search
Back to results

Working Memory Training Combined With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Smokers

Primary Purpose

Tobacco Use Disorder

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Working Memory Training
Sham Working Memory Training
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Sponsored by
Kent State University
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Tobacco Use Disorder

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - 60 Years (Adult)All SexesAccepts Healthy Volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • meet safety guidelines for application of rTMS
  • be 18-60 years of age
  • have smoked cigarettes regularly for at least one year
  • currently smoke at least 10 cigarettes per day
  • have a carbon monoxide (CO) level >10 ppm
  • currently use no other nicotine products regularly

Exclusion Criteria:

  • meet criteria for current alcohol or substance dependence
  • have a current affective disorder (depression, dysthymia, or mania) or psychotic symptoms
  • are currently pregnant or lactating, or intend to become pregnant
  • have a health condition for which rTMS is contraindicated

Sites / Locations

  • Brown University
  • Butler Hospital

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Active Comparator

Sham Comparator

Arm Label

WMT + rTMS

Sham WMT + rTMS

WMT + sham rTMS

Sham WMT + sham rTMS

Arm Description

WMT + rTMS is the Working Memory Training + repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation arm. Both conditions are active.

Sham WMT + rTMS is the sham Working Memory Training + repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation arm. This condition isolates the effects of rTMS. WMT is inactive.

WMT + sham rTMS is the Working Memory Training + sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation arm. This condition isolates the effects of WMT. rTMS is inactive.

sham WMT + sham rTMS is the sham Working Memory Training + sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation arm. Both are inactive in this arm.

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Time to Lapse on a Smoking Lapse Analogue Task
The Delay to Smoking Analogue Task is a behavioral choice paradigm that is sensitive to smoking medication effects in which participants earn monetary rewards for delaying initiation of cigarette smoking in 5-minute increments over a 50-minute period, following 3-hours of observed smoking deprivation. Range = 0 - 50 minutes. Higher scores indicate better ability to delay smoking.
Working Memory Performance 1
NIH Examiner N-back score. The minimum value is 0 and maximum is 90, higher scores indicate a better outcome. Calculated change scores are presented (outcome score at day 30 minus baseline score).
Working Memory Performance 2
NIH Examiner Dot Counting Task score. The minimum total score is 0 and the maximum score is 27, higher scores indicate a better outcome. Calculated change scores are presented (outcome score at day 30 minus baseline score).
Working Memory Performance 3
Mean End Level Score on Maastricht University Working Memory Tasks. For each scale (i.e. visuospatial, back-digit, and letter-sequencing) the minimum total is 3 and the maximum is 15, higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Cigarette Consumption
Self reported number of cigarettes smoked daily

Secondary Outcome Measures

Delay Discounting
Discounting Rate on the Monetary Choice Questionnaire, assessed by k (log transformed). Individuals made hypothetical choices between smaller immediate rewards (e.g. $11 today) and larger delayed rewards (e.g. $30 in 7 days) at varying levels of hyperbolic-like discounting. Overall temporal discounting function (k) was assessed; larger values indicate steeper discounting which reflects a worse outcome. Total score range = 0 - 0.25.
Cigarette Demand
Demand characteristics on the Cigarette Purchase Task. Demand sensitivity indicates sensitivity to change in price, with higher values reflecting higher sensitivity to the monetary reinforcer rather than the substance, thus higher scores reflect a better outcome. Score range = 0 - .100.

Full Information

First Posted
October 25, 2017
Last Updated
April 29, 2022
Sponsor
Kent State University
Collaborators
Brown University, Butler Hospital
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03337113
Brief Title
Working Memory Training Combined With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Smokers
Official Title
Working Memory Training Combined With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Smokers: 2x2 Factorial Study
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
April 2022
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
March 5, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
January 31, 2021 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
January 31, 2021 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Principal Investigator
Name of the Sponsor
Kent State University
Collaborators
Brown University, Butler Hospital

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Product Manufactured in and Exported from the U.S.
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the United States, and current first-line treatments leave the majority of tobacco dependent individuals unable to quit. The inability to quit despite motivation to do so, is thought to result in part, from self-control failure. Working memory (WM) deficits contribute to imbalanced self-control and allow automatic impulses to drive behavior. Thus, WM plays a critical role in addictive behavior, and is particularly relevant to smoking. Indeed, a strong link between WM and smoking has been established in the literature; most notably, degree of WM impairment and deficits in activation in associated brain regions predict time to relapse, and WM moderates the relationship between craving and relapse. Given these insights, researchers have been examining interventions that may target WM including WM training (WMT) and repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS). WMT involves taxing this executive function repeatedly over time and has shown positive preliminary results in improving measures of self-control and reducing consumption of addictive substances. Similarly, rTMS, a non-invasive brain stimulation procedure that stimulates neuronal tissues and increases cortical excitability, has been shown to increase WM capacity and reduce craving and consumption of several addictive substances including nicotine. While these interventions have demonstrated initial promise in affecting addictive behaviors, the magnitude and durability of their effects may be limited. Recently, researchers have posited - but not yet empirically tested - that WMT administered in combination with rTMS may result in an additive or supra-additive effect in treating addictive processes. This is highly significant; the clinical utility of rTMS over current first line treatments may be limited if factors with potential to enhance its effectiveness are not examined. Given these recent advances in the literature, the primary objective of the proposed study is to evaluate the individual and combined effects of Working Memory (WM) training and repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS) on WM performance and smoking behaviors as well as critical mediators of these effects. These aims will be examined in a sample of tobacco dependent adults (N=130) utilizing a 2x2 factorial experimental design including four groups (WMT+rTMS, sham WMT+rTMS, WMT+sham TMS, and sham WMT+sham rTMS) capable of isolating independent and combined effects of WMT and rTMS.
Detailed Description
SPECIFIC AIMS Smoking remains the leading cause of preventable death in the U.S. Current first line treatments leave approximately 70% of tobacco dependent individuals unsuccessful in their attempt to quit. Specifically, only 5-30% of those who initiate treatment, including intensive first-line interventions, are able to maintain abstinence for one or more years. The inability to quit despite motivation to do so is thought to result, in part, from self-control failure and can be understood within the framework of dual process models of addiction. Dual process models view vulnerability to tobacco dependence as the relative balance between automatic impulses and control processes orchestrated through the interplay of multiple executive function. Working memory (WM) is an executive function associated with updating information to solve immediate problems, and achieve current goals. WM is a key cognitive process underlying the regulatory control component of dual process models and is involved in the initiation, maintenance, and relapse stages of tobacco dependence. Most notably, deficits in WM performance and activation in associated brain regions predict time to relapse and strong WM has been shown to reduce the effect of craving on the ability to resist smoking. Given this relationship, individuals with tobacco dependence are likely to benefit from interventions that strengthen WM. Recently, several studies have demonstrated that increasing WM capacity through WM training (WMT) is associated with positive outcomes in several populations with substance use or impulse control disorders. Specifically, studies have demonstrated that WMT is associated with decreased: delay discounting in substance users, weight re-gain after a weight loss program, and alcohol use in heavy drinkers. A second emerging innovation in the treatment of addictions is repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation (rTMS), a procedure which sends magnetic pulses through the scalp to stimulate neuronal tissue resulting in observed changes in neuronal plasticity and striatal dopamine. rTMS has now demonstrated positive effects in several substance use disorders including nicotine, alcohol, and stimulant dependence. This procedure has been shown to be effective in reducing smoking urges in abstinent as well as satiated smokers and to reduce cigarette consumption. While promising results for this treatment have been demonstrated, the size and durability of the therapeutic effect may be limited. Additionally, the mechanism by which rTMS exerts positive effects on smoking outcomes is unknown. Recently it has been posited that changes in WM performance resulting from rTMS may be the key pathway to its observed effects on smoking related outcomes, and furthermore that WMT administered in close temporal precedence to rTMS may result in an additive or supra-additive effect in treating addictive processes. However, these hypotheses have not been tested to date despite their importance for understanding and improving the clinical impact of these emerging therapeutic modalities for treating addictive behaviors. Interventions with the ability to effectively target self-control processes fill in a critical gap in currently available treatment options. The primary objective of the proposed study is to evaluate the potential for improved effects and examine mediating pathways of WMT in combination with rTMS on a laboratory based smoking task and neuropsychological measures of WM performance. These aims will be examined in a sample of tobacco dependent adults (N=130) utilizing a 2x2 factorial design including four groups (WMT+rTMS, sham WMT+rTMS, WMT+sham TMS, and sham WMT+sham rTMS) capable of isolating independent and combined effects of WMT and rTMS. The study will include a baseline laboratory assessment, 10 WMT sessions over two weeks, followed by 10 days of WMT immediately preceding and following brain stimulation sessions (10 Hz rTMS, 2000 pulses per session, applied to left DLPFC). Neurocognitive and psychological mediators will be assessed between baseline and final laboratory assessment. Lastly, a follow-up assessment will occur one-month after the final laboratory visit. The proposed study will test the following Specific Aims: Aim 1: To test the potential for improved effects of combining WMT with rTMS on smoking behaviors as compared to the independent effects of either condition alone. Hypothesis: Single active conditions (WMT+sham rTMS and sham WMT+rTMS) will result in significant increases in time to lapse on an analogue task as compared to the double sham condition (sham WMT+sham rTMS), and the WMT+rTMS condition will result in significant increases in time to lapse as compared to the single active conditions. Aim 2: To test the potential for improved effects of combining WMT with rTMS on WM performance. Hypothesis: WMT + rTMS will result in significant increases in WM performance as compared to all other conditions, including the additive increases in conditions outlined in Aim 1. Aim 3: To test mediating pathways of the effects rTMS on smoking behaviors including changes in craving, mood, and WM performance. Hypothesis: The direct effect of rTMS on smoking outcomes will be mediated by gains in WM performance, and this effect will be largest in the WMT+rTMS condition.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Tobacco Use Disorder

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Factorial Assignment
Model Description
A 2x2 factorial model will include four groups (Working Memory Training [WMT] + repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation ]rTMS], sham WMT+rTMS, WMT+sham TMS, and sham WMT+sham rTMS) capable of isolating independent and combined effects of WMT and rTMS on the primary outcome variables.
Masking
ParticipantCare Provider
Masking Description
The participant will be prevented from having knowledge of the interventions assigned.
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
50 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
WMT + rTMS
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
WMT + rTMS is the Working Memory Training + repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation arm. Both conditions are active.
Arm Title
Sham WMT + rTMS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Sham WMT + rTMS is the sham Working Memory Training + repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation arm. This condition isolates the effects of rTMS. WMT is inactive.
Arm Title
WMT + sham rTMS
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
WMT + sham rTMS is the Working Memory Training + sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation arm. This condition isolates the effects of WMT. rTMS is inactive.
Arm Title
Sham WMT + sham rTMS
Arm Type
Sham Comparator
Arm Description
sham WMT + sham rTMS is the sham Working Memory Training + sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation arm. Both are inactive in this arm.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Working Memory Training
Other Intervention Name(s)
Executive Function Training
Intervention Description
The Working Memory Training condition: This condition will include 30 sessions across 4 weeks (10 remote sessions prior to initiation of the rTMS stimulation, and 20 lab sessions on rTMS stimulation days). Participants will complete three distinct WM tasks in each session: a visuospatial WM task, a backward digit span task, and a letter span task. In the training condition, the difficulty level of all three WM tasks will be automatically adjusted on a trial-by-trial basis. An identical protocol and software have demonstrated efficacy in increasing WM capacity, and this improvement in WM predicts reduction in addictive behavior.
Intervention Type
Other
Intervention Name(s)
Sham Working Memory Training
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sham Executive Function Training
Intervention Description
In the Sham WMT condition, the difficulty level of the WM tasks will not be adjusted; instead it will remain at the initial easy level throughout each task (i.e., three items in each sequence). All other aspects of the condition are identical to the active WMT condition.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Neuromodulation
Intervention Description
The rTMS Condition: rTMS will be delivered with a Magstim Rapid2 system using Magstim Air Film Coils. rTMS pulses will be delivered at 10 Hz (100% resting motor threshold, RMT) in 40, 5 second trains, with 15 second inter-train interval, for a total of 2000 pulses per session. Active or sham rTMS will be applied over the left DLPFC; corresponding with the standard "F3" location on scalp (F3=left frontal lobe, location #3 for electrode placement using international 10-20 system for scalp measurements). Five consecutive daily sessions will occur on two consecutive weeks, for a total of 10 sessions. RMT, defined as the amount of energy required to induce movement in the contralateral abducer pollicis brevis in at least 50% of stimulations, will be assessed on first day of application.
Intervention Type
Device
Intervention Name(s)
Sham repetitive Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation
Other Intervention Name(s)
Sham Neuromodulation
Intervention Description
Sham rTMS will be identical to active treatment, with the exception that mu-metal plates attached to the sham coil block the magnetic field while providing a sensation of stimulation.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Time to Lapse on a Smoking Lapse Analogue Task
Description
The Delay to Smoking Analogue Task is a behavioral choice paradigm that is sensitive to smoking medication effects in which participants earn monetary rewards for delaying initiation of cigarette smoking in 5-minute increments over a 50-minute period, following 3-hours of observed smoking deprivation. Range = 0 - 50 minutes. Higher scores indicate better ability to delay smoking.
Time Frame
an average of 30 days after baseline
Title
Working Memory Performance 1
Description
NIH Examiner N-back score. The minimum value is 0 and maximum is 90, higher scores indicate a better outcome. Calculated change scores are presented (outcome score at day 30 minus baseline score).
Time Frame
Change from baseline score to score at 30 days
Title
Working Memory Performance 2
Description
NIH Examiner Dot Counting Task score. The minimum total score is 0 and the maximum score is 27, higher scores indicate a better outcome. Calculated change scores are presented (outcome score at day 30 minus baseline score).
Time Frame
Change from baseline score to score at 30 days
Title
Working Memory Performance 3
Description
Mean End Level Score on Maastricht University Working Memory Tasks. For each scale (i.e. visuospatial, back-digit, and letter-sequencing) the minimum total is 3 and the maximum is 15, higher scores indicate a better outcome.
Time Frame
Change from baseline score to score at 30 days
Title
Cigarette Consumption
Description
Self reported number of cigarettes smoked daily
Time Frame
throughout 60 day study participation, cigarettes per day assessed at outcome reported
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Delay Discounting
Description
Discounting Rate on the Monetary Choice Questionnaire, assessed by k (log transformed). Individuals made hypothetical choices between smaller immediate rewards (e.g. $11 today) and larger delayed rewards (e.g. $30 in 7 days) at varying levels of hyperbolic-like discounting. Overall temporal discounting function (k) was assessed; larger values indicate steeper discounting which reflects a worse outcome. Total score range = 0 - 0.25.
Time Frame
Change from baseline score to score at 30 days
Title
Cigarette Demand
Description
Demand characteristics on the Cigarette Purchase Task. Demand sensitivity indicates sensitivity to change in price, with higher values reflecting higher sensitivity to the monetary reinforcer rather than the substance, thus higher scores reflect a better outcome. Score range = 0 - .100.
Time Frame
Change from baseline score to score at 30 days

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Maximum Age & Unit of Time
60 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: meet safety guidelines for application of rTMS be 18-60 years of age have smoked cigarettes regularly for at least one year currently smoke at least 10 cigarettes per day have a carbon monoxide (CO) level >10 ppm currently use no other nicotine products regularly Exclusion Criteria: meet criteria for current alcohol or substance dependence have a current affective disorder (depression, dysthymia, or mania) or psychotic symptoms are currently pregnant or lactating, or intend to become pregnant have a health condition for which rTMS is contraindicated
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
William V Lechner, Ph.D.
Organizational Affiliation
Kent State University
Official's Role
Principal Investigator
Facility Information:
Facility Name
Brown University
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02906
Country
United States
Facility Name
Butler Hospital
City
Providence
State/Province
Rhode Island
ZIP/Postal Code
02906
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Plan to Share IPD
Undecided
IPD Sharing Plan Description
IPD may be shared.
Citations:
PubMed Identifier
35907262
Citation
Lechner WV, Philip NS, Kahler CW, Houben K, Tirrell E, Carpenter LL. Combined Working Memory Training and Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation Demonstrates Low Feasibility and Potentially Worse Outcomes on Delay to Smoking and Cognitive Tasks: A Randomized 2 x 2 Factorial Design Pilot and Feasibility Study. Nicotine Tob Res. 2022 Nov 12;24(12):1871-1880. doi: 10.1093/ntr/ntac183.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

Working Memory Training Combined With Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation in Smokers

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs