC
  • Coastal Carolina Research Center at LowCountry Orthopaedics
  • ACME Research, LLC
  • Office of Dr.Ramesh C. Gupta MD
  • West Texas Clinical Research
  • Clinical Investigations Of Texas
  • Synexus USA
  • Charlottesville Medical Research Center LLC
  • Health Research of Hampton Roads, Inc
  • Spokane Joint Replacement Center

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Experimental

Arm Label

Dosing regimen 1

Dosing regimen 2

Dosing regimen 3

Dosing regimen 4

Arm Description

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Scores up to Week 24 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Placebo
WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) in past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (higher pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores up to Week 24 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Placebo
Physical function referred to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 30 Percent (%) Reduction From Baseline up to Week 24 in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Placebo
WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index knee during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate more pain.
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score up to Week 24 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Placebo
The PGA was a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities) and, 5 =very poor (Very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores up to Week 24 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Participants Treated With NSAIDs
WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) in the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (higher pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores up to Week 24 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Participants Treated With NSAIDs
Physical function referred to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty.
Change From Baseline in PGA Score up to Week 24 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Participants Treated With NSAIDs
The PGA was a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities) and, 5 =very poor (Very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Walking Index Joint Pain Score up to Week 24 by Using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scale
Participants reported weekly average walking index joint pain based on NRS. The NRS was nationally recognized numeric scale from 0 to 10, where 0 would demonstrate no pain, 1 to 3 would demonstrate mild pain, 4 to 6 would be moderate pain, 7 to 9 would be severe pain and 10 would be the worst pain possible. Higher score indicated greater pain.
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events
AA was a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive Osteoarthritis (OA) type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee. AAs were also evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy criteria.
Number of Participants With AA Events Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria
DA is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive OA type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee.
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAE was defined as an AE with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
Number of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Events
Potential events of SNS dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist.
Number of Participants With At-least One Peripheral Sensory Adverse Events (AEs)
Any participants with a peripheral sensory event that persisted for 2 months was referred for a neurology or other specialty consultation and reported as an Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI).
Number of Participants Who Underwent a Joint Replacements (JR) Surgery From Baseline up to Week 24
Number of participants who underwent a JR surgery from baseline up to Week 24 were reported.
Number of Participants Who Underwent a Joint Replacements (JR) Surgery From Baseline up to Week 44
Number of participants who underwent a JR surgery from baseline up to follow-up period (Week 44) were reported.
Number of Participants With Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Reported at End of Study (EOS) (Week 72)
An EOS phone contact was conducted at Week 72 following the last dose of study drug (Week 24) to evaluate the number of participants who had undergone or were scheduled for JR surgery.
Serum Concentrations of Functional Fasinumab
Number of Participants With At-least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Development
Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses & titers. Responses categories: Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses < 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, >= 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing.

Full Information

First Posted
October 2, 2017
Last Updated
January 30, 2023
Sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Collaborators
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03304379
Brief Title
Study to Determine the Safety and the Efficacy of Fasinumab Compared to Placebo and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) for Treatment of Adults With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip
Acronym
FACT OA2
Official Title
Phase 3 Randomized, Double-Blind, Multi-Dose, Placebo And NSAID Controlled Study To Evaluate The Efficacy And Safety Of Fasinumab In Patients With Pain Due To Osteoarthritis Of The Knee Or Hip
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
January 2023
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 26, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
December 13, 2019 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
November 9, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Collaborators
Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, Ltd.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The primary objective of the study is to evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared to placebo, when administered for up to 24 weeks in patients with pain due to osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip. The secondary objectives of the study are: To evaluate the efficacy of fasinumab compared to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAID)s, when administered for up to 24 weeks in patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip To assess the safety and tolerability of fasinumab compared to placebo and compared to NSAIDs, when administered for up to 24 weeks in patients with pain due to OA of the knee or hip

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Osteoarthritis, Knee, Osteoarthritis, Hip

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
1650 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Dosing regimen 1
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Dosing regimen 2
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Dosing regimen 3
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Title
Dosing regimen 4
Arm Type
Experimental
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Fasinumab
Other Intervention Name(s)
REGN475, MT-5547
Intervention Description
Solution for injection in pre-filled syringe
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Diclofenac
Other Intervention Name(s)
ZORVOLEX
Intervention Description
NSAID active comparator (capsule)
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Celecoxib
Other Intervention Name(s)
CELEBREX
Intervention Description
NSAID active comparator (capsule)
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Matching placebo
Intervention Description
Fasinumab-matching placebo (solution for injection in pre-filled syringe); NSAID-matching placebo (capsule)
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Change From Baseline in the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) Pain Subscale Scores up to Week 24 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Placebo
Description
WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) in past 48 hours. It was calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a numerical rating scale (NRS) of 0 (no pain) to 10 (higher pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores up to Week 24 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Placebo
Description
Physical function referred to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 24
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percentage of Participants With Greater Than or Equal to (≥) 30 Percent (%) Reduction From Baseline up to Week 24 in WOMAC Pain Subscale Score in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Placebo
Description
WOMAC pain subscale was a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index knee during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum pain) to 10 (maximum pain), where higher scores indicate more pain.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Patient Global Assessment (PGA) Score up to Week 24 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Placebo
Description
The PGA was a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities) and, 5 =very poor (Very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Pain Subscale Scores up to Week 24 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Participants Treated With NSAIDs
Description
WOMAC pain subscale is a 5-item questionnaire used to assess the amount of pain experienced due to osteoarthritis in the index joint (knee or hip) in the past 48 hours. It is calculated as the mean of the scores from the 5 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (no pain) to 10 (higher pain), where higher scores indicated higher pain.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in WOMAC Physical Function Subscale Scores up to Week 24 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Participants Treated With NSAIDs
Description
Physical function referred to participant's ability to move around and perform usual activities of daily living. The WOMAC physical function subscale was a 17-item questionnaire used to assess the degree of difficulty experienced due to osteoarthritis in index joint (knee or hip) during past 48 hours. It was calculated as mean of the scores from 17 individual questions scored on a NRS of 0 (minimum difficulty) to 10 (maximum difficulty), where higher scores indicated maximum difficulty.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in PGA Score up to Week 24 in Participants Treated With Fasinumab Compared to Participants Treated With NSAIDs
Description
The PGA was a patient-rated assessment of current disease state on a 5-point Likert scale where 1 = very good (asymptomatic and no limitation of normal activities), 2 = good (mild symptoms and no limitation of normal activities), 3 = fair (moderate symptoms and limitation of some normal activities), 4 = poor (Severe symptoms and inability to carry out most normal activities) and, 5 =very poor (Very severe symptoms which were intolerable and inability to carry out all normal activities). Higher score indicated severe condition.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 24
Title
Change From Baseline in Weekly Average Walking Index Joint Pain Score up to Week 24 by Using the Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) Pain Scale
Description
Participants reported weekly average walking index joint pain based on NRS. The NRS was nationally recognized numeric scale from 0 to 10, where 0 would demonstrate no pain, 1 to 3 would demonstrate mild pain, 4 to 6 would be moderate pain, 7 to 9 would be severe pain and 10 would be the worst pain possible. Higher score indicated greater pain.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 24
Title
Number of Participants With Adjudicated Arthropathy (AA) Events
Description
AA was a composite term that encompasses the following conditions: Rapidly progressive Osteoarthritis (OA) type 1 and 2, Subchondral insufficiency fractures, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee. AAs were also evaluated to determine if they met Destructive Arthropathy criteria.
Time Frame
Baseline up to follow-up period (Week 44)
Title
Number of Participants With AA Events Meeting Destructive Arthropathy (DA) Criteria
Description
DA is a unique clinical form of rapidly destructive arthropathy over and above that seen in the normal progression of OA. DA criteria can be associated with Rapidly Progressive OA type 2, Subchondral Insufficiency fracture, and Primary Osteonecrosis confirmed by an arthropathy adjudication committee.
Time Frame
Baseline up to follow-up period (Week 44)
Title
Number of Participants With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
Description
An adverse event (AE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence in a participant administered a study drug which may or may not have a causal relationship with the study drug. TEAE was defined as an AE with an onset that occurs after receiving study drug. A serious adverse event (SAE) was defined as any untoward medical occurrence that resulted in any of the following outcomes: death, life-threatening, required initial or prolonged in-patient hospitalization, persistent or significant disability/incapacity, congenital anomaly/birth defect, or considered as medically important event. Any TEAE included participants with both serious and non-serious TEAEs.
Time Frame
Baseline up to follow-up period (Week 44)
Title
Number of Participants With Sympathetic Nervous System (SNS) Dysfunction Events
Description
Potential events of SNS dysfunction were monitored throughout the study through physical examination, AE reporting, assessment of orthostatic hypotension, and the Survey of Autonomic Symptoms. Sympathetic nervous system dysfunction was diagnosed after consultation with an appropriate specialist, such as a neurologist and/or cardiologist.
Time Frame
Baseline up to follow-up period (Week 44)
Title
Number of Participants With At-least One Peripheral Sensory Adverse Events (AEs)
Description
Any participants with a peripheral sensory event that persisted for 2 months was referred for a neurology or other specialty consultation and reported as an Adverse Events of Special Interest (AESI).
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 44
Title
Number of Participants Who Underwent a Joint Replacements (JR) Surgery From Baseline up to Week 24
Description
Number of participants who underwent a JR surgery from baseline up to Week 24 were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 24
Title
Number of Participants Who Underwent a Joint Replacements (JR) Surgery From Baseline up to Week 44
Description
Number of participants who underwent a JR surgery from baseline up to follow-up period (Week 44) were reported.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 44
Title
Number of Participants With Joint Replacement (JR) Surgery Reported at End of Study (EOS) (Week 72)
Description
An EOS phone contact was conducted at Week 72 following the last dose of study drug (Week 24) to evaluate the number of participants who had undergone or were scheduled for JR surgery.
Time Frame
At Week 72
Title
Serum Concentrations of Functional Fasinumab
Time Frame
At Weeks 0, 4, 8, 16, 24 and 44
Title
Number of Participants With At-least One Positive Anti-Drug Antibody (ADA) Development
Description
Immunogenicity was characterized by ADA responses & titers. Responses categories: Pre-existing immunoreactivity - ADA positive response at baseline with all post first dose negative results or positive response at baseline with all post first dose ADA responses < 9-fold over baseline titer levels; Treatment-boosted response - positive response in the assay post first dose, >= 9-fold over baseline titer levels, when baseline results are positive; Treatment-emergent response - ADA positive response post first dose when baseline results = negative or missing.
Time Frame
Baseline up to Week 44

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Key Inclusion Criteria (additional criteria may apply at screening): A clinical diagnosis of osteoarthritis (OA) of the knee or hip based on the American College of Rheumatology criteria with radiologic evidence of OA (K-L score ≥2 for the index joint) at the screening visit. Willing to discontinue current pain medications and to adhere to study requirements for rescue treatments (acetaminophen/paracetamol to be taken as needed with a maximum daily dose of 2500 mg [countries where 500 mg strength tablets/capsules are available] or 2600 mg [countries where 325 mg strength tablets/capsules are available]) A history of at least 12 weeks of inadequate pain relief or intolerance to analgesics used for pain due to OA of the knee or hip Currently using a stable dose of NSAID Willing to discontinue glucosamine sulfate and chondroitin sulfate treatments during the 24 weeks of treatment Key Exclusion Criteria (additional criteria may apply at screening): Non-compliance with the numeric rating scale (NRS) recording during the pre-randomization period History or presence at the screening visit of non-OA inflammatory joint disease, Paget's disease of the spine, pelvis or femur, neuropathic disorders, multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia, tumors or infections of the spinal cord, or renal osteodystrophy History or presence on imaging of arthropathy, hip or knee dislocation, extensive subchondral cysts, evidence of severe structural damage, bone collapse, or primary metastatic tumor with the exception of chondromas or pathologic fractures Trauma to the index joint within 3 months prior to the screening visit Signs or symptoms of carpal tunnel syndrome within 6 months of screening Patient is not a candidate for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) Is scheduled for a JR surgery to be performed during the study period or who would be unwilling or unable to undergo JR surgery if needed History or presence at the screening visit of autonomic or diabetic neuropathy, or other peripheral neuropathy, including reflex sympathetic dystrophy Evidence of autonomic neuropathy as defined in the schedule of assessments (SoAs) History or diagnosis of chronic autonomic failure syndrome including pure autonomic failure, multiple system atrophy Use of systemic corticosteroids within 30 days prior to the screening visit. Intra-articular corticosteroids in the index joint within 12 weeks prior to the screening visit, or to any other joint within 30 days prior to the screening visit Exposure to an anti-NGF antibody prior to the screening visit or known sensitivity or intolerance to anti-NGF antibodies Women of childbearing potential who are unwilling to practice highly effective contraception prior to the start of the first treatment, during the study, and for at least 20 weeks after the last dose
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Clinical Trial Management
Organizational Affiliation
Regeneron Pharmaceuticals
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Pinnacle Research Group, Llc
City
Anniston
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36207
Country
United States
Facility Name
Horizon Research Partners
City
Mobile
State/Province
Alabama
ZIP/Postal Code
36608
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Advantage, Inc./Warner Family Practice, PC
City
Chandler
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Synexus Central Phoenix Medical Clinic
City
Phoenix
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85020
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Consortium Arizona
City
Tempe
State/Province
Arizona
ZIP/Postal Code
85283
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advance Research Center
City
Anaheim
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92805
Country
United States
Facility Name
TriWest Research Associates, LLC
City
El Cajon
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92020
Country
United States
Facility Name
Paragon Rx Clinical Research, Inc.
City
Garden Grove
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92840
Country
United States
Facility Name
Catalina Research Institute, LLC
City
Montclair
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91763
Country
United States
Facility Name
Sierra Clinical Research
City
Roseville
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95661
Country
United States
Facility Name
UC Davis Center for Musculoskeletal Health
City
Sacramento
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
95817
Country
United States
Facility Name
Advanced Research Center, Inc
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92103
Country
United States
Facility Name
California Research Foundation
City
San Diego
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92123
Country
United States
Facility Name
Paragon Rx Clinical Research, Inc
City
Santa Ana
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92703
Country
United States
Facility Name
Encompass Clinical Research
City
Spring Valley
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91978
Country
United States
Facility Name
Westlake Medical Research
City
Thousand Oaks
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
91360
Country
United States
Facility Name
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.
City
Vista
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
92083
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mountain View Clinical Research
City
Denver
State/Province
Colorado
ZIP/Postal Code
80209
Country
United States
Facility Name
New England Research Associates, LLC
City
Bridgeport
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06606
Country
United States
Facility Name
CRM of Greater New Haven, LLC
City
Hamden
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06157
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stamford Therapeutics Consortium
City
Stamford
State/Province
Connecticut
ZIP/Postal Code
06905
Country
United States
Facility Name
Avail Clinical Research, LLC
City
DeLand
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32720
Country
United States
Facility Name
Lakes Research, LLC
City
Miami Lakes
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33014
Country
United States
Facility Name
AMB Research Center, Inc
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33144
Country
United States
Facility Name
Allied Biomedical Research Institute
City
Miami
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33155
Country
United States
Facility Name
Bioclinica Research
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32806
Country
United States
Facility Name
Gulf Region Clinical Research institute
City
Pensacola
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32514
Country
United States
Facility Name
Integral Rheumatology & Immunology Specialists (IRIS)
City
Plantation
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
33324
Country
United States
Facility Name
Progressive Medical Research
City
Port Orange
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32127
Country
United States
Facility Name
Drug Studies America
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30060
Country
United States
Facility Name
Georgia Institute For Clinical Research LLC
City
Marietta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30060
Country
United States
Facility Name
North Georgia Clinical Research
City
Woodstock
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30189
Country
United States
Facility Name
Chicago Clinical Research Institute, Inc
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60607
Country
United States
Facility Name
Affinity Clinical Research Institute
City
Oak Lawn
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60453
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Research Advantage, Inc.
City
Evansville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47714
Country
United States
Facility Name
MediSphere Medical Research Center, LLC
City
Evansville
State/Province
Indiana
ZIP/Postal Code
47714
Country
United States
Facility Name
L-MARC Research Center
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40213
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tandem Clinical Research
City
Marrero
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70072
Country
United States
Facility Name
Tufts Medical Center, Inc.
City
Boston
State/Province
Massachusetts
ZIP/Postal Code
02111
Country
United States
Facility Name
Great Lakes Research Group, Inc.
City
Bay City
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48706
Country
United States
Facility Name
Onyx Clinical Research
City
Caro
State/Province
Michigan
ZIP/Postal Code
48723
Country
United States
Facility Name
Synexus Clinical Research US, Inc.
City
Richfield
State/Province
Minnesota
ZIP/Postal Code
55423
Country
United States
Facility Name
Skyline Medical Center /Radiant Research, Inc.
City
Elkhorn
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68022
Country
United States
Facility Name
Meridian Clinical Research Associates, LLC
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68134
Country
United States
Facility Name
Robert Kaplan, D.O.
City
Las Vegas
State/Province
Nevada
ZIP/Postal Code
89144
Country
United States
Facility Name
Amici Clinical Research, LLC
City
Raritan
State/Province
New Jersey
ZIP/Postal Code
08869
Country
United States
Facility Name
Albuquerque Clinical Trials, Inc.
City
Albuquerque
State/Province
New Mexico
ZIP/Postal Code
87102
Country
United States
Facility Name
Drug Trial Brooklyn
City
Brooklyn
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11230
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwell Health
City
Great Neck
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
11021
Country
United States
Facility Name
Drug Trials America
City
Hartsdale
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10530
Country
United States
Facility Name
Upstate Clinical Research Associates, LLC
City
Williamsville
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
14221
Country
United States
Facility Name
Carolina Research Center
City
Shelby
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28150
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Wilmington LLC
City
Wilmington
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28401
Country
United States
Facility Name
The Center For Clinical Research
City
Winston-Salem
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27103
Country
United States
Facility Name
New Horizons Clinical Research
City
Cincinnati
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45242
Country
United States
Facility Name
Aventiv Research Inc
City
Columbus
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
43213
Country
United States
Facility Name
DOC Clinical Research
City
Dayton
State/Province
Ohio
ZIP/Postal Code
45432
Country
United States
Facility Name
Center for Orthopaedics and Sports Medicine
City
Indiana
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
15701
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc.
City
Anderson
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29621
Country
United States
Facility Name
Piedmont Comprehensive Pain Management Group
City
Greenville
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29601
Country
United States
Facility Name
Radiant Research, Inc.
City
Greer
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29651
Country
United States
Facility Name
Piedmont Research Partners, LLC
City
Indian Land
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29707
Country
United States
Facility Name
Coastal Carolina Research Center at LowCountry Orthopaedics
City
North Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29406
Country
United States
Facility Name
ACME Research, LLC
City
Orangeburg
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29118
Country
United States
Facility Name
Office of Dr.Ramesh C. Gupta MD
City
Memphis
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
38119
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Texas Clinical Research
City
Lubbock
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
79410
Country
United States
Facility Name
Clinical Investigations Of Texas
City
Plano
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75075
Country
United States
Facility Name
Synexus USA
City
Plano
State/Province
Texas
ZIP/Postal Code
75093
Country
United States
Facility Name
Charlottesville Medical Research Center LLC
City
Charlottesville
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
22911
Country
United States
Facility Name
Health Research of Hampton Roads, Inc
City
Newport News
State/Province
Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
23606
Country
United States
Facility Name
Spokane Joint Replacement Center
City
Spokane
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
99218
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

Study to Determine the Safety and the Efficacy of Fasinumab Compared to Placebo and Nonsteroidal Anti-inflammatory Drugs (NSAIDs) for Treatment of Adults With Pain From Osteoarthritis of the Knee or Hip

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs