search
Back to results

A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Bempedoic Acid Plus Ezetimibe Fixed-Dose Combination Compared to Bempedoic Acid, Ezetimibe, and Placebo in Patients Treated With Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy

Primary Purpose

Hyperlipidemias

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 3
Locations
United States
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Bempedoic Acid + Ezetimibe Fixed-Dose Combination
Bempedoic Acid
Ezetimibe
Placebos
Sponsored by
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Hyperlipidemias focused on measuring hyperlipidemia, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, high cholesterol, ASCVD, HeFH, LDL

Eligibility Criteria

18 Years - undefined (Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  • Require lipid-modifying therapy for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease
  • Fasting LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL for primary prevention or LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL for secondary prevention (history of HeFH and/or ASCVD)
  • Treated with maximally tolerated statin therapy at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to screening

Exclusion Criteria:

  • Total Fasting Triglyceride ≥ 400 mg/dL
  • Renal Dysfunction or nephrotic syndrome or history of nephritis
  • Significant cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular event within the past 3 months

Sites / Locations

  • PMG Research of McFarland
  • Foundation Cardiology
  • PMG Research of Piedmont Healthcare
  • PMG Research of Wilmington
  • PMG Research of Knoxville

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm 3

Arm 4

Arm Type

Experimental

Experimental

Active Comparator

Placebo Comparator

Arm Label

BA 180 mg + EZE 10 mg FDC

BA 180 mg

EZE 10 mg

Placebos

Arm Description

Bempedoic acid (BA) + ezetimibe (EZE) fixed-dose combination (FDC) 180 mg/10 mg tablets taken orally once daily for 12 weeks

Bempedoic acid (BA) 180 mg tablets taken orally once daily for 12 weeks

Ezetimibe (EZE) 10 mg overencapsulated tablets taken orally once daily for 12 weeks

Placebos to match identical bempedoic acid + ezetimibe fixed-dose combination (FDC) 180 mg/10 mg tablet, or identical bempedoic acid 180 mg tablet, or identical ezetimibe 10 mg capsule, taken orally, once daily for 12 weeks

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for LDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the LDL-C values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline in LDL-C was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline LDL-C as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([LDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100. For LDL-C, if measured LDL-C value was available, measured LDL-C was used.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for hsCRP. Baseline was defined as the predose Day 1/Week 0 value. Percent change from baseline in hsCRP was analyzed using a non-parametric analysis. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([hsCRP value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for non-HDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the non-HDL-C values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline non-HDL-C as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([non-HDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol (TC)
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for TC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the TC values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline in TC was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline TC as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([TC value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for apo B. Baseline was defined as the predose Day 1/Week 0 value. Percent change from baseline in apo B was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline apo B as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([apo B value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for HDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the HDL-C values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([HDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100.
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Triglycerides (TGs)
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for TGs. Baseline was defined as the mean of the TGs values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([TGs value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100.

Full Information

First Posted
November 6, 2017
Last Updated
March 25, 2020
Sponsor
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03337308
Brief Title
A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Bempedoic Acid Plus Ezetimibe Fixed-Dose Combination Compared to Bempedoic Acid, Ezetimibe, and Placebo in Patients Treated With Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy
Official Title
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel Group Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid 180 Mg + Ezetimibe 10 Mg Fixed-Dose Combination Compared to Bempedoic Acid, Ezetimibe, and Placebo Alone in Patients Treated With Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
March 2020
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
October 23, 2017 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
June 18, 2018 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
July 18, 2018 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No
Data Monitoring Committee
Yes

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if Bempedoic Acid (BA) + Ezetimibe (EZE) in a fixed-dose combination (FDC) is effective and safe versus its individual components and placebo in patients with elevated LDL cholesterol treated with maximally tolerated statin therapy.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Hyperlipidemias
Keywords
hyperlipidemia, heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia, atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease, high cholesterol, ASCVD, HeFH, LDL

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 3
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
ParticipantCare ProviderInvestigatorOutcomes Assessor
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
382 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
BA 180 mg + EZE 10 mg FDC
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Bempedoic acid (BA) + ezetimibe (EZE) fixed-dose combination (FDC) 180 mg/10 mg tablets taken orally once daily for 12 weeks
Arm Title
BA 180 mg
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Bempedoic acid (BA) 180 mg tablets taken orally once daily for 12 weeks
Arm Title
EZE 10 mg
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Ezetimibe (EZE) 10 mg overencapsulated tablets taken orally once daily for 12 weeks
Arm Title
Placebos
Arm Type
Placebo Comparator
Arm Description
Placebos to match identical bempedoic acid + ezetimibe fixed-dose combination (FDC) 180 mg/10 mg tablet, or identical bempedoic acid 180 mg tablet, or identical ezetimibe 10 mg capsule, taken orally, once daily for 12 weeks
Intervention Type
Combination Product
Intervention Name(s)
Bempedoic Acid + Ezetimibe Fixed-Dose Combination
Other Intervention Name(s)
Bempedoic Acid + Zetia FDC, ETC-1002 + Zetia
Intervention Description
bempedoic acid + ezetimibe FDC 180 mg/10 mg tablet
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Bempedoic Acid
Other Intervention Name(s)
ETC-1002
Intervention Description
bempedoic acid 180 mg tablet
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Ezetimibe
Other Intervention Name(s)
Zetia
Intervention Description
ezetimibe 10 mg overencapsulated tablet
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Placebos
Other Intervention Name(s)
Placebo
Intervention Description
placebo tablet or capsule to match bempedoic acid + ezetimibe fixed-dose combination (FDC) 180 mg/10 mg tablet, or bempedoic acid 180 mg tablet, or ezetimibe 10 mg capsule
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Low-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDL-C)
Description
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for LDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the LDL-C values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline in LDL-C was analyzed using analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline LDL-C as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([LDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100. For LDL-C, if measured LDL-C value was available, measured LDL-C was used.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 12
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-sensitivity C-reactive Protein (hsCRP)
Description
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for hsCRP. Baseline was defined as the predose Day 1/Week 0 value. Percent change from baseline in hsCRP was analyzed using a non-parametric analysis. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([hsCRP value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Non-high-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (Non-HDL-C)
Description
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for non-HDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the non-HDL-C values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline in non-HDL-C was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline non-HDL-C as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([non-HDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Total Cholesterol (TC)
Description
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for TC. Baseline was defined as the mean of the TC values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline in TC was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline TC as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([TC value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Apolipoprotein B (Apo B)
Description
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for apo B. Baseline was defined as the predose Day 1/Week 0 value. Percent change from baseline in apo B was analyzed using ANCOVA with treatment group and randomization stratification as a factors and baseline apo B as a covariate. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([apo B value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in High-density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDL-C)
Description
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for HDL-C. Baseline was defined as the mean of the HDL-C values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([HDL-C value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 12
Title
Percent Change From Baseline to Week 12 in Triglycerides (TGs)
Description
Blood samples were drawn after a minimum 10-hour fast (water was allowed) at pre-specified intervals. Samples were collected and analyzed for TGs. Baseline was defined as the mean of the TGs values from Week -2 and predose Day 1/Week 0. Percent change from baseline was calculated as: ([TGs value at Week 12 minus Baseline value] divided by [Baseline Value]) multiplied by 100.
Time Frame
Baseline; Week 12

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
18 Years
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Require lipid-modifying therapy for primary or secondary prevention of cardiovascular disease Fasting LDL-C ≥ 130 mg/dL for primary prevention or LDL-C ≥ 100 mg/dL for secondary prevention (history of HeFH and/or ASCVD) Treated with maximally tolerated statin therapy at stable dose for at least 4 weeks prior to screening Exclusion Criteria: Total Fasting Triglyceride ≥ 400 mg/dL Renal Dysfunction or nephrotic syndrome or history of nephritis Significant cardiovascular disease or cardiovascular event within the past 3 months
Overall Study Officials:
First Name & Middle Initial & Last Name & Degree
Ron Haberman, MD
Organizational Affiliation
Esperion Therapeutics, Inc.
Official's Role
Study Director
Facility Information:
Facility Name
PMG Research of McFarland
City
Ames
State/Province
Iowa
ZIP/Postal Code
50010
Country
United States
Facility Name
Foundation Cardiology
City
Nashua
State/Province
New Hampshire
ZIP/Postal Code
03060
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Piedmont Healthcare
City
Statesville
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28625
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Wilmington
City
Wilmington
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
28401
Country
United States
Facility Name
PMG Research of Knoxville
City
Knoxville
State/Province
Tennessee
ZIP/Postal Code
37912
Country
United States

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Citations:
PubMed Identifier
27892461
Citation
Pinkosky SL, Newton RS, Day EA, Ford RJ, Lhotak S, Austin RC, Birch CM, Smith BK, Filippov S, Groot PHE, Steinberg GR, Lalwani ND. Liver-specific ATP-citrate lyase inhibition by bempedoic acid decreases LDL-C and attenuates atherosclerosis. Nat Commun. 2016 Nov 28;7:13457. doi: 10.1038/ncomms13457.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
21067804
Citation
Cholesterol Treatment Trialists' (CTT) Collaboration; Baigent C, Blackwell L, Emberson J, Holland LE, Reith C, Bhala N, Peto R, Barnes EH, Keech A, Simes J, Collins R. Efficacy and safety of more intensive lowering of LDL cholesterol: a meta-analysis of data from 170,000 participants in 26 randomised trials. Lancet. 2010 Nov 13;376(9753):1670-81. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(10)61350-5. Epub 2010 Nov 8.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27594540
Citation
Authors/Task Force Members:; Catapano AL, Graham I, De Backer G, Wiklund O, Chapman MJ, Drexel H, Hoes AW, Jennings CS, Landmesser U, Pedersen TR, Reiner Z, Riccardi G, Taskinen MR, Tokgozoglu L, Verschuren WM, Vlachopoulos C, Wood DA, Zamorano JL. 2016 ESC/EAS Guidelines for the Management of Dyslipidaemias: The Task Force for the Management of Dyslipidaemias of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and European Atherosclerosis Society (EAS) Developed with the special contribution of the European Assocciation for Cardiovascular Prevention & Rehabilitation (EACPR). Atherosclerosis. 2016 Oct;253:281-344. doi: 10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2016.08.018. Epub 2016 Sep 1. No abstract available.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
27673306
Citation
Silverman MG, Ference BA, Im K, Wiviott SD, Giugliano RP, Grundy SM, Braunwald E, Sabatine MS. Association Between Lowering LDL-C and Cardiovascular Risk Reduction Among Different Therapeutic Interventions: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016 Sep 27;316(12):1289-97. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13985.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
24222016
Citation
Stone NJ, Robinson JG, Lichtenstein AH, Bairey Merz CN, Blum CB, Eckel RH, Goldberg AC, Gordon D, Levy D, Lloyd-Jones DM, McBride P, Schwartz JS, Shero ST, Smith SC Jr, Watson K, Wilson PW, Eddleman KM, Jarrett NM, LaBresh K, Nevo L, Wnek J, Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, Bozkurt B, Brindis RG, Curtis LH, DeMets D, Hochman JS, Kovacs RJ, Ohman EM, Pressler SJ, Sellke FW, Shen WK, Smith SC Jr, Tomaselli GF; American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. 2013 ACC/AHA guideline on the treatment of blood cholesterol to reduce atherosclerotic cardiovascular risk in adults: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S1-45. doi: 10.1161/01.cir.0000437738.63853.7a. Epub 2013 Nov 12. No abstract available. Erratum In: Circulation. 2014 Jun 24;129(25 Suppl 2):S46-8. Circulation. 2015 Dec 22;132(25):e396.
Results Reference
background
PubMed Identifier
31357887
Citation
Ballantyne CM, Laufs U, Ray KK, Leiter LA, Bays HE, Goldberg AC, Stroes ES, MacDougall D, Zhao X, Catapano AL. Bempedoic acid plus ezetimibe fixed-dose combination in patients with hypercholesterolemia and high CVD risk treated with maximally tolerated statin therapy. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 Apr;27(6):593-603. doi: 10.1177/2047487319864671. Epub 2019 Jul 29.
Results Reference
derived

Learn more about this trial

A Study Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Bempedoic Acid Plus Ezetimibe Fixed-Dose Combination Compared to Bempedoic Acid, Ezetimibe, and Placebo in Patients Treated With Maximally Tolerated Statin Therapy

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs