Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare (ASICA) in Melanoma (ASICA)
Primary Purpose
Melanoma
Status
Completed
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
United Kingdom
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
ASICA digital app
Sponsored by
About this trial
This is an interventional diagnostic trial for Melanoma
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
- Adult (≥18)
- Patients treated for stage 0-2C cutaneous melanoma within the preceding 24 months
Exclusion Criteria:
- Stage 3 and 4 melanoma.
- Previous local recurrence of melanoma within last 24 months.
- Patients who are unable to consent and/or complete questionnaires (e.g. due to cognitive or language issues).
- Patients who are blind or visually impaired.
Sites / Locations
- University of Aberdeen
- Addenbrookes Hospital
Arms of the Study
Arm 1
Arm 2
Arm Type
No Intervention
Experimental
Arm Label
Control
Intervention
Arm Description
Control group will attend their routine melanoma follow-ups
The intervention group will use the ASICA app in addition to their routine follow-ups
Outcomes
Primary Outcome Measures
The impact of receiving ASICA on cancer worry
This outcome will be measured using Melanoma Worry Scale (MWS). The scale consists of four questions asking the patients how worried they are about getting melanoma and how this impacts their current lifestyle. The patients choose the answers on a 5-point scale ranging from 'not at all worried' (best answer) to 'worried almost all the time' (worst answer).
The impact of receiving ASICA on anxiety and depression
This outcome will be measured using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). HADS was devised to measure anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients. The questionnaire comprises seven questions for anxiety and seven questions for depression. The patients choose the answers on a 4-point scale ranging from 'not at all' (best answer) to 'all the time' (worst answer). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 leading to a score range of 0 and 21 for each subscales (anxiety or depression). For both scales, scores of less than 7 indicate non-cases, scores of 8-10 indicate mild anxiety/depression, scores of 11-14 indicate moderate anxiety/depression, and scores of 15-21 indicate severe anxiety/depression.
The impact of receiving ASICA quality of life.
This outcome will be measured using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. EQ-5D-5L consists of two sections - descriptive system and a visual scale. The descriptive system comprises of five questions about mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each question has five possible answers ranging from: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient chooses the most appropriate statement in each of the five questions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that question. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The higher the number the worse the health state is. The visual scale records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The worst health you can imagine' (score of 0) and 'The best health you can imagine' (score of 100).
Secondary Outcome Measures
The impact of receiving ASICA on detection rate of second primary and recurrent melanoma
The questionnaire consists of 14 questions asking patients whether they have ever and in the past 12 month checked any part of their skin for signs of skin cancer (yes/no answer). If so, how often (5 point scale ranging from 'zero' to 'more than six times') and which areas of the body were checked. The patients are also asked whether they used a mirror or get help to check difficult to reach areas of their body. The patients are also asked how confident they are about being able to check their own skin. Patients choose the answers on a 10-point scale ranging from 'not at all confident' (worst answer) to 'highly confident' (best answer). The final set of questions ask patients whether they have found anything concerning during their last skin check (yes/no answer) and if so what action was taken by the patient (watched it/showed it to a relative/showed it to a professional) and how quickly (immediately, in few days, in a week, in a month, other).
The impact of receiving ASICA on adherence to and self-efficacy to conduct TSSE in future
This outcome will be measured using a questionnaire designed to determine what the patients think about examining their own skin. The questionnaire consists of nine statements about how important it is to patients to check their skin, do they do it regularly, does it make them anxious, whether they feel confident about having their skin checked by a professional, and do they make plans regarding when and where they will have their skin checked. For each statement, patients indicate whether they strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree, or are unsure.
The impact of receiving ASICA on patterns of UK NHS resource use
This outcome will be measured using a questionnaire designed to determine whether patients used NHS because of their skin problems. The set of seven questions is about any appointments within the NHS that patients may have had about their skin in the past 12 months. Patients are asked whether they had any appointments with a medical professional (GP/nurse/other) for their skin in the past 12 months (yes/no answer), how many (free text) and at what setting (visit at the practice/visit at home/telephone). Patients are also asked about operations or any other treatment they may have had on their skin in the past 12 months (free text). Patients are also asked to list any prescribed medicines or non-prescribed skin products in the last 12 months and their cost (free text).
Full Information
NCT ID
NCT03328247
First Posted
October 23, 2017
Last Updated
April 27, 2021
Sponsor
University of Aberdeen
Collaborators
Cancer Research UK
1. Study Identification
Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03328247
Brief Title
Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare (ASICA) in Melanoma
Acronym
ASICA
Official Title
Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare (ASICA) in Melanoma: A Randomized Patient-focused Trial of Delivering the ASICA Intervention as a Means to Earlier Detection of Recurrent and Second Primary Melanoma
Study Type
Interventional
2. Study Status
Record Verification Date
April 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
January 12, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
March 31, 2020 (Actual)
3. Sponsor/Collaborators
Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
University of Aberdeen
Collaborators
Cancer Research UK
4. Oversight
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
No
5. Study Description
Brief Summary
The ASICA study is looking at how the UK National Health Service (NHS) might use technology in the future to more effectively support people who have been treated for melanoma.
Detailed Description
All patients who have been treated for melanoma are advised to regularly examine their own skin (total-skin-self-examinations; TSSE) but research has found that many people are not shown how to do this effectively. We are investigating whether a digital app we have developed (ASICA) can help people with melanoma to use a hand-held tablet computer to do more regular and effective TSSE, and whether this would lead to earlier detection of recurrent and new primary melanomas. The ASICA app also uses the internet to enable people to electronically communicate the findings of their TSSE to a specialist nurse. All those who consent to take part in the study will be randomly allocated into one of two groups. One group will use the ASICA app in addition to their normal follow-up, the other group will continue to attend their routine melanoma follow-up only. Participants will be recruited from two UK sites - NHS Grampian and Cambridge University Hospitals.
6. Conditions and Keywords
Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Melanoma
7. Study Design
Primary Purpose
Diagnostic
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
240 (Actual)
8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions
Arm Title
Control
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Control group will attend their routine melanoma follow-ups
Arm Title
Intervention
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
The intervention group will use the ASICA app in addition to their routine follow-ups
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
ASICA digital app
Intervention Description
Participants in the intervention arm will be trained to use ASICA (in addition to completing routine follow-up) and participants within the control arm will continue to attend their usual structured melanoma follow-up only. The hypothesis is that the ASICA intervention will increase TSSE practice in those affected by melanoma without affecting psychological well-being and lead to earlier detection of recurrent and new primary melanoma.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The impact of receiving ASICA on cancer worry
Description
This outcome will be measured using Melanoma Worry Scale (MWS). The scale consists of four questions asking the patients how worried they are about getting melanoma and how this impacts their current lifestyle. The patients choose the answers on a 5-point scale ranging from 'not at all worried' (best answer) to 'worried almost all the time' (worst answer).
Time Frame
Up to 12 months following randomisation.
Title
The impact of receiving ASICA on anxiety and depression
Description
This outcome will be measured using Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). HADS was devised to measure anxiety and depression in a general medical population of patients. The questionnaire comprises seven questions for anxiety and seven questions for depression. The patients choose the answers on a 4-point scale ranging from 'not at all' (best answer) to 'all the time' (worst answer). Each item on the questionnaire is scored from 0-3 leading to a score range of 0 and 21 for each subscales (anxiety or depression). For both scales, scores of less than 7 indicate non-cases, scores of 8-10 indicate mild anxiety/depression, scores of 11-14 indicate moderate anxiety/depression, and scores of 15-21 indicate severe anxiety/depression.
Time Frame
Up to 12 months following randomisation.
Title
The impact of receiving ASICA quality of life.
Description
This outcome will be measured using EQ-5D-5L questionnaire. EQ-5D-5L consists of two sections - descriptive system and a visual scale. The descriptive system comprises of five questions about mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort and anxiety/depression. Each question has five possible answers ranging from: no problems, slight problems, moderate problems, severe problems and extreme problems. The patient chooses the most appropriate statement in each of the five questions. This decision results in a 1-digit number that expresses the level selected for that question. The digits for the five dimensions can be combined into a 5-digit number that describes the patient's health state. The higher the number the worse the health state is. The visual scale records the patient's self-rated health on a vertical visual analogue scale, where the endpoints are labelled 'The worst health you can imagine' (score of 0) and 'The best health you can imagine' (score of 100).
Time Frame
Up to 12 months following randomisation.
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
The impact of receiving ASICA on detection rate of second primary and recurrent melanoma
Description
The questionnaire consists of 14 questions asking patients whether they have ever and in the past 12 month checked any part of their skin for signs of skin cancer (yes/no answer). If so, how often (5 point scale ranging from 'zero' to 'more than six times') and which areas of the body were checked. The patients are also asked whether they used a mirror or get help to check difficult to reach areas of their body. The patients are also asked how confident they are about being able to check their own skin. Patients choose the answers on a 10-point scale ranging from 'not at all confident' (worst answer) to 'highly confident' (best answer). The final set of questions ask patients whether they have found anything concerning during their last skin check (yes/no answer) and if so what action was taken by the patient (watched it/showed it to a relative/showed it to a professional) and how quickly (immediately, in few days, in a week, in a month, other).
Time Frame
Up to 12 months following randomisation.
Title
The impact of receiving ASICA on adherence to and self-efficacy to conduct TSSE in future
Description
This outcome will be measured using a questionnaire designed to determine what the patients think about examining their own skin. The questionnaire consists of nine statements about how important it is to patients to check their skin, do they do it regularly, does it make them anxious, whether they feel confident about having their skin checked by a professional, and do they make plans regarding when and where they will have their skin checked. For each statement, patients indicate whether they strongly disagree, disagree, agree, strongly agree, or are unsure.
Time Frame
Up to 12 months following randomisation.
Title
The impact of receiving ASICA on patterns of UK NHS resource use
Description
This outcome will be measured using a questionnaire designed to determine whether patients used NHS because of their skin problems. The set of seven questions is about any appointments within the NHS that patients may have had about their skin in the past 12 months. Patients are asked whether they had any appointments with a medical professional (GP/nurse/other) for their skin in the past 12 months (yes/no answer), how many (free text) and at what setting (visit at the practice/visit at home/telephone). Patients are also asked about operations or any other treatment they may have had on their skin in the past 12 months (free text). Patients are also asked to list any prescribed medicines or non-prescribed skin products in the last 12 months and their cost (free text).
Time Frame
Up to 12 months following randomisation.
10. Eligibility
Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria:
Adult (≥18)
Patients treated for stage 0-2C cutaneous melanoma within the preceding 24 months
Exclusion Criteria:
Stage 3 and 4 melanoma.
Previous local recurrence of melanoma within last 24 months.
Patients who are unable to consent and/or complete questionnaires (e.g. due to cognitive or language issues).
Patients who are blind or visually impaired.
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Peter Murchie, MBChB, PhD
Organizational Affiliation
University of Aberdeen
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
University of Aberdeen
City
Aberdeen
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Addenbrookes Hospital
City
Cambridge
Country
United Kingdom
12. IPD Sharing Statement
Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36074560
Citation
Murchie P, Constable L, Hall S, Brant W, Allan J, Johnston M, Masthoff J, Lee A, Treweek S, Ayansina D, Proby C, Rahman K, Walter F, Burrows N, Durrani A, Maclennan G. The Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare Intervention for Detection of Recurrent and Second Primary Melanoma in Survivors of Melanoma: Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial. JMIR Cancer. 2022 Sep 8;8(3):e37539. doi: 10.2196/37539.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
36041758
Citation
Allan JL, Johnston DW, Johnston M, Murchie P. Describing, predicting and explaining adherence to total skin self-examination (TSSE) in people with melanoma: a 12-month longitudinal study. BMJ Open. 2022 Aug 30;12(8):e056755. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056755.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
34774015
Citation
Reilly F, Contstable L, Brant W, Rahman K, Durrani A, Burrows N, Proby C, Allan J, Johnston M, Johnston D, Walter F, Murchie P. Achieving integrated self-directed Cancer aftercare (ASICA) for melanoma: how a digital intervention to support total skin self-examination was used by people treated for cutaneous melanoma. BMC Cancer. 2021 Nov 13;21(1):1217. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08959-2.
Results Reference
derived
PubMed Identifier
31159849
Citation
Murchie P, Masthoff J, Walter FM, Rahman K, Allan JL, Burrows N, Proby C, Lee AJ, Johnston M, Durrani A, Depasquale I, Brant B, Neilson A, Meredith F, Treweek S, Hall S, McDonald A. Achieving Self-Directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare (ASICA) in melanoma: protocol for a randomised patient-focused pilot trial of delivering the ASICA intervention as a means to earlier detection of recurrent and second primary melanoma. Trials. 2019 Jun 3;20(1):318. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3453-x.
Results Reference
derived
Learn more about this trial
Achieving Self-directed Integrated Cancer Aftercare (ASICA) in Melanoma
We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs