search
Back to results

Personalised Medicine With IgGAM Compared With Standard of Care for Treatment of Peritonitis After Infectious Source Control (the PEPPER Trial) (PEPPER)

Primary Purpose

Peritonitis, Sepsis

Status
Suspended
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Pentaglobin®
Sponsored by
RWTH Aachen University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Peritonitis focused on measuring Pentaglobin®, Personalised Medicine

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Peritonitis
  2. The time of the surgical infectious source control must have been within 6 h after the indication (defined as the time of the registration of the surgical procedure/ minimal invasive surgery)
  3. Sepsis and septic shock (according to the current Sepsis Guideline)
  4. SOFA Score ≥ 8
  5. IL-6 ≥ 1000 pg / ml
  6. Start of therapy with antibiotics and IgGAM (Pentaglobin) within 12 hours after admission to the ICU
  7. Signed informed consent by the patient himself or by his legal representative, such as a court-appointed supervisor or by an authorized proxy authorized representative or by a consultant

Exclusion criteria

  1. Patients with a life expectancy of less than 90 days due to medical conditions that are not associated with postoperative peritonitis or with sepsis / septic shock
  2. Pregnant, breastfeeding women
  3. Minors (< 18 years)
  4. Patients with a known dialysis-requiring chronic renal function (creatinine ≥ 3.4 mg / dl or creatinine clearance ≤ 30 mL / min / 1.73 m2)
  5. Patients with acute, primary non-infectious pancreatitis or mediastinitis
  6. BMI> 40
  7. Patients with a contraindication to study medication
  8. Participate in another medication study within the last 30 days
  9. Persons who are in a relationship of dependency or employment relationship with the sponsor or auditor
  10. Persons who are placed in an institution on a judicial or administrative order

Sites / Locations

  • LKH-Univ. Klinikum Graz
  • Medizinische Universität Wien
  • University Hospital Aachen
  • Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum GmbH
  • Klinikum Westfalen, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Dortmund
  • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus
  • Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
  • Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
  • Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
  • Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
  • Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
  • Klinikum der Universität München

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

No Intervention

Active Comparator

Arm Label

A: Control group

B: Pentaglobin®

Arm Description

Standard of Care

Standard of Care + Pentaglobin®

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Relative number of patients whose MOF score improves by 0.8 points on Day 7 (i.e., percentage of 'responders') [%]
The relative number of patients whose MOF score improves by 0.8 points on Day 7 (i.e., percentage of 'responders'). The MOF score is determined in the morning, with the following scoring for each organ (lungs, heart, kidneys, liver, blood): normal function, 0; dysfunction, 1; individual organ failure, 2. An aggregate score greater than 4 implies multi-organ failure. Patients who die will be assigned the maximum score of 10 and will be included in the population assessment. Day 7

Secondary Outcome Measures

Number of survivers on day 28 [-]
Evaluation of the Overall 28-day survival. Day 28
Number of survivers on day 90 [-]
Evaluation of the Overall 90-day survival. Day 90
MOF Score on day 5 [-]
MOF Score on day 5 Day 5
Relative number of patients with MOF (i.e., > 4 MOF points) on Day 7 [%]
Relative number of patients with MOF (i.e., > 4 MOF points) on Day 7 [%] Day 7

Full Information

First Posted
October 27, 2017
Last Updated
April 28, 2022
Sponsor
RWTH Aachen University
Collaborators
Biotest
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03334006
Brief Title
Personalised Medicine With IgGAM Compared With Standard of Care for Treatment of Peritonitis After Infectious Source Control (the PEPPER Trial)
Acronym
PEPPER
Official Title
Personalised Medicine With IgGAM Compared With Standard of Care for Treatment of Peritonitis After Infectious Source Control (the PEPPER Trial): a Randomised, Controlled Trial
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Suspended
Why Stopped
Due to safety-relevant aspects with regard to internal processes of the sponsor
Study Start Date
November 20, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
September 2026 (Anticipated)
Study Completion Date
January 2027 (Anticipated)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
RWTH Aachen University
Collaborators
Biotest

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
No
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the adjuvant Immuneglobulins G, A and M (IgGAM) treatment for: An improvement of the outcome for the patient's peritonitis. This will be investigated by using scores such as the multiple organ failure (MOF) and Sequential Organ Failure Assessment (SOFA) scores as well as survival data. Identification of biomarkers [Ig level, procalcitonin (PCT), interleukin-6 (IL 6), Human Leukocyte Antigen - antigen D Related (HLA DR), nuclear factor kappa-light-chain-enhancer of activated B cells (NF kB1), adrenomedullin (ADM), pathogen spectrum], to identify patient subpopulations that profit most from treatment with IgGAM. Such patients will comprise the basis for a further study, which will be a randomised, controlled, double-blind trial (RCT) to demonstrate the value of this treatment. Furthermore, these biomarkers are expected to help with developing a "personalised" adjuvant therapy with IgGAM in the indication of peritonitis.
Detailed Description
The purpose of this study is to test the adjuvant IgGAM treatment for: An improvement of the outcome for the patient's peritonitis. This will be investigated by using scores such as the multiple organ failure and SOFA scores as well as survival data. Identification of biomarkers (Ig level, PCT, IL 6, HLA DR, Nf kB1, ADM, pathogen spectrum), to identify patient subpopulations that profit most from treatment with IgGAM. Such patients will comprise the basis for a further study, which will be a randomised, controlled, double-blind trial (RCT) to demonstrate the value of this treatment. Furthermore, these biomarkers are expected to help with developing a "personalised" adjuvant therapy with IgGAM in the indication of peritonitis. The control group will receive standard-of-care treatment, i.e., the IgGAM is an add-on treatment in this study. The active study treatment is IgGAM (Pentaglobin®). IgGAM is administered by continuous infusion over 5 days at a dose level of 0.4 ml per kg body weight per hour, until a total dose of 7 ml/kg on that day has been reached; administration will then be stopped and recommenced on the following day, until administration has been completed for 5 consecutive days. Primary target variable The relative number of patients whose MOF score improves by 0.8 points on Day 7 (i.e., percentage of 'responders'). The primary analysis will be performed with the per protocol population (see below). The MOF score is determined in the morning, with the following scoring for each organ (lungs, heart, kidneys, liver, blood): normal function, 0; dysfunction, 1; individual organ failure, 2. An aggregate score greater than 4 implies multi-organ failure. Patients who die will be assigned the maximum score of 10 and will be included in the population assessment. Secondary target variables Overall 28-day survival, Overall 90-day survival, MOF score on Day 5, Relative number of patients with MOF (i.e., > 4 MOF points) on Day 7. Additional study variables Time course of the biomarkers (PCT, IL 6, HLA DR, ADM, Immuneglobulins M, G, A), the SOFA score, the Mannheim Peritonitis Index, the surrogate variables for organ dysfunction and survival according to Heyland et al. 2011 and vital signs. Influence of the biomarkers NF kB1, ADM and pathogen spectrum upon the outcome for the patient. Comparison of the MOF score with other scores, such as the SOFA score, for assessment of organ dysfunction.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Peritonitis, Sepsis
Keywords
Pentaglobin®, Personalised Medicine

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Model Description
The control group will receive standard-of-care treatment, i.e., the IgGAM is an add-on treatment in this study. The active study treatment is IgGAM (Pentaglobin®). The preparation to be provided contains (per ml solution) 50 mg human plasma proteins, of which >95% are immunoglobulins: IgM 6 mg, IgA 6 mg and IgG 38 mg. The IgG subclass distribution is IgG1 ~63%, IgG2 ~26%, IgG3 ~4%, IgG4 ~7%. IgGAM is administered by continuous infusion over 5 days at a dose level of 0.4 ml per kg body weight per hour, until a total dose of 7 ml/kg on that day has been reached; administration will then be stopped and recommenced on the following day, until administration has been completed for 5 consecutive days.
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
200 (Anticipated)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
A: Control group
Arm Type
No Intervention
Arm Description
Standard of Care
Arm Title
B: Pentaglobin®
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard of Care + Pentaglobin®
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Pentaglobin®
Intervention Description
Standard of Care + Pentaglobin®
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Relative number of patients whose MOF score improves by 0.8 points on Day 7 (i.e., percentage of 'responders') [%]
Description
The relative number of patients whose MOF score improves by 0.8 points on Day 7 (i.e., percentage of 'responders'). The MOF score is determined in the morning, with the following scoring for each organ (lungs, heart, kidneys, liver, blood): normal function, 0; dysfunction, 1; individual organ failure, 2. An aggregate score greater than 4 implies multi-organ failure. Patients who die will be assigned the maximum score of 10 and will be included in the population assessment. Day 7
Time Frame
7 days
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Number of survivers on day 28 [-]
Description
Evaluation of the Overall 28-day survival. Day 28
Time Frame
28 days
Title
Number of survivers on day 90 [-]
Description
Evaluation of the Overall 90-day survival. Day 90
Time Frame
90 days
Title
MOF Score on day 5 [-]
Description
MOF Score on day 5 Day 5
Time Frame
5 days
Title
Relative number of patients with MOF (i.e., > 4 MOF points) on Day 7 [%]
Description
Relative number of patients with MOF (i.e., > 4 MOF points) on Day 7 [%] Day 7
Time Frame
7 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Peritonitis The time of the surgical infectious source control must have been within 6 h after the indication (defined as the time of the registration of the surgical procedure/ minimal invasive surgery) Sepsis and septic shock (according to the current Sepsis Guideline) SOFA Score ≥ 8 IL-6 ≥ 1000 pg / ml Start of therapy with antibiotics and IgGAM (Pentaglobin) within 12 hours after admission to the ICU Signed informed consent by the patient himself or by his legal representative, such as a court-appointed supervisor or by an authorized proxy authorized representative or by a consultant Exclusion criteria Patients with a life expectancy of less than 90 days due to medical conditions that are not associated with postoperative peritonitis or with sepsis / septic shock Pregnant, breastfeeding women Minors (< 18 years) Patients with a known dialysis-requiring chronic renal function (creatinine ≥ 3.4 mg / dl or creatinine clearance ≤ 30 mL / min / 1.73 m2) Patients with acute, primary non-infectious pancreatitis or mediastinitis BMI> 40 Patients with a contraindication to study medication Participate in another medication study within the last 30 days Persons who are in a relationship of dependency or employment relationship with the sponsor or auditor Persons who are placed in an institution on a judicial or administrative order
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Gernot Marx, Univ.-Prof.
Organizational Affiliation
RWTH Aachen University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
LKH-Univ. Klinikum Graz
City
Graz
ZIP/Postal Code
8020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Medizinische Universität Wien
City
Wien
ZIP/Postal Code
1090
Country
Austria
Facility Name
University Hospital Aachen
City
Aachen
ZIP/Postal Code
52074
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Knappschaftskrankenhaus Bochum GmbH
City
Bochum
ZIP/Postal Code
44892
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum Westfalen, Knappschaftskrankenhaus Dortmund
City
Dortmund
ZIP/Postal Code
44309
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Frankfurt
City
Frankfurt
ZIP/Postal Code
60590
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Hamburg-Eppendorf
City
Hamburg
ZIP/Postal Code
20246
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover
City
Hannover
ZIP/Postal Code
30625
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Heidelberg
City
Heidelberg
ZIP/Postal Code
69120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsmedizin der Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz
City
Mainz
ZIP/Postal Code
55131
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum der Universität München
City
München
ZIP/Postal Code
81377
Country
Germany

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
No
Citations:
Citation
Kujath P., Rodloff Peritonitis UNI-MED, 2001 ISBN 3-8999-549-5
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20978264
Citation
Chang HJ, Lynm C, Glass RM. JAMA patient page. Sepsis. JAMA. 2010 Oct 27;304(16):1856. doi: 10.1001/jama.304.16.1856. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11500339
Citation
Harbarth S, Holeckova K, Froidevaux C, Pittet D, Ricou B, Grau GE, Vadas L, Pugin J; Geneva Sepsis Network. Diagnostic value of procalcitonin, interleukin-6, and interleukin-8 in critically ill patients admitted with suspected sepsis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001 Aug 1;164(3):396-402. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.164.3.2009052.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21418560
Citation
Heyland DK, Muscedere J, Drover J, Jiang X, Day AG; Canadian Critical Care Trials Group. Persistent organ dysfunction plus death: a novel, composite outcome measure for critical care trials. Crit Care. 2011;15(2):R98. doi: 10.1186/cc10110. Epub 2011 Mar 18.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10809269
Citation
Muller B, Becker KL, Schachinger H, Rickenbacher PR, Huber PR, Zimmerli W, Ritz R. Calcitonin precursors are reliable markers of sepsis in a medical intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2000 Apr;28(4):977-83. doi: 10.1097/00003246-200004000-00011.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10984072
Citation
Maruna P, Nedelnikova K, Gurlich R. Physiology and genetics of procalcitonin. Physiol Res. 2000;49 Suppl 1:S57-61.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16374163
Citation
Clec'h C, Fosse JP, Karoubi P, Vincent F, Chouahi I, Hamza L, Cupa M, Cohen Y. Differential diagnostic value of procalcitonin in surgical and medical patients with septic shock. Crit Care Med. 2006 Jan;34(1):102-7. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000195012.54682.f3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9594089
Citation
Monneret G, Doche C, Durand DV, Lepape A, Bienvenu J. Procalcitonin as a specific marker of bacterial infection in adults. Clin Chem Lab Med. 1998 Jan;36(1):67-8. doi: 10.1515/CCLM.1998.012. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19021084
Citation
Brunkhorst FM. [Sepsismarker--what is useful?]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2008 Nov;133(48):2512-5. doi: 10.1055/s-0028-1100949. Epub 2008 Nov 19. No abstract available. German.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
16603606
Citation
Christ-Crain M, Stolz D, Bingisser R, Muller C, Miedinger D, Huber PR, Zimmerli W, Harbarth S, Tamm M, Muller B. Procalcitonin guidance of antibiotic therapy in community-acquired pneumonia: a randomized trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006 Jul 1;174(1):84-93. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200512-1922OC. Epub 2006 Apr 7.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
2188664
Citation
Van Snick J. Interleukin-6: an overview. Annu Rev Immunol. 1990;8:253-78. doi: 10.1146/annurev.iy.08.040190.001345. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15640628
Citation
Panacek EA, Marshall JC, Albertson TE, Johnson DH, Johnson S, MacArthur RD, Miller M, Barchuk WT, Fischkoff S, Kaul M, Teoh L, Van Meter L, Daum L, Lemeshow S, Hicklin G, Doig C; Monoclonal Anti-TNF: a Randomized Controlled Sepsis Study Investigators. Efficacy and safety of the monoclonal anti-tumor necrosis factor antibody F(ab')2 fragment afelimomab in patients with severe sepsis and elevated interleukin-6 levels. Crit Care Med. 2004 Nov;32(11):2173-82. doi: 10.1097/01.ccm.0000145229.59014.6c.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9788457
Citation
Kuster H, Weiss M, Willeitner AE, Detlefsen S, Jeremias I, Zbojan J, Geiger R, Lipowsky G, Simbruner G. Interleukin-1 receptor antagonist and interleukin-6 for early diagnosis of neonatal sepsis 2 days before clinical manifestation. Lancet. 1998 Oct 17;352(9136):1271-7. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(98)08148-3.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
19590022
Citation
Meisel C, Schefold JC, Pschowski R, Baumann T, Hetzger K, Gregor J, Weber-Carstens S, Hasper D, Keh D, Zuckermann H, Reinke P, Volk HD. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor to reverse sepsis-associated immunosuppression: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled multicenter trial. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2009 Oct 1;180(7):640-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200903-0363OC. Epub 2009 Jul 9.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17558345
Citation
Schefold JC, von Haehling S, Corsepius M, Pohle C, Kruschke P, Zuckermann H, Volk HD, Reinke P. A novel selective extracorporeal intervention in sepsis: immunoadsorption of endotoxin, interleukin 6, and complement-activating product 5a. Shock. 2007 Oct;28(4):418-25. doi: 10.1097/shk.0b013e31804f5921.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24815605
Citation
Bermejo-Martin JF, Rodriguez-Fernandez A, Herran-Monge R, Andaluz-Ojeda D, Muriel-Bombin A, Merino P, Garcia-Garcia MM, Citores R, Gandia F, Almansa R, Blanco J; GRECIA Group (Grupo de Estudios y Analisis en Cuidados Intensivos). Immunoglobulins IgG1, IgM and IgA: a synergistic team influencing survival in sepsis. J Intern Med. 2014 Oct;276(4):404-12. doi: 10.1111/joim.12265. Epub 2014 May 29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24144038
Citation
Giamarellos-Bourboulis EJ, Apostolidou E, Lada M, Perdios I, Gatselis NK, Tsangaris I, Georgitsi M, Bristianou M, Kanni T, Sereti K, Kyprianou MA, Kotanidou A, Armaganidis A; Hellenic Sepsis Study Group. Kinetics of circulating immunoglobulin M in sepsis: relationship with final outcome. Crit Care. 2013 Oct 21;17(5):R247. doi: 10.1186/cc13073.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
23089676
Citation
Tamayo E, Fernandez A, Almansa R, Carrasco E, Goncalves L, Heredia M, Andaluz-Ojeda D, March G, Rico L, Gomez-Herreras JI, de Lejarazu RO, Bermejo-Martin JF. Beneficial role of endogenous immunoglobulin subclasses and isotypes in septic shock. J Crit Care. 2012 Dec;27(6):616-22. doi: 10.1016/j.jcrc.2012.08.004. Epub 2012 Oct 22.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11162047
Citation
Koo DJ, Zhou M, Chaudry IH, Wang P. The role of adrenomedullin in producing differential hemodynamic responses during sepsis. J Surg Res. 2001 Feb;95(2):207-18. doi: 10.1006/jsre.2000.6013.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
9865646
Citation
Wang P, Ba ZF, Cioffi WG, Bland KI, Chaudry IH. The pivotal role of adrenomedullin in producing hyperdynamic circulation during the early stage of sepsis. Arch Surg. 1998 Dec;133(12):1298-304. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.133.12.1298.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24533868
Citation
Marino R, Struck J, Maisel AS, Magrini L, Bergmann A, Di Somma S. Plasma adrenomedullin is associated with short-term mortality and vasopressor requirement in patients admitted with sepsis. Crit Care. 2014 Feb 17;18(1):R34. doi: 10.1186/cc13731.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
10390390
Citation
Ueda S, Nishio K, Minamino N, Kubo A, Akai Y, Kangawa K, Matsuo H, Fujimura Y, Yoshioka A, Masui K, Doi N, Murao Y, Miyamoto S. Increased plasma levels of adrenomedullin in patients with systemic inflammatory response syndrome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 1999 Jul;160(1):132-6. doi: 10.1164/ajrccm.160.1.9810006.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21427539
Citation
Adamzik M, Frey UH, Mohlenkamp S, Scherag A, Waydhas C, Marggraf G, Dammann M, Steinmann J, Siffert W, Peters J. Aquaporin 5 gene promoter--1364A/C polymorphism associated with 30-day survival in severe sepsis. Anesthesiology. 2011 Apr;114(4):912-7. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e31820ca911.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20646511
Citation
Zhu Y, Qiu HB, Liu JT, Wang Y, Lin HY, Xu Y, Jiang L, Shi Y, Zhu X, Ning B, Cheng R, Xie ZY, Ma PL. [Effect of endothelial nitric oxide synthase gene polymorphisms upon disease severity and outcome in septic patients]. Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Apr 6;90(13):906-11. Chinese.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21257964
Citation
Thair SA, Walley KR, Nakada TA, McConechy MK, Boyd JH, Wellman H, Russell JA. A single nucleotide polymorphism in NF-kappaB inducing kinase is associated with mortality in septic shock. J Immunol. 2011 Feb 15;186(4):2321-8. doi: 10.4049/jimmunol.1002864. Epub 2011 Jan 21.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
26661744
Citation
Beyer K, Menges P, Kessler W, Heidecke CD. [Pathophysiology of peritonitis]. Chirurg. 2016 Jan;87(1):5-12. doi: 10.1007/s00104-015-0117-6. German.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15803051
Citation
Rodriguez A, Rello J, Neira J, Maskin B, Ceraso D, Vasta L, Palizas F. Effects of high-dose of intravenous immunoglobulin and antibiotics on survival for severe sepsis undergoing surgery. Shock. 2005 Apr;23(4):298-304. doi: 10.1097/01.shk.0000157302.69125.f8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25217146
Citation
Cavazzuti I, Serafini G, Busani S, Rinaldi L, Biagioni E, Buoncristiano M, Girardis M. Early therapy with IgM-enriched polyclonal immunoglobulin in patients with septic shock. Intensive Care Med. 2014 Dec;40(12):1888-96. doi: 10.1007/s00134-014-3474-6. Epub 2014 Sep 13.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24043371
Citation
Alejandria MM, Lansang MA, Dans LF, Mantaring JB 3rd. Intravenous immunoglobulin for treating sepsis, severe sepsis and septic shock. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Sep 16;2013(9):CD001090. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001090.pub2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24449349
Citation
Janssens U. [Treatment of sepsis and septic shock with immunoglobulins]. Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2014 Jan;139(5):178. doi: 10.1055/s-0032-1329177. Epub 2014 Jan 21. No abstract available. German.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
20414762
Citation
Reinhart K, Brunkhorst FM, Bone HG, Bardutzky J, Dempfle CE, Forst H, Gastmeier P, Gerlach H, Grundling M, John S, Kern W, Kreymann G, Kruger W, Kujath P, Marggraf G, Martin J, Mayer K, Meier-Hellmann A, Oppert M, Putensen C, Quintel M, Ragaller M, Rossaint R, Seifert H, Spies C, Stuber F, Weiler N, Weimann A, Werdan K, Welte T; German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive and Emergency Care Medicine; German Sepsis Society. [Prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up care of sepsis. First revision of the S2k Guidelines of the German Sepsis Society (DSG) and the German Interdisciplinary Association for Intensive and Emergency Care Medicine (DIVI)]. Anaesthesist. 2010 Apr;59(4):347-70. doi: 10.1007/s00101-010-1719-5. No abstract available. German.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
4038052
Citation
Goris RJ, te Boekhorst TP, Nuytinck JK, Gimbrere JS. Multiple-organ failure. Generalized autodestructive inflammation? Arch Surg. 1985 Oct;120(10):1109-15. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.1985.01390340007001.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
11981679
Citation
Lefering R, Goris RJ, van Nieuwenhoven EJ, Neugebauer E. Revision of the multiple organ failure score. Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2002 Apr;387(1):14-20. doi: 10.1007/s00423-001-0269-3. Epub 2002 Jan 31.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
25479113
Citation
Casserly B, Phillips GS, Schorr C, Dellinger RP, Townsend SR, Osborn TM, Reinhart K, Selvakumar N, Levy MM. Lactate measurements in sepsis-induced tissue hypoperfusion: results from the Surviving Sepsis Campaign database. Crit Care Med. 2015 Mar;43(3):567-73. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000742.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
17847176
Citation
Weigelt JA. Empiric treatment options in the management of complicated intra-abdominal infections. Cleve Clin J Med. 2007 Aug;74 Suppl 4:S29-37. doi: 10.3949/ccjm.74.suppl_4.s29.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
15846719
Citation
Wong PF, Gilliam AD, Kumar S, Shenfine J, O'Dair GN, Leaper DJ. Antibiotic regimens for secondary peritonitis of gastrointestinal origin in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Apr 18;(2):CD004539. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004539.pub2.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27034779
Citation
Mebazaa A, Laterre PF, Russell JA, Bergmann A, Gattinoni L, Gayat E, Harhay MO, Hartmann O, Hein F, Kjolbye AL, Legrand M, Lewis RJ, Marshall JC, Marx G, Radermacher P, Schroedter M, Scigalla P, Stough WG, Struck J, Van den Berghe G, Yilmaz MB, Angus DC. Designing phase 3 sepsis trials: application of learned experiences from critical care trials in acute heart failure. J Intensive Care. 2016 Mar 31;4:24. doi: 10.1186/s40560-016-0151-6. eCollection 2016.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
30832742
Citation
Kalvelage C, Zacharowski K, Bauhofer A, Gockel U, Adamzik M, Nierhaus A, Kujath P, Eckmann C, Pletz MW, Bracht H, Simon TP, Winkler M, Kindgen-Milles D, Albertsmeier M, Weigand M, Ellger B, Ragaller M, Ullrich R, Marx G. Personalized medicine with IgGAM compared with standard of care for treatment of peritonitis after infectious source control (the PEPPER trial): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2019 Mar 4;20(1):156. doi: 10.1186/s13063-019-3244-4.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Personalised Medicine With IgGAM Compared With Standard of Care for Treatment of Peritonitis After Infectious Source Control (the PEPPER Trial)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs