search
Back to results

An Open-Label Study of Defibrotide for the Prevention of Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease (AGvHD)

Primary Purpose

Graft-versus-host Disease, Acute-graft-versus-host Disease

Status
Completed
Phase
Phase 2
Locations
International
Study Type
Interventional
Intervention
Defibrotide
Standard of Care
Sponsored by
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
About
Eligibility
Locations
Arms
Outcomes
Full info

About this trial

This is an interventional treatment trial for Graft-versus-host Disease

Eligibility Criteria

1 Year - undefined (Child, Adult, Older Adult)All SexesDoes not accept healthy volunteers

Inclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant must be ≥1 year of age at screening and undergoing allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT).
  2. Participant must be diagnosed with acute leukemia in morphologic complete remission (CR1 or CR2) or with Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with no circulating blasts and with less than 5% blasts in the bone marrow
  3. Participant must have planned to receive either a myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning regimen and have an unrelated donor who is human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched or single-allele mismatched
  4. Participant must receive the following medical regimen as part of standard of care immunoprophylaxis for GvHD in either study arm at doses and regimen determined by local institutional guidelines, physician preference, and participant need:

    Methotrexate (MTX) or Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + calcineurin inhibitor (Cyclosporine A [CSA] or Tacrolimus [TAC]) +/- Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (ATG use is limited to 30% of participants).

  5. Graft must be a CD3+ T-cell replete peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) graft or non-manipulated bone marrow (BM) graft.
  6. Adult participants must be able to understand and sign a written informed consent. For pediatric participants, the parent/legal guardian or representative must be able to understand and sign a written informed consent. Assent, when appropriate, will be obtained according to institutional guidelines.

Exclusion Criteria:

  1. Participant has had a prior autologous or allogeneic HSCT.
  2. Participant is using or plans to use an investigational agent for the prevention of GvHD.
  3. Participant is receiving or plans to receive other investigational therapy and/or is enrolled or plans to enroll in a separate clinical study.
  4. Participant, in the opinion of the investigator, may not be able to comply with the safety monitoring requirements of the study.
  5. Participant has a psychiatric illness that would prevent the participant or legal guardian or representative from giving informed consent and/or assent.
  6. Participant has a serious active disease or co-morbid medical condition, as judged by the investigator, which would interfere with the conduct of this study.
  7. Participant is pregnant or lactating and does not agree to stop breastfeeding.
  8. Any other condition that would cause a risk to the participant if he/she participated in the trial.
  9. Participant has a known history of hypersensitivity to defibrotide or any of the excipients.
  10. Participant had acute bleeding that is clinically significant within 24 hours before the start of study treatment, defined as either of the following:

    • Hemorrhage requiring >15 cc/kg of packed red blood cells (eg, pediatric participant weighing 20 kg and requiring 300 cc packed red blood cells/24 hours, or an adult weighing >70 kg and requiring 3 units of packed red blood cells/24hours) to replace blood loss, or
    • Bleeding from a site which, in the investigator's opinion, constituted a potential life-threatening source (eg, pulmonary hemorrhage or central nervous system bleeding), irrespective of amount of blood loss
  11. Participant used any medication that increases the risk of bleeding within 24 hours before the start of study treatment, including, but not limited to, systemic heparin, low molecular weight heparin, heparin analogs, alteplase, streptokinase, urokinase, antithrombin III, oral anticoagulants including warfarin, and other agents that increase the risk of bleeding. Participants may have received heparin or other anticoagulants for routine central venous line management and intermittent dialysis or ultrafiltration. Fibrinolytic instillation for central venous line occlusion was also permitted. Note: Heparin used to keep catheters open was allowed (up to 100 U/kg/day).

Sites / Locations

  • USC Norris Cancer Center
  • Mattel Children's Hospital UCLA
  • Stanford University
  • University of California, San Francisco Medical Center
  • Mayo Clinic Jacksonville - PPDS
  • Blood & Marrow Transplant Center
  • Emory University Hospital
  • Northwestern Memorial Hospital
  • University of Kansas Medical Center
  • James Graham Brown Cancer Center
  • Ochsner Clinic Foundation
  • University of Nebraska Medical Center
  • Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center
  • University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
  • Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center
  • MUSC-Hollings Cancer Center
  • VA Puget Sound Health Care System
  • West Virginia University Hospital
  • Universitätsklinikum Innsbruck
  • Ordensklinikum Linz, Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen GmbH
  • Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
  • UZ Gent
  • UZ Leuven
  • Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Haematological Diseases - Sofia
  • Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
  • Sainte Justine Hospital
  • McGill University Health Center
  • Klinichki Bolnicki Centar Zagreb
  • Hospital d Instructions des Armees Percy
  • CHRU Lille
  • Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole
  • Institut Gustave Roussy
  • Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch
  • Medizinische Universitätsklinik Knappschaftskrankenhaus
  • Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder) GmbH
  • Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden
  • University Medicine Göttingen Germany
  • Universitaetsklinikum Halle (Saale)
  • Uniklinik Köln
  • Universitatsklinikum Leipzig
  • Klinikum Mannheim Universitätsklinikum gGmbH
  • Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
  • Klinikum der Universitat Regensburg
  • Attikon University General Hospital
  • University General Hospital of Patras
  • ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda - Presidio Ospedaliero Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda
  • Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma
  • Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù
  • Centrum Onkologii im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie
  • Dolnoslaskie Centrum Transplantacji Komorkowych z Krajowym Bankiem Dawcow Szpiku
  • Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, E.P.E.
  • Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
  • Hospital de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrin
  • Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda
  • Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca - H. Clinico
  • Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
  • Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
  • Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
  • St James University Hospital
  • St. James University Hospital
  • Leicester Royal Infirmary
  • Manchester Royal Infirmary

Arms of the Study

Arm 1

Arm 2

Arm Type

Experimental

Active Comparator

Arm Label

Defibrotide Prophylaxis

Standard of Care

Arm Description

Standard of Care Immunoprophylaxis + Defibrotide

Standard of Care Immunoprophylaxis Alone

Outcomes

Primary Outcome Measures

Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade B to D Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGvHD) by Day +100 Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade B to D aGvHD was defined using the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) Severity Index. Grade B is defined as Skin stage = 2 or Liver stage = 1 to 2 or GI stage = 1 to 2. Grade C is defined as Skin stage = 3 or Liver stage = 3 or GI stage = 3. Grade D is defined as a Skin stage = 4 or Liver stage = 4 or GI stage = 4.

Secondary Outcome Measures

Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade B to D aGvHD by Day +180 Post-HSCT
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade B to D aGvHD was defined using the IBMTR Severity Index. Grade B is defined as Skin stage = 2 or Liver stage = 1 to 2 or GI stage = 1 to 2. Grade C is defined as Skin stage = 3 or Liver stage = 3 or GI stage = 3. Grade D is defined as a Skin stage = 4 or Liver stage = 4 or GI stage = 4.
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Grade B to D aGvHD-free Survival by Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT
Grade B to D aGvHD was defined using the IBMTR Severity Index. Grade B is defined as Skin stage = 2 or Liver stage = 1 to 2 or GI stage = 1 to 2. Grade C is defined as Skin stage = 3 or Liver stage = 3 or GI stage = 3. Grade D is defined as a Skin stage = 4 or Liver stage = 4 or GI stage = 4.
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade C to D aGvHD by Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade C to D aGvHD was defined using the IBMTR Severity Index. Grade C is defined as Skin stage = 3 or Liver stage = 3 or GI stage = 3. Grade D is defined as a Skin stage = 4 or Liver stage = 4 or GI stage = 4.
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Disease Relapse by Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT
Disease relapse was defined by either morphological evidence of acute leukemia or Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) consistent with pre-transplant features, documented or not by biopsy. The event was defined as an increase in size of prior sites of disease or evidence of new sites of disease, documented or not by biopsy. Disease relapse was diagnosed when there was morphological or clinical evidence of the following: reappearance of leukemia blast cells in the peripheral blood, or >5% blasts in the bone marrow (BM), not attributable to another cause (eg, BM regeneration), or the appearance of previous or new dysplastic changes (MDS specific) within the BM, with or without falling donor chimerism, or the development of extramedullary leukemia or leukemic cells in the cerebral spinal fluid, or institution of therapy to treat relapsed disease, including donor lymphocyte infusion.
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Systemic Steroids for the Treatment of aGvHD +180 Days Post-HSCT
For each treatment arm, the cumulative incidence rate of systemic steroid use for the treatment of aGvHD by Day +180 post-HSCT will be estimated using the cumulative incidence competing risk estimator. The calculation of the cumulative incidence rates and the stratified Gray's test was carried out using the LIFETEST procedure in SAS version 9.4. If the participant experienced a competing risk event, then the initiation date was used to calculate the time-to-event variable.
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Physical Wellbeing Subscale as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) Questionnaire Score
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. The FACT physical wellbeing subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Social/Family Wellbeing Subscale as Measured by the FACT-BMT Questionnaire Score
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. The FACT social/family wellbeing subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Emotional Wellbeing Subscale as Measured by the FACT-BMT Questionnaire Score
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. The FACT emotional wellbeing subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 24, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Functional Wellbeing Subscale as Measured by the FACT-BMT Questionnaire Score
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. The FACT functional wellbeing subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Bone Marrow Transplantation Subscale (BMTS) as Measured by the FACT-BMT Questionnaire Score
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. The FACT-BMT subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 40, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the General (FACT-G) Questionnaire Score
The FACT-General (FACT-G) is a core component of the FACT-BMT, and includes 4 of the 5 subscales included in the FACT-BMT total score (FACT physical wellbeing score, FACT social/family wellbeing score, FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score). In line with this similarity, results of the FACT-G exhibited the same pattern as described for the FACT-BMT total score. The FACT-G scores range from a minimParticipants were age ≥16 years at baseline.
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the FACT-BMT Total Score
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. The FACT-BMT total score range is from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant-Trial Outcomes Index (FACT-BMT-TOI)
The FACT-BMT-TOI is defined as the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 96, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in Participant Reported Outcomes Measured Based on the EQ-5D-5L Index Value for Health States
The 5-Level EuroQol-5D health questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) index value, which is country-specific, was only performed for participants in the US. The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Change from the baseline assessment to Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT in the index value was assessed. The index value total range is from a minimum value of -1 to a maximum value of +1. A higher EQ-5D-5L index value represents better quality of life (QoL), thus a positive change in the index value represents improved QoL.
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in Participant Reported Outcomes as Measured Based on the EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ VAS)
The EQ VAS score at baseline and each of the post-HSCT assessments was summarized and presented using descriptive statistics. A higher EQ VAS score represents better QoL. For each of the post-HSCT assessments, change between baseline and that assessment in the EQ VAS score was calculated similarly to the EQ-5D-5L index value for a specific participant and was summarized and presented using descriptive statistics. The score ranges from a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. A negative change in the score indicates a decrease in quality of life.
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Mobility Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Mobility Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Pain/Discomfort Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Days +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Pain/Discomfort Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Self-Care Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Self-Care Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Usual Activities Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Usual Activities Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Anxiety/Depression Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Anxiety/Depression Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.

Full Information

First Posted
November 8, 2017
Last Updated
July 26, 2021
Sponsor
Jazz Pharmaceuticals
search

1. Study Identification

Unique Protocol Identification Number
NCT03339297
Brief Title
An Open-Label Study of Defibrotide for the Prevention of Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease (AGvHD)
Official Title
A Phase 2, Prospective, Randomized, Open-Label Study on the Efficacy of Defibrotide Added to Standard of Care Immunoprophylaxis for the Prevention of Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease in Adult and Pediatric Patients After Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant
Study Type
Interventional

2. Study Status

Record Verification Date
July 2021
Overall Recruitment Status
Completed
Study Start Date
February 21, 2018 (Actual)
Primary Completion Date
May 12, 2020 (Actual)
Study Completion Date
May 12, 2020 (Actual)

3. Sponsor/Collaborators

Responsible Party, by Official Title
Sponsor
Name of the Sponsor
Jazz Pharmaceuticals

4. Oversight

Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Drug Product
Yes
Studies a U.S. FDA-regulated Device Product
No

5. Study Description

Brief Summary
This is a study comparing the defibrotide prophylaxis arm vs standard of care arm for the prevention of aGvHD.

6. Conditions and Keywords

Primary Disease or Condition Being Studied in the Trial, or the Focus of the Study
Graft-versus-host Disease, Acute-graft-versus-host Disease

7. Study Design

Primary Purpose
Treatment
Study Phase
Phase 2
Interventional Study Model
Parallel Assignment
Masking
None (Open Label)
Allocation
Randomized
Enrollment
152 (Actual)

8. Arms, Groups, and Interventions

Arm Title
Defibrotide Prophylaxis
Arm Type
Experimental
Arm Description
Standard of Care Immunoprophylaxis + Defibrotide
Arm Title
Standard of Care
Arm Type
Active Comparator
Arm Description
Standard of Care Immunoprophylaxis Alone
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Defibrotide
Intervention Description
6.25 mg/kg via 2-hour IV infusion every 6 hours
Intervention Type
Drug
Intervention Name(s)
Standard of Care
Intervention Description
Administered according to local institutional guidelines, physician preference, and patient need.
Primary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade B to D Acute Graft Versus Host Disease (aGvHD) by Day +100 Post-Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT)
Description
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade B to D aGvHD was defined using the International Bone Marrow Transplant Registry (IBMTR) Severity Index. Grade B is defined as Skin stage = 2 or Liver stage = 1 to 2 or GI stage = 1 to 2. Grade C is defined as Skin stage = 3 or Liver stage = 3 or GI stage = 3. Grade D is defined as a Skin stage = 4 or Liver stage = 4 or GI stage = 4.
Time Frame
HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Day +100 post-HSCT
Secondary Outcome Measure Information:
Title
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade B to D aGvHD by Day +180 Post-HSCT
Description
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade B to D aGvHD was defined using the IBMTR Severity Index. Grade B is defined as Skin stage = 2 or Liver stage = 1 to 2 or GI stage = 1 to 2. Grade C is defined as Skin stage = 3 or Liver stage = 3 or GI stage = 3. Grade D is defined as a Skin stage = 4 or Liver stage = 4 or GI stage = 4.
Time Frame
HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Day +180 post-HSCT
Title
Kaplan-Meier Estimate of Grade B to D aGvHD-free Survival by Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT
Description
Grade B to D aGvHD was defined using the IBMTR Severity Index. Grade B is defined as Skin stage = 2 or Liver stage = 1 to 2 or GI stage = 1 to 2. Grade C is defined as Skin stage = 3 or Liver stage = 3 or GI stage = 3. Grade D is defined as a Skin stage = 4 or Liver stage = 4 or GI stage = 4.
Time Frame
HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
Title
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade C to D aGvHD by Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT
Description
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Grade C to D aGvHD was defined using the IBMTR Severity Index. Grade C is defined as Skin stage = 3 or Liver stage = 3 or GI stage = 3. Grade D is defined as a Skin stage = 4 or Liver stage = 4 or GI stage = 4.
Time Frame
HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
Title
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Disease Relapse by Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT
Description
Disease relapse was defined by either morphological evidence of acute leukemia or Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) consistent with pre-transplant features, documented or not by biopsy. The event was defined as an increase in size of prior sites of disease or evidence of new sites of disease, documented or not by biopsy. Disease relapse was diagnosed when there was morphological or clinical evidence of the following: reappearance of leukemia blast cells in the peripheral blood, or >5% blasts in the bone marrow (BM), not attributable to another cause (eg, BM regeneration), or the appearance of previous or new dysplastic changes (MDS specific) within the BM, with or without falling donor chimerism, or the development of extramedullary leukemia or leukemic cells in the cerebral spinal fluid, or institution of therapy to treat relapsed disease, including donor lymphocyte infusion.
Time Frame
HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
Title
Cumulative Incidence Percentage of Systemic Steroids for the Treatment of aGvHD +180 Days Post-HSCT
Description
For each treatment arm, the cumulative incidence rate of systemic steroid use for the treatment of aGvHD by Day +180 post-HSCT will be estimated using the cumulative incidence competing risk estimator. The calculation of the cumulative incidence rates and the stratified Gray's test was carried out using the LIFETEST procedure in SAS version 9.4. If the participant experienced a competing risk event, then the initiation date was used to calculate the time-to-event variable.
Time Frame
HSCT Day (Day +0 post-HSCT) through Day +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Physical Wellbeing Subscale as Measured by the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) Questionnaire Score
Description
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. The FACT physical wellbeing subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
Time Frame
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Social/Family Wellbeing Subscale as Measured by the FACT-BMT Questionnaire Score
Description
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. The FACT social/family wellbeing subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
Time Frame
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Emotional Wellbeing Subscale as Measured by the FACT-BMT Questionnaire Score
Description
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. The FACT emotional wellbeing subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 24, with higher scores indicating better quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Functional Wellbeing Subscale as Measured by the FACT-BMT Questionnaire Score
Description
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. The FACT functional wellbeing subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 28, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
Time Frame
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Bone Marrow Transplantation Subscale (BMTS) as Measured by the FACT-BMT Questionnaire Score
Description
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. The FACT-BMT subscale scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 40, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
Time Frame
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the General (FACT-G) Questionnaire Score
Description
The FACT-General (FACT-G) is a core component of the FACT-BMT, and includes 4 of the 5 subscales included in the FACT-BMT total score (FACT physical wellbeing score, FACT social/family wellbeing score, FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score). In line with this similarity, results of the FACT-G exhibited the same pattern as described for the FACT-BMT total score. The FACT-G scores range from a minimParticipants were age ≥16 years at baseline.
Time Frame
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the FACT-BMT Total Score
Description
The Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant (FACT-BMT) total score is the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT social/family wellbeing score, the FACT emotional wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. The FACT-BMT total score range is from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 148, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
Time Frame
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-Bone Marrow Transplant-Trial Outcomes Index (FACT-BMT-TOI)
Description
The FACT-BMT-TOI is defined as the sum of the FACT physical wellbeing score, the FACT functional wellbeing score, and the FACT-BMT subscale. Scores range from a minimum of 0 to a maximum of 96, with higher scores indicating better quality of life. A negative change from baseline indicates a decrease in score.
Time Frame
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in Participant Reported Outcomes Measured Based on the EQ-5D-5L Index Value for Health States
Description
The 5-Level EuroQol-5D health questionnaire (EQ-5D-5L) index value, which is country-specific, was only performed for participants in the US. The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). Change from the baseline assessment to Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT in the index value was assessed. The index value total range is from a minimum value of -1 to a maximum value of +1. A higher EQ-5D-5L index value represents better quality of life (QoL), thus a positive change in the index value represents improved QoL.
Time Frame
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Days +100 and +180 Post-HSCT in Participant Reported Outcomes as Measured Based on the EQ Visual Analog Scale (EQ VAS)
Description
The EQ VAS score at baseline and each of the post-HSCT assessments was summarized and presented using descriptive statistics. A higher EQ VAS score represents better QoL. For each of the post-HSCT assessments, change between baseline and that assessment in the EQ VAS score was calculated similarly to the EQ-5D-5L index value for a specific participant and was summarized and presented using descriptive statistics. The score ranges from a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100. A negative change in the score indicates a decrease in quality of life.
Time Frame
Baseline through Days +100 and +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Mobility Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Mobility Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Pain/Discomfort Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Days +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Pain/Discomfort Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Self-Care Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Self-Care Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Usual Activities Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Usual Activities Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Day +100 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Anxiety/Depression Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +100 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline through Day +100 post-HSCT
Title
Change From Baseline to Day +180 Post-HSCT in 5-Level European Quality of Life (EQ-5D-5L) Anxiety/Depression Dimension for Participants With Age >=16 Years
Description
The EQ-5D-5L is a standardized instrument for use as a measure of health outcome that includes a descriptive system consisting of 5 dimensions (mobility, self-care, usual activities, pain/discomfort, and anxiety/depression). For each of the 5 dimensions based on the descriptive system of the EQ-5D-5L, the numbers of participants for all categories (the 5 levels of reported problems) were assessed. For Day +180 Post-HSCT change between baseline in each dimension will be categorized as follows for a specific participant: Condition improved, if the reported level of problem is lower at that assessment than at baseline; Condition unchanged, if the reported level of problem remains the same; Condition deteriorated, if the reported level of problem is higher at that assessment than at baseline; Unknown, if the reported level of problem is not completed or missing either at baseline or at that assessment.
Time Frame
Baseline through Day +180 post-HSCT

10. Eligibility

Sex
All
Minimum Age & Unit of Time
1 Year
Accepts Healthy Volunteers
No
Eligibility Criteria
Inclusion Criteria: Participant must be ≥1 year of age at screening and undergoing allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant (HSCT). Participant must be diagnosed with acute leukemia in morphologic complete remission (CR1 or CR2) or with Myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) with no circulating blasts and with less than 5% blasts in the bone marrow Participant must have planned to receive either a myeloablative or reduced-intensity conditioning regimen and have an unrelated donor who is human leukocyte antigen (HLA) matched or single-allele mismatched Participant must receive the following medical regimen as part of standard of care immunoprophylaxis for GvHD in either study arm at doses and regimen determined by local institutional guidelines, physician preference, and participant need: Methotrexate (MTX) or Mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) + calcineurin inhibitor (Cyclosporine A [CSA] or Tacrolimus [TAC]) +/- Anti-thymocyte globulin (ATG) (ATG use is limited to 30% of participants). Graft must be a CD3+ T-cell replete peripheral blood stem cell (PBSC) graft or non-manipulated bone marrow (BM) graft. Adult participants must be able to understand and sign a written informed consent. For pediatric participants, the parent/legal guardian or representative must be able to understand and sign a written informed consent. Assent, when appropriate, will be obtained according to institutional guidelines. Exclusion Criteria: Participant has had a prior autologous or allogeneic HSCT. Participant is using or plans to use an investigational agent for the prevention of GvHD. Participant is receiving or plans to receive other investigational therapy and/or is enrolled or plans to enroll in a separate clinical study. Participant, in the opinion of the investigator, may not be able to comply with the safety monitoring requirements of the study. Participant has a psychiatric illness that would prevent the participant or legal guardian or representative from giving informed consent and/or assent. Participant has a serious active disease or co-morbid medical condition, as judged by the investigator, which would interfere with the conduct of this study. Participant is pregnant or lactating and does not agree to stop breastfeeding. Any other condition that would cause a risk to the participant if he/she participated in the trial. Participant has a known history of hypersensitivity to defibrotide or any of the excipients. Participant had acute bleeding that is clinically significant within 24 hours before the start of study treatment, defined as either of the following: Hemorrhage requiring >15 cc/kg of packed red blood cells (eg, pediatric participant weighing 20 kg and requiring 300 cc packed red blood cells/24 hours, or an adult weighing >70 kg and requiring 3 units of packed red blood cells/24hours) to replace blood loss, or Bleeding from a site which, in the investigator's opinion, constituted a potential life-threatening source (eg, pulmonary hemorrhage or central nervous system bleeding), irrespective of amount of blood loss Participant used any medication that increases the risk of bleeding within 24 hours before the start of study treatment, including, but not limited to, systemic heparin, low molecular weight heparin, heparin analogs, alteplase, streptokinase, urokinase, antithrombin III, oral anticoagulants including warfarin, and other agents that increase the risk of bleeding. Participants may have received heparin or other anticoagulants for routine central venous line management and intermittent dialysis or ultrafiltration. Fibrinolytic instillation for central venous line occlusion was also permitted. Note: Heparin used to keep catheters open was allowed (up to 100 U/kg/day).
Facility Information:
Facility Name
USC Norris Cancer Center
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90033
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mattel Children's Hospital UCLA
City
Los Angeles
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
90095
Country
United States
Facility Name
Stanford University
City
Palo Alto
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94304
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of California, San Francisco Medical Center
City
San Francisco
State/Province
California
ZIP/Postal Code
94143
Country
United States
Facility Name
Mayo Clinic Jacksonville - PPDS
City
Jacksonville
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32224
Country
United States
Facility Name
Blood & Marrow Transplant Center
City
Orlando
State/Province
Florida
ZIP/Postal Code
32804
Country
United States
Facility Name
Emory University Hospital
City
Atlanta
State/Province
Georgia
ZIP/Postal Code
30322
Country
United States
Facility Name
Northwestern Memorial Hospital
City
Chicago
State/Province
Illinois
ZIP/Postal Code
60611
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Kansas Medical Center
City
Westwood
State/Province
Kansas
ZIP/Postal Code
66205
Country
United States
Facility Name
James Graham Brown Cancer Center
City
Louisville
State/Province
Kentucky
ZIP/Postal Code
40202
Country
United States
Facility Name
Ochsner Clinic Foundation
City
New Orleans
State/Province
Louisiana
ZIP/Postal Code
70121
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of Nebraska Medical Center
City
Omaha
State/Province
Nebraska
ZIP/Postal Code
68198
Country
United States
Facility Name
Montefiore Einstein Cancer Center
City
Bronx
State/Province
New York
ZIP/Postal Code
10467
Country
United States
Facility Name
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill
City
Chapel Hill
State/Province
North Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
27514
Country
United States
Facility Name
Penn State Milton S Hershey Medical Center
City
Hershey
State/Province
Pennsylvania
ZIP/Postal Code
17033
Country
United States
Facility Name
MUSC-Hollings Cancer Center
City
Charleston
State/Province
South Carolina
ZIP/Postal Code
29425
Country
United States
Facility Name
VA Puget Sound Health Care System
City
Seattle
State/Province
Washington
ZIP/Postal Code
98108
Country
United States
Facility Name
West Virginia University Hospital
City
Morgantown
State/Province
West Virginia
ZIP/Postal Code
26506
Country
United States
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Innsbruck
City
Innsbruck
ZIP/Postal Code
6020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Ordensklinikum Linz, Krankenhaus der Elisabethinen GmbH
City
Linz
ZIP/Postal Code
4020
Country
Austria
Facility Name
Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc
City
Brussels
ZIP/Postal Code
1200
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
UZ Gent
City
Gent
ZIP/Postal Code
9000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
UZ Leuven
City
Leuven
ZIP/Postal Code
3000
Country
Belgium
Facility Name
Specialized Hospital for Active Treatment of Haematological Diseases - Sofia
City
Sofia
ZIP/Postal Code
1756
Country
Bulgaria
Facility Name
Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont
City
Montreal
ZIP/Postal Code
H1T 2M4
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Sainte Justine Hospital
City
Montreal
ZIP/Postal Code
H3T 1C5
Country
Canada
Facility Name
McGill University Health Center
City
Montreal
ZIP/Postal Code
H4A 3J1
Country
Canada
Facility Name
Klinichki Bolnicki Centar Zagreb
City
Zagreb
ZIP/Postal Code
10000
Country
Croatia
Facility Name
Hospital d Instructions des Armees Percy
City
Clamart
ZIP/Postal Code
92141
Country
France
Facility Name
CHRU Lille
City
Lille
ZIP/Postal Code
59037
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Universitaire du Cancer de Toulouse - Oncopole
City
Toulouse
ZIP/Postal Code
31059
Country
France
Facility Name
Institut Gustave Roussy
City
Villejuif
ZIP/Postal Code
94805
Country
France
Facility Name
Helios Klinikum Berlin Buch
City
Berlin
ZIP/Postal Code
13125
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Medizinische Universitätsklinik Knappschaftskrankenhaus
City
Bochum
ZIP/Postal Code
44892
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum Frankfurt (Oder) GmbH
City
Brandenburg
ZIP/Postal Code
15236
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitätsklinikum Carl Gustav Carus an der TU Dresden
City
Dresden
ZIP/Postal Code
01307
Country
Germany
Facility Name
University Medicine Göttingen Germany
City
Göttingen
ZIP/Postal Code
37075
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitaetsklinikum Halle (Saale)
City
Halle
ZIP/Postal Code
06120
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Uniklinik Köln
City
Köln
ZIP/Postal Code
50937
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Universitatsklinikum Leipzig
City
Leipzig
ZIP/Postal Code
04103
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum Mannheim Universitätsklinikum gGmbH
City
Mannheim
ZIP/Postal Code
68167
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum rechts der Isar der Technischen Universität München
City
Munchen
ZIP/Postal Code
81675
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Klinikum der Universitat Regensburg
City
Regensburg
ZIP/Postal Code
93053
Country
Germany
Facility Name
Attikon University General Hospital
City
Athens
ZIP/Postal Code
12462
Country
Greece
Facility Name
University General Hospital of Patras
City
Patras
ZIP/Postal Code
26500
Country
Greece
Facility Name
ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda - Presidio Ospedaliero Ospedale Niguarda Ca' Granda
City
Milano
ZIP/Postal Code
20162
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Parma
City
Parma
ZIP/Postal Code
41236
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù
City
Roma
ZIP/Postal Code
00165
Country
Italy
Facility Name
Centrum Onkologii im. Marii Sklodowskiej-Curie
City
Warsaw
ZIP/Postal Code
00-001
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Dolnoslaskie Centrum Transplantacji Komorkowych z Krajowym Bankiem Dawcow Szpiku
City
Wrocław
ZIP/Postal Code
53-439
Country
Poland
Facility Name
Instituto Português de Oncologia de Lisboa Francisco Gentil, E.P.E.
City
Lisboa
ZIP/Postal Code
1099
Country
Portugal
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Marques de Valdecilla
City
Coruña
ZIP/Postal Code
15006
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrin
City
Las Palmas De Gran Canaria
ZIP/Postal Code
35010
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro - Majadahonda
City
Madrid
ZIP/Postal Code
28222
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Complejo Asistencial Universitario de Salamanca - H. Clinico
City
Salamanca
ZIP/Postal Code
37007
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocio
City
Sevilla
ZIP/Postal Code
41013
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Hospital Clinico Universitario de Valencia
City
Valencia
ZIP/Postal Code
41013
Country
Spain
Facility Name
Birmingham Heartlands Hospital
City
Birmingham
ZIP/Postal Code
B9 5SS
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
St James University Hospital
City
Leeds
ZIP/Postal Code
LS9 7TF
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
St. James University Hospital
City
Leeds
ZIP/Postal Code
LS9 7TF
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Leicester Royal Infirmary
City
Leicester
ZIP/Postal Code
LE1 5WW
Country
United Kingdom
Facility Name
Manchester Royal Infirmary
City
Manchester
ZIP/Postal Code
LE1 5WW
Country
United Kingdom

12. IPD Sharing Statement

Learn more about this trial

An Open-Label Study of Defibrotide for the Prevention of Acute Graft-versus-Host-Disease (AGvHD)

We'll reach out to this number within 24 hrs