search
Back to results

The Effects of the Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass on the Remission of Type II Diabetes Mellitus (DIABAR)

Primary Purpose

Obesity, Morbid, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus

Status
Unknown status
Phase
Not Applicable
Locations
Netherlands
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
laparoscopic Mini gastric bypass
Sponsored by
Slotervaart Hospital
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Obesity, Morbid focused on measuring Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Mini gastric bypass, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Morbid Obesity

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 65 Years (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • BMI ≥35 and ≤50 kg/m2
  • Diagnosis and treatment of T2DM at intake at bariatric ward with use of anti-diabetic medication.
  • American Society of Anaesthesiologist Classification (ASA) ≤3
  • All patients are required to lose 6 kilograms of weight prior to surgery

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Known genetic basis for insulin resistance or glucose intolerance
  • Type 1 DM
  • Prior Bariatric surgery
  • Patients requiring a concomitant intervention (such as cholecystectomy, ventral hernia repair)
  • Auto-immune gastritis
  • Known presence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease
  • Known presence of large hiatal hernia requiring concomitant surgical repair
  • Coagulation disorders (PT time > 14 seconds, aPTT ((dependent on laboratory methods) or known presence of bleeding disorders (anamnestic))
  • Known presence of hemoglobinopathy
  • Uncontrolled hypertension (RR > 150/95 mmHg)
  • Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 150 umol/L)
  • Pregnancy
  • Breastfeeding
  • Alcohol or drug dependency
  • Primary lipid disorder
  • Participation in any other (therapeutic) study that may influence primary or secondary outcomes

Sites / Locations

  • medical Center SlotervaartRecruiting

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Active Comparator

Experimental

Arm Label

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass

Arm Description

Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass

laparoscopic Mini gastric bypass

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

glycaemic control
as measured by the difference in HBa1C

Secondary Outcome Measures

glycaemic control
as measured by the difference in HBa1C
glycaemic control
as measured by the difference in HBa1C and anti-diabetic medication
Insulin sensitivity
Mixed meal tolerance test for level of insulin sensitivity
NAFLD/NASH
NAFLD/NASH parameters in liver biopsy measured with the Steatosis, Activity and Fibrosis (SAF) score according to Bedossa et al (2012).For each patient a SAF score summarizing the main histological lesions will be defined. The steatosis score (S) will assess the quantities of larger or median-sized lipid droplets but not foamy microvesicules from 0 to 3 (S0 <5%; S1 5-33%; S2 34-66% and S3>67%). Activity grade (A) from 0-4 is the unweighted addition of hepatocyte ballooning (0-2) and lobular inflammation (0-2). Stage of fibrosis will be assessed using the score described by NASH-CRN as follows; stage 0 (F0) no fibrosis; stage 1 (F1) 1a or 1b perisinusoidal zone 3 or 1c portal fibrosis; stage 2 (F2) persinusoidal and periportal fibrosis without bridging; stage 3 (F3) bridging fibrosis and stage 4 (F4) cirrhosis. A diagnostic algorithm which will be used during this study can be found in the original paper published by Bedossa et al.
Presence of bacterial DNA/bacterial metabolites - portal vein
in portal vein blood
Presence of bacterial DNA/bacterial metabolites - liver
in liver
Presence of bacterial DNA/bacterial metabolites - abdominal adipose tissue
in abdominal adipose tissue depots
Expression and differentiation of intestinal immunological cells - GALT
in GALT
Expression and differentiation of intestinal immunological cells - abdominal adipose tissue
in abdominal adipose tissue depots
Expression and differentiation of intestinal immunological cells - liver
in liver
Expression and differentiation of intestinal immunological cells - peripheral blood
in peripheral blood
Expression and differentiation of immunological cells
ILC's, macrophages
Expression and differentiation of inflammatory markers
IL6, IRX3 and 5
Small intestinal and fecal microbiota composition
feces
Peripheral blood inflammatory markers
ILC's, macrophages, T/B-cells and dendritic cells
Eating habits
G-food craving questionnaire (FCQ-T) 21 item questionaire scale 0 (never) - 6 (always)
Eating habits
10 questions, scale 0-10 for instance 0 not hungry -10 very hungry / satiety / craving salty food / craving sweet food / craving fat food
Excreted metabolites
urine
Bio electric impedance
body composition as assesed by bioelectical impedance analysis (BIA): the measurement of body fat in relation to lean body mass.
Quality of life
Quality of life (IWQOL lite) 5 domain questionaire, 31 items: 1 never true - 5 always true
Cardiac / ventricular hypertrophy
Electrocardiogram (ECG)

Full Information

First Posted
October 13, 2017
Last Updated
November 8, 2017
Sponsor
Slotervaart Hospital
Collaborators
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03330756
Brief Title
The Effects of the Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass on the Remission of Type II Diabetes Mellitus
Acronym
DIABAR
Official Title
The Effects of the Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and the Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass on the Remission of Type II Diabetes Mellitus and the Pathophysiological Mechanisms That Drive the Conversion of Malign to Benign Obesity
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
November 2017
Overall Recruitment Status
Unknown status
Study Start Date
October 23, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
November 1, 2021 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
November 1, 2021 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Slotervaart Hospital
Collaborators
Academisch Medisch Centrum - Universiteit van Amsterdam (AMC-UvA)

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
It is estimated that there will be 439-552 million people with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) globally in 2030. Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is present in one quarter of patients at the bariatric outpatient clinic. It is undecided which metabolic surgery grants best results in the remission of T2DM and which procedure does that at the lowest rate of surgical complications, long term difficulties and side effects. Non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is present in 80% of all morbidly obese subjects and is a major risk factor for development of insulin resistance and non alcoholic steatohepatis (NASH). It is increasingly recognized that the immune system, possibly driven by innate lymphoid cells (ILC's), and the intestinal microbiome are major players in this obesity related disease and the switch from benign to malign (insulin resistance and T2DM) obesity. However, the exact mechanisms of action behind the surgery-driven switch back from malign to benign obesity are unknown.Primary objective is to evaluate and compare the glycaemic control in T2DM within the first year of LRYGB and LMBG. Secondary aim is to gain insight in the pathophysiological mechanisms that drive the conversion of malign to benign obesity.
Detailed Description
Metabolic surgery has proven to be a viable long-term solution in the treatment of morbid obesity and its comorbidities. It induces rapid remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM). Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus is present in one quarter of patients at the bariatric outpatient clinic. Non alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is present in 80% of all morbidly obese subjects and is a major risk factor for development of insulin resistance and non alcoholic steatohepatis (NASH), with the latter becoming the major indication for liver transplantation in the USA. It is increasingly recognized that the immune system, possibly driven by innate lymphoid cells (ILC's), and the intestinal microbiome are major players in this obesity related disease and the switch from benign to malign (insulin resistance and T2DM) obesity. However, the exact mechanisms of action behind the surgery-driven switch back from malign to benign obesity are unknown. Also, it is undecided which metabolic surgery grants best results in the remission of T2DM and which procedure does that at the lowest rate of surgical complications, long term difficulties and side effects. The Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass (LRYGB), an efficient but complex procedure, is the golden standard in the Netherlands. The Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass (LMGB) is technically less challenging and has been introduced to overcome some of the limitations of LRYGB. It has been hypothesized that the LMGB has a more rapid and durable glycaemic control, possibly due to the altered constitution and the augmented length of the biliary limb. There is reason to believe that the improved glycaemic control might become apparent within the first year of surgery and that it might remain thereafter. However, it is unknown what order of magnitude is to be expected and whether subgroups of T2DM patients will benefit the LMGB more. Also, it is unknown whether and to what extent intestinal microbiota and immunological tone can predict the metabolic response (improvement in insulin sensitivity) and NAFLD/NASH reduction and whether differences are expected between these two surgeries. Increased understanding of the pathophysiological mechanisms as well as their relationship to metabolic disturbances are thought to be of crucial importance to discover new diagnostic and therapeutical targets in obesity associated insulin resistance/T2DM and NAFLD/NASH. Primary objective is to evaluate and compare the glycaemic control in T2DM within the first year of LRYGB and LMBG. Secondary aim is to gain insight in the pathophysiological mechanisms that drive the conversion of malign to benign obesity.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Obesity, Morbid, Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus
Keywords
Roux-en-Y gastric bypass, Mini gastric bypass, Type 2 diabetes mellitus, Morbid Obesity

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Not Applicable
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
Single-center, open randomized controlled clinical trial
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
220 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Arm Title
Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
laparoscopic Mini gastric bypass
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass
Other Intervention Name(s)
gastric bypass
Intervention Description
laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass with a 50 cm biliary limb and a 150 cm alimentary limb
Intervention Type
Procedure
Intervention Name(s)
laparoscopic Mini gastric bypass
Other Intervention Name(s)
One anastomosis gastric bypass, omega loop gastric bypass
Intervention Description
laparoscopic Mini gastric bypass with a gastrojejunostomy at 200 centimeters measured from the ligament of Treitz
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
glycaemic control
Description
as measured by the difference in HBa1C
Time Frame
12 months FU
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
glycaemic control
Description
as measured by the difference in HBa1C
Time Frame
6 and 24 months FU
Title
glycaemic control
Description
as measured by the difference in HBa1C and anti-diabetic medication
Time Frame
6, 12 and 24 months FU
Title
Insulin sensitivity
Description
Mixed meal tolerance test for level of insulin sensitivity
Time Frame
baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Title
NAFLD/NASH
Description
NAFLD/NASH parameters in liver biopsy measured with the Steatosis, Activity and Fibrosis (SAF) score according to Bedossa et al (2012).For each patient a SAF score summarizing the main histological lesions will be defined. The steatosis score (S) will assess the quantities of larger or median-sized lipid droplets but not foamy microvesicules from 0 to 3 (S0 <5%; S1 5-33%; S2 34-66% and S3>67%). Activity grade (A) from 0-4 is the unweighted addition of hepatocyte ballooning (0-2) and lobular inflammation (0-2). Stage of fibrosis will be assessed using the score described by NASH-CRN as follows; stage 0 (F0) no fibrosis; stage 1 (F1) 1a or 1b perisinusoidal zone 3 or 1c portal fibrosis; stage 2 (F2) persinusoidal and periportal fibrosis without bridging; stage 3 (F3) bridging fibrosis and stage 4 (F4) cirrhosis. A diagnostic algorithm which will be used during this study can be found in the original paper published by Bedossa et al.
Time Frame
day of surgery, reoperation
Title
Presence of bacterial DNA/bacterial metabolites - portal vein
Description
in portal vein blood
Time Frame
day of surgery, reoperation
Title
Presence of bacterial DNA/bacterial metabolites - liver
Description
in liver
Time Frame
day of surgery, reoperation
Title
Presence of bacterial DNA/bacterial metabolites - abdominal adipose tissue
Description
in abdominal adipose tissue depots
Time Frame
day of surgery, reoperation
Title
Expression and differentiation of intestinal immunological cells - GALT
Description
in GALT
Time Frame
day of surgery, reoperation
Title
Expression and differentiation of intestinal immunological cells - abdominal adipose tissue
Description
in abdominal adipose tissue depots
Time Frame
day of surgery, reoperation
Title
Expression and differentiation of intestinal immunological cells - liver
Description
in liver
Time Frame
day of surgery, reoperation
Title
Expression and differentiation of intestinal immunological cells - peripheral blood
Description
in peripheral blood
Time Frame
day of surgery, reoperation
Title
Expression and differentiation of immunological cells
Description
ILC's, macrophages
Time Frame
12 and 24 months FU
Title
Expression and differentiation of inflammatory markers
Description
IL6, IRX3 and 5
Time Frame
12 and 24 months FU
Title
Small intestinal and fecal microbiota composition
Description
feces
Time Frame
2, and 6 weeks, 6 months, as well as 12 and 24 months after surgery
Title
Peripheral blood inflammatory markers
Description
ILC's, macrophages, T/B-cells and dendritic cells
Time Frame
2, and 6 weeks, 6 months, as well as 12 and 24 months after surgery
Title
Eating habits
Description
G-food craving questionnaire (FCQ-T) 21 item questionaire scale 0 (never) - 6 (always)
Time Frame
baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Title
Eating habits
Description
10 questions, scale 0-10 for instance 0 not hungry -10 very hungry / satiety / craving salty food / craving sweet food / craving fat food
Time Frame
baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Title
Excreted metabolites
Description
urine
Time Frame
baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Title
Bio electric impedance
Description
body composition as assesed by bioelectical impedance analysis (BIA): the measurement of body fat in relation to lean body mass.
Time Frame
baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Title
Quality of life
Description
Quality of life (IWQOL lite) 5 domain questionaire, 31 items: 1 never true - 5 always true
Time Frame
baseline, 12, 24 months FU
Title
Cardiac / ventricular hypertrophy
Description
Electrocardiogram (ECG)
Time Frame
baseline, 12, 24 months FU

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
65 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: BMI ≥35 and ≤50 kg/m2 Diagnosis and treatment of T2DM at intake at bariatric ward with use of anti-diabetic medication. American Society of Anaesthesiologist Classification (ASA) ≤3 All patients are required to lose 6 kilograms of weight prior to surgery Exclusion Criteria: Known genetic basis for insulin resistance or glucose intolerance Type 1 DM Prior Bariatric surgery Patients requiring a concomitant intervention (such as cholecystectomy, ventral hernia repair) Auto-immune gastritis Known presence of gastro-esophageal reflux disease Known presence of large hiatal hernia requiring concomitant surgical repair Coagulation disorders (PT time > 14 seconds, aPTT ((dependent on laboratory methods) or known presence of bleeding disorders (anamnestic)) Known presence of hemoglobinopathy Uncontrolled hypertension (RR > 150/95 mmHg) Renal insufficiency (creatinine > 150 umol/L) Pregnancy Breastfeeding Alcohol or drug dependency Primary lipid disorder Participation in any other (therapeutic) study that may influence primary or secondary outcomes
Central Contact Person:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Anne-Sophie van Rijswijk, MD
Phone
+31205124460
Email
anne-sophie.vanrijswijk@slz.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name or Official Title & Degree
Maurits de Brauw, MD PhD
Email
maurits.debrauw@slz.nl
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maurits de Brauw, MD PhD
Organizational Affiliation
Head of department of Surgery
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
medical Center Slotervaart
City
Amsterdam
State/Province
Noord-Holland
ZIP/Postal Code
1066EC
Country
Netherlands
Individual Site Status
Recruiting
Facility Contact:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Anne-Sophie van Rijswijk, MD
Phone
+31205014460
Email
anne-sophie.vanrijswijk@slz.nl
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Maurtis de Brauw, MD PhD
Email
maurits.debrauw@slz.nl

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
36273149
Citation
van Rijswijk A, van Olst N, Meijnikman AS, Acherman YIZ, Bruin SC, van de Laar AW, van Olden CC, Aydin O, Borger H, Beuers UHW, Herrema H, Verheij J, Apers JA, Backhed F, Gerdes VEA, Nieuwdorp M, de Brauw LM. The effects of laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass and one-anastomosis gastric bypass on glycemic control and remission of type 2 diabetes mellitus: study protocol for a multi-center randomized controlled trial (the DIABAR-trial). Trials. 2022 Oct 22;23(1):900. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06762-3.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

The Effects of the Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y Gastric Bypass and Laparoscopic Mini Gastric Bypass on the Remission of Type II Diabetes Mellitus

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs